Debate over the Supreme Defense Council (SDC) is back in Lebanon amid rising political discussions about the possibility of assigning it a role in handling the controversial issue of Hezbollah’s weapons.
While some view the council as a body that could offer “technical solutions,” legal and constitutional experts stress that its powers are limited and entirely dependent on a clear mandate from the Cabinet.
Government-driven authority
Constitutional expert Dr. Said Malik told Asharq Al-Awsat that the council does not act independently, especially on sensitive national matters like Hezbollah’s arms.
“The Supreme Defense Council only acts when specifically tasked by the Cabinet. It has no constitutional right to interfere in sovereign matters unless the government authorizes it,” he explained.
He emphasized that the issue of Hezbollah’s weapons is a purely political and governmental responsibility. “Even if the Cabinet assigns this issue to the council, it only executes what it’s asked to do. It cannot take action on its own,” he added.
Malik stressed that there is no legal basis for the council to operate outside the government’s authority, saying: “The council is not a substitute for the Cabinet. It’s only a tool to carry out government decisions.”
Role during crises
While the council’s role tends to expand in times of national tensions or crisis, the constitutional expert insists that this does not change its legal limits.
“The council becomes more visible during periods of instability, as there’s a greater need for coordination among security and military institutions, but all under government supervision,” he underlined.
Malik further noted that the council’s authority stems from Lebanon’s National Defense Law (Decree No. 102, issued on September 16, 1983), particularly Articles 7, 8, and 9.
Structure and operations
According to Article 7, the council is headed by the President of the Republic, with the Prime Minister as deputy. Other members include the Ministers of Foreign Affairs, Interior, Defense, Finance, and Economy. The council can also call in military and security leaders as needed.
Article 8 grants the council executive powers when formally assigned a mission by the Cabinet. Otherwise, it mainly offers advice and recommendations.
Not a political decision-maker
Former Interior Minister Marwan Charbel said that assigning the Hezbollah weapons issue to the council would go beyond its real role.
“The council is not meant to replace the government. Its function is limited to security coordination and offering opinions on matters referred to it,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.
Charbel believes that even if the council is assigned the file, it won’t offer a complete solution: “The council may recommend that the Lebanese Army take over the file, either by integrating Hezbollah fighters or by creating practical security arrangements.”
The former minister also warned against handling the weapons issue with technical fixes or partial solutions.
“You can’t address this problem with isolated decisions. There are serious concerns within the Shiite community and Hezbollah’s support base that must be considered,” he noted, calling for a comprehensive political solution.
“The right approach is a national political process, perhaps a conference under Arab and international sponsorship, that discusses all types of weapons in Lebanon whether Hezbollah’s, Palestinian groups’, and other parties’,” he concluded.