Damascus and SDF Face Hurdles over Integration, Decentralization

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa and SDF Leader Mazloum Abdi signed integration deal in Damascus in March. (EPA)
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa and SDF Leader Mazloum Abdi signed integration deal in Damascus in March. (EPA)
TT

Damascus and SDF Face Hurdles over Integration, Decentralization

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa and SDF Leader Mazloum Abdi signed integration deal in Damascus in March. (EPA)
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa and SDF Leader Mazloum Abdi signed integration deal in Damascus in March. (EPA)

The issues of “integration” and “decentralization” continue to pose significant hurdles in negotiations between Damascus and the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), sources close to the talks in Damascus said.

Amid the stalled efforts, SDF leader Mazloum Abdi announced that he welcomes a potential Saudi role in mediation, reflecting Riyadh’s unique influence and acceptance among various Syrian factions.

He made the announcement amid reported Kurdish concerns over Türkiye’s growing role in the negotiations.

Following the postponement of a planned meeting between the Syrian government and the SDF in Paris amid conflicting statements from northeastern Syria, Abdi spoke to Al Arabiya on Tuesday, saying Saudi Arabia “could play a positive role as a mediator” in talks with Damascus.

Abdi pointed to recent violence in the Sweida province as a reminder of the urgent need for “negotiations and reaching an agreement.” He added that upcoming talks in Paris would focus on the mechanism for integrating SDF forces into the Syrian army.

The SDF leader reiterated his group’s agreement with Damascus on “a united Syria under one army and one flag,” adding that the SDF would become part of Syria’s Ministry of Defense. However, he also highlighted Kurdish apprehension about joining the Syrian army “without constitutional guarantees.”

On the implementation of the March 10 agreement, Abdi said his forces aim to fulfill all terms before the year’s end, but acknowledged the process is slow due to “issues on both sides.”

The dialogue between interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s administration and Abdi is seen as a key pathway toward establishing a political process that will define Syria’s state structure and governance model. But, according to Turkish-Kurdish affairs analyst Khurshid Deli, the track faces considerable challenges.

Deli told Asharq Al-Awsat that “the first major problem is the fundamental divergence in visions.” While Damascus insists on a centralized state, the SDF and other Syrian groups advocate for decentralization, believing it best ensures political partnership through a constitutional process that protects all communities’ rights.

The second major obstacle concerns the concept of “integration.” Damascus views integration as requiring the SDF and all autonomous administration institutions in northeast Syria to join state structures individually.

In contrast, the SDF sees integration as maintaining these institutions with restructured coordination with Damascus, preserving Kurdish and other communities’ rights within a new Syrian state framework.

The Turkish factor also complicates dialogue. Ankara exerts pressure on Damascus to uphold its vision while simultaneously causing anxiety within the SDF, which regards talks with Damascus as an internal Syrian matter.

Deli said Abdi’s welcoming of a Saudi role is significant given Riyadh’s capacity and acceptance among all Syrian factions.

Paris is slated to host renewed talks between Damascus and the SDF in the coming days. Deli said France, supported by Western countries, appears to be banking on “softening disagreements between the two sides.”

Both parties remain committed to dialogue and appear ready to make concessions toward a final deal. Deli suggested the Syrian government might need to reassess its approach to the internal Syrian landscape following recent security incidents in coastal areas, Sweida, and elsewhere, alongside its outreach abroad.

French media have reported preparations for negotiation sessions between the SDF and the Syrian government in the coming weeks, involving senior officials from both sides.



Israel Says Military Operation Against Hezbollah 'Still Not Complete'

A man next to an ambulance looks at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki
A man next to an ambulance looks at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki
TT

Israel Says Military Operation Against Hezbollah 'Still Not Complete'

A man next to an ambulance looks at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki
A man next to an ambulance looks at the site of an Israeli strike carried out before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel went into effect, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki

Israel's defense minister said on Friday that the campaign against Hezbollah was not yet complete, just hours after a 10-day ceasefire came into force in Lebanon.

He also warned that if the fighting resumed, displaced residents returning to the country's war-torn south would have to evacuate again.

"The ground maneuver into Lebanon and the strikes on Hezbollah have achieved many gains, but they are still not complete," Defense Minister Israel Katz said in a broadcast statement.

There remained areas of the south that had not yet been cleared of Hezbollah militants, which would have to happen one way or another, he added.

"The area between the security zone and the Litani (River) line, which is currently under our control, has not yet been cleared of terrorists and weapons," Katz warned.

"This will have to be carried out either through diplomatic means or by continued IDF activity once the ceasefire ends."

As the truce took effect at midnight (2100 GMT), thousands of displaced Lebanese civilians began heading south, hoping to return to their homes.

But Katz said a fresh bout of fighting could force them to leave again.

"If the fighting resumes, those residents who return to the security zone will have to be evacuated to allow completion of the mission," AFP quoted him as saying.

According to details of the truce released by the US State Department, Israel reserves the right to continue targeting Hezbollah to prevent "planned, imminent, or ongoing attacks".

Israel, whose troops are occupying parts of southern Lebanon, has also said it will maintain a 10-kilometer (six-mile) security zone it has established along the border.

"The security zone has been cleared of militants and weapons, is empty of residents, and will continue to be cleared of terrorist infrastructure, including the destruction of homes in front-line villages that have effectively become terrorist outposts," Katz said.

The details of the truce also stipulate that Lebanon "with international support... will take meaningful steps to prevent Hezbollah" from undertaking any attacks against Israeli targets.


Beirut Conference Sees Wide Consensus Over Weapons-free Capital

Members of the military at the site of an Israeli strike carried out on Wednesday April 8, in Ain Al Mraiseh in Beirut, Lebanon, April 9, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir 
Members of the military at the site of an Israeli strike carried out on Wednesday April 8, in Ain Al Mraiseh in Beirut, Lebanon, April 9, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir 
TT

Beirut Conference Sees Wide Consensus Over Weapons-free Capital

Members of the military at the site of an Israeli strike carried out on Wednesday April 8, in Ain Al Mraiseh in Beirut, Lebanon, April 9, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir 
Members of the military at the site of an Israeli strike carried out on Wednesday April 8, in Ain Al Mraiseh in Beirut, Lebanon, April 9, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir 

Beirut MPs representing most of Lebanon’s political parties met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free,” following recent security incidents and Israeli strikes.

The conference brought together most factions, except MPs from Hezbollah, the Amal Movement and Al-Jamaa al-Islamiya.

Despite political divisions, participants struck a unified rhetoric, calling for all weapons to be placed exclusively under state control and for a stronger presence of official institutions, chiefly the Lebanese Army, across the capital to ensure stability and restore public confidence in security.

MP Fouad Makhzoumi said Beirut “deserves to be protected together” and would remain “a city that embraces everyone,” describing the “Black Wednesday” as a serious warning of the risks still facing the capital.

He called for the army to deploy across all neighborhoods, for checkpoints to be reinforced and for effective security oversight, stressing that state-building requires a monopoly on arms “without exception.”

He further stressed all necessary measures should be taken to restore order, “up to declaring general mobilization if needed.”

For his part, MP Ghassan Hasbani of the Lebanese Forces said the meeting reflected a national stance tied to the responsibility of representing Beirut’s residents. He voiced support for state efforts to assert full authority, confiscate illegal weapons and treat any armed activity outside state control as a direct threat to the capital’s security and stability.

Kataeb Party lawmaker Nadim Gemayel noted that Lebanon should no longer be used as a bargaining chip by external actors, calling for firm implementation of government decisions and for the army to deploy across the country, starting with Beirut, to protect citizens and reinforce sovereignty.

Similarly, MP Ibrahim Mneimneh said Hezbollah had dragged Lebanon into a conflict unrelated to it, exposing the country to heavy losses, while Beirut and other regions paid the price in security and stability. He stressed that the current phase required restoring state authority and ensuring its exclusive control over arms.

MP Waddah Sadeq said the Lebanese “have the right to loyalty to Lebanon alone,” urging support for what he described as “historic” government decisions. He called for unity under a state based on institutions and the rule of law, and for security forces to fully carry out their duties.

MP Nicolas Sehnaoui of the Free Patriotic Movement highlighted the need for an inclusive national approach to rebuild trust in the state, stressing that limiting arms to the army and legitimate forces remains essential, while avoiding exclusionary rhetoric.

Lawmaker Edgar Traboulsi said Beirut, despite wars and crises, “does not die,” but needs unity and solidarity free from division and incitement.

MP Faisal Sayegh of the Progressive Socialist Party stated that Beirut’s security is inseparable from Lebanon’s, calling for adherence to sovereignty and independence and implementation of the Taif Agreement and relevant government decisions.


Beirut Conference Sees Wide Consensus Over Weapons-free Capital

Beirut MPs met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free." Asharq Al-Awsat
Beirut MPs met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free." Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Beirut Conference Sees Wide Consensus Over Weapons-free Capital

Beirut MPs met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free." Asharq Al-Awsat
Beirut MPs met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free." Asharq Al-Awsat

Beirut MPs representing most of Lebanon’s political parties met in the capital to support a government move declaring the city “safe and weapons-free,” following recent security incidents and Israeli strikes.

The conference brought together most factions, except MPs from Hezbollah, the Amal Movement and Al-Jamaa al-Islamiya.

Despite political divisions, participants struck a unified rhetoric, calling for all weapons to be placed exclusively under state control and for a stronger presence of official institutions, chiefly the Lebanese Army, across the capital to ensure stability and restore public confidence in security.

MP Fouad Makhzoumi said Beirut “deserves to be protected together” and would remain “a city that embraces everyone,” describing the “Black Wednesday” as a serious warning of the risks still facing the capital.

He called for the army to deploy across all neighborhoods, for checkpoints to be reinforced and for effective security oversight, stressing that state-building requires a monopoly on arms “without exception.”

He further stressed all necessary measures should be taken to restore order, “up to declaring general mobilization if needed.”

For his part, MP Ghassan Hasbani of the Lebanese Forces said the meeting reflected a national stance tied to the responsibility of representing Beirut’s residents. He voiced support for state efforts to assert full authority, confiscate illegal weapons and treat any armed activity outside state control as a direct threat to the capital’s security and stability.

Kataeb Party lawmaker Nadim Gemayel noted that Lebanon should no longer be used as a bargaining chip by external actors, calling for firm implementation of government decisions and for the army to deploy across the country, starting with Beirut, to protect citizens and reinforce sovereignty.

Similarly, MP Ibrahim Mneimneh said Hezbollah had dragged Lebanon into a conflict unrelated to it, exposing the country to heavy losses, while Beirut and other regions paid the price in security and stability. He stressed that the current phase required restoring state authority and ensuring its exclusive control over arms.

MP Waddah Sadeq said the Lebanese “have the right to loyalty to Lebanon alone,” urging support for what he described as “historic” government decisions. He called for unity under a state based on institutions and the rule of law, and for security forces to fully carry out their duties.

MP Nicolas Sehnaoui of the Free Patriotic Movement highlighted the need for an inclusive national approach to rebuild trust in the state, stressing that limiting arms to the army and legitimate forces remains essential, while avoiding exclusionary rhetoric.

Lawmaker Edgar Traboulsi said Beirut, despite wars and crises, “does not die,” but needs unity and solidarity free from division and incitement.

MP Faisal Sayegh of the Progressive Socialist Party stated that Beirut’s security is inseparable from Lebanon’s, calling for adherence to sovereignty and independence and implementation of the Taif Agreement and relevant government decisions.