Baghdad, Washington Coordinate to Confront ‘Concerning’ Regional Developments

Iraq's Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani listens during a meeting with President Joe Biden in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, April 15, 2024, in Washington. (AP)
Iraq's Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani listens during a meeting with President Joe Biden in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, April 15, 2024, in Washington. (AP)
TT
20

Baghdad, Washington Coordinate to Confront ‘Concerning’ Regional Developments

Iraq's Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani listens during a meeting with President Joe Biden in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, April 15, 2024, in Washington. (AP)
Iraq's Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani listens during a meeting with President Joe Biden in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, April 15, 2024, in Washington. (AP)

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth held lengthy telephone talks on Sunday to discuss regional developments as Washington pursues its “maximum pressure” policy against Iran.

This was the third telephone call between Sudani and an American official in a month. He had held talks with Secretary of State Marco Rubio on February 25 and with National Security Adviser Mike Waltz two days ago.

His talks with Hegseth coincided with the US carrying out airstrikes against the Iran-backed Houthi militias in Yemen over the weekend.

US President Donald Trump on Monday explicitly linked the actions of the Houthis to their main benefactor, Iran, warning Tehran would “suffer the consequences” for further attacks by the militants.

In a statement, Sudani’s media office said he discussed with Hegseth security developments in the region, especially the military operations in Yemen and “concerning” situation in Syria. They also reviewed the strategic partnership between Iraq and the US and their joint interest to achieve regional stability and security.

“Hegseth reviewed developments related to military operations in Yemen, noting that the United States will continue its operations unless Houthi attacks on US forces and their impact on navigation in the Red Sea cease. He emphasized that Washington does not seek escalation and that military operations will stop immediately once these attacks cease,” said the statement.

For his part, Sudani stated: “De-escalation and dialogue are the most effective paths to resolving crises in a region as sensitive and vital as the Middle East. He stressed that this approach represents Iraq’s consistent position in addressing regional challenges, and Iraq will continue to act based on this principle.”

Both sides underscored the importance of continued security cooperation within the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS and discussed regional security developments.

Sudani reiterated Iraq’s “commitment to protecting Coalition advisors, who are present in the country at the invitation of the Iraqi government to support efforts in combating ISIS. He also emphasized Iraq’s dedication to ensuring that the use of force remains exclusively within the state’s authority and to boosting internal stability.”

Additionally, they reaffirmed “their shared commitment to preventing the resurgence of terrorist threats and extremist ideologies, including ISIS, and strengthening ongoing counterterrorism efforts to support regional security.”

The talks addressed “recent successes in targeting and eliminating senior ISIS leaders, with both sides stressing the importance of maintaining a strong and coordinated counterterrorism approach to prevent the organization from rebuilding its capabilities.”

Sudani and Hegseth also tackled regional security dynamics, “particularly the concerning situation in Syria. Both sides expressed their determination to prevent ISIS in Syria from posing any threat, especially as the group has acquired new weapons and is reorganizing its ranks, which necessitates a collective international response to prevent any new escalation that could threaten stability.”

They underlined their commitment to regional stability, with Hegseth reiterating the United States’ long-term commitment to supporting Iraq’s security and stability.

Last week, the head of ISIS in Iraq and Syria was killed in Iraq in an operation by members of the Iraqi national intelligence service along with US-led coalition forces.

Iraqi observers said the operation helped ease concerns about how the new American administration was going to approach Iraq and the pro-Iran Coordination Framework given its “maximum pressure” policy towards Tehran.

An Iraqi politician noted to Asharq Al-Awsat the debates that had taken place over whether the US would adopt a hard line against Iraq given its ties to Iran.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, he added that the Trump administration is aware of the complex and close relations between the two neighbors.

However, by coordinating with Sudani, it is making a distinction between Iraq and Iran while being aware that some of its actions against Tehran will impact Baghdad, he remarked.

He stressed that the American administration “does not want to meddle in Iraqi affairs and is not concerned with speculation that it has sided with one party against the other.”

Rather, it wants to keep Iraq clear of any repercussions of its policies while also studying whether it can play a major role in the region, he went on to say.

On reports that Hegseth had strongly warned Sudani against the armed factions in Iraq retaliating to the US strikes on the Houthis, the politcian said his telephone talks with the PM were positive.

Iraq and the US are in agreement on several issues, so there is no need for such warnings, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.



US Sends Beirut ‘Warning’ and ‘Incentive’ Over Hezbollah Arms

US special envoy Tom Barrack (Reuters)
US special envoy Tom Barrack (Reuters)
TT
20

US Sends Beirut ‘Warning’ and ‘Incentive’ Over Hezbollah Arms

US special envoy Tom Barrack (Reuters)
US special envoy Tom Barrack (Reuters)

US special envoy Tom Barrack delivered a dual message of “incentive” and “warning” to the Lebanese capital this week, urging swift action on the issue of Hezbollah’s weapons.

“You have Israel on one side, you have Iran on the other, and now you have Syria manifesting itself so quickly that if Lebanon doesn’t move, it’s going to be Bilad Al Sham again,” he said, using the historical name for the Syria region.

The remarks sparked alarm within Lebanon’s political establishment, with some interpreting the comments as a blunt warning of “existential danger.”

Government sources told Asharq al-Awsat that Barrack, who also serves as Washington’s ambassador to Türkiye and was previously tasked with Syria policy, appears to be approaching the Lebanon and Syria files through a unified lens.

“Barrack believes that Lebanon should follow the same diplomatic path as Syria,” one official said, referring to Damascus' recent re-engagement with regional and international actors. “But he also understands Lebanon’s complex political terrain.”

Barrack’s comments about Lebanon potentially “returning to Bilad Al Sham” provoked criticism across the political spectrum, prompting him to clarify his position in a post on X, formerly Twitter.

“My comments yesterday praised Syria’s impressive strides, not a threat to Lebanon,” wrote Barrack.

“I observed the reality that Syria is moving at light speed to seize the historic opportunity presented by President Donald Trump lifting of sanctions: investment from Türkiye and the Gulf, diplomatic outreach to neighboring countries, and a clear vision for the future,” he added.

He said Syria’s leadership is “seeking coexistence and shared prosperity with Lebanon based on sovereign equality,” and stressed that the United States supports a bilateral relationship that promotes “peace, prosperity, and mutual respect” between the two nations.

“I can assure that Syria’s leaders only want co-existence and mutual prosperity with Lebanon, and the United States is committed to supporting that relationship between two equal and sovereign neighbors enjoying peace and prosperity,” said Barrack.

Barrack, in the context of disarming Hezbollah, had stated that a successful approach requires a combination of "carrots and sticks". This means using both positive incentives (carrots) and negative consequences (sticks) to achieve the desired outcome.

Barrack’s recent warning to Lebanon reflects the “stick” Washington is wielding, while his unprecedented acknowledgment of Hezbollah’s dual structure signals the “carrot” being offered.

“This is the first time a US official publicly distinguishes between Hezbollah’s political and military wings,” one source told Asharq al-Awsat.

“It’s a message of inducement aimed directly at Hezbollah, despite the fact that Washington has long treated both branches as inseparable and placed them under the same sanctions regime,” they explained.

In remarks to the press, Barrack reiterated the US designation of Hezbollah as a terrorist organization, but added nuance rarely heard from senior American officials.