Asharq Al-Awsat Exclusive – Israeli Strikes Response to ‘Syria’s Surrender to Iran’

Destruction in Homs city, Syria. (Reuters)
Destruction in Homs city, Syria. (Reuters)
TT

Asharq Al-Awsat Exclusive – Israeli Strikes Response to ‘Syria’s Surrender to Iran’

Destruction in Homs city, Syria. (Reuters)
Destruction in Homs city, Syria. (Reuters)

Despite Israel’s traditional refusal to officially comment on the recent air strikes in Syria, several of its officials have made comments that implicitly reveal that it may have indeed been behind the attack on the regime’s T-4 air base in Homs.

Former chief of staff Moshe Yaalon and a number of former senior officers gave several strong hints on Monday that Israel was indeed behind the strikes.

They delivered several messages that Israel has many purposes that are not limited to preventing the smuggling of arms to “Hezbollah”.

They stressed that Israel will not remain an idle spectator, but it has taken it upon itself to play an active role in the developments in the region.

Political and military circles said that the strikes were linked to the Ankara summit that was held last week between the presidents of Russia, Turkey and Iran.

Israel believes that Iran obtained from this summit the support and backing to remain in Syria, they explained. This will harm Israel and the United States’ interests.

They therefore did not hesitate in criticizing the American administration of President Donald Trump that “is hesitating in remaining in Syria, but is more inclined to withdraw” from the country.

The air strikes are a message that “Israel will not remain silent over this situation and will not allow it to succeed.”

Sources quoted senior Israeli security officials as saying that Iran considers the Ankara summit a green light for it to continue on cementing its presence in Syria.

“This development is worrying for Israel,” they stressed. The summit was aimed at dividing the spoils in Syria after the war ends.

“This is a dangerous development in the region,” they added, while also questioning if Russia really had any real interest in bolstering Iran’s position in Syria.

Yaalon told Israeli military radio on Monday morning that “red lines” should be placed in Syria. He did however object to Minister Yoav Galant’s call to assassinate Syrian regime head Bashar Assad.

Retired Major General Amiram Levin, meanwhile, did not confirm that Israel carried out the strikes, adding however: “It seems very clear who did it.”

“The problem with the US and Israel is that they only respond to developments. They do not have a long-term policy,” he added.

“We must cooperate with the US in order to overthrow Assad. Responses, regardless of how many they are, remain nothing more than responses and this is not enough,” he stressed.

“Israel has means, not just military ones, to work with the US. We must cooperate and oust Assad from power in Syria,” he stated.

Military analyst Amos Harel revealed that Israel had twice struck the military base, once in March 2017 and another time in February. The February attack was in retaliation to an Iranian drone entering Israeli airspace. In a rare occurrence, Israel announced that it had struck targets in Syria.

This week’s attacks may have been part of Israel’s setting of new red lines in Syria linked to thwarting Iran’s presence in the country.

Prior to the strikes, Galant had stressed on Sunday the need to get rid of Assad, whom he called the “angel of death” because he had used chemical weapons against his people on several occasions.

“Assad is the Syrian angel of death. There is no doubt that the world will be a better place without him. Five days ago, the world marked the Holocaust anniversary and the world once again was given a terrible reminder in Syria,” he stated.

“The killer in Damascus is still here and he is using gas to mercilessly murder women and children. The leaders of the world must intervene and fast,” he demanded.

Defense Minister Avidgor Lieberman added that “all sorts of red lines” have been crossed.

“We are watching the developments unfold and are not standing idly by,” he continued.

He accused Iran of controlling developments in Syria and of seizing the country.

Security sources revealed that Israeli intelligence was closely monitoring the use of chemical weapons in Syria.

The question remains whether the regime had again used sarin gas, which Assad had used to target rebels in Khan Sheikhoun a year ago. The attack in April 2017 prompted Trump to order a strike against a Syrian air base.

Israeli experts believe that Assad had used 98 percent of his large chemical arsenal, which included nerve and mustard gas. The arsenal was originally stockpiled to use against Israel should it threaten the regime. It has however left limited quantities of chlorine and sarin gas to use against the rebels to defend the advances it had achieved against them.



Gaza War Resonates But Has Global Diplomacy Shifted One Year On?

Internally displaced Palestinians walk in a street in Khan Yunis, southern Gaza Strip, 25 September 2024. EPA/MOHAMMED SABER
Internally displaced Palestinians walk in a street in Khan Yunis, southern Gaza Strip, 25 September 2024. EPA/MOHAMMED SABER
TT

Gaza War Resonates But Has Global Diplomacy Shifted One Year On?

Internally displaced Palestinians walk in a street in Khan Yunis, southern Gaza Strip, 25 September 2024. EPA/MOHAMMED SABER
Internally displaced Palestinians walk in a street in Khan Yunis, southern Gaza Strip, 25 September 2024. EPA/MOHAMMED SABER

A year after the October 7 attack that sparked war in Gaza, diplomacy has failed to produce a ceasefire and the world watches on as the death toll mounts.
Fears of war engulfing the wider region have soared as exchanges of fire have escalated between Israel and Lebanese militant group Hezbollah.
Over the past year, South Africa has taken Israel to court and some European governments have drawn Israeli anger by recognizing the State of Palestine, but analysts say only a radical change in US policy can stop the conflict, AFP said.
Here is a breakdown:
How has the war resonated?
Palestinian militant group Hamas carried out an unprecedented attack against Israel on October 7, resulting in the deaths of 1,205 people on the Israeli side, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on Israeli official figures, which includes hostages killed in captivity.
Out of 251 people taken hostage that day, 97 are still being held inside Gaza, including 33 the Israeli military says are dead.
Israel's retaliatory military campaign in Gaza has killed more than 41,000 Palestinians, a majority of them civilians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory.
To the north, Israeli air strikes killed at least 558 people in Lebanon on Monday in the country's deadliest day of violence since the 1975-1990 civil war, the health ministry said.
Around the world, the conflict has had a polarizing effect, generating passionate support for both sides.
"This war has considerably deepened fracture lines," said analyst Karim Bitar.
"What is happening today in Lebanon only compounds this."
For many people, especially in countries which experienced colonial rule, the West's perceived failure to defend the human rights of Palestinians had exposed its "hypocrisy", he said.
In the Arab world, "there is this idea that all great principles fly out the window when it comes to Israel and that the West remains consumed by guilt" from World War II and the Holocaust.
Palestinian historian and diplomat Elias Sanbar said that the West had given the Israelis a "carte-blanche of impunity" for decades, ever since the creation of Israel in 1948.
But today "it will be much harder to show unconditional support to Israel", he said.
Has international law prevailed?
South Africa in December brought a case before the International Court of Justice, arguing the war in Gaza breached the 1948 UN Genocide Convention, an accusation Israel has strongly denied.
Colombia, Libya, Spain, Mexico, Türkiye and Chile have since joined the case.
Analyst Rym Momtaz said the ICJ proceedings against Israel were "unprecedented".
"International law is taking over the issue," she said.
In May, the prosecutor for the International Criminal Court sought arrest warrants against top Hamas leaders -- but also Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his defense minister -- on suspicion of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Since October 7, violence against Palestinians has also flared in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, where far-right parties in the governing coalition have championed a quickening expansion of Israeli settlements, regarded as illegal under international law.
At least 680 Palestinians have been killed in the territory by Israeli troops or settlers, according to the Palestinian health ministry.
UN member states have adopted a non-binding resolution to formally demand an end to the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories within 12 months.
But Israeli historian and diplomat Elie Barnavi said his country "doesn't care" about what the so-called global South thinks.
Is European support for Israel waning?
Some European governments have taken a stance.
Slovenia, Spain, Ireland and Norway have recognized the State of Palestine, drawing retaliatory moves from Israel.
The European Union has implemented sanctions against "extremist" settlers, and EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell has called for more against some far-right members of the Israeli government.
The United Kingdom has suspended 30 of 350 arms exports licenses for Israel.
Barnavi noted a "real shift in the attitude of Europeans towards Israel", but said it was "insufficient".
Zeenat Adam, of the Afro-Middle East Centre in South Africa, said the UK arms exports suspension was "minuscule".
"The recent 'recognition' by European states of Palestine is mere lip-service," she added.
In the end, said Sanbar, countries in Europe largely still supported Israel, even if "a sort of embarrassment" at times triggered statements of concern.
"It's simply not enough," he said.
What of the United States?
All eyes are instead on Israel's main ally the United States, which has pushed for a ceasefire but kept up its military aid to Israel.
"If the United States does not change their stance, there will be no change," said Momtaz.
"There has been no real fraying of US military support to Israel. Yet it's that support that is crucial and makes all the difference," she said.
The Israeli defense ministry said on Thursday it had secured a new $8.7 billion US aid package to support the country's ongoing military efforts, including upgrading air defense systems.
Momtaz said it was not clear that the US presidential election in November would change anything, regardless of whether the winner was Donald Trump or Kamala Harris.
"There has been no sign that a Trump or Harris administration would be ready to use US leverage, the only efficient means to help both parties stop this war," she said.
Bitar said that among US voters, the Jewish community and young progressive Democrats were more openly distancing themselves from Israel, but that might only have a political impact in 10 to 15 years' time.
No end in sight?
The Gaza war has revived talk of a so-called "two-state solution" of Israeli and Palestinian states living in peace side by side, but that goal seems today more unattainable than ever.
For too many years, the international community "promised a two-state solution without doing anything to end the occupation, to end settlements to make a Palestinian state viable," Bitar said.
"Many believe the train has left the station, that it's perhaps already too late," Bitar said.
Barnavi said there was "no other solution", though it would involve dismantling most settlements in the West Bank.
"It would imply a lot of violence, including a period of civil war in Israel," he said.
Sanbar said: "Never have the two sides been so distanced from each other. I don't know what could bring them closer."