Israel Strikes Pound Gaza, Killing 60, ahead of US Talks on Ceasefire

Smoke billows after an Israeli strike on Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on June 28, 2025, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas group. (Photo by Bashar TALEB / AFP)
Smoke billows after an Israeli strike on Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on June 28, 2025, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas group. (Photo by Bashar TALEB / AFP)
TT

Israel Strikes Pound Gaza, Killing 60, ahead of US Talks on Ceasefire

Smoke billows after an Israeli strike on Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on June 28, 2025, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas group. (Photo by Bashar TALEB / AFP)
Smoke billows after an Israeli strike on Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on June 28, 2025, amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas group. (Photo by Bashar TALEB / AFP)

 Israeli strikes killed at least 60 people across Gaza on Monday in some of the heaviest attacks in weeks as Israeli officials were due in Washington for a new ceasefire push by US President Donald Trump.

A day after Trump called to "Make the deal in Gaza, get the hostages back", Israel's strategic affairs minister Ron Dermer, a confidant of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's, was travelling to Washington for talks on Iran and Gaza, according to an Israeli official and a source familiar with the matter.

Dermer was expected to begin meetings with Trump administration officials on Tuesday, the source in Washington said.

But on the ground in the Palestinian enclave, there was no sign of fighting letting up. The Israeli military issued evacuation orders on Monday to residents in large districts in the northern Gaza Strip, forcing a new wave of displacement.

"Explosions never stopped; they bombed schools and homes. It felt like earthquakes," said Salah, 60, a father of five children, from Gaza City. "In the news we hear a ceasefire is near, on the ground we see death and we hear explosions."

Israeli tanks pushed into the eastern areas of Zeitoun suburb in Gaza City and shelled several areas in the north, while aircraft bombed at least four schools after ordering hundreds of families sheltering inside to leave, residents said.

There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military, which says Palestinian militants embed among civilians. The Hamas groups deny this.

The heavy bombardment followed new evacuation orders to vast areas in the north, where Israeli forces had operated before and left behind wide-scale destruction. The military ordered people there to head south, saying that it planned to fight Hamas operating in northern Gaza, including in the heart of Gaza City.

NEXT STEPS

In Israel, Netanyahu's security cabinet was expected to convene to discuss the next steps in Gaza.

On Friday, Israel's military chief said the present ground operation was close to having achieved its goals, and on Sunday, Netanyahu said new opportunities had opened up for recovering the hostages, 20 of whom are believed to still be alive.

Palestinian and Egyptian sources with knowledge of the latest ceasefire efforts said that mediators Qatar and Egypt have stepped up their contacts with the two warring sides, but that no date has been set yet for a new round of truce talks.

A Hamas official said that progress depends on Israel changing its position and agreeing to end the war and withdraw from Gaza. Israel says it can end the war only when Hamas is disarmed and dismantled. Hamas refuses to lay down its arms.

The war began when Hamas fighters stormed in to Israel on October 7 2023, killed 1,200 people, most of them civilians, and took 251 hostages back to Gaza in a surprise attack that led to Israel's single deadliest day.

Israel's subsequent military assault has killed more than 56,000 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to the Gaza health ministry, has displaced almost the entire 2.3 million population and plunged the enclave into a humanitarian crisis.

More than 80% of the territory is now an Israeli-militarized zone or under displacement orders, according to the United Nations.



Hezbollah’s Selective Turn to State Exposes Paralysis

Hezbollah parliamentary bloc head Mohammed Raad meets Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (Lebanese Presidency)
Hezbollah parliamentary bloc head Mohammed Raad meets Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (Lebanese Presidency)
TT

Hezbollah’s Selective Turn to State Exposes Paralysis

Hezbollah parliamentary bloc head Mohammed Raad meets Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (Lebanese Presidency)
Hezbollah parliamentary bloc head Mohammed Raad meets Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (Lebanese Presidency)

Since the ceasefire reached with Israel in November 2024, Hezbollah has shown a striking shift in its political conduct, particularly in how it deals with Lebanese state institutions.

A group long used to operating outside official channels is now, despite its escalatory rhetoric, shifting responsibility to the state on issues ranging from Lebanese prisoners held by Israel and postwar reconstruction to indirect negotiations with Tel Aviv.

Since the ceasefire, Hezbollah has also refrained from responding militarily to Israel, with no direct action recorded, in clear contrast to its traditional discourse built around retaliation and deterrence.

At the same time, the group continues to reject any discussion of handing over its weapons. It has launched a campaign against officials who have spoken about restricting arms to the state north of the Litani River.

This was evident in remarks by Mohammed Raad, head of Hezbollah’s parliamentary bloc, following his meeting with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun on Wednesday, after tensions had surfaced between the two sides over recent statements by the president urging the group to act with restraint.

While Raad did not address the issue of weapons during his remarks at the presidential palace, he reiterated Hezbollah’s stance of placing responsibility on the state regarding liberation, prisoners, and reconstruction.

He said the group was committed to understanding and cooperation to achieve the goals of all Lebanese, starting with ending the occupation, securing the release of prisoners, strengthening stability, enabling residents to return to their homes and villages, launching reconstruction efforts, and having the state assume responsibility for protecting sovereignty, with Hezbollah supporting it when necessary, while rejecting all forms of intervention and tutelage.

This approach is also reflected in Hezbollah’s meetings with Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam to hand over lists of Lebanese prisoners and explicitly call on the state to take full responsibility for the issue. This practice was not typical of the group in previous phases.

Contradiction and confusion

Sources close to the presidency declined to comment on Raad’s remarks or assess the meeting with Aoun, telling Asharq Al-Awsat that there was an apparent contradiction and confusion in Hezbollah’s behavior and positions. At the same time, everyone awaited the outcome of US-Iranian negotiations.

They said what was happening amounted to buying time, and that the state was not a menu from which responsibilities could be selectively chosen.

They said Hezbollah wanted the state to shoulder responsibility for all outstanding issues, which was indeed the state’s duty, even though the group had launched its support front without consulting it and continued to reject the implementation of state decisions. They described Hezbollah officials as lacking clarity in defining their objectives.

Clear incapacity

Opposition political analyst Ali al-Amin described Hezbollah’s behavior, combining escalatory rhetoric with rejection of disarmament while demanding the state resolve outstanding issues, as a clear expression of its inability to respond to repeated Israeli strikes, including killings and destruction.

Amin told Asharq Al-Awsat that Hezbollah was also attempting to transfer the consequences of the war to the state, channeling the complaints of displaced and affected citizens toward state institutions, as if to say the matter was the state’s responsibility, while ignoring what was required of it in terms of handing over its weapons.

He said that when the discussion turns to the role of the state, weapons are framed in terms of dignity and honor, but when it comes to bearing burdens, citizens are told the state is responsible.

Despite this, Amin said Hezbollah had succeeded to some extent in shifting these burdens, noting that it had not paid housing compensation, issued checks that were not honored, and that citizens were now being told the state would pay instead.

At the same time, the group had not carried out any response against Israel, raising a question it avoided answering: whether it no longer wanted to fight Israel.

Confusion and mutual benefit

Amin said Hezbollah was seeking to reduce the cost of confrontation and transfer the burden to the state without abandoning its tools or strategic options.

He said the group wanted to preserve the current situation, with ongoing Israeli attacks used to justify retaining weapons. At the same time, Israel benefits from their continued presence to strengthen its leverage and impose conditions on Lebanon later.

He added that Lebanon was facing a state of confusion: no fighting, no resistance, no liberation, only a continued insistence on retaining arms whose remaining function was unclear, except as an Israeli pretext for further attacks and for weakening the Lebanese state.


UK Sanctions Sudanese Army and RSF Leaders

Sacks of crops are stacked at the El Obeid crops market, in El Obeid, North Kordofan State, Sudan, January 14, 2026. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig
Sacks of crops are stacked at the El Obeid crops market, in El Obeid, North Kordofan State, Sudan, January 14, 2026. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig
TT

UK Sanctions Sudanese Army and RSF Leaders

Sacks of crops are stacked at the El Obeid crops market, in El Obeid, North Kordofan State, Sudan, January 14, 2026. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig
Sacks of crops are stacked at the El Obeid crops market, in El Obeid, North Kordofan State, Sudan, January 14, 2026. REUTERS/El Tayeb Siddig

Britain sanctioned six individuals suspected of committing atrocities in Sudan's war or of fueling the conflict through the supply of mercenaries and military equipment, the government said on Thursday.

The measures targeted senior commanders in both the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudanese Armed Forces, the government said.

The conflict between ⁠the two forces has displaced millions, drawn in regional powers and caused a vast humanitarian crisis since it broke out in April 2023.

"We urgently need a ceasefire, and safe access for humanitarian relief agencies ⁠to reach all those in need," British foreign minister Yvette Cooper, who visited the Sudan-Chad border this week, said in the statement.

"Through these sanctions, we will seek to dismantle the war machine of those who perpetrate or profit from the brutal violence in Sudan," Cooper added.

The British government also sanctioned three individuals - Alvaro ⁠Andres Quijano, Mateo Andres Duque Botero, and Claudia Viviana Oliveros Forero - suspected of recruiting foreign fighters for the conflict or facilitating the purchase of military equipment.

Others sanctioned include Abu Aqla Mohamed Kaikal, a former RSF Commander and current head of the Sudan Shied Forces, RSF Field Commander Hussein Barsham, and RSF Financial Advisor Mustafa Ibrahim Abdel Nabi Mohamed.


Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor: Israel’s Chemical Spraying of Farmland in Lebanon, Syria Amounts to War Crime

Fire and smoke rises after Israeli airstrikes on Kfar Hatta in southern Lebanon, Lebanon, January 11, 2026. REUTERS/Ali Hankir
Fire and smoke rises after Israeli airstrikes on Kfar Hatta in southern Lebanon, Lebanon, January 11, 2026. REUTERS/Ali Hankir
TT

Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor: Israel’s Chemical Spraying of Farmland in Lebanon, Syria Amounts to War Crime

Fire and smoke rises after Israeli airstrikes on Kfar Hatta in southern Lebanon, Lebanon, January 11, 2026. REUTERS/Ali Hankir
Fire and smoke rises after Israeli airstrikes on Kfar Hatta in southern Lebanon, Lebanon, January 11, 2026. REUTERS/Ali Hankir

The Israeli army’s spraying of chemical substances over vast agricultural areas in southern Lebanon and Syria amounts to a “war crime,” the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor said Thursday.

Beirut accused Israel on Wednesday of spraying the herbicide glyphosate on the Lebanese side of their shared border, with President Joseph Aoun decrying a "crime against the environment.”

More than a year after a ceasefire was struck to end a war between Israel and Hezbollah, border areas in Lebanon remain largely deserted and Israel continues to carry out regular airstrikes in the south.

After collecting samples following the recent spraying, the Lebanese agriculture and environment ministries said some of them showed concentrations of glyphosate "20 to 30 times higher than the average" in the area.

In a joint statement, they expressed worries about "damage to agricultural production" and soil fertility.

Aoun denounced the spraying as a "flagrant violation of Lebanese sovereignty and a crime against the environment and health.”

The UN peacekeeping mission in Lebanon, UNIFIL, said Monday that it had been notified by Israel of its plans to spray a "non-toxic chemical substance" near the border and warned to take shelter.

“The deliberate targeting of civilian farmland violates international humanitarian law, particularly the prohibition on attacking or destroying objects indispensable to civilian survival,” said the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor Thursday.

“Large-scale destruction of private property without specific military necessity amounts to a war crime and undermines food security and basic livelihoods in the affected areas,” it added.

Euro-Med Monitor also said that it documented Israeli aircraft spraying pesticides of unknown composition over farmland in the countryside of Quneitra in southern Syria last month.

“The direct targeting of civilian objects caused widespread crop destruction, posing a serious threat to economic and food security and violating farmers’ rights to work and to an adequate standard of living by destroying their primary sources of income without military justification,” it added.

The Monitor called on the international community “to act immediately by establishing an independent fact-finding mission to collect samples from affected soil and crops in southern Lebanon and the countryside of Quneitra, subject them to thorough laboratory analysis, determine the chemical composition of the substances used, assess their toxicity, and evaluate any potential violation of the Chemical Weapons Convention or relevant international environmental protocols.”