Opposition Rallies Cry Against Dragging Lebanon to War

Opposition parties and figures are seen at the Maarab meeting on Saturday. (Lebanese Forces)
Opposition parties and figures are seen at the Maarab meeting on Saturday. (Lebanese Forces)
TT

Opposition Rallies Cry Against Dragging Lebanon to War

Opposition parties and figures are seen at the Maarab meeting on Saturday. (Lebanese Forces)
Opposition parties and figures are seen at the Maarab meeting on Saturday. (Lebanese Forces)

The Lebanese opposition launched on Saturday a rallying cry against parties that are “tampering with Lebanon’s security and dragging the Lebanese people” towards conflict and towards “countries that sponsor illegal organizations.”

It called for the implementation of United Nations Security Council resolution 1701 and the deployment of the army along Lebanon’s entire borders. It urged bolstering the monitoring of the entire border with Syria and the implementation of the agreement on the return of Syrians back to their country.

The Lebanese Forces organized on Saturday a meeting of opposition groups. Held at Maarab, the meeting, “1701 in Defense of Lebanon”, was attended by parties, lawmakers, politicians, activists and journalists, from across Lebanon’s sectarian spectrum, who are opposed to Hezbollah.

The meeting was notably boycotted by some parties that share the LF’s views, while others, such as the Kataeb party, sent representatives. Kataeb leader Sami Gemayel and MPs from his party did not attend the meeting.

The Progressive Socialist Party, National Moderation bloc, Saydet Al Jabal gathering, and the National Council to End the Iranian Occupation in Lebanon declined to attend the meeting.

Some observers said the failure to attract a large number of opposition parties may have rendered the Maarab meeting a “failure”. The LF and other participants said however, that the meeting served its purpose and delivered the message it wanted to send.

Former minister, MP Ashraf Rifi described the meeting as “excellent”.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, he added that the meeting was necessary given the circumstances in Lebanon, comparing it to the 2005 Bristol Gathering that helped galvanize the opposition against Syrian hegemony over Lebanon.

LF sources described the Maarab meeting as successful, saying it underlined the demand to defend and consolidate Lebanon’s sovereignty.

“The meeting was not aimed at forming a political front,” they told Asharq Al-Awsat.

They highlighted the timing of the meeting, explaining that Lebanon is in danger and so it was “necessary to launch a political cry and this is what happened.”

“Whoever declined the invite had their reasons and considerations. What matters is that this political cry was made, and we didn’t expect anything more than that,” they stressed.

On what the meeting was expected to yield, they replied: “More of the same. We will continue to do what we have been doing. We will exert more pressure and follow diplomatic efforts that are pushing for the implementation of resolution 1701, which bothers Hezbollah.”

“The implementation of the resolution is the only demand the international community is making. It is essential to avert Lebanon from being dragged to war,” they added.

The meeting’s concluding statement underscored three main issues.

“First: The possession of weapons outside state security institutions, led by the army, and carried by any party regardless of their motives, is a threat to Lebanese sovereignty and a flagrant violation against the security of the entire Lebanese people,” it said, demanding the immediate laying down of these arms.

“Second: The Lebanese army is trusted by all Lebanese people and so, it has the right and duty to protect the borders and Lebanese sovereignty against any foreign attack, especially from Israel,” continued the statement.

“Third: The Lebanese government, even in its caretaker capacity, alone has the responsibility to implement and apply Lebanese laws and international resolutions,” it continued.

“Based on the above and the developments in southern Lebanon and the possibility that they may take a turn for the worst, the gatherers appeal to the caretaker government of Prime Minister Najib Mikati to immediately issue orders for the deployment of the army in regions south of the Litani River and along the entire border with Israel,” it said.

“Such a step would have a massive political impact and the deployment could act as a decisive deterrence force against any Israeli plots and possible offensive against Lebanese sovereignty,” it went on to say.

It also called for tightening security along the border with Syria and closing all illegal crossing through which weapons, people, funds, goods, illicit material and criminals continue to be smuggled.

LF leader Samir Geagea said the meeting was aimed at drafting with a small roadmap to attempt to prevent Lebanon from being dragged to war and stress the need to implement resolution 1701 in full, which has been an issue of consensus by successive governments.

Moreover, he noted that Lebanon is living in a state of the “non-state” with the existence of a “statelet that has usurped the country’s military decisions.”

The meeting was held to discuss “what can be done in wake of diplomatic reports that have warned that the situation in the South could deteriorate,” he added.

He warned that allowing Hezbollah to maintain its line of action is a threat to the whole of Lebanon, remarking that facts have demonstrated that the Iran-backed party is incapable of defending Lebanon against Israel.

Hezbollah claims that its operations against Israel are aimed at supporting Gaza, when in fact, they have not helped Gaza in any way, he stated. “Rather, the fighting has cost Lebanon dearly in losses of life and damage to southern villages and regions. It has also led to massive economic losses,” he said.

“Iran’s intervention itself has done more harm than good to the Palestinian cause,” he added.

Hezbollah has also played a negative role as attested by the international community against it and Iran, he continued.

“So, the main winners in the scenario are Iran and Israel, while Palestine is the biggest loser,” Geagea noted.



EU Exploring Support for New Gaza Administration Committee, Document Says

Palestinians push a cart past the rubble of residential buildings destroyed during the two-year Israeli offensives, in Gaza City, February 17, 2026. REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa
Palestinians push a cart past the rubble of residential buildings destroyed during the two-year Israeli offensives, in Gaza City, February 17, 2026. REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa
TT

EU Exploring Support for New Gaza Administration Committee, Document Says

Palestinians push a cart past the rubble of residential buildings destroyed during the two-year Israeli offensives, in Gaza City, February 17, 2026. REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa
Palestinians push a cart past the rubble of residential buildings destroyed during the two-year Israeli offensives, in Gaza City, February 17, 2026. REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa

The European Union is exploring possible support for a new committee established to take over the civil administration of Gaza, according to a document produced by the bloc's diplomatic arm and seen by Reuters.

"The EU is engaging with the newly established transitional governance structures for Gaza," the European External Action Service wrote in a document circulated to member states on Tuesday.

"The EU is also exploring possible support to the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza," it added.

European foreign ministers will discuss the situation in Gaza during a meeting in Brussels on February 23.


Israel Military Says Soldier Killed in Gaza 

A drone view shows the destruction in a residential neighborhood, after the withdrawal of the Israeli forces from the area, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, in Gaza City, October 21, 2025. (Reuters)
A drone view shows the destruction in a residential neighborhood, after the withdrawal of the Israeli forces from the area, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, in Gaza City, October 21, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

Israel Military Says Soldier Killed in Gaza 

A drone view shows the destruction in a residential neighborhood, after the withdrawal of the Israeli forces from the area, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, in Gaza City, October 21, 2025. (Reuters)
A drone view shows the destruction in a residential neighborhood, after the withdrawal of the Israeli forces from the area, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, in Gaza City, October 21, 2025. (Reuters)

The Israeli military announced that one of its soldiers had been killed in combat in southern Gaza on Wednesday, but a security source said the death appeared to have been caused by "friendly fire".

"Staff Sergeant Ofri Yafe, aged 21, from HaYogev, a soldier in the Paratroopers Reconnaissance Unit, fell during combat in the southern Gaza Strip," the military said in a statement.

A security source, however, told AFP that the soldier appeared to have been "killed by friendly fire", without providing further details.

"The incident is still under investigation," the source added.

The death brings to five the number of Israeli soldiers killed in Gaza since a ceasefire took effect on October 10.


Syria: SDF’s Mazloum Abdi Says Implementation of Integration Deal May Take Time

People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman
People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman
TT

Syria: SDF’s Mazloum Abdi Says Implementation of Integration Deal May Take Time

People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman
People sit outdoors surrounded by nature, with the Tigris river flowing in the background, following a long atmospheric depression, near the Syrian-Turkish border in Derik, Syria, February 16, 2026 REUTERS/Orhan Qereman

Mazloum Abdi, commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces, said the process of merging the SDF with Syrian government forces “may take some time,” despite expressing confidence in the eventual success of the agreement.

His remarks came after earlier comments in which he acknowledged differences with Damascus over the concept of “decentralization.”

Speaking at a tribal conference in the northeastern city of Hasakah on Tuesday, Abdi said the issue of integration would not be resolved quickly, but stressed that the agreement remains on track.

He said the deal reached last month stipulates that three Syrian army brigades will be created out of the SDF.

Abdi added that all SDF military units have withdrawn to their barracks in an effort to preserve stability and continue implementing the announced integration agreement with the Syrian state.

He also emphasized the need for armed forces to withdraw from the vicinity of the city of Ayn al-Arab (Kobani), to be replaced by security forces tasked with maintaining order.