Sudanese FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Reject a ‘Libyan Model’ with Formation of Parallel Government

Egyptian Foreign Minister receiving his Sudanese counterpart in Cairo on Sunday (Egyptian Foreign Ministry)
Egyptian Foreign Minister receiving his Sudanese counterpart in Cairo on Sunday (Egyptian Foreign Ministry)
TT

Sudanese FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: We Reject a ‘Libyan Model’ with Formation of Parallel Government

Egyptian Foreign Minister receiving his Sudanese counterpart in Cairo on Sunday (Egyptian Foreign Ministry)
Egyptian Foreign Minister receiving his Sudanese counterpart in Cairo on Sunday (Egyptian Foreign Ministry)

Sudanese Foreign Minister Ali Youssef Al-Sharif expressed firm opposition to what he described as the “Libyan model” being replicated in Sudan, emphasizing that any moves aimed at forming a parallel government are unacceptable.

He warned that such efforts would “weaken Sudan and complicate efforts to resolve the current crisis.”

Since April 2023, Sudan has been engulfed in internal conflict between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), labeled a “rebel militia” by the government. The war has claimed thousands of civilian lives and displaced millions both internally and externally.

In exclusive remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat during his visit to Cairo, Al-Sharif cautioned against the dangers of consultations being held by some political and civil actors to form a “parallel government,” describing such efforts as targeting the division and fragmentation of Sudan.

In recent weeks, Sudanese political forces, including figures from the “Tansiqiyya Taqaddum” coalition, have held discussions in Nairobi, Kenya, to explore the formation of a “peace government,” a move welcomed by the RSF.

The foreign minister described these initiatives as “a new conspiracy against Sudan,” alleging the involvement of external actors motivated by the military’s advances against the RSF. He emphasized Sudan’s reliance on countries that support its unity and stability to thwart these moves and ensure they are not legitimized. Al-Sharif highlighted that Egypt is at the forefront of nations on which Sudan depends in countering these efforts, adding that his country maintains strong relations with key Arab states and international powers, including Russia and China.

During talks with his Egyptian counterpart, Badr Abdel Aty, the two ministers agreed that attempts to establish a parallel government would complicate Sudan’s internal situation. Al-Sharif praised Egypt’s support for Sudan’s unity, sovereignty, and national institutions.

On warnings of famine in Sudan, the official dismissed claims by some international forces about the country facing famine, accusing these actors of trying to pressure the UN Security Council to intervene. He clarified that Sudan is experiencing a “domestic food crisis” but not famine.

Russia recently vetoed a British-sponsored resolution in the Security Council calling for the implementation of the Jeddah humanitarian agreement signed in May 2023. The resolution also proposed creating a regional protection force in coordination with the African Union and international partners to safeguard civilians in Sudan.

The minister linked international focus on the famine narrative to calls for a parallel government, describing these as part of a “unified conspiracy targeting Sudan’s resources and capabilities.”

He criticized the international community’s “weak response” to crimes committed by the RSF against civilians, asserting that the documented violations are sufficient grounds for the International Criminal Court to prosecute RSF leaders.

Sudan has taken legal measures through international organizations such as the UN Security Council and the African Union to classify the RSF as a terrorist group. Al-Sharif also criticized the global community for ignoring Sudan’s crisis while focusing on the war in Gaza. He urged action to restrict the movement of RSF leaders and hold accountable the states providing them refuge.

Regarding the resolution of the ongoing war, Al-Sharif asserted that military resolution is the only viable option at present. He highlighted the army’s progress toward military victory, attributing delays to the RSF’s strategy of using civilians and civilian infrastructure as shields.

The foreign minister insisted that a political solution cannot be pursued while the war continues, arguing that political issues must be left to civilian forces to discuss after a ceasefire is achieved. He emphasized that any lasting resolution must involve a ceasefire followed by the complete disbandment of the RSF, as Sudan cannot tolerate the existence of armed forces parallel to the national military.

On Sudan’s potential reinstatement to the African Union, Al-Sharif stated that restoring the country’s membership requires the formation of a civilian government in line with a constitutional document. He did not rule out the possibility of such a government being formed in the near future. “It is possible,” he said.



Lebanon ‘Seriously’ Dealing with Israeli Threat to Maintain its Occupation of Southern Regions

Israeli tanks are seen on a road following the ceasefire between Israel and the Iran-backed group Hezbollah, near the Israel-Lebanon border in northern Israel, December 29, 2024. (Reuters)
Israeli tanks are seen on a road following the ceasefire between Israel and the Iran-backed group Hezbollah, near the Israel-Lebanon border in northern Israel, December 29, 2024. (Reuters)
TT

Lebanon ‘Seriously’ Dealing with Israeli Threat to Maintain its Occupation of Southern Regions

Israeli tanks are seen on a road following the ceasefire between Israel and the Iran-backed group Hezbollah, near the Israel-Lebanon border in northern Israel, December 29, 2024. (Reuters)
Israeli tanks are seen on a road following the ceasefire between Israel and the Iran-backed group Hezbollah, near the Israel-Lebanon border in northern Israel, December 29, 2024. (Reuters)

Israel announced that it may not withdraw from regions of southern Lebanon that it occupied during its latest war with Hezbollah, sparking alarm in the country.

Israeli media reported that Tel Aviv may inform Washington that it may not pull out from the South at the end of the 60-day deadline stipulated in the ceasefire agreement that ended the war.

Yedioth Ahronoth said Israel is hoping that the American officials will “understand’ this position, especially since Lebanon has not met its commitments towards the ceasefire.

Lebanese military sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that they have not received any information about the withdrawal.

Meanwhile, a Lebanese ministerial source stressed that the reports may be Israel’s attempt at “testing the waters” and perhaps an attempt “to pressure the Americans and Lebanon to complete the Lebanese army’s deployment in the South at a faster pace”.

The Lebanese government is “seriously” handling these reports and caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati is intensifying his internal and international contacts to warn against Israel’s attempt to remain in the South, added the source.

He will bring up this issue at cabinet after completing his talks, which include the US, it went on to say.

The US heads the committee tasked with monitoring the ceasefire.

Meanwhile, Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem warned that his party was ready to retaliate to the Israeli violations of the truce.

“Our patience may run out during or after the end of the deadline,” he warned, while holding the Lebanese state responsible for implementing the ceasefire.

“The resistance (Hezbollah) is not bound by any time schedule. The resistance’s leadership decides when and how to resist,” he stated.

“Our morale remains high despite the wounds and pain,” he went on to say.

Moreover, he noted that throughout the 64-day war with Hezbollah, Israel only managed to advance “a few hundred meters” in Lebanon. “It failed to advance deeper thanks to the power of the resistance,” he declared. “We confronted an unprecedented attack, persevered and broke Israel’s might.”

Member of parliament Speaker Nabih Berri’s Liberation and Development bloc MP Qassem Hashem stressed that Lebanon will not allow Israel to remain an hour more in the South as soon as the deadline expires.

“We will be confronted by a very dangerous situation should Israel fail to withdraw from the territories it occupied,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He noted Israel’s incursion into Syrian territories and Lebanon’s commitment to the ceasefire; and yet, it seems that Israel is keen on occupying more areas.

“Lebanon has not officially received any request to amend the pullout date. Should Israel remain in Lebanon beyond the deadline, then all international norms and treaties give Lebanon and its people the right to fully liberate their territories through all means necessary,” he stressed.

Hezbollah MP Mohammed Raad said Israel is “committing shameful violations to compensate for its losses on the field.”

“It is everyone’s duty to preserve national sovereignty,” he stated after meeting with Berri.

Talks with the speaker focused on the ceasefire committee’s work, as well as the upcoming presidential elections.

On the ground and after 40 days since the ceasefire took effect, Israel continued its violations of Lebanese sovereignty. It blew up houses in the towns of Hayyan, Markaba, al-Taybeh and Rab Thalathin.

Israeli artillery targeted the vicinity of the Imam al-Sadr sports complex west of Mays al-Jabal town.

Lebanon’s National News Agency reported that an Israeli unit advanced on the town of Bourj al-Mamlouk and took up position in the area, blocking a road with barbed wire.

The Lebanese army, in turn, closed three roads in the town that would give access to the Marjeyoun plain, thereby preventing any Israeli advance there.