Int'l Reports: One Yemeni Child Dies Every 10 Minutes from Hunger

Children displaced by conflict receive food aid from a Kuwaiti charity at a displaced camp in Maarib, Yemen (AFP)
Children displaced by conflict receive food aid from a Kuwaiti charity at a displaced camp in Maarib, Yemen (AFP)
TT

Int'l Reports: One Yemeni Child Dies Every 10 Minutes from Hunger

Children displaced by conflict receive food aid from a Kuwaiti charity at a displaced camp in Maarib, Yemen (AFP)
Children displaced by conflict receive food aid from a Kuwaiti charity at a displaced camp in Maarib, Yemen (AFP)

Rashad Mohammed Al-Alimi, President of the Presidential Leadership Council, stressed on Saturday the need to make optimal use of UN assistance to improve the living conditions of local communities in Yemen.

Al-Alimi’s statement came while two reports revealed that one child dies every 10 minutes from hunger in Yemen, while 89% of internally displaced in Yemen are unable to meet their daily food need and more than 20 million people require humanitarian assistance.

The Islamic Relief said that after nine years of conflict, malnutrition rates in Yemen are some of the highest ever recorded with more than 20.7 million people in need of humanitarian aid to survive and with a child dying every 10 minutes from hunger.

The organization said families in Yemen are facing ongoing armed conflict, displacement, disease and economic decline. It also noted malnutrition is spiraling in Yemen as people begin to feel the impact of recent cuts to humanitarian aid, leaving many families unable to afford essential food.

Islamic Relief said 17.6 million people in Yemen are facing food insecurity.

The organization, which operates from the British city of Birmingham said nearly 80% of the population live below the poverty line in the country while the price of essential food in the market is rising rapidly.

“Our teams have observed a surge in malnourished children over the past few months through our work in 159 nutrition centers across the country and the price of essential food in the market is rising rapidly, leaving many families unable to afford it,” the organization said.

It added that after 9 years of war, malnutrition rates in Yemen are some of the highest ever recorded and are expected to worsen. “Around 2.7 million women and 5 million children under 5 years old are estimated to require treatment for acute malnutrition in 2024,” it revealed.

Islamic Relief then urgently appealed to the international community to ensure the humanitarian response in Yemen is appropriately funded.

It said aid has been vital in preventing Yemen falling into famine in recent years, and it saved countless lives. But it added that if the international community continues to overlook the humanitarian situation in Yemen “then we will see conditions badly deteriorate again.”

UN and Yemeni Cooperation

Meanwhile, Al-Alimi made his statement during a meeting at Al-Maashiq presidential Palace with Abdallah Al Dardari, UN Assistant Secretary-General and Assistant Administrator and Director of the Regional Bureau for Arab States, and Julien Harneis, the UN Resident Coordinator in Yemen, said the government-run news agency, SABA.

Al-Alimi welcomed UN’s active efforts aimed at alleviating the Yemeni people’s suffering caused by the ongoing war in the country.

The Chairman stressed the importance of building upon the efforts of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and the Secretariat General of the Gulf Cooperation Council to address economic, developmental, and humanitarian challenges.

For his part, the UN Assistant Secretary General said the United Nations plans to deploy international expertise to help in developing a framework for the national economic recovery plan in Yemen.

A recent UN report revealed that approximately 89% of internally displaced people in Yemen are unable to meet their daily food needs, due to the worsening vulnerabilities and the erosion of the ability to withstand and adapt after nine years of conflict.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees said in the report that the assessments it conducted during 2023 indicate high levels of social and economic vulnerabilities among displaced families, as only 11% of internally displaced people can meet their daily food needs, while 89% cannot.

In 2023, UNHCR conducted 136,913 household assessments, covering 820,440 individuals.

The results of these assessments indicate that 70% purchase less preferred or cheaper, lower quality food, 52.7% reduce portion sizes while 48.2% reduce the number of meals per day.

The results also indicate high levels of socio-economic vulnerabilities among IDP households and that opportunities to earn an income are limited and largely consist of informal and hazardous jobs.

The results further showed that 48.6% of the population report no source of income and 41.5% report monthly incomes of less than $50.

As a result, IDP households continuously struggle to meet their basic needs and many turn to harmful coping mechanisms to get by.

UNHCR assessments showed that 69.6% rely on debt to meet their basic needs, 46.4% reduce expenditure on essential non-food items, 41.1% reduce expenditure on healthcare and medicine, 10.8% sell productive assets, and 11.9% of children drop out of school.

The UN agency said Yemen remains among the most critical humanitarian crises globally.

For the majority of IDPs, humanitarian assistance, including in-kind food assistance and cash transfers, remain a critical source of life-saving support, it added.



Lebanese Foreign Ministry Sources to Asharq Al-Awsat: US Declares Consul Charara Persona Non Grata

People enter the US State Department building in Washington (File/Reuters)
People enter the US State Department building in Washington (File/Reuters)
TT

Lebanese Foreign Ministry Sources to Asharq Al-Awsat: US Declares Consul Charara Persona Non Grata

People enter the US State Department building in Washington (File/Reuters)
People enter the US State Department building in Washington (File/Reuters)

Sources at Lebanon's Foreign Ministry confirmed to Asharq Al-Awsat that the Lebanese Embassy in Washington had been officially notified by the US State Department of its decision to declare Ibrahim Charara, Lebanon's consul in Detroit, persona non grata and order him to leave the United States within 48 hours.

Reports had indicated that the decision followed controversy sparked by American media coverage of old social media posts attributed to Charara, in which he described the 1983 bombing of the US Marine barracks in Beirut as an act of "heroic resistance."

His participation in political events in Michigan, including an event supporting Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed, also attracted media attention in the United States.


From Tehran to Beirut: Who Controls Hezbollah's Decision to Go to War?

A photo of former Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah and senior official Hashem Safieddine at Beirut's Sports City during their funeral last February (Reuters)
A photo of former Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah and senior official Hashem Safieddine at Beirut's Sports City during their funeral last February (Reuters)
TT

From Tehran to Beirut: Who Controls Hezbollah's Decision to Go to War?

A photo of former Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah and senior official Hashem Safieddine at Beirut's Sports City during their funeral last February (Reuters)
A photo of former Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah and senior official Hashem Safieddine at Beirut's Sports City during their funeral last February (Reuters)

As Lebanese citizens await the repercussions of the US and Israeli election results on their country's domestic situation, and whether these will lead to a regional war involving Lebanon or a major political agreement that inevitably includes it, reports have recently emerged of reassurances conveyed to several Lebanese officials that Hezbollah does not intend to participate in any future war in support of Iran.

For many, however, these reassurances appear insufficient, given the experience of the latest round of fighting. At the time, Hezbollah was reportedly said to have informed Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri that it would not join the conflict, only to reverse its position and open fire toward Israel on March 2.

Some reports at the time pointed to conflicting decisions between the group's political and military wings, with the position of those controlling operations on the ground, and Tehran behind them, ultimately prevailing.

This raises serious questions about whether decision-making within Hezbollah remains centralized, with a political and organizational leadership whose decisions are binding on all its institutions, or whether the military wing and commanders on the ground now have the final say.

More importantly, does Hezbollah still retain any independence in its decision-making, or are strategic decisions concerning war now determined in Tehran according to Iranian interests and calculations?

Assessments differ between those who believe Hezbollah continues to operate under a centralized organizational structure that leaves no room for conflicting political and military decisions, and those who argue that the transformations the group has undergone, particularly following the latest confrontations and the losses suffered by its leadership, have made military decision-making more closely tied to Iran and significantly weakened the political leadership's room for maneuver.

What Is the Decision-Making Shura Council?

Political writer Dr. Qassem Qassir, who closely follows Hezbollah's positions, explained that the group's leadership is represented by the Decision-Making Shura Council, which makes decisions binding on all its bodies and institutions, including the Political Council and the Jihad Council.

Qassir denied that the Political Council could adopt one position while the Jihad Council made a conflicting decision.

"There is one centralized decision made by the Decision-Making Shura Council, and everyone abides by it," he said.

According to Qassir, the council includes Hezbollah's secretary-general, the head of its Executive Council, the head of its parliamentary bloc, the head of its Political Council and the secretary-general's political aide.

But what about the reassurances reportedly delivered to Lebanese officials that Hezbollah does not intend to become involved in another war?

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Qassir stressed that "there are no serious, definitive guarantees or promises of this kind."

He explained that Hezbollah determines its position according to developments on the ground and cannot make decisions in advance without knowing the nature of unfolding events.

He also argued that the likelihood of war had diminished following the US and Israeli elections, as Washington and Tel Aviv were preoccupied with their domestic affairs, unless Israel decided to launch a new attack on Lebanon.

The Decision Lies With the Revolutionary Guards

Political writer Ali Al-Amin, editor-in-chief of the Janoubia news website, offered a different assessment.

He argued that "the final say within Hezbollah has always belonged, and continues to belong, to those on the ground," adding that the military wing controls operations and represents a direct and effective extension of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Al-Amin asserted that "the decision to ignite a war in Lebanon, whether during the previous round or in any future confrontation, is primarily an Iranian decision governed by Iranian interests. Hezbollah has no real room to alter or oppose it."

Al-Amin also pointed to recent statements by Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei about opening the battle across multiple fronts and geographical areas.

He argued that these remarks "reflect a single rhythm controlled by Tehran, which the other parties are required to follow."

Al-Amin maintained that the room for maneuver once available to Hezbollah's political wing under former Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah and other senior leaders no longer exists, given the changes that have affected the group's structure and leadership.


Sudanese Army, RSF Clash in Fierce Battles in Kordofan

A man walks on his home debris following a strike in Imtidad Nasser, a neighborhood east of Khartoum's airport, Sudan, Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2026. (AP Photo/Marwan Ali)
A man walks on his home debris following a strike in Imtidad Nasser, a neighborhood east of Khartoum's airport, Sudan, Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2026. (AP Photo/Marwan Ali)
TT

Sudanese Army, RSF Clash in Fierce Battles in Kordofan

A man walks on his home debris following a strike in Imtidad Nasser, a neighborhood east of Khartoum's airport, Sudan, Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2026. (AP Photo/Marwan Ali)
A man walks on his home debris following a strike in Imtidad Nasser, a neighborhood east of Khartoum's airport, Sudan, Tuesday, Oct. 20, 2026. (AP Photo/Marwan Ali)

Fierce fighting in western Sudan raged for a second straight day after the army launched simultaneous attacks on Rapid Support Forces (RSF) positions in North and West Kordofan on Thursday, with both sides making conflicting claims of battlefield gains.

The Sudanese army has released no official details of the fighting, but Major Mutawakkil Ali Wakil, spokesman for the army-allied Joint Force, said the two forces had launched sweeping operations across Kordofan, recapturing Umm Sumayma, Kazgeil, Al-Hammadi and Abu Quoud.

The operations inflicted heavy losses in fighters and equipment on the RSF, he said.

"Our forces destroyed 40 combat vehicles and seized another 43 with all their equipment," Wakil said in a statement, adding that troops were pursuing RSF fighters who had fled the battlefield.

He said the Joint Force would continue fighting alongside the army and allied forces until all RSF-held territory was recaptured.

Chairman of Sudan's Transitional Sovereign Council Abdel Fattah al-Burhan speaks with Russian President Vladimir Putin (not pictured) during their talk on the sidelines of the third Russia-Africa Summit in Moscow, Russia, 30 October 2026. EPA/MAXIM SHIPENKOV / POOL

The Joint Force's claims of territorial gains could not be independently verified.

The Joint Force of Armed Struggle Movements, which previously joined the Sudanese army in its war against the RSF, includes the Justice and Equality Movement, led by Jibril Ibrahim, and the Sudan Liberation Movement/Army, headed by Darfur Governor Minni Arko Minnawi.

Pro-RSF media platforms, however, painted a sharply different picture, claiming RSF fighters had ambushed the advancing troops, killed large numbers of them and seized fully equipped combat vehicles before retaking the contested areas.

The platforms suggested the army had retreated to El Obeid, the capital of North Kordofan state, after suffering setbacks on several fronts.

Neither side typically acknowledges losing territory until its opponent declares full control.

The latest clashes follow months of advances by the army and allied forces, which have recaptured key areas of North Kordofan while pushing to gain control of neighboring West Kordofan, a state rich in oil.

Reports have circulated for days that the army was preparing sweeping counteroffensives to reclaim RSF-held territory in West Kordofan.

The towns of Kazgeil and Al-Hammadi have already changed hands several times between the warring sides.

The army has not officially disclosed its latest troop movements, but commanders have previously signaled plans for offensives on multiple fronts to reclaim RSF-held areas.

They said the goal was to retake towns across West Kordofan and open a route into the Darfur region in western Sudan.