From Retaliation to Displacement: How Gaza’s War Has Evolved

Nuseirat camp in Gaza amid Israel's ongoing military campaign, March 20, 2025 (AFP)
Nuseirat camp in Gaza amid Israel's ongoing military campaign, March 20, 2025 (AFP)
TT
20

From Retaliation to Displacement: How Gaza’s War Has Evolved

Nuseirat camp in Gaza amid Israel's ongoing military campaign, March 20, 2025 (AFP)
Nuseirat camp in Gaza amid Israel's ongoing military campaign, March 20, 2025 (AFP)

There is a stark difference between the war Israel launched on Gaza 16 months ago and the one it is waging today. In the first, Israel was driven by a deep wound to its prestige following Hamas’s surprise attack on October 7, 2023, making its military campaign in Gaza an act of retaliation.

Today, however, it is pursuing a war with a clear strategic goal: to eliminate the Palestinian cause and force the displacement of as many Palestinians as possible—not just from Gaza.

Israel now has a military led by a loyal, unchallenging command and the backing of a US administration hostile to Hamas.

While former President Joe Biden’s administration strongly supported Israel’s retaliatory war under the pretext of restoring its deterrence against the “Axis of Resistance,” providing extensive assistance in striking Hamas, Hezbollah, and even directly targeting Iran and the Houthis, the US at the time imposed some constraints on Tel Aviv.

Washington urged Israel to adhere to international law and voiced objections over the high civilian death toll, particularly among women and children.

The Biden administration managed the crisis while keeping political avenues open in response to Arab demands for an end to the war that would prevent future conflicts and destruction.

It was clear to Washington that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government was not suited for a comprehensive peace initiative. Expecting his swift downfall once the war ended, the administration engaged with political forces in Israel working to unseat him.

In the current war, Washington is led by a completely different administration under President Donald Trump, which is fully aligned with Netanyahu. This has allowed Netanyahu to act without restraint from the new US leadership, which harbors deep hostility toward Hamas—not only over the October 7 attack but also due to a fundamental misunderstanding of the group’s policies and objectives.

As a result, the key difference between the two wars is that Netanyahu now enjoys even stronger backing from Washington.

The Trump administration has opened a direct communication channel with Hamas despite Israeli objections, attempting to persuade the group to extend the initial phase of the ceasefire as a compromise that would keep Israel in the truce and allow the US to manage the crisis on its terms.

Moreover, the administration shares the same right-wing ideological base as Netanyahu’s government and wants it to remain in power.

It agrees with Netanyahu on the need to eliminate not only Hamas but also as many Palestinians as possible.

The administration has embraced the far-right proposal advocating for the “voluntary” displacement of Palestinians—an agenda that has come to be known as the Trump Plan.

Trump’s team recognizes that Netanyahu’s government cannot survive without appeasing the demands of the hardline right that controls its fate—not just figures like Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, but also an ideologically rigid faction within Netanyahu’s own Likud party.

 

 



Zaki to Asharq Al-Awsat: Iraq Played its Part, up to Syria to Determine its Participation at Arab Summit

Assistant Secretary-General of the Arab League Ambassador Hossam Zaki. (Arab League)
Assistant Secretary-General of the Arab League Ambassador Hossam Zaki. (Arab League)
TT
20

Zaki to Asharq Al-Awsat: Iraq Played its Part, up to Syria to Determine its Participation at Arab Summit

Assistant Secretary-General of the Arab League Ambassador Hossam Zaki. (Arab League)
Assistant Secretary-General of the Arab League Ambassador Hossam Zaki. (Arab League)

Iraq is hosting on May 17 a regular Arab League summit amid complex regional challenges and crises, including Israel’s war on Gaza, the severing of relations between Sudan and the United Arab Emirates and some parties in Baghdad’s wariness of the new rulers in Syria.

Assistant Secretary-General of the Arab League Ambassador Hossam Zaki told Asharq Al-Awsat that efforts are underway to mend ties between Sudan and the UAE.

He also hailed the Iraqi government’s handling of Syrian interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa's participation at the summit given the tensions between the neighbors following the ouster of Bashar al-Assad in December.

The is the second Arab League regular summit that is held amid the war on Gaza, which demands that leaders come up with a “cohesive Arab stance that takes into account the developments of the past months and which adopts Arab principles related to the Palestinian cause,” Zaki said.

Since the last summit, US President Donald Trump unveiled his plan to transform Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East,” which was vehemently rejected by Arab states. The countries countered by adopting a reconstruction plan for the enclave that ensures that its people remain in place.

Israel has since reignited the war, complicating peace efforts. “Israel is in control of the situation on the ground, making it difficult to challenge it through any means or decisions,” acknowledged Zaki. “All we have is political and diplomatic work.”

He recognized that political efforts are often doubted and dismissed, but they are actually “very important because they allow the Palestinian cause to remain alive, while the other party tries to kill it.”

“Israel’s attempts to mislead the public and distort facts can only be confronted by political and diplomatic work,” Zaki said. “We must continue to forge ahead along this path and hope that time is on our side.”

Several parties are banking on Washington to wield its influence on Israel to pressure it to stop the war. Zaki revealed that bilateral contacts are being held between Arab countries and the American administration in the hopes of achieving some form of breakthrough.

“It remains to be seen whether these contacts are a success,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

Tensions between Sudan and the UAE will also weigh heavily on the Baghdad summit. The Sudanese government announced earlier this month that it was severing ties with Abu Dhabi over its support to the Rapid Support Forces in its war against the military.

Zaki described the situation as “difficult and thorny. It may not impact the overall work of the Arab League, but it will certainly impact discussions about the Sudanese crisis given the differences in positions.”

Efforts are underway to help bridge the gap between Sudan and the UAE, but they have yet to yield the desired results, he revealed.

On Syria, Zaki said the summit is significant because it will be the first since Assad’s ouster.

“Syria is an important country, and it plays a traditional role in Arab affairs. At the same time, however, it is facing several challenges that are threatening its unity,” he noted.

The Arab League had reinstated Syria’s membership in May 2023 after it was suspended in 2011 when the Assad regime violently cracked down on peaceful anti-regime protests.

Sharaa had taken part in an emergency Arab League summit in Cairo in March.

His participation at the Baghdad summit has stirred controversy in Iraq given the strained ties between it and the new rulers in Damascus. Some parties in Iraq have openly opposed his participation.

Zaki said that Iraq, as the host, has fulfilled its duty in inviting Syria to the summit. It is now up to Syria to determine who will represent it at the meeting.

He did not reveal which leaders have confirmed their attendance of the summit, saying that the meeting does not gain importance with who shows up, but with what its outcomes are.

It is important, however, that all countries are represented, he added.