Is China Playing a Role in Rebuilding Egyptian-Iranian Relations?

 Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry during his reception of the Iranian delegation participating in the COP 27 summit in Sharm El-Sheikh last November (Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry during his reception of the Iranian delegation participating in the COP 27 summit in Sharm El-Sheikh last November (Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
TT

Is China Playing a Role in Rebuilding Egyptian-Iranian Relations?

 Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry during his reception of the Iranian delegation participating in the COP 27 summit in Sharm El-Sheikh last November (Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs)
Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry during his reception of the Iranian delegation participating in the COP 27 summit in Sharm El-Sheikh last November (Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs)

A recent research paper released by the Jeddah-based Gulf Research Center has outlined two scenarios for the future of Egyptian-Iranian relations: the reestablishment and strengthening of diplomatic ties, or the continuation of the current state of estrangement while maintaining a policy of de-escalation.

Youssef Khattab, the author of the research paper, explained that the severed ties between the two nations do not stem from a deep-rooted historical strategic conflict, fundamental clashes of interests, geopolitical rivalry, or other factors that perpetuate perpetual tension and animosity between countries.

According to Khattab, this fact makes it relatively easier for both nations to restore their relations if the will and sincerity exist.

In his report, Khattab points out two potential scenarios for the future relations between Egypt and Iran.

The first scenario involves the reestablishment and consolidation of diplomatic ties. This scenario holds significant potential to serve the interests of both nations and their people, especially considering the economic hardships they currently face.

To alleviate inflation, unemployment, and other pressures, both countries would need to expand their cooperation in trade, finance, and investment.

According to the report, there are factors that support the scenario of diplomatic reconciliation between Egypt and Iran. The global economic crises caused by the coronavirus pandemic have affected all nations, especially developing or third-world countries, which lacked the capabilities to effectively cope with the crisis and swiftly recover from its aftermath.

This has led both countries to seek closer cooperation, shun discord, and mend their relations.

Additionally, the Russian invasion of Ukraine compelled many nations to pursue conflict de-escalation, problem-solving, and prioritizing national interests.

The researcher highlighted the resolution of the tense Iran-Gulf relations, with successful normalization and resumption of ties with Kuwait, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia.

Khattab also mentioned the possibility of China mediating a historic agreement similar to the Saudi-Iranian accord, which could help bridge the gap between Cairo and Tehran.

This possibility arises from China's strategic interest in competing with the US for influence in the region.

Khattab further elaborated that achieving this scenario would require Egypt’s responsiveness to Iran’s acceptance of Omani mediation to restore relations.

Egypt should engage with the supportive statements from Iranian officials regarding reconciliation and overcome hesitation by embracing dialogue and negotiation.

Khattab emphasized that Iran must back its statements and welcoming gestures towards restoring relations with tangible steps that build trust and seriousness in Egypt’s ongoing efforts for reconciliation.

Historically, Iran has been the one to step back from re-establishing relations in previous attempts.



Iran Opts for Dialogue with Europe ahead of Trump's Return to Office

President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
TT

Iran Opts for Dialogue with Europe ahead of Trump's Return to Office

President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)
President Donald Trump shows a signed Presidential Memorandum after delivering a statement on the Iran nuclear deal from the Diplomatic Reception Room of the White House, Tuesday, May 8, 2018, in Washington. (AP)

It is difficult to predict what the outcomes will be of the discussions between Iran, France, Britain and Germany about Tehran’s nuclear program in Geneva on Friday.

Last week, the UN atomic watchdog's 35-nation Board of Governors passed a resolution again ordering Iran to urgently improve cooperation with the agency and requesting a "comprehensive" report aimed at pressuring Iran into fresh nuclear talks.

Britain, France, Germany and the United States, which proposed the resolution, dismissed as insufficient and insincere a last-minute Iranian move to cap its stock of uranium that is close to weapons-grade. Diplomats said Iran's move was conditional on scrapping the resolution.

Iran has been weighing its response to the censure, debating whether to increase uranium enrichment or by being open to the proposals expected at the Geneva talks.

The discussions may seek a new nuclear deal instead of the 2015 one with Tehran that is in tatters.

As it stands, Iran is likely to opt for negotiations instead of escalation due to a number of internal, regional and international reasons.

Diplomatic sources in Paris noted US President-elect Donald Trump’s appointments of officials handling Middle East affairs, underscoring their unreserved support to Israel and clear hostility to Iran.

These appointments may lead Iran to think twice before resorting to any escalation.

Even before Trump has taken office, his circles have said that the new president will take “several executive decisions related to Iran and that will be declared on his first day in office.” The decisions will be binding and do not need Congress’ approval.

However, Trump is unpredictable and the sources did not rule out the surprise possibility of him striking a deal with Iran related to its nuclear program and behavior in the Middle East. This means that Tehran will have to make major concessions, including abandoning its policy of “exporting the revolution”.

This remains a far-fatched possibility, however. In all likelihood, Washington under Trump will return to his “maximum pressure” policy against Iran on political, diplomatic and economic levels to make it return to the negotiations table and agree on a deal that completely ends its nuclear ambitions.

So, at the Geneva meeting on Friday, Tehran will seek to achieve two main goals: a nuclear breakthrough during what remains of US President Joe Biden’s time in office, and attempt to lure the European powers away from Trump.

The truth is that Tehran is wading in the unknown. One only has to go back to Trump’s past statements about how Israel should have struck Iran’s nuclear facilities during its October 26 attack on the country.

Trump has already shown Iran his hardline stance when he ordered the assassination of Quds Forces leader Qassem Soleimani near Baghdad airport in January 2020.

Based on this, Tehran is scrambling to avert a joint American-Israeli strike that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been dreaming of.

Iran is vulnerable now due to two main reasons: the Israeli strike in October weakened Iran’s air defenses and Netanyahu has said that Israeli jets can now run rampant over Iran without any worries.

And Tehran can no longer rely on its allied militias to threaten Israel with all-out war. Hamas in Gaza is no longer in a position to threaten Israel and neither is Hezbollah in Lebanon.

So, Iran now finds itself exposed and would rather turn to negotiations with Europe than risk escalation that would cost it dearly with Israel now that it can no longer rely on Hamas and Hezbollah.