Despite 2016 Defeats, Shabaab Returning in Force in Somalia

Security forces stand guard on a destroyed building following a car bomb claimed by al-Shabaab terrorists in the Somali capital Mogadishu, August 30, 2016. (Reuters)
Security forces stand guard on a destroyed building following a car bomb claimed by al-Shabaab terrorists in the Somali capital Mogadishu, August 30, 2016. (Reuters)
TT
20

Despite 2016 Defeats, Shabaab Returning in Force in Somalia

Security forces stand guard on a destroyed building following a car bomb claimed by al-Shabaab terrorists in the Somali capital Mogadishu, August 30, 2016. (Reuters)
Security forces stand guard on a destroyed building following a car bomb claimed by al-Shabaab terrorists in the Somali capital Mogadishu, August 30, 2016. (Reuters)

Several factors in 2016 led to a sharp drop in the terrorist activity of Somalia’s al-Shabaab group. This can be credited to regional and international efforts that saw the organization lose the majority of the land it had seized since 2009. Internal disputes within the Shabaab and the defection of some of its members to ISIS also led to its weakness.

The African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) demonstrated an ability to confront the group, especially after it received training and weapons from the United States, Britain and Europe. US airstrikes have also managed to target senior members of the organization.

Despite these losses however, the Shabaab, led by Ahmed Diriye Abou Obeida, have managed to adjust to the new reality and the current balance of power on the ground. It therefore still remains a threat to the Somali government and the fragile stability in each of Somalia, Kenya and Ethiopia. In addition, the Shabaab has started to adopt a new approach, guerrilla warfare, against the African Union and Somali government. A new intelligence body was formed in order to confront this strategy.

As part of its new policies, the Somali terrorist group is being more selective in choosing its targets. The second half of 2017 is witnessing a qualitative shift in the nature of the confrontation that the group is adopting. It is being more accurate in the nature of its targets and the timing of its attacks.

This was demonstrated in the October 15, 2017, Mogadishu attack that left 250 people dead in the worst such assault since 2007.

As part of its policy of centralized strikes and keeping the Somali capital under the “hell” of terrorism, the Shabaab launched an attack against the Nasa-Hablod 2 Hotel on October 28 that left 70 people dead, including some former lawmakers, a senior police officer, state officials and foreign figures. The police announced that the assault was carried out by a suicide bomber and gunmen, who attacked the hotel that is frequented by politicians due to its proximity to the presidential palace.

On October 14, the Shabaab carried out two bombings in Mogadishu, killing some 22 people and injuring several others.

The weak Somali government took urgent measures to confront this threat. On October 29, it sacked the chief of police and head of the national intelligence agency. This showed the extent in which the Shabaab were able to influence the internal Somali scene and the government’s security policy.

Given the above, one can conclude that the victories that the terrorist organization achieved recently are not connected only to destabilizing security and stability, but to the bitter defeats suffered by the army. This in turn created a real political crisis and problems for the government.

The confusion on the internal scene was demonstrated when the Shabaab managed to kill some 100 Somali special forces in an attack on the town of Breiry, which lies 60 kms west of Mogadishu. The attack led to the resignation of Defense Minister Abdirashid Abdullahi Mohamed and Chief of Staff General Ahmed Mohamed Jimale Irfid.

Moreover, and as part of its resurgence in Somalia, the Shabaab seized on August 4 the town of Lego, which lies 130 kms northwest of Mogadishu. This is a region that witnessed almost weekly bloody battles before it was captured by the terrorists, who killed 12 peacekeepers during very fierce confrontations.

The renewed Shabaab push prompted some 50 lawmakers last week to sign a petition, demanding the resignation of President Mohammed Abdullahi Farmajo. The government has meanwhile turned to bolstering regional and international cooperation to confront the terror group. Farmajo recently paid visits to each of Uganda, Ethiopia and Djibouti to that end.

Somali media on Thursday reported that Ethiopia had deployed more forces, some 1,000 heavily armed soldiers, in the Gedo province. A Somali official in the region said that the deployment was part of Somali-Ethiopian cooperation and a precursor to an imminent attack against Shabaab positions there.

Despite these official Somali efforts and international support, especially American strikes, we can say that the Shabaab has regained much of its power. Its long experience has enabled it to leave battles with African peacekeepers with lesser casualties.

Despite the smaller geographic area that the terror group has been controlling since 2016 and the return of many displaced Somalis back to their homes, divisions between clans, tribes and neighboring countries remain. The poor military armament and equipment of the African peacekeepers also works in the terrorists’ favor. These are all factors that the Shabaab is exploiting to transform Somalia into a real African base for Ayman al-Zawahiri’s organization. This will enable the group to recruit fighters loyal to ISIS.

The new Shabaab policy does not pose a threat to Somalia alone, but it goes beyond the borders to target the stability of the Horn of Africa, Yemen and the Arab Gulf. This therefore demands that regional and international forces offer more support to the Somali government and ensure their own trade and economic interests in the region.

*Khaled Yamout is a visiting political science professor at Mohammed V University in Rabat.



What to Know about Israel's Plan to Retake Gaza City

A plume of smoke rises during an Israeli strike on Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on June 13, 2025. (AFP)
A plume of smoke rises during an Israeli strike on Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on June 13, 2025. (AFP)
TT
20

What to Know about Israel's Plan to Retake Gaza City

A plume of smoke rises during an Israeli strike on Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on June 13, 2025. (AFP)
A plume of smoke rises during an Israeli strike on Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip on June 13, 2025. (AFP)

Israel announced early Friday that it plans to take over Gaza City, the largest urban area in the territory and one that has already suffered extensive devastation in repeated Israeli raids.

Another major ground operation in one of the few areas of Gaza not already under evacuation orders would likely spark even more mass displacement and further disrupt efforts to deliver desperately needed food in the territory, where experts have warned that famine is unfolding, The Associated Press reported.

Israel has faced mounting calls from many of its closest allies to end the war, and the plan faces opposition within Israel from families of the remaining 20 or so living hostages held by Hamas and members of the security establishment who say there is little to gain militarily at this point.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says more military pressure is needed to achieve Israel's goals of returning the hostages and destroying Hamas.

Not much is left of Gaza City

Israel has repeatedly bombarded Gaza City and launched major ground operations there within weeks of Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 attack that triggered the war. Several neighborhoods and key infrastructure have been almost completely destroyed.

It was Gaza's most populous city on the eve of the war, home to some 700,000 people, about the population of Washington, D.C. Hundreds of thousands fled under Israeli evacuation orders at the start of the war but many returned during a ceasefire earlier this year.

Israel already controls and has largely destroyed around 75% of Gaza, with most of the population of some 2 million Palestinians now sheltering in Gaza City, the central city of Deir al-Balah and the sprawling displacement camps in the Muwasi area along the coast.

Israel's offensive has already killed over 61,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many were fighters or civilians. The ministry is part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals. The UN and independent experts view its figures as the most reliable estimate of war casualties. Israel disputes them but has not provided its own.

Opposition inside Israel

Another major ground operation will almost certainly lead to the killing of more Israeli soldiers in hit-and-run attacks, eroding domestic support for the war, and could endanger the remaining hostages.

Hamas-led militants killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, in the Oct. 7 attack and abducted 251 hostages. Most have since been released in ceasefires or other deals. Fifty remain inside the territory, around 20 of whom are believed by Israel to be alive.

The Palestinian Hamas group released videos in recent days showing emaciated hostages, saying they are suffering the same starvation as the Palestinian population. Hamas is believed to be holding the hostages in tunnels and other secret locations and has hinted it will kill them if Israeli forces draw near.

Former security officials have also spoken out against further military operations, saying there is little to gain after Hamas has been militarily decimated. Israel's military chief of staff, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, reportedly argued during a Security Cabinet meeting that a more sweeping plan to retake all of Gaza would endanger the hostages and put added strain on the army after two years of regional wars.

International outrage Israel has come under mounting international pressure in recent weeks as images of starving children have shone a light on the worsening hunger crisis. Twenty-eight Western-aligned nations, including some of its closest allies, called for it to end the war last month.

Even President Donald Trump, the strongest supporter it has ever had in the White House, has expressed concern about the hunger crisis. He has said he wants to end the war and return all the hostages, but also that it's up to Israel to decide its next moves.

Israel has dismissed the criticism, saying it has done everything it can to limit harm to civilians and blaming Hamas for their deaths. Netanyahu has denied there is starvation in Gaza despite eyewitness testimony, data compiled by experts and dire warnings from United Nations officials and major international aid groups operating there.

Netanyahu has said more military pressure is needed to get Hamas to agree to release the hostages and surrender.

But Hamas has already withstood one of the deadliest and most destructive military campaigns since World War II. The group says it will only release the remaining hostages in return for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal.