Hezbollah’s Latest Threats Do Not Impede Calls for it to Disarm

Hezbollah Secretary General Sheikh Naim Qassem. (Reuters)
Hezbollah Secretary General Sheikh Naim Qassem. (Reuters)
TT

Hezbollah’s Latest Threats Do Not Impede Calls for it to Disarm

Hezbollah Secretary General Sheikh Naim Qassem. (Reuters)
Hezbollah Secretary General Sheikh Naim Qassem. (Reuters)

The Lebanese presidency and premiership dismissed the latest Hezbollah threats related to its disarmament, saying they are forging ahead with the ceasefire and commitments they have made to the people.

Hezbollah Secretary General Sheikh Naim Qassem declared on Friday: “We will confront anyone working on disarming us the same way we confronted Israel.”

Sources from the premiership told Asharq Al-Awsat that the government is forging ahead in implementing its ministerial statement, which stipulated the need to limit the possession of arms in the country to the state.

President Joseph Aoun had made a similar pledge during his swearing in speech.

Commenting on Qassem’s statement, ministerial sources close to the presidency told Asharq Al-Awsat: “No one has threatened to remove the weapons by force.”

“Everything can be resolved through dialogue, which Qassem himself had expressed readiness to take part in,” they added.

They read Qassem’s escalatory tone as an attempt to reach out to Hezbollah’s support base during such a critical time for the Iran-backed party.

They noted that Qassem did not negatively address the dialogue that Aoun had called for. He also did not dismiss the army and its role. Rather, he rejected setting a timeframe for disarming Hezbollah.

“The president is the one who sets the mechanism for the dialogue and when it will start,” they stressed.

Moreover, the sources added that communication will continue “despite everything, given that Hezbollah – above anyone else – has an interest in maintaining calm” in Lebanon.

“Dialogue and diplomacy take time and Qassem has dismissed neither,” they went on to say.

The sources said that Qassem’s remarks may have been addressed to foreign actors, most notably amid the negotiations between the United States and Iran over the latter’s nuclear program.

Qassem is effectively telling Tehran that Hezbollah’s weapons are a card it can use in its negotiations with the Americans and that it rejects US pressure on it, explained the sources.

Wave of condemnation

Lebanese officials were quick to condemn Qassem’s remarks, saying the party has not changed its “arrogant” stances.

Even deputy US Middle East envoy Morgan Ortagus dismissed Qassem’s statement, replying simply with “Yawn” in a post on her X account.

Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi, in his Easter message, demanded: “Enough war. Enough weapons.”

Former President Michel Suleiman responded directly to Hezbollah, saying: “We reject threats of violence and of a return to civil war.”

“We reject claims that the army is weak and statements that the weapons will be retained in the South, Mountain, Bekaa, North, and Beirut,” he added. He noted that as long as weapons remain outside state control “state institutions will not rise, the economy will not be revived and Lebanon will not regain its friends in the international community.”

Addressing the Hezbollah leadership, MP Ashraf Rifi said on X: “What is left of the leadership has not derived lessons from the catastrophe that their party has caused. Here they are recklessly clinging on to their weapons for the sake of Tehran that is negotiating with the Americans with the lives of the Lebanese people.”

It seems that the leadership “has lost the least bit of wisdom and the ability to use sound judgement,” he remarked.

“The Lebanese people will not allow you to forcibly lead them to another suicidal adventure,” he said. “The weapons will be handed over sooner or later. There can be no turning back the hands of time.”

Head of the Lebanese Forces Samir Geagea said of Qassem’s statements: “It appears that some are insisting on returning to the mentality of threats and severing hands” that come near the weapons.

“This is not the mentality of the state or democracy, rather one that undermines civil peace. Those adopting such mentalities must cease and see for themselves what their catastrophes have incurred on the nation,” he continued.

He called for allowing Lebanon’s new leaderships to help the country out of the calamities caused by Hezbollah.

‘Conspiracy’

Meanwhile, Iranian Ambassador to Lebanon Mojtaba Amani dismissed as a “conspiracy” calls for stripping Hezbollah of its weapons.

In a post on X, he said that as the US continues to supply Israel with weapons and missiles, it prevents countries from arming and bolstering their militaries.

“Iran is aware of the dangerousness of this conspiracy and its threat to the security of the people of the region,” he added.

“We warn others of falling for the trap set up by the enemies. Maintaining the deterrence power is the first line of defense of sovereignty and independence,” he charged.



Gaza’s Rafah Border Crossing with Egypt Reopens for Limited Traffic in Key Step for Ceasefire

01 February 2026, Palestinian Territories, Khan Younis: Trucks carrying humanitarian aid arrive in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip, after passing through the Rafah border crossing from Egypt. Photo: Abed Rahim Khatib/dpa
01 February 2026, Palestinian Territories, Khan Younis: Trucks carrying humanitarian aid arrive in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip, after passing through the Rafah border crossing from Egypt. Photo: Abed Rahim Khatib/dpa
TT

Gaza’s Rafah Border Crossing with Egypt Reopens for Limited Traffic in Key Step for Ceasefire

01 February 2026, Palestinian Territories, Khan Younis: Trucks carrying humanitarian aid arrive in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip, after passing through the Rafah border crossing from Egypt. Photo: Abed Rahim Khatib/dpa
01 February 2026, Palestinian Territories, Khan Younis: Trucks carrying humanitarian aid arrive in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip, after passing through the Rafah border crossing from Egypt. Photo: Abed Rahim Khatib/dpa

Gaza’s Rafah border crossing with Egypt reopened on Monday for limited traffic, a key step as the Israeli-Hamas ceasefire moves ahead, according to Egyptian and Israeli security officials.

An Egyptian official said 50 Palestinians would cross in each direction in the first day of the crossing’s operation. The official, involved in talks related the implementation of the ceasefire deal, spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss the issue.

State-run Egyptian media and an Israeli security official also confirmed the reopening, which for now at least, is largely symbolic. Few people will be allowed to travel in either direction, and no goods will be allowed to enter.

About 20,000 Palestinian children and adults needing medical care hope to leave devastated Gaza via the crossing, according to Gaza health officials. Thousands of other Palestinians outside the territory hope to enter and return home.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has also said that Israel will allow 50 patients a day to leave. An official involved in the discussions, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the diplomatic talks, said each patient would be allowed to travel with two relatives, while some 50 people who left Gaza during the war would be allowed to return each day.

The Egyptian health ministry said in a statement on Monday that 150 hospitals across the country have been prepared to receive Palestinian patients and wounded who will be evacuated from Gaza through the Rafah crossing.

Israel has said it and Egypt will vet people for exit and entry through the crossing, which will be supervised by European Union border patrol agents with a small Palestinian presence. The numbers of travelers are expected to increase over time, if the system is successful.

Israeli troops seized the Rafah crossing in May 2024, calling it part of efforts to combat arms-smuggling for the Hamas group. The crossing was briefly opened for the evacuation of medical patients during a ceasefire in early 2025. Israel had resisted reopening the Rafah crossing, but the recovery of the remains of the last hostage in Gaza last week cleared the way to move forward.

The reopening is a key step as last year’s US-brokered ceasefire agreement that took effect on Oct. 10 moves into its second phase.

Before the war, Rafah was the main crossing for people moving in and out of Gaza. The territory’s handful of other crossings are all shared with Israel. Under the ceasefire terms, Israel’s military controls the area between the Rafah crossing and the zone where most Palestinians live.

Fearing that Israel could use the crossing to push Palestinians out of the enclave, Egypt has repeatedly said it must be open for them to enter and exit Gaza.

The current ceasefire halted more than two years of war between Israel and Hamas that began with the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. The truce’s first phase called for the exchange of all hostages held in Gaza for hundreds of Palestinians held by Israel, an increase in badly needed humanitarian aid and a partial pullback of Israeli troops.

The second phase of the ceasefire deal is more complicated. It calls for installing the new Palestinian committee to govern Gaza, deploying an international security force, disarming Hamas and taking steps to begin rebuilding.


Iraq Starts Investigations into ISIS Detainees Moved from Syria

A member of the Popular Mobilization Forces stands guard near a concrete wall at the Iraqi-Syrian border in Al-Qaim, west of Iraq on January 23, 2026. (AFP)
A member of the Popular Mobilization Forces stands guard near a concrete wall at the Iraqi-Syrian border in Al-Qaim, west of Iraq on January 23, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Iraq Starts Investigations into ISIS Detainees Moved from Syria

A member of the Popular Mobilization Forces stands guard near a concrete wall at the Iraqi-Syrian border in Al-Qaim, west of Iraq on January 23, 2026. (AFP)
A member of the Popular Mobilization Forces stands guard near a concrete wall at the Iraqi-Syrian border in Al-Qaim, west of Iraq on January 23, 2026. (AFP)

Iraq's judiciary announced on Monday it has begun its investigations into more than 1,300 ISIS group detainees who were transferred from Syria as part of a US operation.

"Investigation proceedings have started with 1,387 members of the ISIS terrorist organization who were recently transferred from the Syrian territory," the judiciary's media office said in a statement.

"Under the supervision of the head of Iraq's Supreme Judicial Council, several judges specializing in counterterrorism started the investigation."

Those detainees are among 7,000 ISIS suspects, previously held by Syrian Kurdish fighters, whom the US military said it would transfer to Iraq after Syrian government forces recaptured Kurdish-held territory.

They include Syrians, Iraqis and Europeans, among other nationalities, according to several Iraqi security sources.

In 2014, ISIS swept across Syria and Iraq, committing massacres. Backed by US-led forces, Iraq proclaimed the defeat of ISIS in the country in 2017, and the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) ultimately beat back the group in Syria two years later.

The SDF went on to jail thousands of suspected extremists and detain tens of thousands of their relatives in camps.

Last month, the United States said the purpose of its alliance with Kurdish forces in Syria had largely expired, as Damascus pressed an offensive to take back territory long held by the SDF.

In Iraq, where many prisons are packed with ISIS suspects, courts have handed down hundreds of death sentences and life terms to people convicted of terrorism offences, including many foreign fighters.

Iraq's judiciary said its investigation procedures "will comply with national laws and international standards".


Israel Fears SDF-Like Agreement in South Syria

A resident greets Syrian government forces south of Hasakah, in northeastern Syria, on Jan. 20, 2026. (Credit: Omar Haj Kadour/AFP) 
A resident greets Syrian government forces south of Hasakah, in northeastern Syria, on Jan. 20, 2026. (Credit: Omar Haj Kadour/AFP) 
TT

Israel Fears SDF-Like Agreement in South Syria

A resident greets Syrian government forces south of Hasakah, in northeastern Syria, on Jan. 20, 2026. (Credit: Omar Haj Kadour/AFP) 
A resident greets Syrian government forces south of Hasakah, in northeastern Syria, on Jan. 20, 2026. (Credit: Omar Haj Kadour/AFP) 

As the United States seeks to activate the joint Syrian-Israeli Mechanism Committee and invite it to meet again within the next two weeks, political sources in Tel Aviv revealed that the government of Benjamin Netanyahu is further disputing with Washington over Damascus.

The government considers the US policy in Syria as “silly and not compatible with the nature of the broiling Middle East,” the sources said.

According to far-right newspaper Makor Rishon, “Israel expressed frustration with the US administration's policy in Syria, including Washington’s support and confidence in the rule of Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa, who has not yet proven he cleared his past associated to the Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham.”

Misgav Institute Fellow, Dr. Elie Klutstein, wrote that Washington is looking out for its own interests in Syria while placing Israel's security interests on the sidelines.

Klutstein said the Israeli government should confront Washington to insist on its interests at any cost.

Israel fears the new regime in Syria succeeds at consolidating itself. Tel Aviv bets on an ethnically and sectarian fragmented country and could not support the idea of a “united Syria.”

Israel is particularly angered by an agreement between the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) and the Syrian government in the north, that would guarantee the unity of the Syrian territory.

Today, Israel also fears al-Sharaa government will reach a similar agreement with the Druze in the province of Sweida, south of the country.

The majority of Druze leaders in the south are concerned with the unity of Syria, and are ready to ink an agreement with the government in return of guarantees that attacks by its forces will not be repeated.

The leaders also argue that only a small Druze community opposes al-Sharaa regime and therefore, will eventually succumb to an agreement if the government is serious in granting them minority rights.

Last week, Hebrew media outlets said the comprehensive agreement between Kurdish-led Syrian SDF factions and the Syrian government to integrate with the Syrian army is not an arrangement between two equal parties.

“This is a Kurdish submission to Ahmed al-Sharaa that happened after government supporters dismantled the SDF from the inside, and brought several factions closer to the regime,” the Hebrew media wrote.

Earlier, US sources said Türkiye informed the US administration it supports a centralized Syrian state and rejects any Kurdish canton in the northeast.

In return, Israel’s government conveyed to Washington its opposition to a centralized Syria, preferring a federal model.

Sources said Netanyahu is angered by the outcome in northeastern Syria and considers US Special Envoy to Syria tom Barrack biased toward Ankara.

The Israeli circles see Türkiye as the 'biggest winner' from the collapse of the SDF.

Therefore, the Israeli government reiterated that it will not accept Turkish troop presence in Syria and insists on protecting Druze communities in southern Syria.

Tel Aviv’s response to the agreement between SDF forces and al-Sharaa’s government was translated on Friday, when Israeli forces entered two locations in southern Syria: the Saida al-Hanout village in the southern Quneitra countryside and the village of Samdaniya al-Sharqiya in the northern Quneitra countryside.

An Israeli patrol, consisting of seven military vehicles, erected a barrier west the village of Saida in Hanout, before withdrawing from the area.

This development came while the US plans to invite the joint Syrian-Israeli Mechanism Committee to again meet in Amman within the next two weeks and resume direct official talks between the two countries.

The joint fusion mechanism -- a dedicated communication cell -- aims to facilitate immediate and ongoing coordination on the two countries’ intelligence sharing, military de-escalation and diplomatic engagement under the supervision of the United States.