Iran to Import No Wheat until March 2025

FILE PHOTO: A combine harvests wheat in a field near the town of Akkol, some 110 km (68 miles) north of the capital Astana October 11, 2011. REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov
FILE PHOTO: A combine harvests wheat in a field near the town of Akkol, some 110 km (68 miles) north of the capital Astana October 11, 2011. REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov
TT

Iran to Import No Wheat until March 2025

FILE PHOTO: A combine harvests wheat in a field near the town of Akkol, some 110 km (68 miles) north of the capital Astana October 11, 2011. REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov
FILE PHOTO: A combine harvests wheat in a field near the town of Akkol, some 110 km (68 miles) north of the capital Astana October 11, 2011. REUTERS/Shamil Zhumatov

Iran will not import any wheat until March 2025 as it will rely on domestic production, the Iranian Student News Agency reported a deputy at the Agriculture Ministry saying on Thursday.

"Between March 2023 and March 2024, domestic production of wheat has reached 10.5 million tons and we only needed to import 1 million tons of wheat," Alireza Mohajer said, adding that the country expects to be self-sufficient in the production of wheat for this year.

Iran's domestic wheat output can vary widely depending on rainfall.

In some years Iran has been self-sufficient while droughts at other times have forced the country to import record high levels.
Domestic output levels fell as low as 4.5 million tons and imports rose as high as 7 million tons between March 2021 and March 2022, Mohajer said.

Between March 2022 and March 2023, domestic wheat output was 7.5 million tons while import were 3 million tons, he said.



WTO Suffers Fresh Blow as Reform Push Hits a Wall at Cameroon Meeting

Delegates attend the World Trade Organisation (WTO) 14th ministerial meeting in Yaounde, Cameroon, March 28, 2026.  WTO/Handout via REUTERS
Delegates attend the World Trade Organisation (WTO) 14th ministerial meeting in Yaounde, Cameroon, March 28, 2026. WTO/Handout via REUTERS
TT

WTO Suffers Fresh Blow as Reform Push Hits a Wall at Cameroon Meeting

Delegates attend the World Trade Organisation (WTO) 14th ministerial meeting in Yaounde, Cameroon, March 28, 2026.  WTO/Handout via REUTERS
Delegates attend the World Trade Organisation (WTO) 14th ministerial meeting in Yaounde, Cameroon, March 28, 2026. WTO/Handout via REUTERS

World Trade Organization talks broke up with no agreement on Monday on a plan for reform or even on extending a moratorium on e-commerce, piling more pressure on the trade body that finds itself increasingly sidelined by economic nationalism.

The four-day ministerial talks in Cameroon's capital Yaounde ended in the early hours with Brazil blocking a bid by the US and others to prolong a moratorium on duties for electronic transmissions like digital downloads and streaming.

Expectations for progress had been low before the talks but there had been hopes the moratorium at least would be renewed. In the end, even that proved impossible amid resistance from Brazil, and trade ministers could not agree to extend it for more than two years, which was not ⁠enough for the ⁠United States, diplomats said.

US officials and business groups expressed frustration at the impasse, and the failure to reach a joint decision was described as a "major setback for global trade" by Britain's Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle. The talks were deemed a test of the WTO's relevance after a year of huge trade turmoil and more recent major disruptions due to the US-Israeli war on Iran.

Agreeing on an ⁠e-commerce moratorium was seen as key to securing support for the WTO from the US, which under President Donald Trump has retreated from global multilateral bodies as he pursues his "America First" agenda.

The WTO said progress was made on a reform roadmap before time ran out, and discussions on issues like reworking its rules to render subsidy use more transparent and make decision-making easier are expected to continue in Geneva in May.

The US and the European Union argue that China in particular has taken advantage of the current rules to their detriment.

Diplomats worked throughout Sunday to close the gap between Brazil's initial two-year ⁠proposal and ⁠the US, which wanted a permanent extension, by drafting a plan for a four-year extension with a one-year sunset buffer, concluding in 2031, Reuters reported.

Brazil later proposed a four-year extension, with a review clause halfway through, but that failed to win support.

Developing countries have opposed a lengthy extension, arguing that the moratorium denies them potential tax revenue.

A US official said Brazil had opposed a "near-consensus document" saying "it's not US vs Brazil. It's Brazil and Türkiye v 164 members." A Brazilian diplomat said "the US wanted the sky," and that it was not prudent to pursue a longer extension given the rapid changes under way in digital trade.

Another diplomat present at the talks said US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer made delegates "uncomfortable" as he suggested there "would be consequences," if the US did not secure a long-term moratorium extension.


Dollar Bides Time as Markets Brace for Drawn-Out Middle East War

US dollar banknotes are seen in this illustration taken March 24, 2026. (Reuters)
US dollar banknotes are seen in this illustration taken March 24, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

Dollar Bides Time as Markets Brace for Drawn-Out Middle East War

US dollar banknotes are seen in this illustration taken March 24, 2026. (Reuters)
US dollar banknotes are seen in this illustration taken March 24, 2026. (Reuters)

The US dollar held broadly steady on Monday, poised for its strongest monthly gain since July as investors fret about the ramifications of a long war in the Middle East, denting the yen past the crucial 160 level and spurring intervention jitters.

Markets have been rattled this month after the conflict effectively shut the Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for about a fifth of global oil and gas flows, driving Brent crude toward its biggest monthly rise and unsettling rate expectations.

The war, sparked by US and Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28, has since spread across the Middle East, with fears of a ground offensive and the entry of Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis on Saturday further souring sentiment.

Pakistan said it was preparing to host "meaningful talks" to end the conflict in coming days even though Tehran said it is ready to respond if the United ‌States launches a ‌ground operation.

Investors were largely unmoved by comments from US President Donald Trump that Washington has ‌held "direct ⁠and indirect" talks with ⁠Iran and that its new leaders have been "very reasonable."

The US dollar was a touch weaker in Asian hours but mostly held onto its recent gains. The euro was 0.1% higher $1.15145, yet was staring at a 2.5% drop in March, its weakest monthly performance since July.

Sterling was at $1.3271, little changed on the day but set for a drop of 1.7% this month. The dollar index, which measures the US currency against six other units, was 0.2% lower at 100.1.

"What stands out is how quickly probabilities have shifted. Only two weeks ago, US boots on the ground in Iran was seen as a low-probability ⁠outcome," said Chris Weston, head of research at Pepperstone.

"That has clearly changed, reinforcing the ‌need for markets to remain open-minded. The playbook is to sell rallies ‌in risk and maintain volatility hedges"

For now, the broader market focus is firmly on oil prices as Brent crude futures sit at $115.53 ‌per barrel, up about 59% in March, its strongest monthly surge on record.

"Where the USD goes from here ‌is simply a view on oil. Where oil goes, the USD goes," said Prashan Newnaha, senior rates strategist at TD Securities.

Elevated oil prices have reignited inflation concerns, prompting US rate futures to begin pricing in the risk of a Federal Reserve rate hike later this year, a sharp shift from earlier this year when traders were betting on as many as two rate cuts in 2026.

At ‌the same time, investors are increasingly weighing the longer-term economic toll of a prolonged war.

"Central banks find themselves in the most uncomfortable of positions: facing prices that argue ⁠for tightening while growth signals ⁠argue for caution," said Marc Chandler, chief market strategist at Bannockburn Capital Markets.

"It is stagflation's calling card, and it arrived before most were ready to receive it."

FRAIL YEN BACK IN SPOTLIGHT

The Japanese yen firmed to 159.70 per dollar after hitting 160.47 earlier in the session, its weakest level since July 2024 when Tokyo last intervened in the currency markets.

The reversal came as Japan geared up its threat of yen intervention and signaled that further falls in the currency could justify a near-term interest rate hike. The yen has dropped over 2% in March on higher oil price worries.

Japan's top currency diplomat Atsushi Mimura said authorities may need to take "decisive" steps if speculative moves persist in the currency market, while Bank of Japan Governor Kazuo Ueda said the central bank will closely watch yen moves as they affect the economy and prices.

The risk-sensitive Australian dollar has struggled in March, as fears over global growth driven by higher energy costs and supply-chain disruptions have outweighed support from expectations of rate hikes at home.

The Aussie hit a two-month low of $0.6843 and was headed for a monthly drop of about 3.5%, its steepest decline since December 2024. The New Zealand dollar weakened 0.3% to $0.57355, down 4.3% in March.


Airlines Face Fare Dilemma as Fuel Spike Threatens Travel Demand

A United Airlines commercial airliner takes-off from Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, California, US, November 6, 2025. (Reuters)
A United Airlines commercial airliner takes-off from Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, California, US, November 6, 2025. (Reuters)
TT

Airlines Face Fare Dilemma as Fuel Spike Threatens Travel Demand

A United Airlines commercial airliner takes-off from Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, California, US, November 6, 2025. (Reuters)
A United Airlines commercial airliner takes-off from Los Angeles International Airport in Los Angeles, California, US, November 6, 2025. (Reuters)

Global airlines have begun to hike fares and cut capacity to cope with the sudden surge in the oil price, but the industry's ability to remain profitable may depend on whether consumers pull back on flying as gasoline costs threaten household budgets.

Before the US-Israeli conflict with Iran began last month, the airline industry had forecast record profits of $41 billion in 2026, but a doubling in jet fuel prices has placed that at risk and forced carriers to rethink their networks and strategies.

Carriers ranging from United Airlines to Air New Zealand and Scandinavia's SAS have announced capacity cuts and fare hikes, while others have imposed fuel surcharges.

"Airlines face an existential challenge," said Rigas Doganis, who once headed Greece's former national carrier, Olympic Airways and served as a director of Britain's easyJet.

"They will need to cut fares to stimulate weakening demand while higher fuel costs will be pushing them to increase fares. A perfect storm," said Doganis, who now chairs London-based consultancy firm Airline Management Group.

RECORD PASSENGER TRAFFIC

Last year, the industry ‌reported record global ‌passenger traffic that rebounded to about 9% above pre-pandemic levels even in the face of persistent ‌supply-chain ⁠challenges that affected deliveries ⁠of new planes.

Record post-pandemic demand for travel and persistent supply-chain challenges had constrained capacity growth and given airlines significant pricing power as they filled more seats on each plane.

But the scale of the increases needed to make up for the jet fuel price surge is huge at a time when consumers are under pressure from higher gasoline prices that could curb discretionary spending.

"The only way to get prices up is to reduce capacity," said Barclays' head of European transport equity research Andrew Lobbenberg. "That is what I would expect to see happen this time, and it's what we saw in the previous occasions when we had other crises; people just have to start trimming capacity."

HIGHER TICKET PRICES

United ⁠Airlines CEO Scott Kirby told ABC News last week that fares would need to rise ‌20% for the airline to cover the higher fuel costs.

Hong Kong's Cathay Pacific ‌Airways has lifted fuel surcharges twice in the last month, and from Wednesday a return trip from Sydney to London will attract an $800 fuel ‌surcharge. Before the Iran conflict, a normal round-trip economy-class fare on the route was roughly A$2,000 ($1,369.60).

Low-cost carriers could struggle the most ‌given their passengers are more price-sensitive than the corporate customers and wealthy consumers who have been increasingly targeted by premium rivals like Delta Air Lines and United Airlines, analysts say.

"I think for the more price-sensitive travelers, even the short-haul flying trip gets downgraded, potentially to rail or to bus or other alternatives," said Nathan Gee, Bank of America's head of Asia-Pacific transport research.

OIL SHOCKS

The Middle East conflict is the fourth oil shock for ‌the airline industry since the turn of the century, though the first in which carriers like Vietnam Airlines have expressed concern about securing physical supplies of fuel due to the Strait of ⁠Hormuz closure.

There was one in ⁠2007-2008 before the global financial crisis dented demand, another after the so-called "Arab Spring" around 2011, and a third after the Russia-Ukraine war broke out in 2022.

A string of mergers between 2008 and 2014 like Delta-Northwest and American Airlines-US Airways reduced eight major US airlines to four and brought on the era of tighter capacity control, while low-cost carriers such as Ryanair and India's IndiGo leaned on single-aircraft fleets and fast turnarounds to keep unit costs low.

Replacing older, thirstier planes with more fuel-efficient models is an obvious way for carriers to reduce costs, but a severe supply-chain shortage in the wake of the pandemic and issues with new-generation engines have delayed deliveries.

And while US ultra-low-cost carriers have some of the newest, most fuel-efficient planes in the industry, if travel demand falters, paying for the new planes could become a barrier to profit.

Dan Taylor, head of consulting at aviation advisory firm IBA, said the current oil shock was expected to widen the gap between financially strong and weaker airlines.

"Carriers with robust balance sheets, strong pricing power, and reliable access to capital are better positioned to absorb ongoing pressures," he said on the firm's website. "In contrast, airlines with low profitability and limited funding options may face increasing financial stress."