Sudanese Return to Khartoum, Reviving a Shattered Capital

Some shops reopen despite extensive damage (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Some shops reopen despite extensive damage (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Sudanese Return to Khartoum, Reviving a Shattered Capital

Some shops reopen despite extensive damage (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Some shops reopen despite extensive damage (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Thousands of displaced Sudanese are returning to Khartoum, where destruction is widespread, explosive drones fill the skies, disease is spreading, and basic services, including electricity, water and medicine, have largely collapsed.

They are clearing rubble, repairing their homes and reopening a narrow door to hope, holding on to their land and trying to resume daily life in all its hardship and small joys.

In Kadro, a northern suburb of Khartoum Bahri about 18 kilometers from the capital, resident Al-Tayeb Mousa stands inside his shop, which he rebuilt and repaired after a long displacement that began when fighting broke out between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces in mid-April 2023.

Mousa, a man in his forties, told Asharq Al-Awsat that he moved between Sudanese cities as a displaced person, saying, “Your destroyed home is still better than rental houses in displacement cities.”

He said: “From the first shots of the war I fled to Sennar, then to Al-Damazin in the southeast for nearly two years, then to Al-Gadarif, Kassala in the east and Atbara in the north. Three months ago I returned to Bahri. It was a hard and painful period.”

“I struggled the whole time just to earn a living. Displacement is a bitter experience, but we faced it with resilience and fighting spirit,” stressed Mousa.

He continued: “After returning, we now face the threat of suicide and strategic drones, and shortages of electricity, water and medicine. But the house where we grew up, even if damaged and destroyed, is still better than a rented home in a displacement city.”

Patience and determination

Because of shelling and stray bullets in the early days of the war, Eihab Ahmed was forced to leave her home in Umbada, Omdurman, and move to Jabal Awliya in the south of Khartoum in search of safety.

Eihab said: “I used to run a small printing and photocopy shop in Souq Al-Shuhada in Omdurman, but I left it because of the war. It was looted, burned and destroyed.”

She added, “When the fighting reached Jabal Awliya, we left again and returned to northern Omdurman. When the Sudanese army retook Khartoum and security improved, I went back to my shop. I started from zero by buying a single printer and faced all the difficulties.”

“We returned amid destruction by choice to build a new life. Everything is difficult and harsh, but our hearts and memories are here,” she said.

Facing hardship

Abdel-Baqi Ismail, 50, who runs a ready-made clothing store, said, “In the first months of the war I left Khartoum and moved to Kosti in White Nile State in the south, but I recently returned to Doctors Street in Omdurman to resume my work, which had stopped because of the violence.”

He added, “I have worked in clothing sales for more than 30 years. We have managed to keep going despite major difficulties, and more than 20 stores have reopened in the area.”

He said the biggest challenge now is “the collapse of essential services, the breakdown of hospitals and health centers, the spread of disease, the high price of medicine and the rising cost of living.”

International reports

On October 21, 2025, the International Organization for Migration said an estimated 2.7 million of the more than 3.77 million people displaced from Khartoum may return despite harsh living conditions and service shortages.

Across Sudan, the organization reported that 2.6 million people returned to their home areas over the same period, nearly half of them children. That included more than two million internally displaced people and 523,844 returnees from abroad, mostly from Egypt, South Sudan and Libya.

Government assurances

Khartoum State Minister of Social Affairs Siddig Farini said the government is working to meet the needs created by the high number of returnees, including water, electricity, medicine and security.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that about 87 shelters were set up in Khartoum to host 15,000 displaced people from Darfur and 12,000 from North, West and South Kordofan, with efforts under way to meet their needs responsibly.

He added that one of the most important decisions was assigning Sovereignty Council member Ibrahim Jaber to head the High Committee for Preparing Conditions for Citizens’ Return to Khartoum State. The committee was granted broad powers to restore essential services, including water stations, electricity supply across neighborhoods and clearing war debris, which Farini said was “at volumes greater than what we see in movies.”

Drones threaten returnees

Farini said Khartoum State has recently come under renewed drone attacks, both regular and strategic, but nonetheless “we have witnessed the return of citizens from inside and outside Sudan to their homes and neighborhoods.” He said health institutions and major hospitals are being restored, and Khartoum International Airport and strategic facilities are being rehabilitated.

He said national, regional and international organizations are working in high coordination to improve conditions for returnees. Life is slowly returning to the capital’s districts, with popular neighborhoods crowded again. In Karari, north of Omdurman, almost no homes remain empty and rents have soared.

According to Farini, social development centers have resumed their psychological support programs for war-affected groups, especially women who suffered severe violations.

He said the war is “deeply complex, with political and cultural dimensions, and heavy psychological impact. Much of it was designed to target the psyche. Its effects are long-term. This war was meant to uproot people from their land and erase their history, heritage, museums and knowledge built over centuries that shaped Sudan’s identity.”

Restoring services

Khartoum State government spokesman and Minister of Information Al-Tayeb Saad Al-Din said specialized agencies have begun initial work to clean and disinfect streets, remove bodies and handle them properly. The second phase included clearing debris and reopening roads.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the High Committee, led by Ibrahim Jaber, coordinated with the state government to prioritize rehabilitating power stations and major transmission lines. Residential and service areas consumed about 15,000 transformers that had to be imported.

Saad Al-Din said major repairs are under way to restore water plants and operate underground wells using solar power to provide drinking water.

Public and private health facilities suffered extensive looting and destruction, he said, but the Ministry of Health has restored services to many hospitals. Work is under way to reopen Ibrahim Malik Hospital, Al-Zira Hospital and Al-Shaab Hospital in Khartoum.

Ahmed Qasim Hospital for heart and kidney care in Bahri is partially functioning, the children’s hospital is operating and Bahri Teaching Hospital is expected to reopen soon. Haj Al-Safi Hospital and Omdurman Teaching Hospital have returned to service, as has Al-Walidayn Eye Hospital.

He added that major efforts are under way to improve sanitation and fight disease vectors. “The health situation is now very stable. Dengue fever has been contained and cholera was controlled months ago. The health sector has begun recovering.”

Saad Al-Din said road repairs have started, including filling potholes and resurfacing some streets. Bridges damaged by the war are being rehabilitated. But he said the roads sector needs “a very large amount of funding,” as Khartoum State has lost most of its revenue sources.

He said the state is working with the High Committee to find funding solutions. Other committees are focusing on restoring state authority and security, removing armed groups and armed motorcycles from the capital, expanding police presence and reopening stations and patrol units to stabilize the city.

“These are major efforts to make the environment safe for citizens to return and resume their lives,” he said.



When Does Peace Become the Rule Rather than the Exception?

The United Nations needs structural reform (Photo by Reuters)
The United Nations needs structural reform (Photo by Reuters)
TT

When Does Peace Become the Rule Rather than the Exception?

The United Nations needs structural reform (Photo by Reuters)
The United Nations needs structural reform (Photo by Reuters)

It has become common among analysts to say that the world has entered a new global order, where the logic of “might makes right” has replaced the “power of right,” and the old rules-based international system has faded. International relations are increasingly managed through power and influence rather than consensus and multilateralism. This emerging order is shaped by empires of varying scale seeking to expand spheres of influence and sources of wealth through force, rather than relying on international agreements that place large and small states on equal footing.

 

It is widely understood that the primary goal of any cooperative global order is the pursuit of sustainable peace. In that regard, the Dutch philosopher of Portuguese origin Baruch Spinoza (1632–1677) described peace as “not merely the absence of war but a virtue, a state of mind, a disposition for benevolence, confidence, justice.” Albert Einstein (1879–1955) stressed that “peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding.” Since antiquity, Plato viewed the establishment of peace and friendship as the highest duty of both citizen and lawgiver, while Aristotle held that victory in war is not enough, and that the real objective is to secure peace. Mahatma Gandhi (1869–1948) asserted that peace does not arise from armed conflict, but from justice upheld even in the face of challenges.

 

Peace as the exception

 

Against these perspectives, historical experience shows that peace has been the exception rather than the rule. Over roughly 3,500 to 5,000 years of recorded human history, the world has seen only about 230 to 268 years entirely free of major wars, less than 10 percent of its history. This indicates that conflict has been the dominant feature of human relations, both at the individual and collective levels.

 

A distinction must be made between the “international system” and the “global order.” The international system describes how the world functions in terms of actors, power, motives, and constraints. The global order, by contrast, is a political, institutional, and cultural structure formed through negotiation, cooperation, or even coercion, as occurred after the First and Second World Wars, each of which ended with victors and defeated parties. The global order is not fixed; it is the result of deliberate choices by active powers to organize and manage the world.

 

It is fair to say that the global order that emerged after the Second World War achieved notable successes. The likelihood of large-scale global wars declined, traditional empires with vast geographic reach came to an end, and levels of welfare and prosperity rose to unprecedented levels. The foundations of national sovereignty were also reinforced for many states, based on the principles associated with the Peace of Westphalia. However, this order no longer meets the demands of the profound transformations underway today. This helps explain the growing sense of crisis, the widespread global unease, and serious concern about the outbreak of a third world war carrying the risks of nuclear catastrophe.

 

Shifts and alternative models

 

In recent decades, influence across the globe has been redistributed, with the rise of new powers challenging Western dominance built on material wealth and scientific and technological advancement. Countries within the BRICS group, for example, are playing an increasingly influential economic and political role. This shift goes beyond the transfer of power; it also involves deep intellectual and cultural changes, as non-Western states seek to assert their identities and present alternative models of governance and development.

 

This phase, sometimes described as “post-Western,” presents major existential challenges for both the West and its competitors. It requires broader international cooperation, especially in addressing cross-border issues such as climate change, cybersecurity, migration, organized crime, and terrorism. Yet these shifts are not without tension. Rising powers are seeking to advance their interests, leading to friction with established powers, particularly in trade relations and sometimes in direct confrontations, complicating efforts to build a stable global balance.

 

The rise of nationalist and populist trends adds another layer of instability. These movements, by their nature, tend to question and undermine international cooperation while prioritizing narrow interests, weakening international institutions and threatening global stability. Regional conflicts and great-power competition, such as tensions between the United States and China, further intensify this fragmentation.

 

Another major challenge lies in balancing universal values with national particularities. International standards cannot be imposed unilaterally without regard for cultural and political diversity. As a result, constructive dialogue and flexible, network-based diplomacy, rather than rigid hierarchical structures, become essential to establishing common ground for building peace.

 

Strait of Hormuz is a theater for major conflict (Photo by Reuters)

 

A test of adaptation and cooperation

 

In sum, the current international system is undergoing a profound transformation shaped by the rise of new powers, the relative decline of Western influence, escalating conflicts, mounting global challenges, and intense competition for economic gains that strengthen position and safeguard sovereignty. The future of this system depends on the ability of international actors to adapt, cooperate, build new partnerships, and embrace multiple perspectives to understand the world’s complexity.

 

In this context, the emergence of alternative narratives should not be viewed as a threat but as an opportunity for a deeper understanding of a multipolar world. The international system now taking shape reflects a significant historical shift in which the West is no longer the sole center of power, but one among several.

 

The path toward a more complex and interconnected global order, where different models of governance coexist, is already taking form. Navigating this new reality requires innovative thinking and openness to change, while preserving the structures and institutions that have proven their value, foremost among them the United Nations, which requires structural reform to prevent decline. Ultimately, building a more just, peaceful, and sustainable world depends on a collective will capable of reconciling difference with cooperation.


The Iran War Has Revealed Trump's Pressure Point: The Economy

President Donald Trump waves to reporters as he walks on the South Lawn upon his arrival to the White House, Friday, April 17, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
President Donald Trump waves to reporters as he walks on the South Lawn upon his arrival to the White House, Friday, April 17, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
TT

The Iran War Has Revealed Trump's Pressure Point: The Economy

President Donald Trump waves to reporters as he walks on the South Lawn upon his arrival to the White House, Friday, April 17, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
President Donald Trump waves to reporters as he walks on the South Lawn upon his arrival to the White House, Friday, April 17, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Seven weeks of war have failed to topple Iran’s theocratic rulers or force them to meet all of President Donald Trump's demands, but for US adversaries and allies it has cast a spotlight on one of his central vulnerabilities: economic pressure.

Even with Iran’s announcement on Friday that it was reopening the Strait of Hormuz to shipping, the Middle East crisis has revealed the limits of Trump's willingness to tolerate domestic economic pain.

Trump joined Israel in attacking Iran on February 28 based on what he said were imminent security threats, especially over its nuclear program. But now, with US gasoline prices high, inflation rising and his approval ratings down, Trump is racing to secure a diplomatic deal that could stem the fallout at home.

Iran has taken a beating militarily, but demonstrated it can exact economic costs that Trump and his aides underestimated, unleashing the worst-ever global energy shock, analysts say.

RISING ENERGY COSTS, RECESSION RISK

Trump has often publicly shrugged off domestic economic concerns driven by the war. But he can hardly ignore that though the US does not depend on the one-fifth of global oil shipments that were effectively blocked by Iran’s chokehold on the strait, surging energy costs have hit US consumers. The International Monetary Fund’s warning of a risk of global recession adds to the gloom.

Pressure for a way out of the unpopular war has mounted as Trump’s fellow Republicans defend narrow majorities in Congress in the November midterm elections.

None of this has been lost on Iran's leaders, who have used their grip on the strait to push Trump's team to the negotiating table.

Analysts say US rivals China and Russia may draw their own lesson: while Trump has shown an appetite for military force in his second term, he looks for a diplomatic off-ramp as soon as the economic heat becomes uncomfortable at home.

“Trump is feeling the economic pinch, which is his Achilles heel in this war of choice,” said Brett Bruen, a former foreign policy adviser in the Obama administration who heads the Global Situation Room strategic consultancy.

White House spokesman Kush Desai said that while working toward a deal with Iran to resolve "temporary" energy market problems, the administration "has never lost focus on implementing the president’s affordability and growth agenda."

FEELING THE PRESSURE

Trump’s abrupt shift on April 8 from airstrikes to diplomacy followed pressure from financial markets and parts of his base.

Some of the economic pain is borne by US farmers, a key Trump constituency, due to disrupted fertilizer shipments, and is also reflected in higher airfares from increased jet fuel prices.

With the clock ticking on a two-week ceasefire, it remains to be seen whether a president who embraces unpredictability will reach a deal that meets his war goals, extend the truce beyond April 21, or relaunch the bombing campaign.

But global oil prices fell sharply and financial markets, which Trump often sees as a barometer of his success, flourished on Friday after Iran said the strait would be open for the remainder of a separate US-brokered 10-day truce between Israel and Lebanon.

Trump was quick to declare the strait safe as he touted a deal-in-the-making with Iran that he said would be completed soon and mostly on his terms. But Iranian sources told Reuters gaps remained to be resolved. Experts have warned that even if the war ends soon, the economic damage could take months if not years to fix. A key question is whether any deal achieves the objectives Trump has laid out, including closing Iran’s path to a nuclear weapon, which Tehran has long denied it is seeking.

Iran has a stockpile of highly enriched uranium believed buried by US-Israeli strikes in June. Trump told Reuters on Friday the emerging deal calls for the US to work with Iran to recover the material and bring it to the US. Iran denied agreeing to a transfer anywhere outside its territory.

A senior Trump administration official said the US was maintaining "several redlines" in negotiations with Iran. At the same time, Trump’s call at the war’s outset for Iranians to overthrow their government has gone unheeded. Allies from Europe to Asia were initially stunned by Trump’s decision to go to war without consulting them or seeming to take into account the risk to them of Iran closing the strait.

“The alarm bell ringing for allies right now is how the war has highlighted that the administration can act erratically, without much regard for consequences,” said Gregory Poling, an Asia expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.

After Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, former Democratic President Joe Biden was cautious about imposing sanctions on Moscow’s energy sector out of concern for reducing oil supplies and inflating US gas prices.

But Trump, who ran for a second term on promises of cheap gas and low inflation, has shown himself sensitive to accusations that his policies raise prices. An example was when he reduced tariffs on China last year after it retaliated.

A motorist fills up his truck for over a $100 at a gas station in Los Angeles on Friday, April 17, 2026. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)

MISCALCULATIONS

Just as Trump misjudged Beijing’s response in a trade war, he seems to have miscalculated how Iran might strike back economically in a shooting war by attacking energy infrastructure in Gulf states and blocking the strategic waterway between them.

Trump mistakenly believed the war would be a limited operation like the January 3 lightning raid in Venezuela and June’s strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites, US officials have said privately. But this time the repercussions are more far-reaching.

The message to Asian allies such as Japan, South Korea and Taiwan may be that Trump, who is looking for warmer ties with China, can be expected to pursue his regional goals with less regard for their geopolitical and economic security.

Analysts believe those governments will adjust for any contingency, such as a Chinese bid to seize Taiwan, out of concern over Trump’s reliability.


In Final Moments Before Truce, Israeli Strike Kills Lebanese Man’s Family

 A woman reacts as emergency personnel search for survivors at the site of an Israeli strike carried out just before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. (Reuters)
A woman reacts as emergency personnel search for survivors at the site of an Israeli strike carried out just before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

In Final Moments Before Truce, Israeli Strike Kills Lebanese Man’s Family

 A woman reacts as emergency personnel search for survivors at the site of an Israeli strike carried out just before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. (Reuters)
A woman reacts as emergency personnel search for survivors at the site of an Israeli strike carried out just before a 10-day ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, in Tyre, Lebanon, April 17, 2026. (Reuters)

Hassan Abu Khalil's family miraculously survived six weeks of war in southern Lebanon, but tragedy struck in the final minutes before a ceasefire came into force. An Israeli strike late on Thursday killed 13 of his relatives, leaving him the sole survivor.

Abu Khalil, 36, stepped out to see friends just before midnight, when a US-brokered truce between Lebanon and Israel was meant to halt fighting that had raged since March 2 between Israel and armed group Hezbollah.

“I heard a very powerful strike, and when I came ‌back to the neighborhood, ‌I found this had happened," Abu Khalil told Reuters on ‌Friday ⁠as he watched ⁠a bulldozer dig through the mountains of pulverized concrete that was once his home in the southern Lebanese port city of Tyre.

"In this building, more than 13 members of my family are missing under the rubble. What then, Israel? Just before the ceasefire, it was one massacre after another against us," he said.

Later on Friday, Lebanon's state news agency said rescue teams had recovered 13 bodies and pulled 35 wounded survivors from the ruins ⁠of the building that was hit the previous evening. It ‌reported that 15 other people were unaccounted for.

The ‌Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the strike.

Lebanon's health ministry ‌says 2,294 people have been killed between March 2 and Thursday, when the ‌ceasefire came into force. The toll includes 177 children and 274 women.

'MY FUTURE IS GONE'

On Friday, thousands of Lebanese streamed through Tyre on the way to their southern villages. They crossed over a dirt berm that Lebanese soldiers had erected over the ruins of a main bridge ‌destroyed by Israel earlier on Thursday. Many were relieved to return to their southern villages, even if they were destroyed.

But ⁠Abu Khalil spent ⁠the first day of the ceasefire in a haze of despair, unable to eat or sleep.

He stood wringing his hands next to a bulldozer working through the ruins, his eyes locked on the gaping hole that rescuers were searching.

"Since the strike, I've been here and haven't gone anywhere. Every time they pull someone out, we run over to see what happened, who it is - my friend I grew up with, my friend's mother, my friend's father," Abu Khalil said.

He said he had been living in the United Kingdom but returned to Lebanon to be with his extended family.

"Who is left? No one is left. I wish I had never gone out for that coffee and had stayed with them," he said.

“My future is gone here. This was my life, this was my family - what now? What more is there after this?"