UN Human Rights Commissioner Calls for Accountability for Atrocity Crimes in Sudan

UN Human Rights commissioner Volker Turk 
UN Human Rights commissioner Volker Turk 
TT

UN Human Rights Commissioner Calls for Accountability for Atrocity Crimes in Sudan

UN Human Rights commissioner Volker Turk 
UN Human Rights commissioner Volker Turk 

UN Human Rights commissioner Volker Turk said on Sunday he is alarmed by the increasing militarization of society by all parties to the conflict in Sudan, also expressing his worries that the atrocity crimes committed during and after the takeover of El Fasher would be repeated in the Kordofan region.

Speaking at a press conference in Port Sudan, where the government had been operating as a temporary capital since the conflict began, the UN envoy said the proliferation of advanced military equipment, in particular drones, across Sudan has enhanced the military capabilities of both the Sudanese army (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), prolonging hostilities and deepening the crisis for civilians.

“I am deeply alarmed by the increasing militarization of society by all parties to the conflict, including through the arming of civilians and recruitment and use of children,” Turk noted.

The envoy said that during his visit to refugee camps in north Sudan, he heard accounts of widespread summary executions by RSF during the offensive on El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur region – for revenge, for suspected affiliation with the Sudanese Army or its allied Joint Forces.

He added, “I am very worried that the atrocity crimes committed during and after the takeover of El Fasher are at grave risk of repeating themselves in the Kordofan region, where the conflict has been rapidly escalating since late October.”

Horror and Hell

Turk also said the Sudanese population had endured “horror and hell,” especially with the expansion of the fighting in Kordofan.

“The Kordofan states are extremely volatile, with relentless military engagements, heavy shelling, drone bombardments and airstrikes causing widespread destruction and collapse of essential services,” he warned.

Since the end of October, and after taking control of El Fasher in Darfur, the RSF attacks have expanded into the neighboring Kordofan region, resulting in a continued displacement of civilians from the besieged city – all in the context of extreme food insecurity, with famine conditions confirmed in Kadugli, and risk of famine in other areas including Dilling, according to Turk.

The latest UN figures show that more than 65,000 people have been displaced since October.

At his press conference at Port Sudan airport, the envoy said that during his four-day visit to Port Sudan, Dongola, Ad Dabba and Merowe, he has met with those who have been hardest hit by brutal violence and injustice in this war.

“The terrifying experiences of these survivors must provoke action to end this conflict, and to make sure they can access what they need: medical care, psychosocial care, justice and support to pursue education and a livelihood”.

End This Madness

Turk and his UN team had visited the Al Afad site for internally displaced people (IDPs) in Ad Dabba, where they met with a large number of displaced people from the regions of Darfur and Kordofan.

“In my meetings with more than 50 local and international organizations in Dongola and Port Sudan, I heard appeals directed to those waging this war and the international community to end this madness,” he said.

“And to allow NGOs, journalists, lawyers and humanitarian actors to do their essential work without undue restrictions and reprisals,” Turk added.

He said the RSF and the Sudanese army must cease intolerable attacks against civilian objects that are indispensable to the civilian population, including markets, health facilities, schools and shelters.

“Attacks on critical civilian infrastructure are serious violations that can amount to war crimes,” Turk affirmed.

The UN envoy said the international community must ensure that the perpetrators of the horrific violations in Sudan face justice, regardless of their affiliation.

My Office, he said, is working to document and report on these violations and abuses to pave the way for accountability.

Turk described as “despicable” the fact that large sums of money are being spent on procuring increasingly advanced weaponry – funds he said that should be used to alleviate the suffering of the population.

Protection of Civilians

The envoy then called on all parties to the conflict to ensure the protection of civilians and civilian infrastructure, to guarantee safe passage for civilians to leave areas of active conflict – including Kadugli and Dilling – and for humanitarian aid to enter where it is needed.

He also repeated his call from three years ago, when he last visited Sudan, urging all those involved to set aside entrenched positions, power games, and personal interests, and to focus on the common interests of the Sudanese people.

The envoy then left Sudan with a plea that human rights be central to building confidence and bringing this war to an end, to resuming the difficult task of building a sustainable peace.

“It is difficult, but certainly not impossible, with the resilience and power of the Sudanese people,” he affirmed.



Iraq Reopens Border Crossing with Iran

Stranded Iranians and Iraqis wait at the Iraq-Iran border following the Iraqi government's decision to close the Shalamsheh border crossing in the southern Basra province on September 12, 2026. (AFP)
Stranded Iranians and Iraqis wait at the Iraq-Iran border following the Iraqi government's decision to close the Shalamsheh border crossing in the southern Basra province on September 12, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Iraq Reopens Border Crossing with Iran

Stranded Iranians and Iraqis wait at the Iraq-Iran border following the Iraqi government's decision to close the Shalamsheh border crossing in the southern Basra province on September 12, 2026. (AFP)
Stranded Iranians and Iraqis wait at the Iraq-Iran border following the Iraqi government's decision to close the Shalamsheh border crossing in the southern Basra province on September 12, 2026. (AFP)

Iraqi authorities reopened on Tuesday a border crossing with Iran after closing it last month amid mounting US pressure to isolate Tehran.

The Iraqi government closed the Al-Sheeb crossing in the Maysan province in October. Two political sources told AFP that the US was pressuring Baghdad to close most crossings with neighboring Iran.

The head of Iraq's border crossings authority Alaa al-Waeli told the state news agency (INA) that Al-Sheeb crossing would reopen Tuesday morning after the completion of the "necessary procedures" required to resume operations and "ensure the smooth movement of travelers and goods".

He added that authorities would temporarily close the Al-Mandali border crossing in Diyala province starting on Friday for "maintenance".

The closure of the Al-Sheeb crossing sparked tensions between the central government and local authorities in Maysan, with several protests erupting over the shutdown of a key route.

In September, Baghdad temporarily closed several crossings with Iran after authorities determined that an unclaimed drone attack on a Saudi pipeline originated from an area near Al-Sheeb.

Pro-Iran armed groups have supported Tehran during the Middle East war, claiming hundreds of attacks on US bases in Iraq and across the region.


Egypt Permanently Lists Muslim Brotherhood as Terrorist Organization

A scene from a previous trial of Muslim Brotherhood members in Egypt (File photo: AFP). 
A scene from a previous trial of Muslim Brotherhood members in Egypt (File photo: AFP). 
TT

Egypt Permanently Lists Muslim Brotherhood as Terrorist Organization

A scene from a previous trial of Muslim Brotherhood members in Egypt (File photo: AFP). 
A scene from a previous trial of Muslim Brotherhood members in Egypt (File photo: AFP). 

Egyptian authorities have permanently placed the Muslim Brotherhood on the country’s list of terrorist entities, according to decisions by the Public Prosecution published in the Official Gazette on Monday.

The Brotherhood has been designated a terrorist organization in Egypt since 2013 and has been placed on the country’s terrorist entities list several times.

Most of its senior leaders, including Supreme Guide Mohamed Badie, remain in Egyptian prisons in cases involving violence and murder following the group’s removal from power that year.

Other Brotherhood members wanted by Egyptian authorities remain abroad, where they continue to lead the organization amid deep internal divisions, according to observers.

Under the latest decisions, the Public Prosecution terminated the effects of two temporary listings issued in 2022: Decision No. 6 concerning terrorist entities and Decision No. 13 concerning individuals designated as terrorists. Both were published in Egypt’s official legal gazette, Al-Waqa’i Al-Masriyya, on January 3, 2023.

Prosecutors also ordered the Brotherhood’s permanent inclusion on the list of terrorist entities.

The decision permanently added three Brotherhood figures convicted under final, binding court rulings to the list of designated terrorists.

They were identified as Abdel Rahman Hassan Mohamed Meligy, Jamal Abdel Hamid Jomaa and Osama Ibrahim Mohamed Mostafa.

The Public Prosecution cited Law No. 8 of 2015, governing lists of terrorist entities and individuals, and its subsequent amendments as the legal basis for the decisions.

A judicial source familiar with the procedures explained that listing an individual as a terrorist automatically triggers measures including asset freezes, travel bans, placement on arrival watchlists and the withdrawal or cancellation of passports.

According to observers, publication of the decision in the Official Gazette also activates a range of restrictions against the Brotherhood, including a ban on the organization, suspension of all its activities and closure of its premises.

The measures prohibit direct or indirect financing, fundraising and the collection of material donations on its behalf, as well as civic or religious outreach activities conducted under any name.

Local media reports on Monday explained that the main distinction between temporary and permanent designation lies in their legal basis.

Temporary listing follows a judicial decision issued at the request of the prosecutor general, while permanent designation is based on a final criminal conviction against an organization or individual.

International Campaign Against Brotherhood Expands

The campaign against the Muslim Brotherhood has expanded across the Arab world and internationally in recent months.

In May, US President Donald Trump’s administration discussed a national counterterrorism strategy that focused primarily on the Brotherhood, portraying it as the ideological source of modern extremist terrorism.

The move followed Washington’s designation in January of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and its branches in Jordan and Lebanon as terrorist organizations.

In March, the United States added the Brotherhood’s Sudanese branch to the same list.

Argentina also moved earlier this year to designate the Brotherhood’s branches in Egypt, Jordan and Lebanon as terrorist organizations.


Palestinians Await Eisenkot Govt While Not Expecting Radical Change

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (second from left) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (second from right) at a meeting in New York in 2009. (AFP/Getty Images)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (second from left) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (second from right) at a meeting in New York in 2009. (AFP/Getty Images)
TT

Palestinians Await Eisenkot Govt While Not Expecting Radical Change

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (second from left) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (second from right) at a meeting in New York in 2009. (AFP/Getty Images)
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (second from left) and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas (second from right) at a meeting in New York in 2009. (AFP/Getty Images)

Palestinian leaders are closely watching Israeli Prime Minister-designate Gadi Eisenkot’s efforts to form a government and unseat Benjamin Netanyahu, hoping for a shift in Israeli policy after four years of hostility.

Although the Palestinian Authority (PA) has refrained from commenting publicly on Israel’s election results, officials are scrutinizing Eisenkot’s statements and political moves for signs of a possible change in relations.

The PA has maintained its longstanding position that Israeli elections are an internal matter. Yet few have more at stake in the outcome after four years in which Netanyahu’s government waged an unrelenting campaign against the Palestinian Authority and Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Palestinian officials, including President Mahmoud Abbas, declared before the elections that they were prepared to engage with any Israeli government. They have stopped short, however, of speaking of a new chapter in relations.

Judging policies, not personalities

Mahmoud al-Habbash, an adviser to Abbas, stressed that the PA would judge any incoming Israeli prime minister by their policies and positions on the Palestinian issue.

“It is too early to judge Eisenkot,” Habbash told Asharq Al-Awsat. “We do not judge individuals. Frankly, the names of those governing Israel do not matter to us.”

“What matters are their actual positions, policies and programs concerning the Palestinian issue, and their commitment to international legitimacy and international law,” he stressed.

These factors will determine the PA’s relationship with any Israeli prime minister or government, he added.

Habbash declined to say whether Eisenkot was the PA’s preferred candidate, reiterating that it was premature to assess him or a government he had yet to form.

Nevertheless, he said: “We hope for a different Israeli leadership that respects international legitimacy and the agreements signed, beginning with Oslo, the Paris Agreement and subsequent accords.”

Such a leadership should have the willingness, determination and political program to put negotiations back on track toward an agreement ending the current situation, he said.

Eisenkot opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state, the PA’s central political objective. However, he has shown greater openness than Netanyahu toward strengthening the PA and transferring withheld Palestinian revenues.

He has also previously argued against Israel directly ruling millions of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza as an occupying power.

Habbash stressed that relations between Palestinians and the Israeli government involve interconnected political, economic and administrative issues.

“These range from everyday matters affecting people’s lives and needs to clearance revenues, compliance with signed agreements and, ultimately, Israel’s position on our legitimate national rights,” he explained.

“If Eisenkot translates his words into action, we will respond positively and remain open to dialogue,” Habbash affirmed.

‘Anyone is better than Netanyahu’

Behind closed doors, PA officials said that almost any alternative would be preferable to Netanyahu, whom they accuse of seeking to dismantle the Authority, displace Palestinians and eliminate their national cause.

They have avoided making such views public for fear their statements could be exploited in Israel’s domestic political struggle.

“It is not about Eisenkot. Any Israeli would be better for us than Netanyahu and his current government,” a senior Palestinian official told Asharq Al-Awsat. “This is the most hostile government Palestinians have ever known - a government of extermination.”

During Israel’s 2022 elections, the PA reportedly sought to help defeat Netanyahu, prompting Israel’s domestic security agency, Shin Bet, to warn against interference in the electoral process.

This time, the PA did not seek to intervene, but maintained various channels of communication with Arab party leaders.

Palestinian officials have expressed pride in the number of seats won by Arab parties in the Knesset, whose electoral gains effectively prevented Netanyahu from remaining in power.

Improve conditions

At a minimum, Palestinian officials hope Eisenkot will ease economic pressures and improve security conditions in the occupied territories.

“We are not suggesting that Eisenkot is a savior. We know he will not lead us to statehood,” an informed Palestinian source told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“But many other crucial issues are at stake: the future of the PA, the economy, clearance revenues, the West Bank, security conditions, settler violence, the future of Gaza, reconstruction and governance.”

The source hoped for progress on these issues, describing any improvement as a potential foundation for further engagement. Nevertheless, the Palestinian leadership remains cautious and does not expect a decisive policy shift.

Change in form, not substance

Palestine Liberation Organization Executive Committee member Wasel Abu Yousef was more skeptical, saying that a change in Israeli leadership would affect appearances rather than fundamental policy.

“There may be change, but it will be in form, not substance,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“They agree on legitimizing settlements, preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state, separating the Gaza Strip and rejecting international resolutions. They are pursuing the Greater Israel project and, to varying degrees, denying the rights and existence of the Palestinian people.”

Meaningful change would require recognition of Palestinian self-determination and the establishment of an independent state in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem, he said.

Habbash similarly reiterated the PA’s willingness to engage while insisting that economic relief alone could not resolve the conflict.

“Our cause is not merely about daily living conditions or improving livelihoods. It is about political rights, foremost among them the establishment of a Palestinian state and an end to the occupation.”