Sudani’s Election Gains Ignite Race to Form Iraq’s Largest Bloc

 A screen displays an election poster of Prime Minister Muhammad Shia al-Sudani (Reuters). 
 A screen displays an election poster of Prime Minister Muhammad Shia al-Sudani (Reuters). 
TT

Sudani’s Election Gains Ignite Race to Form Iraq’s Largest Bloc

 A screen displays an election poster of Prime Minister Muhammad Shia al-Sudani (Reuters). 
 A screen displays an election poster of Prime Minister Muhammad Shia al-Sudani (Reuters). 

Preliminary results from Iraq’s parliamentary elections on Tuesday show that Prime Minister Muhammad Shia al-Sudani has scored a significant victory.

Yet while his bloc has joined the top tier of Shiite political forces, his path to a second term remains far from guaranteed. Several Shiite factions also secured substantial gains, setting the stage for a deeper struggle within the Shiite political camp.

The outcome is expected to intensify rifts within the Coordination Framework, splitting it between al-Sudani and his rival Nouri al-Maliki, leader of the State of Law coalition. According to electoral officials, robust voter turnout meant that the boycott by influential cleric Muqtada al-Sadr had minimal effect on the overall landscape.

Late Wednesday, al-Sudani announced that his Reconstruction and Development Alliance had topped the initial tallies.

The Independent High Electoral Commission, after a two-hour delay, confirmed that al-Sudani’s alliance led in Baghdad, followed by the Taqaddum (Progress) Party of Mohammed al-Halbousi, and then al-Maliki’s State of Law.

Sources within al-Sudani’s alliance said he personally garnered around 250,000 votes in Baghdad, with strong performances across central and southern provinces that could yield more than 50 seats.

Al-Halbousi’s Taqaddum dominated voting in the Sunni-majority Anbar Province and finished second or third in several northern and central districts, winning over 30 seats.

In the Kurdish region, the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) led by Masoud Barzani appears to have retained a decisive lead, while several secular and reformist lists performed poorly.

Following the announcements, al-Sudani said his coalition aimed to form the next government and remained open to engaging “all political forces, including those that boycotted the vote.”

Turnout and Participation

The electoral commission reported an overall turnout of 56.11 percent, based on a count of 99.98 percent of polling stations. Of more than 21.4 million eligible voters, approximately 12 million cast ballots, over 10.9 million in the general vote alone.

Civil Movements Suffer Heavy Losses

The Sadrist boycott did not prevent other Shiite factions in the Coordination Framework from achieving solid turnout and meaningful representation. Instead, it entrenched a new rivalry between al-Sudani and al-Maliki, who has managed to retain a relatively stable Shiite base.

Civil and secular groups emerged as some of the election’s biggest losers. The Alternative and Democratic Civil Alliance lists - umbrella groups for many liberal and left-leaning actors, including the Iraqi Communist Party - did not secure a single parliamentary seat as of this report.

Al-Sudani’s Bid for a Second Term

Al-Sudani’s strong showing has redrawn internal calculations within the Coordination Framework. Having risen to the premiership last term with only two seats, he could now enter negotiations with a sizable bloc of his own, potentially elevating him as a leading contender for a second term.

Yet analysts warn that Iraq’s premiership, traditionally assigned to the Shiite community, has rarely been determined by seat counts alone. Intricate power-sharing arrangements and factional bargaining often override electoral strength.

Both al-Maliki and Qais al-Khazali, whose blocs together exceed 60 seats, are expected to oppose al-Sudani’s return. Additional factions within the Framework together holding roughly 40 seats - may join them.

The Battle for the “Largest Bloc”

With no party able to form a government outright, coalition-building will once again be decisive. Political Science Professor Yassin al-Bakri of Al-Nahrain University expects a fierce contest between al-Sudani and al-Maliki to claim leadership of the “largest bloc,” the parliamentary grouping entitled to nominate the prime minister.

Some Framework leaders are reportedly considering declaring themselves the largest bloc without al-Sudani, arguing that he no longer represents their collective position after the elections. This option would involve drawing defectors from his alliance in exchange for executive guarantees.

Another scenario envisions al-Sudani rejoining the Framework under terms that would return influential figures such as Ahmed al-Asadi and Faleh al-Fayyad to the forefront of negotiations, potentially limiting his authority within the next government.

A third, and increasingly likely, approach involves fragmenting al-Sudani’s bloc so that he cannot negotiate as head of a unified coalition.

Still, those close to al-Sudani argue he may succeed in persuading parts of the Framework to back his second-term bid, citing possible favorable shifts in US and regional positions.

International Reactions

The European Union mission called on political actors in Iraq to support the formation of a government that reflects the will of Iraqi voters, describing the elections as an important opportunity to strengthen institutions amid shifting regional geopolitics.

For his part, UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric praised Iraq for holding elections that were generally calm and orderly and stressed the need to form a government “peacefully and in a timely manner” that meets the public’s aspirations for stability and development.



Portugal Says Israel Undermining Palestinian State Through Settlement Expansion

Palestinian Foreign Affairs and Expatriates Minister Varsin Aghabekian Shahin (L) and Portuguese Foreign Minister Paulo Rangel (R) attend a press conference after a meeting at Necessidades Palace in Lisbon, Portugal, 14 September 2026. (EPA)
Palestinian Foreign Affairs and Expatriates Minister Varsin Aghabekian Shahin (L) and Portuguese Foreign Minister Paulo Rangel (R) attend a press conference after a meeting at Necessidades Palace in Lisbon, Portugal, 14 September 2026. (EPA)
TT

Portugal Says Israel Undermining Palestinian State Through Settlement Expansion

Palestinian Foreign Affairs and Expatriates Minister Varsin Aghabekian Shahin (L) and Portuguese Foreign Minister Paulo Rangel (R) attend a press conference after a meeting at Necessidades Palace in Lisbon, Portugal, 14 September 2026. (EPA)
Palestinian Foreign Affairs and Expatriates Minister Varsin Aghabekian Shahin (L) and Portuguese Foreign Minister Paulo Rangel (R) attend a press conference after a meeting at Necessidades Palace in Lisbon, Portugal, 14 September 2026. (EPA)

Portugal's ‌foreign minister said on Monday that Israeli settlement expansion and economic pressure in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem were undermining prospects for a viable Palestinian state.

Foreign Minister Paulo Rangel said Israel's E1 settlement plan was "extremely pernicious" because ‌it would ‌divide the West Bank, ‌isolate ⁠East Jerusalem and ⁠was incompatible with a two-state solution.

Israel's withholding of Palestinian tax revenues amounted to a "brutal strangulation" of the Palestinian Authority's finances, preventing the economy from ⁠functioning, he said after meeting ‌Palestinian Foreign ‌Minister Varsen Aghabekian Shahin in Lisbon.

‌Rangel also cited the closure ‌of Christian schools in East Jerusalem as evidence of worsening conditions there.

Portugal recognized the State ‌of Palestine a year ago.

Rangel said the two-state ⁠solution ⁠was the only way to guarantee peaceful coexistence between Israelis and Palestinians.

Israel said last week it was closing Britain's consulate in East Jerusalem in response to plans by the UK, France and Canada to block imports from Israeli settlements in the West Bank.


UN Warns Key Humanitarian Network in Sudan Could ‘Collapse within Weeks’

A Sudanese woman, who fled the conflict in Geneina in Sudan's Darfur region, talks to her relative through a fence next to makeshift shelters, in Adre, Chad August 5, 2023. (Reuters)
A Sudanese woman, who fled the conflict in Geneina in Sudan's Darfur region, talks to her relative through a fence next to makeshift shelters, in Adre, Chad August 5, 2023. (Reuters)
TT

UN Warns Key Humanitarian Network in Sudan Could ‘Collapse within Weeks’

A Sudanese woman, who fled the conflict in Geneina in Sudan's Darfur region, talks to her relative through a fence next to makeshift shelters, in Adre, Chad August 5, 2023. (Reuters)
A Sudanese woman, who fled the conflict in Geneina in Sudan's Darfur region, talks to her relative through a fence next to makeshift shelters, in Adre, Chad August 5, 2023. (Reuters)

The United Nations warned on Monday that a key system for bringing aid into conflict-torn Sudan risked collapsing completely unless it receives more funding immediately.

"The entire humanitarian system could collapse within weeks if we don't act now," said Amy Pope, head of the International Organization for Migration.

"Without new funding, we won't be able to get help where it's needed most."

The war between Sudan's regular army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) that erupted in April 2023 has killed more than 200,000 people, aid workers estimate, and created the world's largest hunger and displacement crisis.

The IOM stressed that the Common Humanitarian Pipeline logistics system it runs allows a network of more than 100 national and international NGOs to bring desperately needed shelter and other non-food aid into the African country.

Since the start of the war, it said, the system had reached 2.84 million people.

But it warned that the reach had been shrinking due to falling funds, even as the needs remain at an all-time high.

While the pipeline helped get aid to more than one million people in 2024, only 330,000 had received assistance like shelter and emergency support kits through the system so far in 2026, the IOM said.

"Without immediate donor support, current shelter, sanitation and emergency household relief items are expected to be depleted by the end of September," the UN's migration agency said in a statement.

"The warehousing and operational capacity that keeps the pipeline functioning can only be sustained until December 2026," it stressed.

The IOM said it would need $15 million just to maintain the pipeline at its 2026 minimum capacity for the next 12 months, while it would require $42 million to return to its 2024 level.

It said cutting off access to shelter assistance carried far wider risks.

"Prolonged exposure to weather, disease and insecurity can heighten risks of gender-based violence, family separation and eviction in overcrowded sites," it pointed out.

"Shelter is the foundation from which protection, health and recovery can begin," Pope insisted.

"When the pipeline stops, it is not simply warehouses that become empty. The entire humanitarian response becomes harder to deliver."


Lebanon’s Divide Over Israel Talks Reaches Religious Leaders

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and an accompanying delegation tour the southern city of Nabatieh on Saturday (EPA)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and an accompanying delegation tour the southern city of Nabatieh on Saturday (EPA)
TT

Lebanon’s Divide Over Israel Talks Reaches Religious Leaders

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and an accompanying delegation tour the southern city of Nabatieh on Saturday (EPA)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and an accompanying delegation tour the southern city of Nabatieh on Saturday (EPA)

Lebanon’s divisions over negotiations with Israel have reached its religious leadership, with Maronite Patriarch Beshara al-Rahi backing state efforts to establish a monopoly on arms and pursue talks, and Jaafari Mufti Sheikh Ahmed Qabalan accusing the state of colluding against South Lebanon.

The split turns political disagreements over the government’s policies into a sectarian dispute as talks stall - with an eighth round of negotiations with Israel in Rome postponed until early next month - and the Israeli army continues strikes in the south.

Lebanon’s Shiite religious establishment, Hezbollah and the Amal Movement have long opposed direct negotiations, but Qabalan’s attack was the strongest since the talks began.

President Joseph Aoun has repeatedly pledged to protect Lebanon’s sovereignty, secure an Israeli withdrawal and return residents to occupied areas in the south through negotiations, which he sees as the only available alternative to war.

On Sunday, on the anniversary of the assassination of President-elect Bachir Gemayel, Aoun renewed his pledge to build “a strong and just state,” capable of safeguarding its independent decision-making, sovereignty and citizens’ dignity.

Christian Support for Official Position

Al-Rahi said in his Sunday sermon that placing all weapons under state control “is not the triumph of one side over another, nor a confrontation with a sect or group, but the affirmation of a single national authority.”

“The state cannot function with two decision-making authorities, nor can sovereignty be complete when there are multiple authorities,” he added.

Backing the presidency’s approach, al-Rahi called for negotiations and mediation to produce tangible results, including an end to attacks, Israeli withdrawal and stability under credible guarantees protecting Lebanon’s rights and sovereignty. Negotiations, he said, should not become “an open-ended process with no horizon.”

Qabalan Attacks the State

Qabalan took the opposite position after Aoun visited Nabatieh and pledged state support for the south, saying Israeli withdrawal, the return of prisoners and displaced residents, and reconstruction were national priorities.

In a message published by the state-run National News Agency (NNA), Qabalan accused the executive branch of “strangling and besieging” the south and “colluding against it.”

He warned of what he called government-driven “sedition,” accusing the executive branch of threatening national partnership and seeking to abandon the southern front, which he described as central to Lebanon’s sovereignty and existence.

“The issue today is not that the executive authority does not want to defend the south,” Qabalan said, “but rather the totality of policies that strangle the south, besiege it, drain it and deprive it of every means of life.”

He added that Lebanon’s security was indivisible and called for national action to prevent what he described as “the worst internal strife,” accusing the authorities of giving Israel enough time to continue destroying the south.