Natalie Portman Doesn't Want to Be Seen Pro-Netanyahu

Cast member Natalie Portman poses at the premiere for "Annihilation" in Los Angeles, California, US, February 13, 2018. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni
Cast member Natalie Portman poses at the premiere for "Annihilation" in Los Angeles, California, US, February 13, 2018. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni
TT
20

Natalie Portman Doesn't Want to Be Seen Pro-Netanyahu

Cast member Natalie Portman poses at the premiere for "Annihilation" in Los Angeles, California, US, February 13, 2018. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni
Cast member Natalie Portman poses at the premiere for "Annihilation" in Los Angeles, California, US, February 13, 2018. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

Oscar-winning actress Natalie Portman said she chose not to attend a ceremony in Israel to accept a million-dollar prize because she did not want to be seen as supporting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who was scheduled to speak at the event.

Portman’s decision, which she said was “mischaracterized by others,” had caused a minor backlash in Israel on Friday after organizers of the prestigious Genesis Prize award ceremony said they canceled the prize-giving.

The group had quoted a representative of Portman who said recent “distressing” events in Israel caused the actress to back out.

This led many to interpret her decision as connected to the international criticism of Israel for its military response to Palestinian protests on the Gaza-Israel border during the last few weeks, in which 35 Palestinians were killed.

Israel has said it is doing what it must to defend its borders.

Some ministers in Netanyahu’s right-wing government said Portman appeared to have been manipulated by the Palestinian-led international campaign to boycott Israel.

“Let me speak for myself,” Portman said later in a statement posted on Instagram. “I chose not to attend because I did not want to appear as endorsing Benjamin Netanyahu, who was to be giving a speech at the ceremony.”

Portman said she did not support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which aims to isolate Israel over its treatment of Palestinians.

“Like many Israelis and Jews around the world, I can be critical of the leadership in Israel without wanting to boycott the entire nation,” she said.

“Israel was created exactly 70 years ago as a haven for refugees from the Holocaust,” she said. “But the mistreatment of those suffering from today’s atrocities is simply not in line with my Jewish values. Because I care about Israel, I must stand up against violence, corruption, inequality, and abuse of power.”

The Genesis Prize has been awarded since 2014 to individuals for excellence in their professional fields and “who inspire others through their dedication to the Jewish community and Jewish values”.

Previous winners have included former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, sculptor Anish Kapoor, violinist Itzhak Perlman and Hollywood actor Michael Douglas, all of whom donated their prize money to charitable causes.

Portman was born in Jerusalem and moved to the United States at age three. She won the Best Actress Oscar in 2010 for her role in “Black Swan”.



Europe Hopes for 'No Surprises' as US Weighs Force Withdrawals

The United States is conducting a review of its military deployments worldwide. Nikolay DOYCHINOV / AFP
The United States is conducting a review of its military deployments worldwide. Nikolay DOYCHINOV / AFP
TT
20

Europe Hopes for 'No Surprises' as US Weighs Force Withdrawals

The United States is conducting a review of its military deployments worldwide. Nikolay DOYCHINOV / AFP
The United States is conducting a review of its military deployments worldwide. Nikolay DOYCHINOV / AFP

After keeping Donald Trump happy with a pledge to up defense spending at NATO's summit, Europe is now bracing for a key decision from the US president on the future of American forces on the continent.

Washington is currently conducting a review of its military deployments worldwide -- set to be unveiled in coming months -- and the expectation is it will lead to drawdowns in Europe.

That prospect is fraying the nerves of US allies, especially as fears swirl that Russia could look to attack a NATO country within the next few years if the war in Ukraine dies down.

However, the alliance is basking in Trump's newfound goodwill following its June summit in The Hague, and his officials are making encouraging noises that Europe will not be left in the lurch.

"We've agreed to no surprises and no gaps in the strategic framework of Europe," said Matthew Whitaker, US ambassador to NATO, adding he expected the review to come out in "late summer, early fall".

"I have daily conversations with our allies about the process," he said.

While successive US governments have mulled scaling back in Europe to focus more on China, Trump has insisted more forcefully than his predecessors that the continent should handle its own defense.

"There's every reason to expect a withdrawal from Europe," said Marta Mucznik from the International Crisis Group. "The question is not whether it's going to happen, but how fast."

When Trump returned to office in January many felt he was about to blow a hole in the seven-decade-old alliance.

But the vibe in NATO circles is now far more upbeat than those desperate days.

"There's a sanguine mood, a lot of guesswork, but the early signals are quite positive," one senior European diplomat told AFP, talking as others on condition of anonymity.

"Certainly no panic or doom and gloom."

'Inevitable'

The Pentagon says there are nearly 85,000 US military personnel in Europe -- a number that has fluctuated between 75,000 and 105,000 since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

"I think it is inevitable that they pull out some of their forces," a second European diplomat told AFP.

"But I don't expect this to be like a dramatic overhaul. I think it's going to be gradual. I think it's going to be based on consultations."

Trump's first target is likely to be the troops left over from a surge ordered by his predecessor Joe Biden after Moscow's tanks rolled into Ukraine.

Officials say relocating the rump of that 20,000-strong deployment would not hurt NATO's deterrence too much -- but alarm bells would ring if Trump looked to cut too deep into personnel numbers or close key bases.

The issue is not just troop numbers -- the US has capabilities such as air defenses, long-range missiles and satellite surveillance that allies would struggle to replace in the short-term.

"The kinds of defense investments by Europe that are being made coming out of The Hague summit may only be felt in real capability terms over many years," said Ian Lesser from the German Marshall Fund think tank.

"So the question of timing really does matter."

'Inopportune moment'

Washington's desire to pull back from Europe may be tempered by Trump now taking a tougher line with Russia -- and Moscow's reluctance to bow to his demands to end the Ukraine war.

"It seems an inopportune moment to send signals of weakness and reductions in the American security presence in Europe," Lesser said.

He also pointed to Trump's struggles during his first term to pull troops out of Germany -- the potential bill for relocating them along with political resistance in Washington scuppering the plan.

While European diplomats are feeling more confident than before about the troop review, they admit nothing can be certain with the mercurial US president.

Other issues such as Washington's trade negotiations with the EU could rock transatlantic ties in the meantime and upend the good vibes.

"It seems positive for now," said a third European diplomat.

"But what if we are all wrong and a force decrease will start in 2026. To be honest, there isn't much to go on at this stage."