Egyptian Intelligence Chief’s Israel Visit Aims to Ease Bilateral Tensions

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi meets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in New York (Egyptian Presidency)
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi meets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in New York (Egyptian Presidency)
TT

Egyptian Intelligence Chief’s Israel Visit Aims to Ease Bilateral Tensions

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi meets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in New York (Egyptian Presidency)
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi meets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in New York (Egyptian Presidency)

Egyptian Intelligence Chief Major General Hassan Rashad visited Israel on Tuesday as part of mediator-led efforts to solidify the ceasefire in Gaza, marking a turning point in bilateral relations that have faced mounting tensions since Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip two years ago.

The strains had escalated to fears of a possible military confrontation, alongside accusations of breaching the 1979 peace treaty.

Rashad’s visit, the first by a senior Egyptian official since the war, included a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

According to a statement from Netanyahu’s office, the two discussed Egyptian-Israeli relations and strengthening peace between the two countries, which observers described as “the beginning of tension containment.”

The deterioration in relations had reached low points over Israel’s control of the “Philadelphia axis” and oversight of the Palestinian side of the Rafah crossing, which Egypt refused to recognize.

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi warned last September at the extraordinary Arab-Islamic summit in Doha that continued conflict in Gaza “undermines the peace process.”

He told the Israeli people: “What is happening now threatens the future of peace, your security, and the security of all peoples in the region, obstructing any chance for new peace agreements and jeopardizing existing accords with regional states. The consequences would be grave.”

Military expert Brig. Gen. Samir Ragab, said Rashad’s visit is part of an Egyptian strategy to “penetrate decision-making circles in Israel,” building on contacts initiated between Sisi and Netanyahu during US President Donald Trump’s visit to Israel on October 13.

The Egyptian presidency said Sisi had received calls from Trump and Netanyahu, with Netanyahu agreeing to attend a peace summit in Sharm El-Sheikh—a decision he later reversed, citing the proximity of Israeli holidays.

Ragab added: “Tensions between Egypt and Israel remained within a framework of peace. Even during periods of reduced communication, relations never broke off completely. Now, they are returning to high-level engagement.”

Israeli media have repeatedly accused Egypt of violating the peace agreement. Last month, the US outlet Axios reported that Netanyahu asked the Trump administration to pressure Egypt to reduce its “current military buildup” in Sinai.

Egypt’s State Information Service responded swiftly, asserting that “the forces deployed in Sinai are primarily tasked with securing Egypt’s borders against all threats, including terrorism and smuggling.”

Reports from several Israeli media outlets in recent months indicated that President Sisi had refused calls from Netanyahu, while Cairo also delayed appointing a new ambassador to Israel and did not approve the credentials of Israel’s ambassador.

Yahya Kadawani, a member of the Egyptian House of Representatives’ Defense and National Security Committee, described Rashad’s visit as “important and aimed at preventing a flare-up, especially given Israeli violations of the ceasefire in recent days, which have obstructed the second phase of the agreement.”

The second phase involves discussions on rebuilding Gaza, the future of Hamas’ weapons, and post-war administration of the Strip. Cairo is preparing to host a Gaza reconstruction conference in November.

Ragab emphasized the visit’s significance, noting that “working solely with a negotiating team will not achieve the desired outcomes in upcoming stages, particularly given Netanyahu’s known centralization of power. Egyptian presence in Israel is crucial to influence Netanyahu’s decisions, advance the Gaza ceasefire, and implement subsequent phases.”

Kadawani told Asharq Al-Awsat the visit “marks the start of easing tensions between the two countries, while Egypt monitors Israel’s next steps and commitment to the agreement.”

Ragab said the visit aims not only to “ease tensions” but also to “bridge gaps and shift positions.” “Rashad is the highest-ranking Egyptian official on this file after the president, making this a high-level visit essential for advancing the peace process,” he said.

The military expert added: “Egypt has been able to influence Hamas; now that influence needs to extend to Israel. We are beginning to see some thawing of its previously frozen positions.”

Ragab did not rule out “repeat visits by Rashad or other Egyptian officials to Israel in the coming period if necessary,” predicting that “the intelligence chief’s visit will bear fruit and open a path for communications and negotiations with delegations.”



Will STC Keep its Gains in Yemen or Prepare for a Major Confrontation?

A supporter of the Southern Transitional Council (STC) stands in the back of a pickup truck in the Khor Maksar district of the second city of Aden on August 29, 2019. (AFP file)
A supporter of the Southern Transitional Council (STC) stands in the back of a pickup truck in the Khor Maksar district of the second city of Aden on August 29, 2019. (AFP file)
TT

Will STC Keep its Gains in Yemen or Prepare for a Major Confrontation?

A supporter of the Southern Transitional Council (STC) stands in the back of a pickup truck in the Khor Maksar district of the second city of Aden on August 29, 2019. (AFP file)
A supporter of the Southern Transitional Council (STC) stands in the back of a pickup truck in the Khor Maksar district of the second city of Aden on August 29, 2019. (AFP file)

Yemen's eastern provinces of Hadhramaut and Al-Mahra are passing through a critical phase amid the unprecedented unilateral military escalation carried out by the Southern Transitional Council (STC) that has been met with widespread regional and international condemnation.

Observers have said the STC cannot be allowed to impose a new status quo through the use of force no matter its justifications or claims.

They said the situation is not a passing development that can be ignored by the Saudi-led Arab coalition to restore legitimacy in Yemen and its supporters. Rather, this is a multifaceted political and security test where southern interests, the war against the Houthis and regional peace collide.

At the moment, the STC is opting to maneuver under pressure instead of leading the challenge head-on. In its recent statements, the council has resorted to political claims to justify its actions on the ground, speaking of "coordination" and "understanding concerns", reflecting a growing realization that its room to maneuver is shrinking and that it must take the right decision.

Saudi Arabia has made clear warnings over the situation, starting with a political warning, followed by an airstrike on Hadhramaut. The stern response means that a firm decision has been taken to prevent Hadhramaut and Al-Mahra from being dragged into an internal conflict or becoming an arena where agendas are imposed by force.

The STC is aware that ignoring the warnings puts it in a direct confrontation with a regional heavyweight - Saudi Arabia. The council does not have the political or military means to come out on top, so it has been advised to seriously deal with the warnings and avoid resorting to stalling tactics if it is considering taking the option of minimal losses to the gains it has amassed over the years.

Failing to heed the warning will mean it will have to come to heel through force, which will end in its major defeat.

The observers said the STC has landed itself in an unprecedented crisis. The council has justified its unilateral military actions as aimed at "protecting the southern cause" and that it was meeting the demands of the people. It also claimed that it sought to block Houthi smuggling routes and fight terrorist groups.

Despite everything, it is not too late for the STC to salvage the situation, as stated by Saudi Defense Minister Prince Khalid bin Salman on Saturday. The STC can still end the crisis while taking minimal losses by immediately withdrawing its forces from Hadhramaut and Al-Mahra.

Should it stand its ground, the STC does not have the means to consolidate its presence in the two provinces, especially amid wide popular opposition, notably in Hadhramaut. Moreover, the STC lacks regional cover and international support that is a main condition for creating any security changes in critical areas.

So, it would seem that the best and easiest scenario would be for the STC to withdraw its forces, under such pretexts of "redeployment" or "security arrangements", to minimize its political losses, said the observers.

Should it ignore the warnings and choose to continue to escalate the situation, then the STC will lose its partnership with the legitimate Yemeni authorities, transforming into an obstacle in efforts to restore stability in the country. International sanctions may even be imposed on its leaders.

On the military level, the Arab coalition was clear in stating that it will not allow a new status quo to be imposed by force in eastern Yemen. Any escalation may be met with direct deterrence, meaning casualties on the ground that the STC cannot justify.

On the ground, the STC does not enjoy the support of the people in Hadhramaut and Al-Mahra and the continued escalation will deepen opposition to it in the south. The southern cause will transform from an issue that enjoys consensus to one that causes division.


Syrian Army Enters Latakia, Tartus after Attacks by Regime Remnants

Syrian Security forces stand atop a military vehicle in the city of Latakia, Syria, 28 December 2025. (EPA)
Syrian Security forces stand atop a military vehicle in the city of Latakia, Syria, 28 December 2025. (EPA)
TT

Syrian Army Enters Latakia, Tartus after Attacks by Regime Remnants

Syrian Security forces stand atop a military vehicle in the city of Latakia, Syria, 28 December 2025. (EPA)
Syrian Security forces stand atop a military vehicle in the city of Latakia, Syria, 28 December 2025. (EPA)

The Syrian Defense Ministry announced on Sunday the deployment of military forces in the coastal cities of Latakia and Tartus in wake of an armed attack against security forces and civilians during recent protests.

Syrian television said the deployment was happening after "outlawed groups" carried out attacks against security forces and the people.

The military will work on preserving security and restoring calm in cooperation with the internal security forces, it added.

Earlier, local media reported that three people were killed and 48 wounded when gunmen affiliated with the ousted regime opened fire at civilians and security forces during protests in Latakia and Tartus.

State television said a member of the security forces was killed and others were injured while they were protecting protests in Latakia.

Head of the security forces in the Latakia province Abdulaziz al-Ahmed said the attack was carried out by terrorist members of the former regime.

The protests in Latakia were called for by Ghazal Ghazal.

Al-Ahmed added that masked gunmen were spotted at the protests and they were identified as members of Coastal Shield Brigade and Al-Jawad Brigade terrorist groups, reported the official SANA news agency.

The groups were responsible for bombings on the M1 highway and extrajudicial killings, it added.

A member of the groups was arrested in the Jableh countryside during a security operation, announced the Interior Ministry. Three other members were killed, while explosives and various weapons and ammunition were seized during the operation.

The Al-Jawad Brigade is affiliated with Suheil al-Hassan, a notorious former Syrian military officer.

In a statement, the Interior Ministry said the group was involved in assassinations, bombings and attacks against the Interior Ministry forces and the army.

It was planning attacks on New Year celebrations, it revealed. The detainee also revealed the locations of weapons caches used by the group.


Hezbollah Chief Accuses Lebanese Authorities of Working ‘in the Interest of What Israel Wants’

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem
Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem
TT

Hezbollah Chief Accuses Lebanese Authorities of Working ‘in the Interest of What Israel Wants’

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem
Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem on Sunday said moves to disarm the group in Lebanon are an "Israeli-American plan,” accusing Israel of failing to abide by a ceasefire agreement sealed last year.

Under heavy US pressure and fears of expanded Israeli strikes, the Lebanese military is expected to complete Hezbollah's disarmament south of the Litani River -- located about 30 kilometers from the border with Israel -- by the end of the year.

It will then tackle disarming the Iran-backed movement in the rest of the country.

"Disarmament is an Israeli-American plan," Qassem said.

"To demand exclusive arms control while Israel is committing aggression and America is imposing its will on Lebanon, stripping it of its power, means that you are not working in Lebanon's interest, but rather in the interest of what Israel wants."

Despite a November 2024 ceasefire that was supposed to end more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah, Israel has kept up strikes on Lebanon and has maintained troops in five areas it deems strategic.

According to the agreement, Hezbollah was required to pull its forces north of the Litani River and have its military infrastructure in the vacated area dismantled.

Israel has questioned the Lebanese military's effectiveness and has accused Hezbollah of rearming, while the group itself has rejected calls to surrender its weapons.

"The deployment of the Lebanese army south of the Litani River was required only if Israel had adhered to its commitments... to halting the aggression, withdrawing, releasing prisoners, and having reconstruction commence," Qassem said in a televised address.

"With the Israeli enemy not implementing any of the steps of the agreement... Lebanon is no longer required to take any action on any level before the Israelis commit to what they are obligated to do."

Lebanese army chief Rodolphe Haykal told a military meeting on Tuesday "the army is in the process of finishing the first phase of its plan.”

He said the army is carefully planning "for the subsequent phases" of disarmament.