Israel Shocks Lebanon with Plan to Link Withdrawal to Normalization

Israeli soldiers patrol near the Israel-Lebanon border, in Israel, March 12, 2025. REUTERS/Avi Ohayon
Israeli soldiers patrol near the Israel-Lebanon border, in Israel, March 12, 2025. REUTERS/Avi Ohayon
TT

Israel Shocks Lebanon with Plan to Link Withdrawal to Normalization

Israeli soldiers patrol near the Israel-Lebanon border, in Israel, March 12, 2025. REUTERS/Avi Ohayon
Israeli soldiers patrol near the Israel-Lebanon border, in Israel, March 12, 2025. REUTERS/Avi Ohayon

Lebanon’s government and public were caught off guard by Israeli leaks suggesting a potential deal that would link Israel’s withdrawal from Lebanese territory and the demarcation of land borders to a normalization agreement between Beirut and Tel Aviv.

However, Lebanon firmly rejects the idea, stressing that border talks are strictly security-focused, limited to Israel’s withdrawal, border delineation, and the release of detainees.

The leaks, attributed to an Israeli political source, emerged a day after Israel released four Lebanese detainees in what it described as a “goodwill gesture.” The development coincided with preparations for negotiations on disputed border points.

Israeli media quoted a political source as saying that talks with Lebanon are part of a broader, comprehensive plan.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s policies have reshaped the Middle East, and Israel wants to maintain this momentum to achieve normalization with Lebanon, the source said.

Just as Lebanon has demands regarding the border, Israel has its own demands as well, and these issues will be discussed, the source further stated.

The remarks were seen as an Israeli attempt to link border demarcation and withdrawal from Lebanese territory to a normalization agreement, according to a Lebanese lawmaker following the developments.

However, Lebanon firmly rejects any such linkage, considering it an overreach beyond the mandate of the committee overseeing the implementation of the ceasefire agreement that took effect on November 26.

A senior Lebanese official told Asharq Al-Awsat that the idea of linking border discussions to normalization with Israel is “not on the table for Lebanon.”

The official emphasized that the mandate of the five-nation committee, formed after the recent conflict, is “security-focused, not political,” and is strictly limited to implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1701.

The official explained that the committee's role is “confined to overseeing Israel’s withdrawal from five remaining occupied border points, demarcating the 13 disputed border areas, and securing the release of Lebanese detainees held by Israel.”

While the remarks were attributed to an unnamed source rather than an official spokesperson, they caught Lebanese officials off guard.

Diplomatic sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Lebanon’s Foreign Ministry had not been informed of any such proposal and that no international official had raised the issue so far.

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun met on Tuesday with US General Jasper Jeffers, head of the ceasefire monitoring committee, alongside US Ambassador Lisa Johnson, ahead of a committee meeting in Naqoura.

According to the Lebanese presidency, Aoun urged the committee chief to pressure Israel to implement the agreement, withdraw from the five occupied hills, and release Lebanese detainees.



Türkiye Opposes Iraq Pipeline Deal Extension under Current Conditions, Official Says

A general view of oil tanks at Türkiye's Mediterranean port of Ceyhan, which is run by state-owned Petroleum Pipeline Corporation (BOTAS), some 70 km (43.5 miles) from Adana February 19, 2014. . REUTERS/Umit Bektas
A general view of oil tanks at Türkiye's Mediterranean port of Ceyhan, which is run by state-owned Petroleum Pipeline Corporation (BOTAS), some 70 km (43.5 miles) from Adana February 19, 2014. . REUTERS/Umit Bektas
TT

Türkiye Opposes Iraq Pipeline Deal Extension under Current Conditions, Official Says

A general view of oil tanks at Türkiye's Mediterranean port of Ceyhan, which is run by state-owned Petroleum Pipeline Corporation (BOTAS), some 70 km (43.5 miles) from Adana February 19, 2014. . REUTERS/Umit Bektas
A general view of oil tanks at Türkiye's Mediterranean port of Ceyhan, which is run by state-owned Petroleum Pipeline Corporation (BOTAS), some 70 km (43.5 miles) from Adana February 19, 2014. . REUTERS/Umit Bektas

Türkiye does not want an extension of the existing Kirkuk-Ceyhan oil pipeline agreement under current conditions, a senior Turkish official said, after Baghdad asked Ankara to extend it for at least a year to allow time for more talks.

The decades-old Türkiye-Iraq Crude Oil Pipeline Agreement, which governs exports through the pipeline, is due to expire on July 27. Baghdad and Ankara are still discussing a new draft agreement.

"There is no point in extending an agreement that has been subject to arbitration," the Turkish official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said when asked about Iraq's extension request.

Ceyhan is a crucial export outlet for Iraqi oil, with the state's main export terminal in Basra suffering from the closure of the Strait of Hormuz since US-Israeli strikes on Iran in late February.

Türkiye last year announced the end of the accord covering the pipeline and asked to renew it under new conditions. Türkiye's proposal included a mechanism to ensure the full use of the pipeline and options, such as extending the pipeline to the south of Iraq. The pipeline had remained offline for 2-1/2 years after an arbitration court ruled for Ankara to pay $1.5 billion in damages for unauthorized Iraqi exports Türkiye received between 2014 and 2018. Flows began late last year.

There is also a second arbitration case that covers a period from 2018 onwards and an award enforcement case running in a US court. The pipeline has a capacity of almost 1.5 million barrels per day but has been working significantly below capacity due to security and other issues. Crude exports from Kirkuk to Türkiye were at 177,000 barrels per day in April, according to shipping data reviewed by Reuters.

 

 

 

 


Israel Seizes Powers over Hebron Shrine from Palestinian Authority

Israeli flags flutter on the Ibrahimi mosque, also known as the Cave of the Patriarchs, in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank April 21, 2026. REUTERS/Yosri Aljamal/File Photo
Israeli flags flutter on the Ibrahimi mosque, also known as the Cave of the Patriarchs, in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank April 21, 2026. REUTERS/Yosri Aljamal/File Photo
TT

Israel Seizes Powers over Hebron Shrine from Palestinian Authority

Israeli flags flutter on the Ibrahimi mosque, also known as the Cave of the Patriarchs, in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank April 21, 2026. REUTERS/Yosri Aljamal/File Photo
Israeli flags flutter on the Ibrahimi mosque, also known as the Cave of the Patriarchs, in Hebron, in the Israeli-occupied West Bank April 21, 2026. REUTERS/Yosri Aljamal/File Photo

Israel has seized planning and construction powers at a Jewish and Muslim shrine in the occupied West Bank from the Palestinian Authority, scrapping an agreement in place since the 1990s, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said on Tuesday.

Under the 1997 Hebron Agreement, Palestinians controlled planning and construction in the entire city, including the Jewish Tomb of the Patriarchs and the adjoining Muslim Ibrahimi Mosque.

The far-right minister said he had given the final sign-off late on Monday to the transfer of those powers as they affected the religious site and the nearby Jewish settlement to Israeli authorities.

Israel's right to control the West Bank, which it captured in the 1967 Middle East War, is not recognized internationally. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas's office called the seizure of powers an "infringement upon the political and legal status of Hebron", and a violation of international law.

In a speech marking the establishment of a new Israeli settlement near Hebron, Smotrich said the "historic step" would deepen "Israeli sovereignty" in the West Bank, which Palestinians seek as the heart of a future independent state.

Israel is due to call an election by the end of October, ahead of which Smotrich is struggling in the polls. A settler himself, he has long pushed for the annexation of the West Bank and his party draws much of its support from ideologically motivated settlers who view the West Bank as their biblical heartland.

Hebron has at times been a flashpoint for Israeli-Palestinian violence. In 1994, a Jewish settler killed 29 Muslims praying at the shrine.

The decision to transfer the powers was taken by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's security cabinet in February, one of a series of measures meant to make it easier for settlers to buy land and give Israeli authorities more enforcement powers in the territory.

Smotrich has been key to a rapid expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which has been accompanied by a rise in violence.

UN bodies and most countries have found Israel's settlements in the West Bank to be illegal. Israel disputes this view, citing biblical and historical ties, as well as security needs.

Settlers have killed 13 Palestinians this year, according to UN data.


Arab League Condemns Opening of Embassy for So-Called 'Somaliland Region' in Occupied Jerusalem

The Arab League headquarters in Cairo (Asharq Al-Awsat)
The Arab League headquarters in Cairo (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Arab League Condemns Opening of Embassy for So-Called 'Somaliland Region' in Occupied Jerusalem

The Arab League headquarters in Cairo (Asharq Al-Awsat)
The Arab League headquarters in Cairo (Asharq Al-Awsat)

The General Secretariat of the Arab League strongly condemned the move by the so-called "Somaliland Region" to open an embassy in occupied Jerusalem. It described the step as a challenge to international law and international legitimacy resolutions concerning the legal status of the city.

In a statement issued by the Palestine and Occupied Arab Territories Sector, the Arab League said the move further entrenches the illegal occupation and forms part of attempts to alter the legal, historical, and demographic status quo of Jerusalem and isolate it from its Palestinian surroundings. It stressed that such measures are null and void and carry no legal effect, SPA reported.

The Arab League reiterated that East Jerusalem is an integral part of the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967. It also reaffirmed its commitment to the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people, foremost among them the establishment of an independent state along the pre-1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital.

The organization further reaffirmed its support for the unity, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Somalia and rejected any measures that undermine those principles. It called on the international community to uphold its responsibilities in preserving the legal and historical status quo of Jerusalem and preventing attempts to impose a new reality or legitimize the Israeli occupation and its illegal practices.

The Arab League stressed that establishing diplomatic missions in occupied Jerusalem or recognizing the city as a location for foreign missions violates the international consensus regarding the city's status. It added that such actions undermine efforts to achieve a just and comprehensive peace based on the two-state solution and international legitimacy resolutions.