Conference Proposing Gaza Settlements Rekindles Discord in Israel

A conference advocating the re-establishment of settlements within the Gaza Strip convened on Sunday in Jerusalem, intensifying divisions in Israel and prompting scathing criticism of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The gathering drew thousands of Israeli extremists and saw the participation of 12 cabinet ministers.
Opposition leader MK Yair Lapid said the conference “is a disgrace on the head of Netanyahu and the party.”
He warned that the conference harms Israel’s standing internationally and gives the impression that it is planning to deport the Palestinians.
War cabinet member Benny Gantz said in a statement that the conference “harms Israeli society at a time of war, harms our international legitimacy, harms efforts to establish a framework for returning our hostages.”
Gantz snapped at Netanyahu over his public silence about the event. “Those who remain silent and are being led along, are not leaders,” he said, in apparent reference to Netanyahu.
“While troops are fighting shoulder to shoulder in a war of unparalleled justification, and while we are choosing to look for what unites us, even if there are disagreements... others are finding time for an event that sunders Israeli society, increases distrust in the government and its elected officials, and above all, sharpens divisions over that which brings us together,” said war cabinet observer Gadi Eisenkot.
Senior Likud officials criticized the participation of ministers and MPs from the party in the re-settlement conference, saying that this event undermines the international reputation of Israel.
Thousands of Israelis participated in a festival on Sunday when 12 cabinet ministers and 15 members of the Knesset pledged the re-establishment of Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip and the encouragement of the migration of the Palestinians after the end of the war with Hamas.
Speaking at the festival, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, the leader of the ultranationalist Religious Zionism party, extolled the virtues of creating new settlements, declaring: “God willing, we will settle and we will be victorious.”
National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, leader of the extreme-right Otzma Yehudit party, told Prime Minister Netanyahu, who was not present, and the audience that it was “time to return home to Gush Katif” — the name of the Israeli settlement bloc in Gaza that was evacuated in the 2005 Disengagement.
Smotrich and Ben Gvir, together with six coalition MKs, signed what was dubbed the “Covenant of Victory and Renewal of Settlement,” which pledged that the signatories would “grow Jewish settlements full of life” in the Gaza Strip.
Alongside them, Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi of Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party also called for building settlements in Gaza and “encouraging voluntary emigration.”
A banner in the crowd said, “Only a transfer [of Palestinians from Gaza] will bring peace.”
Footage from the conference drew backlash on social media, with critics noting that government and coalition ministers were gleefully dancing while a war is raging, tens of thousands of Israelis are displaced, soldiers are being killed on a near-daily basis, and 136 hostages are still being held by Hamas in Gaza, according to the Times of Israel website.
Netanyahu himself didn’t attend the conference and indicated Saturday night that he opposes resettling Gaza and that this wasn’t an accepted government policy.
Israel dismantled its 21 settlements in the Gaza Strip, and compelled their 8,000 residents to leave, when it unilaterally withdrew from Gaza in 2005, pulling back to the pre-1967 lines.
In Ramallah, the Palestinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs vehemently denounced what it termed a "colonial meeting."
The ministry asserted that the event laid bare "the true face of the Israeli ruling right-wing, showcasing its anti-peace stance and unwavering commitment to occupation, colonialism, and apartheid."

Gen. Joseph Aoun currently leads the race for Lebanon's presidency, but some warn his election could be unconstitutional because he holds a “Class A” position, requiring his resignation two years before running.
However, his supporters point to the 2008 election of Gen. Michel Suleiman, who was also army commander at the time, as a precedent. They argue the reasons given for Suleiman’s election should apply to Aoun as well.
At the time, Speaker Nabih Berri argued that the support of over 86 lawmakers for Suleiman made his election constitutional, as any constitutional amendment requires 86 votes.
MP Gebran Bassil, leader of the Free Patriotic Movement, continues to argue that Aoun’s election is unconstitutional under the current process.
He recently stated that constitutional amendments require a president, a functioning parliament, and a fully empowered government. The process also needs two steps: a two-thirds majority in the first vote and a three-quarters majority in the second.
Bassil’s argument is based on Articles 76 and 77 of the constitution, which say amendments can only be proposed by the president or parliament, but only during a regular session — which ended in December.
Dr. Paul Morcos, head of the “JUSTICIA” legal foundation in Beirut, told Asharq Al-Awsat that in 2008, parliament used Article 74 of the constitution to bypass the amendment to Article 49.
He explained that Gen. Suleiman’s election was considered an exception to the rule requiring military officials to resign six months before running for president, due to the presidential vacancy after President Emile Lahoud’s term ended in 2007.
Morcos added that the same reasoning could apply to Gen. Aoun’s potential election as president.

Conference Proposing Gaza Settlements Rekindles Discord in Israel