A New Round of Gaza Cease-Fire Talks is Starting. Why is a Deal So Elusive?

Smoke rises following an Israeli air strike as internally displaced Palestinians sit next to their tents in Khan Younis camp, southern Gaza Strip, 13 August 2024. EPA/HAITHAM IMAD
Smoke rises following an Israeli air strike as internally displaced Palestinians sit next to their tents in Khan Younis camp, southern Gaza Strip, 13 August 2024. EPA/HAITHAM IMAD
TT

A New Round of Gaza Cease-Fire Talks is Starting. Why is a Deal So Elusive?

Smoke rises following an Israeli air strike as internally displaced Palestinians sit next to their tents in Khan Younis camp, southern Gaza Strip, 13 August 2024. EPA/HAITHAM IMAD
Smoke rises following an Israeli air strike as internally displaced Palestinians sit next to their tents in Khan Younis camp, southern Gaza Strip, 13 August 2024. EPA/HAITHAM IMAD

International mediators are hoping to kickstart stalled cease-fire negotiations between Israel and Hamas with a new round of talks meant to finally clinch a deal between the sides. But the chances of a breakthrough appear slim.
The new talks are set to begin Thursday, but Israel and Hamas have been mulling an internationally-backed proposal for more than two months that would wind down the 10-month-long war and free the roughly 110 hostages still held in Gaza, The Associated Press said.
The indirect talks have not advanced substantially during that time and sticking points remain. New terms put forward have complicated progress. And Hamas has yet to say outright whether it will participate in the new round.
Meanwhile, the fighting in Gaza rages on, the hostages continue to languish in captivity, and fears of an all-out regional war involving Iran and one of its regional proxies, Hezbollah, have surged. The killing of Hamas’ top leader in Tehran in an apparent Israeli attack further plunged the talks into uncertainty.
Here is a look at the proposed cease-fire deal and why talks have stalled:
What does the proposal look like? On May 31, US President Joe Biden detailed what he said was an Israeli cease-fire proposal, calling it “a road map" to a lasting truce and freedom for the hostages. It set off the most concentrated US push to bring about an end to the war, which was sparked by Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks on southern Israel.
The original proposal involved three phases. The first would last for six weeks and include a “full and complete cease-fire,” a withdrawal of Israeli forces from all densely populated areas of Gaza, and the release of a number of hostages, including women, the elderly and the wounded, in exchange for the release of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners. Palestinian civilians would be able to return to their homes and humanitarian aid would be increased.
The two sides would use that six-week period to negotiate an agreement on the second phase, which Biden said would include the release of all remaining living hostages, including male soldiers, and Israel’s full withdrawal from Gaza. The temporary cease-fire would become permanent.
The third phase would kick off a major reconstruction of Gaza, which faces decades of rebuilding from the devastation caused by the war.
What are the sticking points? Even though Biden threw his weight behind the proposal, it has not led to a breakthrough and the sides appear to have grown further apart in the weeks since.
Israel has been wary of the plan’s provision that the initial cease-fire would be extended as long as negotiations continued over the second phase. Israel seems concerned that Hamas would drag on endlessly with fruitless negotiations.
Hamas has appeared concerned that Israel would resume the war once its most vulnerable hostages were returned, a scenario reflected in some of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's recent comments. Israel could also make demands during this stage of negotiations that were not part of the initial deal and would be unacceptable to Hamas — and then resume the war when Hamas refuses them.
Israel has added additional demands to the initial proposal in recent weeks, according to two Egyptian officials with knowledge of the talks. In a statement Tuesday, Netanyahu's office denied this, calling the additional terms “essential clarifications.” It said Hamas has made 29 additions, without specifying which.
Egyptian officials said Israel seeks to maintain control of a strip of land along Gaza’s border with Egypt known as the Philadelphi corridor. Israel believes Hamas uses the area to smuggle in weapons through underground tunnels, which Egypt denies.
Israel also wants to maintain forces along an east-west route that bisects Gaza so that they can weed out any militants crossing into the territory's north. Netanyahu's office has said Israel wants some way to ensure this, but it denied accusations that this was an additional condition. Hamas has rejected the idea, saying Israel would use it as a pretext to prevent Palestinians from returning to their homes.
The Egyptian officials and Netanyahu's office said Israel also wants veto power over the Palestinian prisoners who would be freed. Hamas refuses to compromise on the issue, they said.
Israel also wants a list of the hostages who are still alive — another condition rejected by Hamas, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the sensitive talks with the media.
What else is complicating progress? The talks were further thrown into disarray last month when a blast killed Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh while he was in Tehran for the Iranian president’s inauguration. The attack was widely blamed on Israel, which has not confirmed or denied it. Biden said the apparent assassination had “not helped” cease-fire efforts, and the talks were driven into a deep freeze.
That killing came just hours after Israel assassinated a top Hezbollah commander in a strike in Beirut. Both strikes drew threats of retaliation from Iran and Hezbollah, and the fear of an all-out regional war diverted international attention away from efforts to wind down the fighting in Gaza. The killings spurred a flurry of diplomatic activity and led the US to direct military assets to the region.
Both Netanyahu and Hamas' new top leader, Yahya Sinwar, have incentives to continue the war.
Netanyahu's critics say he is dragging out the war for his own political survival. His far-right coalition partners have pledged to topple the government if he agrees to a cease-fire, what could trigger elections that might oust him from power. Netanyahu has said he has the country's best interests in mind.
Hamas has gained from the international condemnation that Israel has faced because of the war. And on a personal level, Haniyeh's killing has shown that Sinwar's own life could be on the line if he surfaces once the war ends.



Anti-War Posters Crop up Across Lebanon

A man walks on an overpass beneath a giant billboard that reads "Enough, we are tired, Lebanon doesn't want war" on a street in Beirut on August 7, 2024, amid regional tensions during the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas movement in the Gaza Strip. (AFP)
A man walks on an overpass beneath a giant billboard that reads "Enough, we are tired, Lebanon doesn't want war" on a street in Beirut on August 7, 2024, amid regional tensions during the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas movement in the Gaza Strip. (AFP)
TT

Anti-War Posters Crop up Across Lebanon

A man walks on an overpass beneath a giant billboard that reads "Enough, we are tired, Lebanon doesn't want war" on a street in Beirut on August 7, 2024, amid regional tensions during the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas movement in the Gaza Strip. (AFP)
A man walks on an overpass beneath a giant billboard that reads "Enough, we are tired, Lebanon doesn't want war" on a street in Beirut on August 7, 2024, amid regional tensions during the ongoing war between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas movement in the Gaza Strip. (AFP)

Anti-war posters have cropped up across Lebanon expressing objection to the war launched by Hezbollah in southern Lebanon against Israel in support of Hamas in Gaza.

The posters have appeared in regions dominated by opposition parties and some neighborhoods in Beirut.

Tensions have skyrocketed between Hezbollah and Israel in the past two weeks after Israel’s assassination of the Iran-backed party’s top military commander Fuad Shukr in Beirut’s southern suburbs, a Hezbollah stronghold. The party has vowed to response to attack, sparking fears of the eruption of wide scale conflict in Lebanon. Tensions spiraled even further when Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh was assassinated in Tehran with Iran blaming Israel.

Lebanon, which is already beleaguered by a crippling economic crisis, would be devastated by a war and the posters are an expression of this.

The posters, which have been hung anonymously, have angered Hezbollah supporters. No one from the civil society groups or opposition has claimed that they have put them up.

Regardless of who is behind them, a leading member of the opposition told Asharq Al-Awsat that the posters reflect the position of the “vast majority of the people, regardless of their sect and affiliations.”

“The people being killed in the Israeli operations are sacrifices at the altar of the Iranian agenda, not the liberation of Jerusalem or defense of Palestine,” he said on condition of anonymity.

“It is natural for voices of opposition to rise more and more. It is the voice of everyone who rejects the choices taken by Hezbollah” and dragging Lebanon towards war, he continued.

“Even the Shiite community, which used to forgive all of Hezbollah’s mistakes” is beginning to show unease and dissent after the party led to the destruction of their homes, killing of their sons and their displacement, he added.

They are beginning to realize the emptiness of the party’s claims that it alone can protect them and Lebanon, he remarked.

No one in Lebanon will argue against enmity to Israel and championing Palestine, which is the Arab and Muslims worlds’ number one cause, but there is real division over Hezbollah’s monopoly over the decision to take the country to war.

“Why Lebanon alone?” wondered the opposition member. “Why has [Hezbollah leader Hassan] Nasrallah exempt Iran and Syria from the responsibility of joining the war against Israel? How is it possible that Lebanon alone is the open arena to settle Iranian scores with the United States and the West?”

The opposition member lamented the massive losses incurred by the tourism sector in Lebanon as a result of the latest tensions, noting that the government, which is operating in a caretaker capacity, “has shed its responsibility towards the Lebanese people, their interests and future.”

On the other side of the divide, a source close to Hezbollah told Asharq Al-Awsat that “it is no secret” who is behind the anti-war campaign and “claims that the party wants war and is dragging the country towards destruction.”

Israeli media has caught on to the campaign, seeing it as a means to exert pressure on Hezbollah from within Lebanon, angering the party’s supporters.

The source said the campaign “serves - deliberately or not - the enemy, which harbors ill intentions towards Lebanon and its people.”

The campaign has gained a lot of traction on social media in Lebanon.

Saydet el-Jabal Gathering member, former MP Fares Soaid agreed that the overwhelming majority of the people oppose the war, “because they naturally oppose war and violence.”

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, he stressed that the people will not be forced into Hezbollah’s agenda. At the same time, the anti-war slogans will not deter the party from heading to war. Rather, the unity of the Lebanese people will.

Moreover, he noted that Hezbollah “is seeking to achieve Iran’s interest in Lebanon and unfortunately, no camp in Lebanon is stepping up against it and voicing its commitment to the Taif Accord and Arab and international legitimacy.”

Many agree that Hezbollah derives its power from the weakness of its rivals and their political differences.

Soaid offered the best example of this. He noted that Christian parties are now preoccupying themselves with parliamentary elections that are two years away, while the real focus should be on settlements that will shape the region.

“Lebanon’s problem lies in a camp that is planning on tying it completely to the dangerous Iranian agenda, and we are addressing this issue with posters that will not alter the situation on the ground or Iran and Hezbollah’s intentions,” he stated.