Israel Resumes South Lebanon Strikes after Netanyahu-Trump Talks

Smoke rises after Israeli airstrikes hit the Jabal al Rihan heights in southern Lebanon (AFP)
Smoke rises after Israeli airstrikes hit the Jabal al Rihan heights in southern Lebanon (AFP)
TT

Israel Resumes South Lebanon Strikes after Netanyahu-Trump Talks

Smoke rises after Israeli airstrikes hit the Jabal al Rihan heights in southern Lebanon (AFP)
Smoke rises after Israeli airstrikes hit the Jabal al Rihan heights in southern Lebanon (AFP)

Israel resumed airstrikes in southern Lebanon on Friday shortly after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu returned from a visit to the United States, where he met US President Donald Trump, as Israeli officials signaled possible military action if Beirut fails to advance to the next phase of a plan to confine Hezbollah’s weapons north of the Litani River.

The ceasefire monitoring committee, also known as the mechanism, is tracking Lebanon’s political and diplomatic efforts, as well as local measures, aimed at preventing a renewed war.

The mechanism is expected to hold a military-level meeting next week to review developments.

Meanwhile, the Lebanese government is also due to receive a briefing next week from Lebanese Army Commander General Rodolphe Haykal on progress in implementing the state’s decision to contain the proliferation of weapons in stages.

Airstrikes resume

Israeli bombardment in Lebanon had eased after Netanyahu departed for the United States, with no intense airstrikes recorded as had been occurring on a weekly and repeated basis.

That situation changed following the end of the visit and Netanyahu’s return to Israel, where he is expected to meet Israeli officials on Saturday to brief them on his trip.

Lebanon’s state-run National News Agency reported that Israeli warplanes carried out airstrikes deep inside Lebanon, hitting the Louaizeh heights, the Mrouj Aqmata area in the Iqlim al Tuffah highlands, the Wadi Aazze Zefta area, the outskirts of Ansar in Nabatieh district, the Tabna area on the outskirts of Bissariyeh in the Zahrani region, and Mount Mashghara in the western Bekaa in eastern Lebanon.

The strikes totaled ten air raids, all within a contiguous geographic belt stretching from the coast to eastern Lebanon, north of the Litani.

Israeli army spokesman Avichay Adraee said on Friday that Israeli forces had carried out strikes on Hezbollah sites in several areas of southern Lebanon.

Writing on X, he said the army targeted what he described as terrorist infrastructure belonging to the group, including a training complex used by the Radwan Force, Hezbollah’s elite unit, and military buildings that he said were used to store weapons.

He said the presence of the targeted infrastructure and the conduct of military training constituted a violation of understandings between Israel and Lebanon.

North of the Litani

All the strikes hit deep valleys and uninhabited areas that have been repeatedly bombed since the ceasefire came into force in November 2024. The locations lie between about 20 kilometers east and 40 kilometers west of the border with Israel.

Earlier on Friday, an Israeli drone struck an excavator in the border town of Aita al Shaab.

Israeli warplanes also violated Lebanese airspace, flying at low altitude over villages in the Tyre district, while two Israeli aircraft breached the airspace over the city of Baalbek and surrounding villages in eastern Lebanon.

Israel has launched a new phase of military strikes since last month, focused on areas north of the Litani, after the Lebanese government announced the completion of the first phase of its plan to confine weapons to official military and security forces south of the river, and preparations to begin the second phase north of the Litani, extending to the Awali River, about 50 kilometers from the southern border.

Netanyahu’s deadline

The strikes followed the end of Netanyahu’s five-day visit to the United States.

Israel’s public broadcaster had reported earlier this week that Netanyahu instructed the military to suspend operations until his return, in order to avoid what it described as an unwanted entanglement during his meeting with Trump.

Israeli media reported on Friday that, upon Netanyahu’s return, security chiefs would be briefed on understandings and agreements reached with Trump.

Israeli media also suggested that Israel could act on its own if Lebanon fails to meet its commitments to implement weapons exclusivity north of the Litani, amid Hezbollah’s refusal to cooperate.

Hezbollah officials have said the priority should be for Israel to meet its obligations under the ceasefire, including withdrawing from occupied Lebanese points, halting attacks, releasing detainees, and launching reconstruction.

Hezbollah’s priorities

Hezbollah lawmaker Hassan Ezzedine said at a memorial event in southern Lebanon that the United States was trying, through politics, pressure and conspiracies, to achieve what Israel failed to accomplish militarily.

He said Lebanon and the resistance had fulfilled all obligations under the agreements, while Israel continued to evade any commitment.

He called on the Lebanese state and the sponsors of the agreement to compel Israel to stop its attacks, paving the way for an internal national dialogue on strategies to safeguard Lebanon’s strength and sovereignty, without foreign interference.

Ezzedine said the government had clear responsibilities outlined in its ministerial statement, foremost liberating land, stopping attacks, securing the release of detainees, and launching reconstruction.

He said inaction was unjustified, arguing the state could raise its voice in international forums, expose Israeli violations, issue a clear political decision mandating the Lebanese army to take all necessary measures to protect sovereignty, and ensure the return of citizens to their villages and properties, particularly in frontline areas.



Lebanon PM Says IMF Wants Rescue Plan Changes as Crisis Deepens

A photograph released by the Lebanese Government Press Office on December 26, 2025, show Lebanon's Prime Minister Nawaf Salam speaking during a press conference following a cabinet session in Beirut on December 26, 2025. (Photo by Handout / Lebanese Government Press Office / AFP)
A photograph released by the Lebanese Government Press Office on December 26, 2025, show Lebanon's Prime Minister Nawaf Salam speaking during a press conference following a cabinet session in Beirut on December 26, 2025. (Photo by Handout / Lebanese Government Press Office / AFP)
TT

Lebanon PM Says IMF Wants Rescue Plan Changes as Crisis Deepens

A photograph released by the Lebanese Government Press Office on December 26, 2025, show Lebanon's Prime Minister Nawaf Salam speaking during a press conference following a cabinet session in Beirut on December 26, 2025. (Photo by Handout / Lebanese Government Press Office / AFP)
A photograph released by the Lebanese Government Press Office on December 26, 2025, show Lebanon's Prime Minister Nawaf Salam speaking during a press conference following a cabinet session in Beirut on December 26, 2025. (Photo by Handout / Lebanese Government Press Office / AFP)

The International Monetary Fund has demanded amendments to a draft rescue law aimed at hauling Lebanon out of its worst financial crisis on record and giving depositors access to savings frozen for six years, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said.

The "financial gap" law is part of a series of reform measures required by the IMF in order to access its funding and aims to allocate the losses from Lebanon's 2019 crash between the state, the central bank, commercial banks and depositors.

Salam told Reuters the IMF wants clearer provisions in the hierarchy of claims, which is a core element of the draft legislation designed to determine how losses are allocated.

"We want to engage with the IMF. We want to improve. This is a draft law," ‌Salam said in ‌an interview at the World Economic Forum annual meeting ‌in ⁠the Swiss mountain ‌resort of Davos.

"They wanted the hierarchy of claims to be clearer. The talks are all positive," Salam added.

In 2022, the government put losses from the financial crisis at about $70 billion, a figure that analysts and economists forecast is now likely to be higher.

Salam stressed that Lebanon is still pushing for a long-delayed IMF program, but warned the clock is ticking as the country has already been placed on a financial 'grey list' and risks falling onto the 'black ⁠list' if reforms stall further.

"We want an IMF program and we want to continue our discussions until we get ‌there," he said, adding: "International pressure is real ... The longer we ‍delay, the more people's money will evaporate".

The ‍draft law, which was passed by Salam's government in December, is under parliamentary ‍review. It aims to give depositors a guaranteed path to recovering their funds, restart bank lending, and end a financial crisis that has left nearly a million accounts frozen and confidence in the system shattered.

The roadmap would repay depositors up to $100,000 over four years, starting with smaller accounts, while launching forensic audits to determine losses and responsibility.

Lebanon's Finance Minister Yassine Jaber, who is driving the reform push with Salam, told Reuters it was ⁠essential to salvage a hollowed-out banking system, and to stop the country from sliding deeper into its cash-only, paralyzed economy.

The aim, Jaber said, is to give depositors clarity after years of uncertainty and to end a system that has crippled Lebanon's international standing.

He framed the law as part of a broader reckoning: the first time a Lebanese government has confronted a combined collapse of the banking sector, the central bank and the state treasury.

Financial reforms have been repeatedly derailed by political and private vested interests over the last six years and Jaber said the responsibility now lies with lawmakers.

Failure to act, he said, would leave Lebanon trapped in "a deep, dark tunnel" with no way back to a functioning system.

"Lebanon ‌has become a cash economy, and the real question is whether we want to stay on the grey list, or sleepwalk into a black list," Jaber added.


Israel Resumes Strikes on Smuggling Routes along Lebanon-Syria Border

Local residents flee into the street during an Israeli strike on the village of Qanarit in southern Lebanon on Jan. 21 (AP)
Local residents flee into the street during an Israeli strike on the village of Qanarit in southern Lebanon on Jan. 21 (AP)
TT

Israel Resumes Strikes on Smuggling Routes along Lebanon-Syria Border

Local residents flee into the street during an Israeli strike on the village of Qanarit in southern Lebanon on Jan. 21 (AP)
Local residents flee into the street during an Israeli strike on the village of Qanarit in southern Lebanon on Jan. 21 (AP)

The Israeli strikes that hit overnight, Wednesday to Thursday, the outskirts of the villages of Hosh al Sayyed Ali and al-Mashrafa on the Lebanese-Syrian border in northeastern Lebanon marked a new episode in a series of attacks increasingly targeting eastern Lebanon, in parallel with ongoing escalation on the southern front.

The strikes were repeated on Friday in eastern Lebanon, where an Israeli drone carried out two air strikes near the city of Baalbek. No casualties were reported.

In a statement, the Israeli army said its aircraft had struck four crossings in the Hermel area on the border between Syria and Lebanon that it said were used by Hezbollah to transport military equipment.

The strikes have refocused Israeli military planning on the eastern border, underscoring concerns over border crossings and the region’s lack of population stability.

The targeted area lies within an open geographic border strip that has been repeatedly struck, indicating a gradual transformation into a zone of indirect pressure used to convey security messages beyond the immediate tactical framework, without sliding into a full-scale confrontation.

Abandoned village and closed crossings

The mayor of Hosh al Sayyed Ali, Mohammad Nasr al-Din, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the strikes did not hit any inhabited areas, noting that the village has been deserted for a long time.

He said all crossings in the area had already been closed and unusable before the strikes, on both the Lebanese and Syrian sides, adding that there was no crossing or smuggling and that the village was completely empty of residents.

Nasr al-Din said the Syrian side and the Lebanese army prevent passage through these crossings, making the strikes puzzling.

He said the damage was limited to material losses, including roads and some nearby facilities, as well as damage to a main bridge in the area.

He added that residents of Hosh al Sayyed Ali have been displaced for some time, with most currently living in Hermel and surrounding areas, some in tents or garages, under difficult humanitarian conditions.

Preventing the rebuilding of capabilities

The strike on Hosh al Sayyed Ali and what are known as illegal crossings fall within the framework of daily Israeli escalation aimed at cutting off any potential supply lines to Hezbollah and preventing it from rebuilding its military structure, retired Brigadier General Saeed Qazzah told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He said Israel has for some time pursued a policy of systematically tracking anything it considers logistical or military support routes for Hezbollah.

Qazzah said claims of full control over borders and crossings remain theoretical, noting that smuggling cannot be completely eliminated between any two countries, even with army deployments and strict monitoring.

He said intercepting one arms shipment necessarily means others may have passed, as smuggling by nature cannot be fully prevented.

Qazzah noted that Israel says Hezbollah is smuggling weapons from Syria, while facts on the ground show Syrian security forces intercepting arms shipments heading from Syria into Lebanon.

He said Israel is pursuing all means of transporting military equipment from Syria to Hezbollah in order to prevent it from rebuilding its capabilities.

Israeli escalation

Qazzah said the developments are not limited to a narrow military signal, adding that all indicators suggest Israeli escalation is likely to be broad and extensive.

He said Israel will not allow Hezbollah to return to the period between 2006 and 2023, when it monitored the growth of the group’s military capabilities and built a target bank before deciding on confrontation.

He added that Israel was fully aware of Hezbollah’s military buildup during those years and had wagered that it would remain within the framework of internal deterrence, before shifting to the option of wide-scale strikes and the destruction of heavy weapons depots.

He stressed that Israel will not allow Hezbollah to rebuild militarily by any means, whether by pursuing known or newly discovered facilities or by targeting potential supply routes.

Qazzah said Israel could continue striking all sources of Hezbollah’s strength across all Lebanese territory without limiting targets to a specific area, adding that the actions also fall within a framework of sustained pressure on Lebanon to push it toward the next phase, namely, confining weapons north of the Litani River.

 


Hamas Disarmament, Reconstruction Plan Hinge on Gaza Truce Understandings

A Palestinian child pulls containers filled with water at the Jabalia refugee camp in the northern Gaza Strip (AFP)
A Palestinian child pulls containers filled with water at the Jabalia refugee camp in the northern Gaza Strip (AFP)
TT

Hamas Disarmament, Reconstruction Plan Hinge on Gaza Truce Understandings

A Palestinian child pulls containers filled with water at the Jabalia refugee camp in the northern Gaza Strip (AFP)
A Palestinian child pulls containers filled with water at the Jabalia refugee camp in the northern Gaza Strip (AFP)

Attention is once again turning to the stalled second phase of the Gaza ceasefire agreement, as momentum builds toward its long-delayed implementation and questions mount over how its most contentious provisions will be handled, notably those concerning the disarmament of Hamas and the reconstruction of the war-ravaged enclave.

The anticipated provisions, unfolding amid ongoing Israeli obstacles and violations since the agreement took effect months ago, require further understanding to push the ceasefire forward, experts told Asharq Al-Awsat.

They estimated that Washington would exert significant pressure to complete the agreement, driven by its need to do so to support its presidency of the Peace Council, whose role remains disputed between the United States and Western countries.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty, in a phone call with his Emirati counterpart Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, voiced support for US President Donald Trump’s initiative to launch the Peace Council and welcomed the move, according to a statement by Egypt’s Foreign Ministry on Friday.

Abdelatty stressed the importance of moving ahead with the requirements of the second phase of the US president’s plan, backing the national committee to administer Gaza, and swiftly deploying an international stabilization force to monitor the ceasefire, paving the way for early recovery and reconstruction.

Meanwhile, Israel’s i24NEWS website reported on Thursday that “understandings are taking shape between the United States and Hamas regarding disarmament in the Gaza Strip.” It said an upcoming meeting between US envoy Steve Witkoff and senior Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya would seek to bridge gaps between the two sides and examine whether a disarmament agreement could be advanced while preserving Israel’s security and reducing security threats.

Witkoff is expected to meet al-Hayya soon to discuss a draft agreement that includes, among other issues, arrangements for dismantling weapons in the enclave, including distinguishing between heavy and light arms, to sign what would be called an “understanding agreement” on firearms, rather than a weapons surrender deal.

Disarmament is not the only issue under discussion. Talk has also intensified over reconstruction, which Egypt and Arab states insist should cover the entire Gaza Strip, in line with the Egyptian plan approved by Arab leaders in March 2025.

By contrast, US President Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, said on Thursday in Davos that Washington envisions a “new Gaza,” transforming the war-ravaged territory into a luxury resort within three years.

Said Okasha, a political analyst specializing in Israeli affairs at the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, said the remaining provisions of the Gaza agreement clearly require further understandings, especially on Hamas disarmament and reconstruction, given the current uncertainty over Israel’s positions.

He said Israel accepts low-intensity attacks but rejects any withdrawal or reconstruction without the complete disarmament of Hamas. Any gradual disarmament understandings may not be accepted and could obstruct the phase, pushing the parties back to new negotiations with mediators. Still, he said, there is no alternative to continuing talks at this critical time.

Palestinian political analyst Nizar Nazzal said the US understanding of Hamas’ weapons differs from Israel’s zero-tolerance approach, and that understandings may emerge from the Witkoff-al-Hayya meeting to freeze or manage the arms issue.

He expected Hamas to find common ground with Washington on the matter, bolstering implementation of the agreement.

In his speech at the Davos forum on Thursday, Kushner stressed that Hamas disarmament is one of the ceasefire provisions in force since Oct. 10, saying it would encourage companies and donors to commit to the enclave.

He outlined what he called a “new Gaza” within three years and called for at least $25 billion in investments to rebuild infrastructure and public services.

Okasha said Kushner’s plan may be the most likely to move forward, provided understandings are reached with mediators on how to implement it.

Nazzal, however, cast doubt on Kushner’s remarks, saying he presented videos depicting Gaza as a paradise, but that Washington’s track record in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict does not inspire confidence, raising expectations that fighting could resume.

Amid these concerns, Israel’s public broadcaster reported on Thursday that Israel had settled the issue of operating the Rafah border crossing with Egypt, saying it would establish an additional crossing, “Rafah 2,” adjacent to the existing one and operated by Israel itself.

The broadcaster said the main crossing would be run by the European Union Border Assistance Mission, with participation from officers of the Palestinian Authority’s General Intelligence Service. In contrast, the new crossing would be subject to Shin Bet checks and Israeli remote screening procedures, including facial imaging and identity card verification.

Okasha said the new crossing would likely be built inside Palestinian territory rather than on the Egyptian border, possibly near the Karni crossing, noting that Cairo would reject any arrangement on its border with Israel.

He added that Israel does not want to take any additional steps under the agreement, but that US pressure remains decisive in implementing its provisions.

Nazzal said Israel does not want more crossings but seeks to assert its sovereignty through control over any crossing, using it to apply pressure in future solutions that advance its gains.

He stressed that the United States would not allow Israel or others to derail the “Trump plan,” predicting Israeli withdrawals, increased aid, the reopening of Rafah, and further positive developments.