Netanyahu Seeks Alternatives to Control over Palestinian Antiquities

One of the historic Solomon’s Pools in Bethlehem, which Israeli Finance Minister Bezalal Smotrich has vowed to take control of. (Bethlehem Municipality)
One of the historic Solomon’s Pools in Bethlehem, which Israeli Finance Minister Bezalal Smotrich has vowed to take control of. (Bethlehem Municipality)
TT

Netanyahu Seeks Alternatives to Control over Palestinian Antiquities

One of the historic Solomon’s Pools in Bethlehem, which Israeli Finance Minister Bezalal Smotrich has vowed to take control of. (Bethlehem Municipality)
One of the historic Solomon’s Pools in Bethlehem, which Israeli Finance Minister Bezalal Smotrich has vowed to take control of. (Bethlehem Municipality)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ordered a comprehensive review of a controversial Antiquities Authority bill for the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and instructed Cabinet Secretary Yossi Fuchs to look for “alternatives” to the draft law, which is now being debated by the Knesset Education Committee, after security and professional bodies warned of “serious international damage.”

Hebrew media outlets quoted Israeli sources on Tuesday as saying Netanyahu was effectively obstructing the bill because it threatens Israel’s foreign relations, making the chances of passing any version of it before the current Knesset is dissolved “slim.”

Netanyahu’s position followed warnings from legal and security officials against the law, which establishes a “civil heritage authority” in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

The Knesset plenum approved the bill in its first reading this month. The legislation would give the Antiquities Authority, once established, absolute authority over archaeological sites in the occupied West Bank. The scope was later expanded to include the Gaza Strip.

Palestinian antiquities under an Israeli minister

The bill, submitted by Likud lawmaker Amit Halevi, whose party is led by Netanyahu, calls for establishing an “Antiquities Authority” under the responsibility of Israel’s “heritage minister.”

It would be “fully responsible for handling all heritage and antiquities affairs in the area,” with powers including land confiscation, archaeological excavations and their management, and law enforcement. The powers of the “archaeology officer” in the army’s Civil Administration would be transferred to it.

The Knesset Education and Culture Committee is discussing the bill to draft its final version and submit it for a second and third reading. During that process, disputes emerged and Netanyahu intervened.

A representative of Israel’s National Security Council confirmed on Tuesday that Netanyahu “authorized the Cabinet secretary to examine the matter and submit the findings to him.”

A representative of Israel’s Foreign Ministry who attended the Knesset Education Committee on Tuesday also confirmed this, telling members that “the prime minister authorized the Cabinet secretary, and alternative options to the law are currently being examined.”

Asked about the Foreign Ministry’s position, he said: “It is too early to express a position.”

Netanyahu’s stance confused the proposal’s supporters and those who had pushed for it.

Education Committee Chairman Zvi Sukkot said that the law was getting promoted in the committee.

‘A violation of law’

Tami Sela, the legal adviser to the Knesset Education Committee, submitted a legal opinion stating that the bill violates international law, raises legal difficulties, and could be interpreted as creeping annexation.

“This is an unusual proposal and an unprecedented one, as an Israeli civil authority that is not part of the Israeli military would be granted powers in Palestinian territories and over their residents,” she said.

“In addition, the proposed law contradicts the Oslo Accords and constitutes a violation of the rules of international law.”

Sela noted that military authority in the West Bank is considered temporary, and that “passing this law could strengthen claims of a gradual annexation process.”

In addition to Sela, security officials opposed the law. The Israeli army said it “would harm the standing of military and security officials, and would be viewed internationally as a step involving de facto annexation.”

The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities also appealed to Netanyahu to prevent the law from passing.

According to the Academy, the passage of the law will be viewed in political and academic circles as the annexation of Judea and Samaria.

This will undoubtedly lead to an immediate deterioration in Israel’s international relations in the field of archaeology and will also affect other areas of science and research.

The council of the Israel Antiquities Authority submitted a similar position paper, warning that “the bill could cause significant damage to academic relations with international bodies.”

It said the legislation “will be interpreted as a violation of international law, and will severely harm Israeli archaeologists’ membership in international organizations and research cooperation, including important excavation projects in the country.”

Israeli media outlets, including The Times of Israel, said the antiquities bill will most likely not be brought to a final vote in the plenum before the Knesset is dissolved.

The Times of Israel said the Knesset plenum convened on Tuesday with no bills on its agenda.

The coalition currently cannot rely on the support of the ultra-Orthodox parties in the Knesset, which led the campaign to dissolve the Knesset, to back its legislation.

This is the first time the Knesset has attempted to give a civil authority powers over Palestinian Authority territory and its residents.

It comes as the Israeli government has pushed a series of laws that would weaken and dismantle the Palestinian Authority and expand Israeli powers in the West Bank.

Smotrich enters Solomon’s Pools

Ignoring Netanyahu and the criticism, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich entered the archaeological area of Solomon’s Pools in Bethlehem on Monday and vowed to take control of it.

Speaking from the site, Smotrich said: “Transferring these pools and this heritage achievement to the terrorist Palestinians was a mistake. It should not have been transferred to Area A for them to desecrate. We will restore the area. I have taken it upon myself to rebuild these pools and open them to visitors. This is a historic matter and a matter of Zionist heritage. We will succeed, God willing, and we will achieve this important goal.”

Solomon’s Pools are among the most important historical, archaeological, and water landmarks in Palestine. They are located southwest of Bethlehem and consist of three very large heritage pools.

The Palestinian Ministry of Awqaf and Religious Affairs condemned Smotrich’s move, stressing that the area is “purely Islamic endowment property.”

“This incursion represents a blatant attack on endowment properties, and a desperate attempt to impose a new colonial reality and falsify the historical and Islamic identity of the area,” it said.

The ministry called on the international community, rights institutions, and UNESCO to intervene immediately to stop what it called this arrogance.



Arab League Chief Condemns Israeli Attacks on South Lebanon, Urges Action

Arab League Secretary-General Nabil Fahmy listens to a Lebanese Army officer pointing out areas occupied by Israeli forces in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh, South Lebanon, alongside Social Affairs Minister Haneen Sayed (AP). 
Arab League Secretary-General Nabil Fahmy listens to a Lebanese Army officer pointing out areas occupied by Israeli forces in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh, South Lebanon, alongside Social Affairs Minister Haneen Sayed (AP). 
TT

Arab League Chief Condemns Israeli Attacks on South Lebanon, Urges Action

Arab League Secretary-General Nabil Fahmy listens to a Lebanese Army officer pointing out areas occupied by Israeli forces in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh, South Lebanon, alongside Social Affairs Minister Haneen Sayed (AP). 
Arab League Secretary-General Nabil Fahmy listens to a Lebanese Army officer pointing out areas occupied by Israeli forces in Zawtar al-Gharbiyeh, South Lebanon, alongside Social Affairs Minister Haneen Sayed (AP). 

Arab League Secretary-General Nabil Fahmy condemned Israeli attacks on South Lebanon as “unacceptable,” calling for concrete Arab action to support the country, strengthen its army and help displaced residents return home.

Fahmy made the remarks during a visit to the southern city of Tyre, where he met senior Lebanese Army officers at the Benoit Barakat barracks, accompanied by Social Affairs Minister Haneen Sayed.

Fahmy said he had chosen Lebanon as one of his first foreign destinations since taking office to see firsthand the challenges facing its people.

His visit to the south, he explained, was meant to reassure residents that the Arab world and the international community recognized their suffering and were prepared to provide tangible support.

He pointed to a September resolution by the Arab League’s ministerial council that addressed Lebanon’s crisis and its underlying causes, particularly repeated Israeli attacks on civilians and infrastructure.

After touring the town of Zawtar and the city of Nabatieh, Fahmy described the destruction he witnessed as “distressing.”

He accused Israel of systematically demolishing residential areas, seizing land and seeking to displace civilians, potentially paving the way for further occupation.

Despite the devastation, he expressed confidence that Lebanese residents would remain attached to their land.

The Arab League was working with the Lebanese government to explore reconstruction efforts and ways to restore stability, he added.

While rebuilding would require action across several sectors, Fahmy stressed that Arab solidarity could not be limited to statements of condemnation.

“This is the beginning of a sustained process, not the end of the road,” he said, reaffirming the League’s commitment to Lebanon.

Army seeks support, post-UNIFIL arrangements

Brig. Gen. Nicolas Tabet, commander of the Lebanese Army’s South Litani Sector, welcomed the visit as a sign of Arab solidarity at a time of mounting security and humanitarian challenges.

He said Israeli attacks had left widespread destruction and displaced thousands of Lebanese, while continued occupation and security threats prevented families from returning safely to their villages.

The situation was also hampering the army’s deployment to the internationally recognized border.

Tabet called for Arab and international pressure to halt Israeli attacks, secure a full withdrawal from Lebanese territory and uphold the country’s sovereignty.

Despite difficult conditions and limited resources, the army remained committed to its duties, he said, urging the Arab League to mobilize diplomatic support, strengthen the military and help rebuild the south.

He also called for lasting security arrangements after the mandate of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) ends.

Such arrangements, developed with the UN and international partners, would be essential to preventing a security vacuum and implementing Security Council Resolution 1701.

Describing Fahmy’s visit as a rare and welcome gesture, Tabet said it offered reassurance that Lebanon had not been left to face its challenges alone.


End of UNIFIL Mission Impacts Hundreds of Jobs in South Lebanon

Head of Mission and Force Commander of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) Major General Diodato Abagnara of the Italian Army reviews the troops at the UNIFIL base, near Mansouri, Southern Lebanon, September 19, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
Head of Mission and Force Commander of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) Major General Diodato Abagnara of the Italian Army reviews the troops at the UNIFIL base, near Mansouri, Southern Lebanon, September 19, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
TT

End of UNIFIL Mission Impacts Hundreds of Jobs in South Lebanon

Head of Mission and Force Commander of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) Major General Diodato Abagnara of the Italian Army reviews the troops at the UNIFIL base, near Mansouri, Southern Lebanon, September 19, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
Head of Mission and Force Commander of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) Major General Diodato Abagnara of the Italian Army reviews the troops at the UNIFIL base, near Mansouri, Southern Lebanon, September 19, 2026. REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir

As UNIFIL’s mandate in Lebanon draws to a close, the implications of its withdrawal extend beyond military and security operations to the labor market in southern Lebanon, where the mission’s decades-long presence has sustained hundreds of jobs and supported local businesses that depend on its demand for goods and services.

As job cuts begin ahead of the withdrawal process, which is set to gather pace at the end of this year, concerns are mounting over the economic and social impact on employees and their families, as well as on small and medium-sized businesses that depend on spending generated by the international force’s presence.

400 Local Employees Work for UNIFIL

According to UNIFIL spokesperson Candice Ardell, the mission currently employs around 400 local staff, most of whom are based in southern Lebanon, while some positions are based in Beirut.

In comments to Asharq Al-Awsat, Ardell said local employees perform a wide range of duties, from the technical work required to support the mission to security, translation, media, political and civil affairs, among other functions.

Most of these positions are based in the south. Many employees live in the area, while others commute to work from elsewhere, she added.

Ardell denied that job cuts had begun as part of UNIFIL’s force reduction and withdrawal process, explaining that the process was expected to start after Dec. 31, 2026.

Families Depend on UNIFIL Salaries

In the border town of Rmeish, 85 families still have members employed directly by UNIFIL on a permanent basis, earning monthly salaries on which they and their families depend for their livelihoods.

Milad Alam, a former Rmeish mayor, told Asharq Al-Awsat in an earlier interview that around 250 other families also have members working for companies contracted by UNIFIL, adding that they, too, stand to lose their monthly sources of income.

Researcher Mohammad Shamseddine said the number of people employed by or contracted to UNIFIL had fallen significantly, noting that the current workforce was well below the roughly 1,200 employees it had previously numbered.

Annual Losses Estimated at $45 Million to $55 Million

Economist Jassem Ajaka warned that UNIFIL’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon would have economic and financial repercussions extending well beyond the south, affecting the Lebanese economy as a whole. The fallout would include reduced foreign currency inflows, job losses and weaker trade and investment, while placing additional pressure on the state treasury.

In comments to Asharq Al-Awsat, Ajaka said UNIFIL’s annual budget stood at about $553 million, estimating that the withdrawal would result in a direct loss of $45 million to $55 million a year in foreign currency inflows, as international forces cease spending locally on contracts with domestic suppliers, restaurants, shops and supply chains.

Ajaka estimated that UNIFIL’s withdrawal would eliminate $15 million to $22 million in annual wages for Lebanese staff, whose average net annual compensation ranges from $15,000 to $25,000.

He estimated that UNIFIL’s withdrawal would add $25 million to $40 million in annual costs for the Lebanese treasury, as the Lebanese army takes over expenses previously covered through cooperation with the international force, putting further pressure on public finances and potentially widening the primary budget deficit.

The economist concluded saying that the real estate sector would be among the hardest hit, particularly in Naqoura, Tyre, Marjayoun and Bint Jbeil. The termination of hundreds of rental contracts held by UNIFIL’s civilian and military personnel could result in annual losses of $10 million to $18 million. He also warned that commercial and residential property values in affected areas could fall by 25% to 45%.


Libya Approves Contentious Türkiye Deal Over Mediterranean Waters

The Libyan parliament meets on Tuesday. (Parliamentary spokesman Abdullah Bliheg)
The Libyan parliament meets on Tuesday. (Parliamentary spokesman Abdullah Bliheg)
TT

Libya Approves Contentious Türkiye Deal Over Mediterranean Waters

The Libyan parliament meets on Tuesday. (Parliamentary spokesman Abdullah Bliheg)
The Libyan parliament meets on Tuesday. (Parliamentary spokesman Abdullah Bliheg)

Libya’s east-based parliament unanimously approved a contested eastern Mediterranean maritime agreement with Türkiye on Tuesday as Turkish chief of intelligence Ibrahim Kalin visited the capital Tripoli.

The House of Representatives voted to adopt the memorandum of understanding signed in 2019 by Türkiye and Libya’s then-government in Tripoli, the Government of National Accord, which was rejected by Egypt, Greece and Cyprus.

Greece’s Foreign Ministry rejected the vote, saying in a statement that it “does not alter the illegal, invalid and groundless nature of the memorandum.”

The ministry said Türkiye and Libya do not have opposite or adjacent coasts that could provide a legal basis for delimiting maritime zones. It said the agreement disregards the rights of Greek islands, which lie between the Turkish and Libyan coasts.

“Geography and the international Law of the Sea cannot be changed by unilateral, legally unfounded parliamentary decisions,” the ministry said. It added that Greece had informed its partners and allies and “will take all appropriate measures to safeguard its sovereign rights.”

Cyprus also condemned the vote, calling the memorandum “illegal, null, and void.”

The Libyan-Türkiye agreement defines maritime jurisdiction areas between the two countries in the Mediterranean, where major natural gas discoveries in recent years have fueled competing claims to offshore waters.

Lawmakers also repealed two resolutions passed in 2020, parliamentary spokesman Abdullah Bliheg said. One rejected agreements with Türkiye, while the other cut political ties with Ankara. Parliament had opposed the accords at a time when Türkiye was backing the Tripoli government against Libyan National Army Khalifa Haftar’s forces.

Head of the Government of National Unity Abdul Hamid al-Dbeibah meets with Turkish chief of intelligence Ibrahim Kalin in Tripoli. (HOKOMITNA platform)

Officials in both camps welcomed Tuesday’s vote. Saddam Haftar, Khalifa Haftar’s son, said in a statement that the decisions reflected “a move toward overcoming disputes of the past.”

He called the maritime agreement a tool to protect Libya’s economic interests in the Mediterranean and described Türkiye as “a significant regional power.”

The Foreign Ministry of the Tripoli-based Government of National Unity, led by Abdul Hamid al-Dbeibah, called the vote “a positive development” for relations with Türkiye.

It said cooperation would proceed “in accordance with the relevant rules and principles of international law.”

Dbeibah also met Tuesday in Tripoli with Kalin. A government statement said they discussed security, regional developments, and migration.

The European Union has said the agreement violates the rights of third countries. Türkiye is not a party to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Egypt also rejected the accord. In August 2020, Cairo and Athens signed their own maritime agreement in response. Greek officials have said it effectively nullifies the Turkish-Libyan deal.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty said he discussed the situation in Libya and the eastern Mediterranean in a phone call with his Greek counterpart on Tuesday, without directly mentioning the vote.