Hezbollah Says It Is Ready for Any Israeli Land Invasion in Lebanon

 People pass by buildings damaged in an Israeli strike, amid ongoing cross-border hostilities between Hezbollah and Israeli forces, in Cola, central Beirut, Lebanon September 30, 2024. (Reuters)
People pass by buildings damaged in an Israeli strike, amid ongoing cross-border hostilities between Hezbollah and Israeli forces, in Cola, central Beirut, Lebanon September 30, 2024. (Reuters)
TT

Hezbollah Says It Is Ready for Any Israeli Land Invasion in Lebanon

 People pass by buildings damaged in an Israeli strike, amid ongoing cross-border hostilities between Hezbollah and Israeli forces, in Cola, central Beirut, Lebanon September 30, 2024. (Reuters)
People pass by buildings damaged in an Israeli strike, amid ongoing cross-border hostilities between Hezbollah and Israeli forces, in Cola, central Beirut, Lebanon September 30, 2024. (Reuters)

Hezbollah's deputy leader Naim Qassem, in his first public address since Israel assassinated the group's chief Hassan Nasrallah last week, said the movement is ready to confront any Israeli ground invasion of Lebanon.

Israel will not achieve its goals, he said.

"We will face any possibility and we are ready if the Israelis decide to enter by land and the resistance forces are ready for a ground engagement," he said.

Israeli forces have dealt multiple blows to Hezbollah in a two-week wave of attacks on targets in Lebanon that has eliminated several commanders. The possibility that Israel's next move might be to send ground troops and tanks over the border is on many minds.

In other developments, the Palestinian group Hamas said an Israeli airstrike killed its leader in Lebanon in the city of Tyre on Monday, and another Palestinian organization said three of its leaders died in a strike in central Beirut - the first such hit inside the capital's limits.

The killings were the latest in a wave of intensified Israeli attacks on militant targets in Lebanon, part of a conflict also stretching from the Palestinian territories of Gaza and the occupied West Bank, to Yemen, and within Israel itself.

Hamas said its leader in Lebanon, Fateh Sherif Abu el-Amin was killed along with his wife, son and daughter, in a strike that targeted their house in a refugee camp in the southern city of Tyre in the early hours of Monday.

Another group, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), said three of its leaders were killed in a strike that targeted Beirut's Cola district.

This was the first time Israel had struck Beirut beyond its southern suburbs in a campaign which culminated in the assassination of Nasrallah last week in a succession of heavy air strikes.

The strike against the PFLP hit the upper floor of an apartment building, Reuters witnesses said. There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military.

The latest attacks indicated Israel has no intention of slowing down its offensive on multiple fronts even after eliminating Nasrallah, who was Iran's most powerful ally in its "Axis of Resistance" against Israeli and US influence in the region.

Israel's intensified attacks against the Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon and Houthi militias in Yemen have prompted fears that Middle East fighting could spin out of control and draw in Iran and the United States, Israel's main ally.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Nasser Kanaani said Tehran would not leave any of Israel's "criminal acts" go unanswered. He was referring to the killing of Nasrallah and an Iranian Guard deputy commander, Brigadier General Abbas Nilforoushan, who died in the same strikes on Friday.

Lebanon's Health Ministry says more than 1,000 Lebanese have been killed and 6,000 wounded in the past two weeks, without specifying how many were civilians. One million people - a fifth of the population - have fled their homes, the government says.

The escalation has put Beirut on edge, with Lebanese fearful that Israel will expand its military campaign.

"There is nothing else to say or add, except God save Lebanon," Beirut resident Nawel said. "What will happen to me is the same as what can happen to anyone."



Al-Baidani: Houthis Use 'Siege' Slogan to Advance Iran’s Agenda as Pressure Builds Within

Yemeni political researcher Saleh Al-Baidani, who says the Houthis are facing growing popular and economic pressure in areas under their control - Asharq Al-Awsat
Yemeni political researcher Saleh Al-Baidani, who says the Houthis are facing growing popular and economic pressure in areas under their control - Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Al-Baidani: Houthis Use 'Siege' Slogan to Advance Iran’s Agenda as Pressure Builds Within

Yemeni political researcher Saleh Al-Baidani, who says the Houthis are facing growing popular and economic pressure in areas under their control - Asharq Al-Awsat
Yemeni political researcher Saleh Al-Baidani, who says the Houthis are facing growing popular and economic pressure in areas under their control - Asharq Al-Awsat

Yemeni political researcher Saleh Al-Baidani says the Houthis' use of claims about a siege and unpaid salaries is an attempt to mask the group's agenda with Iran behind humanitarian slogans.

Al-Baidani, who has authored two books on the Yemeni crisis, believes that Yemenis living in areas under Houthi control will play a role in bringing an end to the coup that began in September 2014.

“The Iran-backed group is facing unprecedented popular and economic pressure in areas under its control,” the political researcher says, adding that the Houthis are trying to escape this internal predicament by launching new rounds of escalation.

The comments came during a new episode of Asharq Al-Awsat Podcast, in which Al-Baidani discussed the latest developments in Yemen. The conversation also covered the tribes, the Houthis' political and ideological ties to Iran, and his home governorate of Al-Bayda, which he described as “strategic.”

3 Reasons Behind the Latest Moves

On a warm August night in Riyadh, Al-Baidani cited three main reasons behind the Houthis' latest moves. The first was to support Iran's position militarily and politically and turn the Houthis into an additional pressure tool in Tehran's hands. The second was an attempt to establish an internal deterrence dynamic that serves the group. The third was linked to growing public anger over economic conditions, levies and taxes, and the declining standard of living.

He said the slogan “I am hungry,” which has begun appearing in areas under Houthi control, reflects the level of accumulated public discontent. He believes that “the explosion will come from within,” and that any future military move by government forces could coincide with a popular uprising in areas controlled by the group.

Regarding the Houthis' relationship with Iran, Al-Baidani rejected arguments that downplay the strength of the ties between the two sides. He said the relationship was no longer merely a political alliance or a convergence of interests, but had, in his words, become a deep ideological and military relationship.

He added that the period when Hassan Irloo was in Sanaa represented an important turning point in reshaping the group's decision-making center. He said the small circle controlling political and military decisions had become more closely aligned with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The discussion also touched on the sectarian dimension. Al-Baidani distinguished between traditional Zaydism, which historically coexisted with the Shafi'i school and other Yemenis, and the version embraced by the Houthi group, which he described as more hardline and closer to Jarudism. He considers the problem to have gone beyond the sectarian dimension to a lineage-based view of power and society.

The Tribe and the Governorate

In discussing the tribe, the political researcher argued that the Houthis have helped revive tribal ties that had faded somewhat in recent years. Asked about the current tribal gathering in Yemen's Al-Jawf governorate, Al-Baidani described the “Al-Rayyan Encampment” as more of a symbolic protest than a military one, while stressing that it nonetheless serves as a symbolic indicator of the level of discontent among the tribes.

Al-Baidani also discussed Al-Bayda governorate, which he described as one of Yemen's most important geographical crossroads because of its central location and its links to eight governorates. He noted that the Houthis recognized its importance early on, which is why it was among the first areas they moved toward after taking control of Sanaa.

Research Work

Al-Baidani discussed the establishment of the “Anaween Center for Research and the Study of Transformations,” explaining that its goal is to examine turning points in Yemen's political landscape rather than simply track events or revisit their background.

He concluded by revealing that he is working on a third book that will, in his words, be “deeper and more comprehensive” than his two previous books, “Faces in the War” and “The Gate of Perdition... The Story of the War in Yemen,” but declined to disclose its title.

The figure who, in his view, remained present on every page of “Faces in the War” without having a chapter devoted to him was the late Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh. Al-Baidani said Saleh's life was intertwined with most of the figures and political transformations that Yemen experienced over more than three decades.


How Yemen Has Developed Rules of Engagement That Are Disrupting the Houthis

The Houthi group suffered heavy losses as a result of government deterrence operations (military media).
The Houthi group suffered heavy losses as a result of government deterrence operations (military media).
TT

How Yemen Has Developed Rules of Engagement That Are Disrupting the Houthis

The Houthi group suffered heavy losses as a result of government deterrence operations (military media).
The Houthi group suffered heavy losses as a result of government deterrence operations (military media).

The confrontation between Yemen's internationally recognized government and the Iran-backed Houthi group is no longer unfolding according to the military equation that had prevailed along the front lines since 2022. The latest escalation, initiated by the group, has revealed a notable shift in the performance of government forces, which have begun developing new rules of engagement that have unsettled the militias. They are moving from a position of defense and containment toward a phase of preemptive strikes, making use of drones and improved precision-targeting capabilities.

The pace of attacks over the past six weeks reveals an escalating trajectory, with the strikes coinciding with Houthi use of ballistic missiles and drones to target military positions, facilities, and maritime routes.

According to information from military sources and monitoring centers, the Houthis carried out more than 75 attacks during this period using ballistic missiles and explosive-laden drones. These included missile barrages against the port of Mokha and the city of Al Khawkhah, as well as attacks on military camps in Marib and Al Abr, and others targeting commercial vessels that killed at least four sailors.

On the other side, field reports indicate that the Yemeni armed forces, the National Resistance formations, and the Giants Brigades carried out more than 500 combat, defensive, and offensive operations, focused on Houthi concentrations and command-and-control centers along the fronts in Hodeidah, Marib, Taiz, Al Dhale, and Al Bayda.

The significance of the current development lies not only in the scale of the strikes, but also in the nature of the means the government forces have begun using. The introduction of drones into offensive operations opens a new avenue for anti-Houthi forces to strike high-value targets without having to conduct large-scale ground operations.

Informed Yemeni sources indicate that two specialized drone aviation brigades have been formed within the Yemeni armed forces, marking a shift in the role of these aircraft from reconnaissance and surveillance to direct combat use.

In recent days, drones have been used to strike Houthi barracks, concentrations, supply vehicles, and trenches. These operations have been documented by drone cameras across various fronts, particularly in Marib, Al Jawf, Al Bayda, the western coast, and Al Dhale, as well as in areas of Hajjah governorate in the northwest of the country that have been retaken.

This shift is particularly significant along the western coast, where the ground confrontation intersects with the maritime threat. The downing of Houthi reconnaissance drones that, according to the available information, were preparing the way for maritime attacks using explosive-laden boats reflects an attempt by the government to deprive the group of one of its most important tools for monitoring the waters and preparing attacks on maritime traffic.

Here, drones are moving beyond their traditional military function to become part of a broader deterrence system aimed at preventing the Houthis from creating a new reality along Yemen's coasts and the Bab al-Mandab Strait.

Testing the Unification of Forces

But possessing more advanced military tools does not necessarily mean possessing the ability to wage an all-out war. The most complex challenge facing the Yemeni government remains the existence of multiple centers of military power and disparities in command-and-control structures.

Over the past two years, Yemen's Presidential Leadership Council has worked to address part of this fragmentation, with signs emerging of a more interconnected military structure, although it remains composed of multiple elements.

This structure includes the regular forces commanded by Lieutenant General Sagheer bin Aziz; the forces deployed along the western coast and in Mokha, commanded by Presidential Leadership Council member Tareq Saleh; the Emergency Forces and Nation's Shield formations, which are directly commanded by Presidential Leadership Council Chairman Rashad Al Alimi; the forces operating along the Taiz fronts under the Fourth Military Region, headquartered in Aden; as well as the Giants Brigades and other southern formations deployed along the fronts in Lahj, Al Dhale, and Shabwa, commanded by Presidential Leadership Council member Abdul Rahman Al Mahrami.

According to military assessments, these formations give the Yemeni government the ability to distribute military pressure across more than one front. At the same time, however, they place the joint operations room before a difficult test: Can it turn these multiple capabilities into a unified battle plan if the limited confrontation develops into an open war?

This question becomes increasingly important as the level of Houthi escalation rises, because moving from localized strikes to large-scale ground operations requires a higher level of coordination and political and military decision-making, as well as substantial logistical and economic capacity.

The Priority of Calculated Deterrence

In the current calculations of Yemen's legitimate government, a full-scale ground war appears less likely than continued calibrated escalation. The government does not appear willing to be drawn into the battle that the Houthis may be seeking to impose.

This is where the scenario of measured escalation repeatedly referenced by Al Alimi comes into focus. It is based on targeting sources of threat with missiles, artillery, and drones, ensuring that Houthi attacks do not go unanswered while avoiding large-scale ground operations to seize new territory.

This strategy allows the Yemeni government to raise the cost of Houthi attacks without opening a front that could later prove difficult to contain. It also gives the government room to maneuver between military retaliation and political and diplomatic options.

But continued Houthi attacks on maritime traffic and vital facilities could change the calculations. If maritime pressure develops into a sustained threat to shipping in the southern Red Sea, and attacks on ports and facilities continue, the western coast, particularly Hodeidah, could become the focus of a larger battle. This is what was understood from Tareq Saleh's recent statements.

The government could then find itself facing the option of launching a military operation aimed at ending the group's ability to use the coast as a platform for maritime threats, a choice that would carry significant military, humanitarian, and economic consequences.

The recent attacks on the port of Mokha reveal the scale of the economic risks associated with this course. According to the available information, the shelling brought the port's strategic activity to a halt and caused extensive damage to its infrastructure, with preliminary estimates putting the losses at billions of Yemeni riyals.

The consequences do not stop at civilian facilities. Yemen, which is facing a deep humanitarian and economic crisis, has little room to maneuver, given that the United Nations humanitarian response plan continues to face a funding gap of more than 80 percent, while the limited escalation of recent weeks has led to new waves of displacement in Marib and along the western coast.

If a full-scale confrontation erupts, the closure of vital roads and corridors and damage to ports and commercial facilities could multiply the cost of the war for the population and place additional pressure on the fragile economy of the governorates held by the government.

Between Houthi escalation and the government's calibrated deterrence, the coming days and weeks will determine whether the drones and precision strikes used by Yemeni government forces succeed in establishing a new balance with the Houthis, or whether they prove to be the prelude to the broadest military round since the 2022 truce and the fragile de-escalation that followed.


Banque Misr in UAE Targeted by US Sanctions

Banque Misr’s main branch in the UAE. (Banque Misr on Instagram)
Banque Misr’s main branch in the UAE. (Banque Misr on Instagram)
TT

Banque Misr in UAE Targeted by US Sanctions

Banque Misr’s main branch in the UAE. (Banque Misr on Instagram)
Banque Misr’s main branch in the UAE. (Banque Misr on Instagram)

An Egyptian banking source and an economic expert downplayed the impact of the US sanctions against Banque Misr’s UAE branch on the Egyptian banking sector and the broader economy, stressing that its fallout remains limited.

The source confirmed that the impact is confined to certain transactions of the UAE branch and does not extend to Banque Misr's operations within Egypt or its other international branches.

The US Treasury Department had on Friday said that “under Operation Economic Outcast, the US Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) proposed a rule that would revoke Banque Misr UAE’s correspondent banking access to US financial institutions.”

“We are taking the first step in holding it accountable for its continued, egregious support of the Iranian regime,” said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

An official Egyptian banking source told Asharq Al-Awsat that the decision will prevent the bank's branch from making any US dollar transfers outside the UAE without undergoing financial monitoring in Washington and obtaining its prior approval.

This measure is designed to ensure that funds do not reach individuals or institutions subject to US sanctions or ban orders, he explained.

The source noted that the decision applies strictly to the US dollar and no other currencies, as intercountry dollar transfers between banks are routed through a US intermediary bank or US intermediary transfer companies known as correspondents, allowing US authorities to track the movement of their currency.

He continued: "Previously, these transfers were carried out routinely under the supervision of the US banking sector alone. However, following this decision, they are now subject to the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) - a department of the US Department of the Treasury, which is the primary US institution that monitors and blocks dollar transfers to entities and individuals listed on sanctions schedules."

The same source stressed that Banque Misr’s UAE branch is an entity independent of the Egyptian banking sector and falls within the scope of the UAE banking sector, though it is fully owned by the state-owned Banque Misr of Egypt.

He noted that "the US decision will not affect any bank inside Egypt in any way," adding that it is a reviewable measure that is highly likely to be canceled following coordination with the US.

Economic expert Abdel Nabi Abdel Muttalib said the US measure will not affect the rating of Banque Misr or the Egyptian banking sector, as the decision was not directed against Banque Misr or its UAE branch directly.

Instead, he explained that the measure targets the "correspondent" service, which is typically provided by US companies or banks to Banque Misr, particularly in countries where the bank does not have direct access to the banking system.

Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, Abdel Muttalib said that the ban does not apply to all currencies, but rather strictly to the US dollar.

He added that even dollar transfers cannot be completely halted, as some transactions are carried out, for instance, in UAE dirhams and received on the other end in dollars.

Furthermore, he noted that many transfers are executed in various other currencies but are delivered in other countries in US dollars, given its status as the most widely used and globally available international currency.

He continued: "US authorities frequently implement broad precautionary measures and include institutions as a safeguard; subsequent reviews and audits then prove that certain entities were wrongfully targeted, leading to the cancellation of measures against them."

In a statement on Saturday, Banque Misr said was reviewing the US Treasury notice, adding that its branch in the UAE continued to provide banking services to its customers in line with applicable rules and ⁠procedures.

The bank stressed that the measure is strictly limited to Banque Misr’s UAE branch and does not extend to its operations in Egypt or any other country where it operates.