Israel Plans to Capture All of Gaza under New Plan, Officials Say

 An Israeli army tank maneuvers in the Gaza Strip, is seen from southern Israel, Sunday, May 4, 2025. (AP)
An Israeli army tank maneuvers in the Gaza Strip, is seen from southern Israel, Sunday, May 4, 2025. (AP)
TT

Israel Plans to Capture All of Gaza under New Plan, Officials Say

 An Israeli army tank maneuvers in the Gaza Strip, is seen from southern Israel, Sunday, May 4, 2025. (AP)
An Israeli army tank maneuvers in the Gaza Strip, is seen from southern Israel, Sunday, May 4, 2025. (AP)

Israel approved plans Monday to capture the entire Gaza Strip and to stay in the Palestinian territory for an unspecified amount of time, two Israeli officials said, a move that, if implemented, would vastly expand Israel's operations there and likely draw fierce international opposition.

Israeli Cabinet ministers approved the plan in an early morning vote, hours after the Israeli military chief said the army was calling up tens of thousands of reserve soldiers.

The new plan, which the officials said was meant to help Israel achieve its war aims of defeating Hamas and freeing hostages held in Gaza, also calls for hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to move to Gaza's south. That would likely amount to their forcible displacement and exacerbate an already dire humanitarian crisis.

A third person, a defense official, said the new plan would not begin until after US President Donald Trump wraps up his expected visit to the Middle East this month, allowing for the possibility that Israel might agree to a ceasefire in the meantime. All three officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were discussing military plans.

Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005 after a decades-long occupation and then imposed a blockade on the territory along with Egypt. Capturing and potentially occupying the territory again for an indefinite period would not only further dash hopes for Palestinian statehood, it would embed Israel inside a population that is deeply hostile to it and raise questions about how Israel plans to govern the territory, especially at a time when it is considering how to implement Trump’s vision to take over Gaza.

Since Israel ended a ceasefire with the Hamas group in mid-March, Israel has unleashed fierce strikes on the territory that have killed hundreds. It has captured swaths of territory and now controls roughly 50% of Gaza. Before the truce ended, Israel halted all humanitarian aid into the territory, including food, fuel and water, setting off what is believed to the be the worst humanitarian crisis in nearly 19 months of war.

The war began when Hamas-led fighters attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking about 250 hostages. Israel says 59 captives remain in Gaza, although about 35 are believed to be dead.

Israel’s offensive has displaced more than 90% of Gaza’s population and, Palestinian health officials say, killed more than 52,000 people there, many of them women and children. The officials do not distinguish between combatants and civilians in their count.

The Palestinian Health Ministry in Gaza said Monday that the bodies of 32 people killed by Israeli strikes have been brought to hospitals over the past 24 hours.

Israel is trying to ratchet up pressure on Hamas

The Israeli officials said the plan included the "capturing of the strip and the holding of territories."

The plan would also seek to prevent Hamas from distributing humanitarian aid, a role that Israel says strengthens the group's rule in Gaza. It also accuses Hamas of keeping the aid for itself, without providing evidence. Aid workers deny there is a significant diversion of aid to militants, saying the UN strictly monitors distribution.

The officials said Israel was in touch with several countries about Trump's plan to take over Gaza and relocate its population, under what Israel has termed "voluntary emigration." That proposal has drawn widespread condemnation, including from Israel's allies in Europe, and rights groups have warned it could be a war crime under international law.

Hamas officials did not return calls and messages seeking comment on the plans.

For weeks, Israel has been trying to ratchet up pressure on Hamas to get the group to agree to its terms in ceasefire negotiations. But the measures do not appear to have moved Hamas away from its negotiating positions.

The previous ceasefire was meant to lead the sides to negotiate an end to the war, but that has remained elusive. Israel says it won’t agree to end the war until Hamas' governing and military capabilities are dismantled. Hamas, meanwhile, has sought an agreement that winds down the war without agreeing to disarm.

Israel's expansion announcement angered families of hostages who fear that any extension of the conflict endangers their loved ones. The Hostages and Missing Families Forum, which supports families, urged Israel's decision-makers to prioritize the hostages and secure a deal quickly.

At a Knesset committee meeting Monday, Einav Zangauker, whose son Matan is being held hostage, called on soldiers "not to report for reserve duty for moral and ethical reasons."

Some reservists have indicated they will refuse to serve in a war they increasingly view as politically motivated.

Israel wants to prevent Hamas from handling aid

The defense official said the plan would "separate" Hamas from the aid by using private firms and by using specified areas secured by the Israeli military. The official added that Palestinians would be screened to prevent Hamas from accessing the aid.

According to a memo circulated among aid groups and seen by The Associated Press, Israel told the United Nations that it will use private security companies to control aid distribution in Gaza. The UN, in a statement Sunday, said it would not participate in the plan as presented, saying it violates its core principles.

The memo summarized a meeting between the Israeli defense body in charge of coordinating aid to Gaza, called COGAT, and the UN It was written by a group briefed on the meeting and sent Sunday to aid organizations.

According to the memo, under COGAT’s plan, all aid will enter Gaza through the Kerem Shalom crossing, on approximately 60 trucks daily, and be distributed directly to people. Some 500 trucks entered Gaza every day before the war.

The memo said that facial-recognition technology will be used to identify Palestinians at logistics hubs and text message alerts will notify people in the area that they can collect aid.

COGAT did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The UN accuses Israel of wanting to control aid as a ‘pressure tactic’

After Israel said it was going to assert more control over aid distribution in Gaza, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs sent an email to aid groups, urging them to "collectively hold the line" and reject any "draconian restrictions on humanitarian work."

The email, which OCHA sent Monday to aid groups and was shared with the AP, further stated that there are mechanisms in place to ensure aid is not diverted.

Earlier, OCHA said in a statement that the plan would leave large parts of the population, including the most vulnerable, without supplies. It said the plan "appears designed to reinforce control over life-sustaining items as a pressure tactic – as part of a military strategy."

Aid groups have said they are opposed to using any armed or uniformed personnel to distribute aid that could potentially intimidate Palestinians or put them at risk, and they fiercely criticized the new plan.

Israeli officials "want to manipulate and militarize all aid to civilians, forcing us to deliver supplies through hubs designed by the Israeli military, once the government agrees to reopen crossings," Jan Egeland, secretary general of the Norwegian Refugee Council, posted on X, saying the group would not participate.

Hamas decried Israel’s efforts to control distribution of humanitarian aid in Gaza as a violation of international law.

In a statement Monday, the group said the effort is "an extension of the starvation policy" adopted by the Israeli government in Gaza.

Earlier this month, the AP obtained notes summarizing various Israeli proposals on aid distribution and aid groups’ concerns about them. In those documents, the groups expressed fears that Palestinians would be required to retrieve aid from a small number of sites, forcing families to move to get assistance and putting their safety at risk if large crowds gathered at the sites.



Smotrich Announces Plan to 'Judaize the Galilee and Negev'

Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reviews the 'E1' settlement map in the West Bank (Archival - AFP)
Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reviews the 'E1' settlement map in the West Bank (Archival - AFP)
TT

Smotrich Announces Plan to 'Judaize the Galilee and Negev'

Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reviews the 'E1' settlement map in the West Bank (Archival - AFP)
Far-right Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reviews the 'E1' settlement map in the West Bank (Archival - AFP)

Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, head of the far-right Religious Zionism party, announced a broad plan to “Judaize” the Galilee and the Negev under the slogan “Yes. We Judaize!”

The plan targets the Arab presence in the north and south, the two regions with large Arab populations. It includes the establishment of dozens of Jewish communities and farms and the expansion of existing settlements.

It also calls for the cancellation of development plans for Arab communities, in what critics describe as an openly discriminatory policy targeting Israel’s Arab citizens.

Speaking at an election rally, Smotrich said that following what he described as initial results showing the success of his “Decisive Plan” for the West Bank, his party would demand, in the next government, control of the Planning Administration and the Israel Land Authority in order to impose sweeping changes on planning policy and land allocation.


Three Israeli Vetoes Complicate Progress in Southern Lebanon

Members of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in southern Lebanon (Reuters)
Members of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in southern Lebanon (Reuters)
TT

Three Israeli Vetoes Complicate Progress in Southern Lebanon

Members of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in southern Lebanon (Reuters)
Members of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) in southern Lebanon (Reuters)

Israel has raised three objections that are blocking progress toward a political or military resolution in southern Lebanon: it has rejected a proposed Italian force to carry out verification in a pilot zone, opposed expanding the model zones and obstructed plans for the post-UNIFIL phase.

Those plans include proposals for a European force to replace the UN mission when its mandate expires at the end of this year.

Arrangements for the next phase in southern Lebanon are becoming increasingly tangled.

Disputes persist over the security mechanism that would accompany any Israeli withdrawal, who would verify compliance and how far that party’s authority would extend, as Israeli operations in the south continue.

Against that backdrop, President Joseph Aoun met Lebanese Army Commander General Rodolphe Haykal to review security conditions across the country, particularly in the south, amid continued Israeli attacks on southern villages and towns.

Haykal briefed Aoun on his visit to Italy and talks with Italian officials.

The presidential statement gave no details of those discussions or whether they directly addressed proposals for future security arrangements.

Israel accused of obstruction

Nearly two months after the Framework Agreement was signed, there has been no move to establish additional pilot zones.

Israeli media have meanwhile reported objections to a proposal for an Italian force to help monitor areas from which Israeli troops are expected to withdraw and where the Lebanese army would assume responsibility.

Lebanese ministerial sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Israel’s shifting positions and objections were among the main reasons no decision had been reached on who would take part in the next phase of security arrangements in southern Lebanon, what duties and powers that party would have, or the rules governing its work.

“The Israelis previously had no objection to Italian participation, but they are now objecting to an Italian force, after objections to the French had also emerged,” the sources said.

“So far, there is no final decision on who will participate, what tasks will be assigned to them, the limits of those tasks, or how they will be carried out.”

Israeli positions keep changing, the sources said.

“Sometimes they object to the French and sometimes to the Italians. At every stage, new conditions or positions emerge. That is why the final arrangements have yet to take shape.”

Contacts are continuing as Lebanon explores possible alternatives, but no final formula has been agreed upon, the sources said.

“Otherwise, the outlines of the next phase would already be clearer.”

The terms of the arrangements themselves are a major source of the deadlock, the sources added.

“Israel is making demands about the force’s powers and operating mechanisms, including issues involving searches of homes and the nature of its participation in field operations. These matters raise several concerns and are obstructing an agreement.”

The sources said those demands were accompanied by Israeli claims that the Lebanese army was not fulfilling the role expected of it.

“Taken together, these signs point to an Israeli tendency to obstruct.”

Washington is at the center of talks

Asked what options Lebanon had in the face of the deadlock, the sources said Beirut was consulting Washington because the United States also bore responsibility for the process.

“When the negotiating framework was established, the American role was central to it. The process is therefore not limited to Lebanon and Israel.”

The sources said there was practically no alternative to engaging with Washington.

“The Americans are the party capable of communicating with the Israeli side and influencing the process. Contacts with them are therefore continuing.”

Israel’s account of the pilot zones

Israeli leaks suggest the dispute goes beyond the identity of any international party involved in future arrangements. It also covers the scope of that party’s powers and duties, its relationship with the Lebanese army and the mechanisms for verifying implementation.

Israeli news website Walla reported that Israel had told the United States it was dissatisfied with the results of the pilot zones project and had criticized the Lebanese army’s performance in those areas.

An Israeli security official said the Lebanese army was not carrying out the required measures from Israel’s perspective, according to the website. The official linked that assessment to Tel Aviv’s current refusal to move to additional zones.

Those statements remain part of Israel’s account of how the understandings are being implemented. Lebanese sources, for their part, say contacts are continuing, with neither the arrangements nor a final formula settled.

Israeli veto of Italian force

A separate dispute centers on who could help monitor the implementation of the arrangements.

Israel’s Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper reported that Israel opposed deploying an Italian military force in southern Lebanon to monitor the pilot zones.

It cited Israeli officials as saying they feared any new international presence could restrict the Israeli military’s ability to operate in Lebanon.

The newspaper also quoted Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz as rejecting the proposal and voicing concern that it could replicate the UNIFIL model.


Can Mazloum Abdi’s Appointment as President's Adviser Bolster Security in Northern Syria?

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, right, meets with the commander of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, Mazloum Abdi, center left, at the presidential palace in Damascus, Syria, Tuesday, Aug. 25, 2026. (AP)
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, right, meets with the commander of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, Mazloum Abdi, center left, at the presidential palace in Damascus, Syria, Tuesday, Aug. 25, 2026. (AP)
TT

Can Mazloum Abdi’s Appointment as President's Adviser Bolster Security in Northern Syria?

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, right, meets with the commander of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, Mazloum Abdi, center left, at the presidential palace in Damascus, Syria, Tuesday, Aug. 25, 2026. (AP)
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, right, meets with the commander of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, Mazloum Abdi, center left, at the presidential palace in Damascus, Syria, Tuesday, Aug. 25, 2026. (AP)

Syrian Kurdish political figures and a senior Arab official in Syria’s Hasakeh region welcomed the appointment of Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) commander Mazloum Abdi as an adviser to the Syrian president, saying the move could speed up the integration process of Kurdish forces and help stabilize northern and eastern Syria.

A Kurdish politician who served in the former Autonomous Administration said the appointment could help “consolidate stability and security in northern and eastern Syria and across the country.”

An independent Kurdish politician also backed the decision, but said its impact on stability would depend on Abdi’s ability to influence armed groups formerly under his command.

A senior Arab dignitary in Hasakeh hoped that “the integration process will proceed quickly to strengthen security, safety and stability in the region, because that will have a positive impact on Syria as a whole.”

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa issued a decree on Thursday appointing Abdi as a presidential adviser. The move came three days after Abdi announced the SDF's dissolution following the “completion of its mission.”

The decision closes a significant chapter in the history of the Kurds, who fought ISIS with US support during Syria’s civil war.

“We view this appointment positively and consider it an important step that could open the way to a new phase of dialogue and understanding,” said Abdul Karim Omar, a Syrian Kurdish politician who served as the Autonomous Administration’s representative in Damascus.

Omar told Asharq Al-Awsat that “placing a figure such as Abdi, who has a presence and a role in northern and eastern Syria, in an advisory position at the presidency could help bring views closer together, build trust and open broader channels of communication on national issues.”

He added that “genuine understandings between the two sides could lay the groundwork for gradual, mutually agreed institutional integration that preserves the particular character of the Kurdish regions and the rights of all their communities, while strengthening Syria’s unity and sovereignty.”

If backed by political will and serious dialogue, such steps could “help consolidate stability and security in northern and eastern Syria and across the country, and open a new chapter based on national partnership,” he stressed.

Abdi’s appointment and the dissolution of the SDF came as implementation of the January 29 agreement signed by al-Sharaa and Abdi.

The agreement provides for the integration of the military, security, and civilian institutions of the Kurdish Autonomous Administration, which the Kurds established during the conflict, into Syrian state structures. It also calls for handing over border crossings and oil and gas fields and for foreign fighters to leave the region.

Abdelaziz Tammo, President of the Independent Syrian Kurds Association, said the appointment “was expected” and sent a message that “the SDF and the other Kurdish military groups affiliated with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) have come to an end and become part of the Syrian state, since their commander is now an adviser to the presidency.”

Tammo told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Syrian government “succeeded in resolving the issue of the SDF and the remaining PKK militias without bloodshed and gave them everything they requested.”

Mazloum Abdi (C), leader of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), arrives with Syria's interim Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani (R) before a televised speech at the People's Palace in Damascus on August 25, 2026. (AFP)

Through the January agreement, the Syrian government sought to reunify the country, strengthen security and stability in northern and eastern Syria, restore full state sovereignty and authority over its territory, unify the military and security sectors, integrate institutions, enforce the rule of law, and recover economic resources.

Tammo said security and stability in northern and eastern Syria would depend on Abdi’s influence over armed groups affiliated with the PKK that operated under the SDF umbrella, such as the People’s Protection Units (YPG) and Women’s Protection Units.

Following the dissolution of the SDF and Abdi’s appointment, Tammo said: “Anyone who does not comply with the decision is now outside the law, and the state can enforce the law against them.”

“There is no longer any reason for those militias to exist, particularly since PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan announced the dissolution of the party and all its affiliated formations,” he said.

“Since the parent party dissolved itself, the other formations linked to it should naturally dissolve themselves,” Tammo added.

Tammo said integrating the SDF into state institutions would not, by itself, have a major impact on the region because it also required social integration and a return to coexistence.

“The PKK and the SDF committed many violations against Kurds, Arabs and other citizens,” he noted. “To end this crisis, we need to activate the role of social capital, represented by community leaders and independent political figures, to heal wounds and address the consequences of those violations.”

He described the dissolution of the SDF as “a step in the right direction”, hoping it would be implemented on the ground.

In July, residents of Hasakeh mobilized for several days to demand that the state extend its control and authority across the province, allow displaced people to return to their cities and villages, and end the SDF’s dominance over the region and its abuses against residents.

Sheikh Mudar Hammad al-Asaad, director of the Association of Syria Refugees, said Abdi’s appointment “will open the way to accelerating the integration of the SDF and the Autonomous Administration into the Syrian state.”

Al-Asaad told Asharq Al-Awsat that he hoped integration would be implemented on the ground through the release of hundreds of detainees from SDF prisons, disclosure of the fate of missing people and the submission of lists identifying foreign fighters who fought alongside the SDF as a step toward removing them from Syria.

He also called for all government offices to be handed over to the state and for an end to military gatherings organized by some groups in the SDF’s name. Those groups continued to make arrests and operate checkpoints, provoking residents and stoking tensions.

“We hope the integration process will proceed quickly to strengthen security, safety and stability in Hasakeh, because that will have a positive impact on Syria as a whole,” al-Asaad said.

He stressed that Hasakeh “is the country’s breadbasket” and that restoring security and stability would allow the province’s infrastructure to be rehabilitated, agricultural and industrial projects to be established, and oil and gas projects to resume, benefiting all Syrians.

Restoring security and stability would also allow refugees and displaced people to return and halt the current wave of displacement, he said.