Is a Western-Iranian Clash in Red Sea Imminent after US Strike against the Houthis?

The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. (AFP)
The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. (AFP)
TT

Is a Western-Iranian Clash in Red Sea Imminent after US Strike against the Houthis?

The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. (AFP)
The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. (AFP)

Iran announced it was deploying a warship to the Red Sea after the US repelled an attack by the Tehran-aligned Houthi militias in Yemen on a container vessel.

US helicopters repelled the attack, sinking three ships and killing 10 militants, according to accounts by American, Maersk, and Houthi officials on Sunday.

Iran’s deployment of the Alborz is seen as an act of support to the Houthis, but it may deepen the tensions in the area and transform Yemen and its territorial waters into an arena of an international conflict.

The deployment took place after Houthi spokesman and their so-called foreign minister Mohammed Abdulsalam Flita met with secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council Ali Akbar Ahmadian in Tehran.

Flita said he discussed with his host "issues of common interest." Iran’s Mehr news agency reported that the officials tackled regional security issues. Ahmadian also praised the Houthis for threatening international marine navigation in the Red Sea.

The Houthis have been targeting vessels in the Red Sea since November to show their support for the Palestinian group Hamas in the war with Israel. This has prompted major shipping companies to take the longer and costlier route around Africa's Cape of Good Hope rather than through the Suez Canal.

The Red Sea is the entry point for ships using the Suez Canal, which handles about 12% of global trade and is vital for the movement of goods between Asia and Europe.

The United States launched Operation Prosperity Guardian on Dec. 19, saying more than 20 countries had agreed to participate in the efforts to safeguard ships in Red Sea waters near Yemen.

Meanwhile, the New York Times reported on Monday that Pentagon officials have come up with plans to strike Houthi missile and drone basis in Yemen should the need arise, but there are concerns that such a move would play into Iran’s hands.

It added that senior officials at the Defense Department were pushing for harsher measures against Iran’s proxies in the region.

The British Sunday Times reported that London, alongside Washington, was preparing to launch air strikes against a number of targets. The operations may take place in the Red Sea or Yemen.

Writing in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, British Defense Secretary Grant Shapps said: "We are willing to take direct action, and we won’t hesitate to take further action to deter threats to freedom of navigation in the Red Sea."

"The Houthis should be under no misunderstanding: we are committed to holding malign actors accountable for unlawful seizures and attacks," he said.

Biggest losers

Meanwhile, Yemeni academic and researcher Fares al-Beel told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Yemenis are "the biggest losers" in the Red Sea showdown.

He remarked that in spite of the threats, the US and Iran were unlikely to take any further escalatory steps.

He explained that the US doesn’t want to expand the conflict, but wants it to remain limited to Israel’s war on Gaza. Iran, for its part, cannot wage a direct confrontation because that would compromise its expansionist ambitions in the region.

It will not burn any bridges at this stage. Rather, it will use the conflict in the Red Sea to gain popular support, al-Beel went on to say.

Moreover, he said Iran’s deployment of a warship in the Red Sea is an act of moral support to the Houths. When it comes down to the wire, it will opt for non-military solutions. The same will take place with Hamas, which is backed by Tehran, after the war.

He did not rule out the possibility of the eruption of "limited confrontations", but the race for power and influence will continue to hold sway in the region.

The Yemeni people and their economy are the ultimate losers in this situation, al-Beel lamented.

Yemeni political analyst Mohammed al-Saar told Asharq Al-Awsat that the instability in the Red Sea is revealing Iran to be a major player in the conflict.

Tehran is seeking to maintain its influence in the region through providing support to the Houthis, he added.

Yemeni political analyst Mahmoud al-Taher ruled out the possibility of a major escalation in the Red Sea.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the countries surrounding Yemen want peace. Iran is also aware that the countries overlooking the Red Sea do not want an escalation and are seeking to defuse tensions.

Tehran deployed its warship to the Red Sea in a show of force and to send a message of support to the Houthis, he remarked.

"At any rate, the developments have proven what we have always warned of. Tehran wants to control the Bab al-Mandeb Strait and Red Sea through the Houthis," Taher stated.

This issue will weigh heavily over the potential peace or truce talks in Yemen, he predicted.

The Houthis and the forces of the Prosperity Guardian coalition will continue to clash, but Iran will not be dragged into a direct confrontation, he said. Iran will continue to order the Houthis to carry out attacks.

Furthermore, Taher said the convention on freedom of international marine navigation binds members of the UN Security Council and countries overlooking the Red Sea to protect the area. Any action by them against the Houthis should be a precursor to the liberation of Yemen’s Hodeidah province from the militias.



Israel Pessimistic about Ceasefire Deal with Lebanon

Damage caused by Israeli raids in Lebanon. (AP)
Damage caused by Israeli raids in Lebanon. (AP)
TT

Israel Pessimistic about Ceasefire Deal with Lebanon

Damage caused by Israeli raids in Lebanon. (AP)
Damage caused by Israeli raids in Lebanon. (AP)

The United States' special envoy for the Middle East, Amos Hochstein, decided to extend his visit to Beirut until Wednesday, political sources in Tel Aviv said. The envoy, who was expected in Israel on Wednesday morning, will arrive there by Thursday at the latest.

Despite the positive signals from Washington about Hochstein’s visit to the Lebanese capital, Israelis cast doubt on the likelihood that a deal could be reached to end the war on Hezbollah in Lebanon.

The sources said US officials are very serious about reaching a possible ceasefire in the Israel-Hezbollah war. “Coordination is ongoing between the administration of President Joe Biden and President-elect Donald Trump, who are both determined to end the war,” the sources stressed.

As evidence, they said, Washington has decided to place a US general at the head of a military technical committee tasked to achieve the total deployment of the Lebanese army in southern Lebanon.

However, Israel is skeptical. It believes Hezbollah is maneuvering and will not accept the Israeli terms of the US proposal.

The sources said the Israeli army is indirectly taking part in the Hochstein-led negotiations by exerting pressure on Lebanon and intensifying its attacks on the capital, not just its southern suburbs where Hezbollah has a strong presence, as well as the South and eastern Bekaa region.

Former head of Israeli Defense Intelligence Professor Amos Yadlin, who held a meeting with Hochstein recently, revealed that the ceasefire agreement with Lebanon is making great progress.

He said a deal could be announced this weekend. “The most important thing is that the agreement between Israel and Washington on the US guarantees is ready. If an agreement is reached in Beirut on those guarantees, a ceasefire deal will be signed and put into effect,” Yadlin said.

Biden sent a message to Israel that the US administration will not only serve as a guarantor to Israel, but it has also given it legitimacy in its right to self-defense, he revealed.

“In Washington, they agree with us that Israel has cancelled its known MABAM doctrine (the ‘war between the wars’), and is now ready to wage a war whenever it is attacked. Hochstein and other mutual friends of Israel and Lebanon have made this clear, but this policy has to be understood in Lebanon, Syria and Iran,” he added.

Meanwhile, the majority of officials close to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remain pessimistic about reaching a ceasefire deal with Lebanon.

The right-wing newspaper Israel Hayom quoted an Israeli political source as saying that “an agreement is not likely to be reached in the near future.”

Instead, it said, the Israeli military has approved plans to attack the southern suburbs of Beirut, carry out assassinations wherever possible, even in the majority-Christian part of east Beirut and continue to target Hezbollah positions in southern Lebanon.

On Tuesday, Bezalel Smotrich, the far-right minister of finance, said, “We will not agree to any arrangement that is not worth the paper it is written on.”

Addressing the ceasefire efforts, Netanyahu told a Knesset meeting that “the important thing is not the piece of paper.”