New Tests to Uncover Pablo Neruda's Death Circumstances

Officials will look into the possibility that Neruda was poisoned by agents of the Pinochet regime/ AFP
Officials will look into the possibility that Neruda was poisoned by agents of the Pinochet regime/ AFP
TT
20

New Tests to Uncover Pablo Neruda's Death Circumstances

Officials will look into the possibility that Neruda was poisoned by agents of the Pinochet regime/ AFP
Officials will look into the possibility that Neruda was poisoned by agents of the Pinochet regime/ AFP

International researchers investigating the death of Chilean poet and Nobel laureate Pablo Neruda raised doubts as to whether he died of cancer 44 years ago as previously presumed, or of poison.

Researches are being made to identify whether the poet died of natural conditions, or he was poisoned by agents of General Augusto Pinochet's dictatorship after the country's 1973 military takeover.
Experts said more tests are needed to reach a final conclusion, according to Reuters.

Mario Carroza, the judge conducting the investigations involving 16 expert from Spain, France, Chile, the United States, and Canada said: “We cannot confirm that third parties effectively intervened, but we think there may be such a possibility.”

Neruda was a member of Chile's Communist Party and a friend to President Salvador Allende. He died in suspicious conditions 12 days after a coup d’état led by General Augusto Pinochet on September 11, 1973.
Ever since, Neruda's chauffeur, Manuel Araya, has claimed that the author received a suspicious injection shortly before his death.

After the coup and President Allende’s murder, and days before Neruda's death, Pinochet's soldiers came to the poet’s house and told him they are looking for weapons at his place.

"Poetry is my only weapon," he replied them.

Forty years after his death, an investigation was launched to reveal the truth behind this mysterious death. His body was exhumed for the first time in April 2013 for analysis, to be buried again for the fourth time in 2016, three years after its extraction to determine the exact cause behind his death.



The Surprising Reason Why There Are No Human Remains in the Titanic

The RMS Titanic sank at 2:20 am Monday morning on April 15, 1912 after hitting an iceberg in the North Atlantic. (Universal History Archive/Getty Images)
The RMS Titanic sank at 2:20 am Monday morning on April 15, 1912 after hitting an iceberg in the North Atlantic. (Universal History Archive/Getty Images)
TT
20

The Surprising Reason Why There Are No Human Remains in the Titanic

The RMS Titanic sank at 2:20 am Monday morning on April 15, 1912 after hitting an iceberg in the North Atlantic. (Universal History Archive/Getty Images)
The RMS Titanic sank at 2:20 am Monday morning on April 15, 1912 after hitting an iceberg in the North Atlantic. (Universal History Archive/Getty Images)

The Titanic, a symbol of hubris and human tragedy, has been a source of fascination for more than 112 years.

But the fact is, the sunken ocean liner was more than just movie fodder or a deep-sea explorer’s holy grail, it was a very real ship on which more than 1,500 people died.

And yet, whilst experts, using the most sophisticated submersible and underwater filming equipment, have found some extraordinary relics from the wreckage, they have never found any skeletons or bones.

“I’ve seen zero human remains,” James Cameron, director of the iconic 1997 film, told the New York Times back in 2012.

“We’ve seen clothing. We’ve seen pairs of shoes, which would strongly suggest there was a body there at one point. But we’ve never seen any human remains.”

Given that Cameron has visited and explored the wreck some 33 times (and claims to have spent more time on the ship than the ship’s captain), if he hasn’t seen any human remains we can assume that there really aren’t any there. So why is this?

It’s a question that has recently been perplexing Reddit users but, luckily, it has some relatively simple answers.

Whilst there was a notoriously insufficient number of lifeboats on the ship, many passengers and crew members still managed to put on life jackets. This means that they remained buoyant even after they succumbed to the freezing cold waters of the Atlantic.

And so, when a storm followed the sinking of the “unsinkable” ship, they were likely swept away from the site of the wreckage and carried further away over subsequent weeks and years by ocean currents.

“The issue you have to deal with is, at depths below about 3,000 feet (around 914 meters), you pass below what's called the calcium carbonate compensation depth,” deep-sea explorer Robert Ballard explained to NPR back in 2009.

“And the water in the deep sea is under saturated in calcium carbonate, which is mostly, you know, what bones are made of. For example, on the Titanic and on the Bismarck, those ships are below the calcium carbonate compensation depth, so once the critters eat their flesh and expose the bones, the bones dissolve,” he said.

Nevertheless, some people believe that there may still be some preserved bodies in sealed off parts of the ship, such as the engine room.

This is because fresh oxygen-rich water that scavengers rely on may not have been able to enter these areas.

Nevertheless, more than a century since the tragedy, it seems likely that such searches for remains would be fruitless.