Lebanese Army Completes Plan to Place Weapons Under State Control

Army Commander General Rodolphe Haykal meets with senior staff, unit and battalion commanders, and a number of officers to discuss the exceptional phase in Lebanon (Army Command). 
Army Commander General Rodolphe Haykal meets with senior staff, unit and battalion commanders, and a number of officers to discuss the exceptional phase in Lebanon (Army Command). 
TT

Lebanese Army Completes Plan to Place Weapons Under State Control

Army Commander General Rodolphe Haykal meets with senior staff, unit and battalion commanders, and a number of officers to discuss the exceptional phase in Lebanon (Army Command). 
Army Commander General Rodolphe Haykal meets with senior staff, unit and battalion commanders, and a number of officers to discuss the exceptional phase in Lebanon (Army Command). 

The Lebanese Army has finalized a comprehensive plan, mandated by the Cabinet on August 5, to ensure that all weapons are brought under state authority by the end of this year. The strategy, completed more than two weeks ago, will be presented on Friday by Army Commander General Rodolphe Haykal.

The proposal has drawn significant domestic, regional, and international interest, and the army has kept its contents tightly guarded. However, sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the plan is structured in stages, each with its own deadline. The Cabinet had explicitly requested that the disarmament process be completed by year’s end, but any delay in approving or launching the plan will inevitably affect the timeline.

Senior political sources did not rule out abandoning the deadlines altogether to ease “growing tensions within the Shiite community.” They suggested that Friday’s Cabinet session could mirror the standoffs of August 5 and 7, when ministers from the Shiite bloc refused to discuss the plan, citing continued Israeli attacks and occupation of Lebanese territory. In such a scenario, the ministers could withdraw, allowing the government to adopt the plan in their absence.

Designed for Implementation

According to the same sources, the army’s proposal assumes cooperation and coordination with Hezbollah to ensure smooth implementation, similar to arrangements south of the Litani River. This does not mean conceding to the status quo, they stressed; rather, the plan was drafted with the intention of being carried out, incorporating multiple scenarios to secure its success. It is built on the premise that Lebanon’s sole enemy is Israel.

Officials involved in the process acknowledge that the final word is political, not military. Without Israel’s engagement in the “step-for-step” approach outlined in the US proposal - whose objectives Lebanon has accepted - the plan risks remaining “ready but on hold” until Tel Aviv makes a reciprocal move.

Counting on US Mediation

Beirut continues to pin its hopes on US envoys Tom Barrack and Morgan Ortagus to secure concessions from Israel, which would make it easier to persuade Hezbollah to cooperate with the army’s plan.

Despite the hardline stance shown by the American delegation during its recent visit to Beirut, Barrack made notable comments afterward, saying he had urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to give Lebanon “a chance, with some tolerance and understanding.”

Political Coordination

For now, direct coordination between the army and Hezbollah is limited to the area south of the Litani, where most operational tasks have already been completed. Hezbollah was not directly involved in drafting the plan, with the political leadership - particularly the presidency - handling this track, which has recently been reactivated.

At a special meeting with senior officers, Haykal acknowledged that the army is “entering a delicate phase, entrusted with sensitive missions,” and pledged to take the necessary steps to ensure success while preserving civil peace and domestic stability.

A Gradual Approach

Retired Brigadier General George Nader told Asharq Al-Awsat that the plan is designed for gradual implementation, beginning south of the Litani, as stipulated in the ceasefire resolution, and extending to all Lebanese territory. “Each phase comes with its own timetable, making the plan both geographically and temporally structured,” he explained.

Nader added that successful implementation requires Hezbollah’s prior approval to cooperate, along with intelligence data on weapons stockpiles, which would make the process “smooth and feasible.”



Israeli Airstrike on Southern Lebanon Kills 7 People

A photograph taken from the southern Lebanese area of Nabatieh shows smoke as it rises from the site of Israeli strikes that targeted the hilltops of the mountainous area of the strategic Ali al-Taher ridge on August 14, 2026. (Photo by AFP)
A photograph taken from the southern Lebanese area of Nabatieh shows smoke as it rises from the site of Israeli strikes that targeted the hilltops of the mountainous area of the strategic Ali al-Taher ridge on August 14, 2026. (Photo by AFP)
TT

Israeli Airstrike on Southern Lebanon Kills 7 People

A photograph taken from the southern Lebanese area of Nabatieh shows smoke as it rises from the site of Israeli strikes that targeted the hilltops of the mountainous area of the strategic Ali al-Taher ridge on August 14, 2026. (Photo by AFP)
A photograph taken from the southern Lebanese area of Nabatieh shows smoke as it rises from the site of Israeli strikes that targeted the hilltops of the mountainous area of the strategic Ali al-Taher ridge on August 14, 2026. (Photo by AFP)

An Israeli airstrike on southern Lebanon killed seven people early Saturday, the worst toll since deals in June saw a lull in hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah.

The state-run National News Agency (NNA) said Israel "escalated its attacks on the south,” reporting that "a strike launched by enemy warplanes on a home" on the outskirts of the village of Ansar "killed seven people and wounded three others.”

It said the strike destroyed the home and that emergency rescuers were removing rubble and transporting the casualties to hospital.

The death toll from the airstrike makes it the deadliest since Lebanon and Israel announced a framework agreement on June 26, laying out a plan for Israeli forces to withdraw from southern Lebanon, in exchange for Hezbollah’s disarmament.

Violence has significantly decreased since the signing of a US-Iran memorandum of understanding in June on the broader Middle East war, and the US-sponsored framework deal between Lebanon and Israel.

But Lebanon still reports intermittent Israeli strikes occasionally causing casualties, and the broad demolitions of civilian buildings in southern villages and towns.

The NNA said "the valley between Ansar and Zarariyeh was also subjected to a strike, the first at this geographical depth since the ceasefire two months ago.”

It also said "Israeli warplanes carried out a series of airstrikes targeting the Ali al-Taher ridge,” a strategic hill overlooking the Nabatieh area, also reporting Israeli shelling there.

The news agency said Israeli forces detonated homes in the town of Bint Jbeil near the border.


Iraqi Faction Rejects Using Force to Disarm Groups

Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi, Coordination Framework member Hadi al-Amiri, and Reconstruction and Development Alliance leader Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani (Coordination Framework)
Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi, Coordination Framework member Hadi al-Amiri, and Reconstruction and Development Alliance leader Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani (Coordination Framework)
TT

Iraqi Faction Rejects Using Force to Disarm Groups

Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi, Coordination Framework member Hadi al-Amiri, and Reconstruction and Development Alliance leader Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani (Coordination Framework)
Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi, Coordination Framework member Hadi al-Amiri, and Reconstruction and Development Alliance leader Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani (Coordination Framework)

Iraq's Badr Organization that is led by Hadi al-Amiri has rejected the government's attempts to using force to disarm armed factions.

The organization’s stance reflects growing disagreement within the political parties of the Coordination Framework over the future of weapons held by armed groups and their relationship with the state.

In a statement issued on Friday, head of the political bureau of the Badr Organization Mohammed Naji said the group opposes any threat to use force to seize the weapons of the factions, warning that raising the issue of disarmament in this manner could lead to tensions and internal strife.

Naji argued that the campaign to place all weapons exclusively under state control is viewed by the organization as coming under pressure from the United States.

"We will not allow the Prime Minister or anyone else to reach this level in dealing with our brothers in the resistance, because that would open the door to internal discord, the primary beneficiaries of which would be the US, the Zionist entity, and those lying in wait for us,” said Naji.

The Organization's position comes at a time when the Iraqi government is seeking to reinforce the principle that all weapons should be held solely by state institutions, amid increasing debate among political parties and armed factions on how this policy should be implemented and the timetable for doing so.

Writer and journalist Montadhar Naser believes that the issue of placing all weapons under state control has exposed contradictions within the forces that make up the Coordination Framework, with divisions extending even into some of the parties and factions themselves.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, he said the dispute is not limited to how weapons should be handled. It is also linked to defining the nature of Iraq’s relationship with both the US and Iran, and to determining the extent to which security and military decision-making can remain independent of armed groups that are connected to external actors.

The debate on the issue of weapons coincided with another unannounced visit to Baghdad by Esmail Qaani, commander of the Quds Force of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), during which he met with a number of leaders of the Coordination Framework.

The visit sparked speculation about the nature of Qaani's meetings and whether he had also met Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi.

Iraqi sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Tehran wants to keep the issue of factional weapons effectively unresolved, while potentially transferring nominal control of those arms to the government.

According to the same sources, this proposal may be acceptable to some leaders within the Coordination Framework, but it is not favored by the relevant Iraqi state authorities.

The disagreement places the government before a sensitive political and security test. Any attempt to impose disarmament by force could trigger a confrontation with factions that possess significant political and security influence.

Conversely, postponing the issue or settling for merely symbolic measures could undermine the state's efforts to strengthen its monopoly over military and security decision-making.


Hezbollah Chief Slams Lebanon-Israel Talks

Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem (Reuters)
Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem (Reuters)
TT

Hezbollah Chief Slams Lebanon-Israel Talks

Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem (Reuters)
Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem (Reuters)

Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem on Friday stepped up his criticism of the Lebanese-Israeli negotiation process, arguing that the seven rounds of talks held so far have produced no results.

He announced the party's rejection of both direct negotiations and the substance of the framework agreement, while reaffirming its commitment to the 2024 agreement.

In a speech marking the anniversary of the July 2006 War, Qassem criticized the Lebanese authorities, saying: "Give us a single achievement from the seven rounds of negotiations."

He also asserted that the Lebanese authorities must “acknowledge their failure."

Qassem accused the authorities of subjecting the country's armed forces to undue pressure by implementing the framework deal agreed with Israel to end hostilities.

The June trilateral framework, to which the United States is also a party, involves Hezbollah’s disarmament and a gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon's south, where it has occupied several areas.

It also includes the deployment of the Lebanese army to areas where Israel's military has pulled out, starting in test areas known as "pilot zones.”

"How can you accept this ongoing humiliation of the Lebanese army, exposing it to bombardment and Israeli pressures, instead of acting as its protectors?" Qassem said in a speech.

"Israel is attempting to bind Lebanon to an inquiry committee that oversees the army's deployment, operations, and internal details. Where is the patriotism? Where is the dignity of the army that ought to be preserved?" he said.

Hezbollah has repeatedly rejected the direct talks and refuses to surrender its weapons.