Debate Resurfaces Over Political Agreement After Al-Mashhadani Elected Iraqi Speaker

Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani (Reuters)
Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani (Reuters)
TT
20

Debate Resurfaces Over Political Agreement After Al-Mashhadani Elected Iraqi Speaker

Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani (Reuters)
Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani (Reuters)

Less than a week after the Iraqi parliament elected Mahmoud al-Mashhadani as speaker, the “political agreement” document has returned to the spotlight due to delays in its implementation caused by disagreements.

The speaker's position had been vacant for nearly a year after former speaker Mohamed al-Halbousi was dismissed by the Federal Supreme Court amid Sunni-Sunni and Sunni-Shiite tensions.

Al-Mashhadani, who had been competing for about nine months with four other candidates, including Salem al-Essawi, was elected with broad Sunni support and full backing from Shiite factions, as a key member of the Shiite Coordination Framework defended his candidacy.

A former Sunni politician and ex-MP told Asharq Al-Awsat that “practically, there is no Sunni-Sunni dispute over al-Mashhadani.”

“The issue is with his nomination process and the involvement of a Shiite party, which shouldn't be a factor, especially when Sunnis should have the right to choose their candidate based on sectarian quotas,” the source noted.

They added that “the delay in electing a speaker for a year was caused by Shiite forces insisting on a specific Sunni candidate, al-Mashhadani.”

“This sparked debate within the Sunni bloc, though all Sunnis, before this insistence, saw al-Mashhadani as one of the last respected historical Sunni leaders after 2003, often called 'the elder' because of his age,” the source noted.

The politician also pointed out that “Sunnis have key demands, which were part of the current government led by Mohamed Shia' al-Sudani, including the law on general amnesty, which is still being debated after being watered down, as well as the dissolution of the Accountability and Justice Commission and its shift to a judicial matter instead of being used against the Sunni community.”

At a meeting of the “State Administration Coalition” on Thursday evening, discussions on implementing the political agreement document resurfaced after the parliament resumed its sessions and extended its legislative term following the election of a new speaker.

According to sources, during the meeting, which included al-Sudani, al-Mashhadani, and leaders from the Shiite Coordination Framework, as well as Sunni and Kurdish representatives, Al-Siyada Alliance leader Khamis al-Khanjar presented the document.

He criticized the failure to implement Sunni demands, despite two years passing since the document was signed, and warned that further delays would have consequences.

Al-Khanjar, who recently resigned from the Al-Siyada party after being included in the Accountability and Justice file, had initially supported al-Mashhadani’s candidacy for speaker, despite backing his own candidate, Salem al-Essawi, earlier.



Will Israel’s ‘Voluntary Departure’ Plan Derail Gaza Reconstruction?

Palestinians in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza, call for an end to the war and chant anti-Hamas slogans (Reuters)
Palestinians in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza, call for an end to the war and chant anti-Hamas slogans (Reuters)
TT
20

Will Israel’s ‘Voluntary Departure’ Plan Derail Gaza Reconstruction?

Palestinians in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza, call for an end to the war and chant anti-Hamas slogans (Reuters)
Palestinians in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza, call for an end to the war and chant anti-Hamas slogans (Reuters)

Israel’s announcement of a new body to facilitate the “voluntary departure” of Palestinians from Gaza has triggered widespread condemnation across the Arab and Muslim world, with analysts calling the move a “provocative act” aimed at undermining an Egyptian-led initiative to rebuild the war-torn enclave.

A senior Egyptian official told Asharq Al-Awsat that “Egyptian diplomacy is fully aware that Israel’s goal is to obstruct efforts to implement the reconstruction plan prepared by Cairo, which has Arab backing and broad international support.”

Arab and Muslim leaders have rejected the Israeli move, while analysts say any attempt to forcibly displace Palestinians from Gaza is unlikely to succeed.

“Such extremist ideas regularly emerge from the Israeli side to undermine negotiation efforts and peace initiatives, but those involved in the talks are well aware of these tactics,” said the official, who requested anonymity.

“There are ongoing contacts with most countries, particularly the United States, to explain the situation Israel is inflaming in the region—a situation that poses risks for everyone,” they added.

An Israeli government spokeswoman said on Monday that the security cabinet had approved a proposal by Defense Minister Israel Katz to establish a body tasked with

“preparing for the voluntary departure of Gaza residents to third countries in a safe and supervised manner”.

She added that the body would operate under the Defense Ministry’s supervision but did not specify which third countries might participate in the plan.

Egypt’s Foreign Ministry dismissed Israel’s “voluntary departure” plan for Gaza residents as lacking any legal basis, stressing that “forcible displacement under bombardment and the denial of humanitarian aid constitutes a crime under international law.”

Saudi Arabia also condemned the move, with its Foreign Ministry stating that lasting and just peace “cannot be achieved without granting the Palestinian people their legitimate rights, in accordance with international resolutions, and establishing an independent Palestinian state”.

The Muslim World League denounced the Israeli announcement as a “violation of all international and humanitarian laws and norms” and an “intentional effort to undermine prospects for a just and comprehensive peace that ensures security and stability in the region and the world.”

The backlash comes after US President Donald Trump proposed relocating Gaza’s more than two million residents to Arab countries and transforming the war-ravaged coastal enclave into the “Riviera of the Middle East”—a vision widely rejected by Arab states, including Egypt.

In a phone call on Tuesday, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi reiterated to Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez Egypt’s “unequivocal rejection” of any attempt to forcibly displace Palestinians from their land.

According to Egyptian presidential spokesman Ambassador Mohamed El-Shinawy, Sánchez welcomed the Arab reconstruction plan for Gaza and aligned with Egypt’s stance against the displacement of Palestinians or the liquidation of their cause.

Both leaders emphasized the need to implement a two-state solution as the “only guarantee for lasting security and stability in the Middle East.”