Karam Steers South Lebanon into New Phase as Mechanism Chief

A UNIFIL military vehicle bearing the United Nations emblem moves ahead of a Lebanese army car during a joint patrol (UNIFIL)
A UNIFIL military vehicle bearing the United Nations emblem moves ahead of a Lebanese army car during a joint patrol (UNIFIL)
TT

Karam Steers South Lebanon into New Phase as Mechanism Chief

A UNIFIL military vehicle bearing the United Nations emblem moves ahead of a Lebanese army car during a joint patrol (UNIFIL)
A UNIFIL military vehicle bearing the United Nations emblem moves ahead of a Lebanese army car during a joint patrol (UNIFIL)

South Lebanon is bracing for a new political stage after President Joseph Aoun appointed former ambassador to the United States, attorney Simon Karam, to head Lebanon’s delegation to the committee overseeing the implementation of the cessation of hostilities, known as the Mechanism.

Karam joined the committee’s meeting in Naqoura on Wednesday alongside United States envoy Morgan Ortagus.

Ortagus will represent Washington in meetings held by the United Nations mission at the ambassadorial level for Security Council members in Beirut on Friday. She is scheduled to meet the three leaders, President Joseph Aoun, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, as well as Army Commander General Rodolphe Haykal, before travelling south the next day to meet the Mechanism and UNIFIL command.

Karam’s appointment followed a United States request to add a civilian to the Lebanese team amid escalating Israeli threats to expand the war at the end of this year in an attempt to enforce exclusive weapons control from north of the Litani to Lebanon’s border with Syria.

The expectation, according to Lebanese US contacts, is that such threats would recede under Washington’s guarantee, diffusing Israeli pressure in tandem with Karam’s designation.

Coordinated Step

Ministerial sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Aoun’s decision to appoint Karam was coordinated with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and Speaker Nabih Berri with authorization from the latter’s ally, Hezbollah.

They said Aoun withheld the announcement until he secured American guarantees preventing Israel from widening the war.

The sources added that Aoun informed Ortagus of Karam’s appointment before her trip to Tel Aviv to meet Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz.

They said Aoun also contacted Washington directly to ensure its readiness to provide guarantees curbing Israeli actions and preventing any expansion of hostilities while keeping the current rules of engagement intact.

The sources said the significance of Karam’s appointment lies in the political cover Aoun secured for the mission, blocking populist criticism, particularly from Hezbollah.

This, they noted, was achieved through Aoun’s communication with the party in parallel with Berri’s efforts to rule out any imminent expansion of the war before the announcement.

They pointed as well to the historic visit of Pope Leo XIV to Lebanon, describing it as having softened positions, with the mass public receptions during the visit serving as a popular mandate by tens of thousands of Lebanese calling for peace and stability.

Opening to Restart Negotiations

According to the sources, Lebanon’s international and Arab partners were informed of Karam’s appointment in line with Beirut’s intention to engineer a breakthrough that could revive negotiations and push Israel, through United States mediation and Mechanism oversight, to halt hostilities.

Discussions are meant to proceed under the framework of paving the way for the implementation of Resolution 1701, contingent on the state’s full authority over its territory.

They added that Karam’s appointment effectively signaled to the incoming United Nations mission that Lebanon was responding to international demands for peaceful negotiations with Israel, consistent with exclusive weapons control.

United Nations Mission Arrives Saturday

The sources said the United Nations mission will arrive in Beirut on Thursday evening, coming from Damascus after meeting Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa and inspecting conditions in Syria.

They will travel to the south on Saturday to meet the Mechanism and UNIFIL command to review the army’s deployment in the liberated zone south of the Litani and the removal of Hezbollah’s military installations and infrastructure, and to discuss the post–UNIFIL mandate period after its scheduled end next year, including support for the army in implementing Resolution 1701.

They added that UNIFIL’s leadership would continue its mission through 2026 in line with Resolution 1701 despite funding shortages, but did not rule out a possible extension if United States-mediated Lebanese-Israeli negotiations make progress.

UNIFIL has already begun reducing its personnel and equipment and is preparing a new withdrawal phase.

Exclusive Weapons Control

The sources said that reactivating Mechanism meetings, if Israel responds to United States pressure to halt any expansion of the war, should help lower public fears in Lebanon despite continuing threats.

At the same time, Lebanon will be compelled to launch internal negotiations with Hezbollah, with Berri playing a constructive role, to draw up a timeline for completing exclusive weapons control from north of the Litani to the international border.

The first phase, ending this year, is considered on track according to Mechanism and UNIFIL assessments of the army’s deployment in the liberated area.

They said Lebanon has no objection to verifying Israeli claims that Hezbollah stores weapons in homes south of the Litani.

The problem, they argued, is that Israel has been bombing such homes instead of filing complaints to the Mechanism, which would refer them to the army and UNIFIL for verification under legal procedures.

Several Israeli strikes flattened homes south and north of the Litani that, according to the army, contained no Hezbollah weapons, prompting the army to submit detailed reports to the Mechanism.

Army Requirements and Filling UNIFIL’s Gap

A Western diplomatic source told Asharq Al-Awsat that the United Nations mission’s visit to the south is not limited to reviewing the situation on the ground or the army’s deployment amid Israel’s continued occupation of several frontline hills and its construction of two concrete walls that annexed about 4,500 square meters of Lebanese land.

The visit, the source said, is also meant to assess the army’s needs to fill the gap once UNIFIL withdraws.

The source asked whether an extension of UNIFIL’s mandate is possible in light of the mission’s ground assessment and the Security Council’s ability to reconsider ending its mission without full implementation of Resolution 1701, provided the United States refrains from vetoing such an extension.

UNIFIL remains, the source said, the only international witness for southerners on the resolution’s implementation unless the Mechanism’s mandate is expanded to allow Washington to directly oversee Lebanese Israeli negotiations should the resolution remain unimplemented.

Grace Period

The sources cautioned against prematurely drawing conclusions ahead of UNIFIL’s mandate expiry while Hezbollah appears to be buying time.

They said Karam’s appointment effectively extended Lebanon’s grace period, giving the government an opportunity to finalize the exclusive weapons framework and produce a timeline that would push Hezbollah to “Lebanonize” its stance and weapons in line with Lebanese rather than Iranian timing, as critics argue.

Failure to do so, they warned, could revive Israeli threats with American backing. Lebanon, they said, cannot afford to waste the opportunity granted to it, which should instead be used to secure the south and oblige Hezbollah to accept a phased handover of its weapons to the state.

 



Palestinians Decry Israeli Push for Control over Ancient West Bank Sites

Pillars and archaeological remains in the ancient village of Sebastia, near Nablus in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, June 4, 2026. REUTERS/Ammar Awad
Pillars and archaeological remains in the ancient village of Sebastia, near Nablus in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, June 4, 2026. REUTERS/Ammar Awad
TT

Palestinians Decry Israeli Push for Control over Ancient West Bank Sites

Pillars and archaeological remains in the ancient village of Sebastia, near Nablus in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, June 4, 2026. REUTERS/Ammar Awad
Pillars and archaeological remains in the ancient village of Sebastia, near Nablus in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, June 4, 2026. REUTERS/Ammar Awad

An Israeli bill that would extend civil control over ancient sites in the West Bank has drawn criticism from Palestinians and Israeli rights groups who say it is tantamount to annexation of occupied land and would expand Jewish settlements.

The "Heritage Authority in Judea and Samaria" bill passed one of three votes by Israel's parliament in May, but it is unclear whether the final vote will be held before parliament disperses ahead of an election expected by October 27.

The bill would bring management of Roman, Byzantine and Crusader-era sites under Israeli Ministry of Heritage management and allow related "expropriation and purchase of real estate" in the West Bank, which Israel calls by its Hebrew biblical name, Reuters reported.

That in effect would strip away oversight of some ancient sites from the Western-backed Palestinian Authority, which under the 1990s Oslo peace accords has exercised limited self-rule in parts of ‌the West Bank, ‌territory Israel captured in a 1967 war.

The PA's tourism minister, Hani Al-Hayek, said "control over these ‌antiquities ⁠is intended to ⁠expand control and expand settlements in these areas, deep inside Palestinian territories."

Israel says the bill's purpose is to protect ancient sites.

VILLAGE NEAR ANCIENT SEBASTIA SITE FACES LAND CONFISCATION

Peace Now, an Israeli settlements watchdog, said the bill "constitutes an annexationist measure in every respect" and would lead to broad-scale confiscation of Palestinian land.

Using archaeology to expand settlements is not a new practice, but the scope of the Israeli government's measures has been unprecedented, Peace Now said.

One example is the Palestinian village of Sebastia in the northern West Bank where residents, many of whom trace their roots to the land back centuries, rely heavily on tourism to a nearby archaeological site.

The ancient site in ⁠Sebastia has ruins from the 9th-century B.C. Israelite kingdom as well as Roman, Byzantine, Crusader ‌and Ottoman remnants, archaeologists say. It is on a tentative list for inclusion as ‌a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

In late 2025, Israel announced a plan to seize about 1,800 dunams (445 acres) at the site, which it ‌said was meant to develop the area, affecting around 5,000 olive trees growing in the village groves, village officials said.

"They ‌are incorporating areas containing water resources, roads and antiquities, leaving us as residents without any resources. It is part of settlement expansion," said Sebastia Deputy Mayor Nizar Kayed.

Business had already been suffering since late 2023 with tourism dropping because of war in the region, said Nahed Sakha, whose Sebastia restaurant is on land slated for confiscation.

"It seems that the Israeli plan (is) to isolate the archaeological site from the people," Sakha said.

ISRAEL CITES ‌ANCIENT TIES TO THE LAND

Israeli parliament member Zvi Sukkot, who has been key in advancing the new bill, says extending Israeli control over the sites is meant to safeguard ⁠ancient remnants dating back to biblical ⁠times.

"There's nothing here that changes the legal status of Judea and Samaria," he told Reuters.

"There are many people who are bothered by our desire to prove the ties between the people of Israel and this land," he said. "All the stories of the Bible, all our history, the people (of Israel) were born in Judea and Samaria."

Sukkot is a member of the pro-settler Religious Zionism party. Like many in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition, he opposes the creation of a Palestinian state and advocates annexation of the West Bank.

UN bodies and most countries view Israel's settlements as illegal under international law, violating the Fourth Geneva Convention provision barring the transfer of civilian population into occupied territory.

Israel rejects this view, saying the West Bank, which it captured in the 1967 war, is disputed territory. It cites security needs and biblical and historical ties to the land.

But the new bill has also caused concern among legal officials in Israel's defense establishment and Israeli scientists.

In an open letter to Netanyahu and Sukkot, the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities called for it to be scrapped.

"This will undoubtedly lead to an immediate deterioration in Israel's international relations in the field of archaeology, and it will also have an impact on other areas of science and research," the academy said.


Israel Says One Soldier Killed in Lebanon after Vehicle Overturned

Israeli soldiers carrying the coffin of a soldier killed in southern Lebanon during his funeral in Kfar Saba, Israel, on Sunday (dpa)
Israeli soldiers carrying the coffin of a soldier killed in southern Lebanon during his funeral in Kfar Saba, Israel, on Sunday (dpa)
TT

Israel Says One Soldier Killed in Lebanon after Vehicle Overturned

Israeli soldiers carrying the coffin of a soldier killed in southern Lebanon during his funeral in Kfar Saba, Israel, on Sunday (dpa)
Israeli soldiers carrying the coffin of a soldier killed in southern Lebanon during his funeral in Kfar Saba, Israel, on Sunday (dpa)

An Israeli military official ‌said ‌on Thursday a ‌soldier ⁠was killed in ⁠southern Lebanon after a vehicle ⁠had ‌overturned.

The official ‌described the ‌incident ‌as an accident, Reuters said.

Earlier, the ‌military said a soldier ⁠had ⁠died during "operational activity".

The pace of violence in Lebanon has eased recently, but Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz stressed that his forces would remain in southern Lebanon.

“We have stated that, in any case, we will not withdraw, and up to this moment — and this is a diplomatic achievement — there has been no US request for Israel to withdraw from Lebanon,” Katz said in an interview during a conference of local leaders in Tel Aviv.

Israel and Lebanon are currently holding US-mediated talks in Washington aimed at reaching a diplomatic solution to the conflict, including the disarmament of Hezbollah and the withdrawal of Israeli forces.

Since April, Lebanon has engaged in direct talks with Israel under US pressure, with the aim of ending the latest war between Hezbollah and Israel.

Lebanese authorities have stressed their determination to keep Lebanon’s file separate from negotiations involving Iran, Hezbollah’s main backer.

On Wednesday, Lebanese President Joseph Aoun stressed that “the negotiations in Washington are separate from the meetings held in Switzerland last week between the United States and Iran, which were followed by Qatar and Pakistan.”


Iraqi Judiciary Applies ‘Terrorism Provisions’ to Drones

People watch as smoke billows from an oil warehouse in the Kani Qirzhala area on the outskirts of Erbil, the capital of Iraq's autonomous Kurdistan region, following a suspected drone strike, on April 1, 2026. (Photo by AFP)
People watch as smoke billows from an oil warehouse in the Kani Qirzhala area on the outskirts of Erbil, the capital of Iraq's autonomous Kurdistan region, following a suspected drone strike, on April 1, 2026. (Photo by AFP)
TT

Iraqi Judiciary Applies ‘Terrorism Provisions’ to Drones

People watch as smoke billows from an oil warehouse in the Kani Qirzhala area on the outskirts of Erbil, the capital of Iraq's autonomous Kurdistan region, following a suspected drone strike, on April 1, 2026. (Photo by AFP)
People watch as smoke billows from an oil warehouse in the Kani Qirzhala area on the outskirts of Erbil, the capital of Iraq's autonomous Kurdistan region, following a suspected drone strike, on April 1, 2026. (Photo by AFP)

Iraq’s Supreme Judicial Council has instructed the country’s courts to apply the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Law to anyone who manufactures, uses, or possesses drones for unlawful purposes, while a security official said the directive is aimed specifically at curbing the activities of armed factions.

In a brief statement on Wednesday, the Council said it had directed the competent courts to enforce Anti-Terrorism Law No. 13 of 2005 against “anyone who manufactures, uses, or possesses drones employed for purposes contrary to the law.”

The law is Iraq’s principal legal framework for prosecuting terrorist crimes that threaten national unity and public safety, carrying penalties of up to the death sentence for perpetrators, instigators, planners, and financiers.

The directive comes amid months of government efforts to bring all weapons under state control and dismantle armed groups operating outside official security institutions.

An Interior Ministry security official told Asharq Al-Awsat that the judicial directive is “exclusively linked to armed factions” and is intended to increase pressure on them. He said the measure places drone-related offenses under terrorism statutes even though Iraqi law permits the use of officially licensed drones, indicating that it is directed at attacks carried out - or potentially to be carried out - by armed factions.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the official described drones as one of Iraq’s most serious security challenges because they are easy to transport and operate, while the country lacks effective counter-drone capabilities, a weakness exposed during recent attacks.

Since the outbreak of the US-Israeli war against Iran on February 28, armed factions have carried out hundreds of attacks, many involving drones, against civilian and military targets.

Kurdish sources say cities in the Kurdistan Region alone have come under more than 800 attacks by Iran-aligned factions, ostensibly because of the presence of US forces and Iranian Kurdish opposition groups.

The factions have also launched dozens of drone attacks against vital assets in several Gulf states and Jordan, prompting those countries to issue a joint statement on March 25 condemning the attacks and urging Baghdad to take immediate action to halt operations by Iran-backed armed groups.

Iraq has long permitted drones for civilian, commercial, and official security purposes, provided operators obtain prior approval from the Iraqi Civil Aviation Authority and the relevant security agencies.

In early February, the authority introduced new regulations governing licensing, operating requirements, legal obligations, and approved uses, including media production, filmmaking, advertising, tourism, protection of oil and energy pipelines and public utilities, agriculture, environmental monitoring, border security, and official Interior Ministry thermal-drone operations against smugglers.

Drone manufacturing is also “common in Iraq,” according to Ahmed al-Janabi, a software and telecommunications engineer, though primarily for civilian and service-related uses. He said drone components are widely available on Iraqi markets and enter the country through multiple routes, including smuggling networks from Iran via Sulaymaniyah.

Specialized import offices also supply drones, often disguising component shipments. While authorities routinely confiscate unauthorized drones and impose relatively light prison sentences on violators, al-Janabi said the key change is that such offenses are now prosecuted under the Anti-Terrorism Law.