Morocco Demands Partisan Representation, Steers Clear from National Council for Human Rights

Morocco’s civil associations called for nonpartisan members at the National Council for Human Rights. (Reuters)
Morocco’s civil associations called for nonpartisan members at the National Council for Human Rights. (Reuters)
TT

Morocco Demands Partisan Representation, Steers Clear from National Council for Human Rights

Morocco’s civil associations called for nonpartisan members at the National Council for Human Rights. (Reuters)
Morocco’s civil associations called for nonpartisan members at the National Council for Human Rights. (Reuters)

Morocco’s civil associations called on Tuesday for suspending a number of parliament members from the National Council for Human Rights to ensure its independence from political parties.

The government also backed the move put forth by human rights groups, after heated controversy broke as parliamentary majority parties insisted on introducing an amendment to article 35 of draft law No. 76.15 concerning the reorganization of the National Council for Human Rights.

A plenary session of the House of Representatives for ratification is expected to handle the amendment, which seeks to provide four parliamentarians with membership to the national human rights body, despite mounting opposition by the government and National Council for Human Rights itself.

The Moroccan Association of Human Rights (MAHR), alongside many other human rights groups, said they have followed with deep concern the debate on the bill in the House of Justice, Legislation and Human Rights Committee.

They cited special concern regarding the amendment proposed to article 35, where majority groups called for the representation of four parliamentarians within the Council.

Human rights groups said in a statement: “The membership of parliamentarians within the National Council for Human Rights diminishes the independence of the institution and the lack of partisan representation within the Council will strengthen its independence and credibility.”

Human rights organizations called for “the non-representation of lawmakers within the National Council for Human Rights, in order to protect the body’s full independence from political parties."

They explained that such impartiality is a position in line with the guidelines of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, which recommends that "national human rights institutions must remain independent, and to seek to establish relations with all parties and political factions while remaining uninvolved with partisan agendas.”

Opponents of the amendment also argued that lawmakers also becoming members of the National Council for Human Rights will put them in the position of dealing with “overlapping tasks.”



Ex-Tunisian Minister Sentenced to Three Years in Prison

Former Environment Minister Riadh Mouakher (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Former Environment Minister Riadh Mouakher (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Ex-Tunisian Minister Sentenced to Three Years in Prison

Former Environment Minister Riadh Mouakher (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Former Environment Minister Riadh Mouakher (Asharq Al-Awsat)

The Criminal Chamber specialized in financial corruption cases at the Court of First Instance of Tunis, sentenced on Friday former Environment Minister Riadh Mouakher to three years in prison, the Tunisian official news agency, TAP, reported.
The ruling is part of a corruption case related to breaches in a transaction carried out by the former minister for the purchase of several vehicles.
Investigation showed that the tender conditions were allegedly manipulated in favor of one particulate supplier.
In addition to Mouakher, the Chamber condemned a civil protection executive, seconded to the Environment Ministry, to two years in prison.
The two defendants are found guilty of abusing their functions to obtain an undue advantage, and therefore causing harm to the administration and contravening the regulations in force.
On Thursday, the Criminal Chamber specialized in corruption cases at the Tunis Court of First Instance sentenced a security officer to three years in prison and four others to four years in prison on charges of abusing their functions to obtain an undue advantage and harm others.
The five security officers had formed a group for the purpose of attacking property and exploiting a public employee.
According to documents related to the case, surveillance activities revealed that the five defendants, who work at a central department, were involved in seizing private funds, giving night jobs to some department agents, and transferring the profits to their personal accounts.
Their case was first examined by the Financial Chamber, which decided to sentence the five security guards to prison.
The case was later referred to the Criminal Chamber that examines financial corruption cases. The chamber had earlier kept the five defendants at liberty, before issuing late on Thursday the prison sentences.