Stockholm Agreement Ignites Differences Among Houthi Leaders

Armed Houthi followers carry their rifles as they attend a gathering to show support for the Houthi movement in Sanaa, Yemen December 19, 2018. (Reuters)
Armed Houthi followers carry their rifles as they attend a gathering to show support for the Houthi movement in Sanaa, Yemen December 19, 2018. (Reuters)
TT

Stockholm Agreement Ignites Differences Among Houthi Leaders

Armed Houthi followers carry their rifles as they attend a gathering to show support for the Houthi movement in Sanaa, Yemen December 19, 2018. (Reuters)
Armed Houthi followers carry their rifles as they attend a gathering to show support for the Houthi movement in Sanaa, Yemen December 19, 2018. (Reuters)

The Stockholm Agreement between the Yemeni government and the Houthis during last week’s talks in Sweden have led to disagreements among Houthi leaders, especially between the two main heads - Abu Ali Al-Hakem and Mahdi al-Mashat - as the former rejects the agreement while the other supports it.

Informed sources close to the Houthis in Sanaa told Asharq Al-Awsat that there were deep and bitter differences between the two movements, which are considered the two most influential currents among Houthi militias.

He pointed out that Al-Hakem movement, which rejects the agreement, was behind breaching the ceasefire, which came into force on Tuesday.

Al-Hakem considered the agreement as a “defeat”, according to the sources, who emphasized deep disputes between the two currents that have almost developed into a fist fight before the intervention of some other Houthi officials.

The sources also said that Iran and Hezbollah could not convince the two sides to reach a solution to the recent disagreements. They noted that Mahdi al-Mashat, along with a number of military and administrative officials, had the final word among the Houthi ranks, due to their strong influence in Iran and Lebanon.

The crisis led Houthi militias to breach of the truce agreed upon in Stockholm, and to fail to commit to the withdrawal of all insurgents from the city of Hodeidah and ports of the province, as it was stipulated in the agreement.

Military sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the joint resistance forces, backed by the Arab Alliance, monitored and documented the breaches committed by Houthi militias of the Stockholm Agreement.



US Links Ankara-Damascus Normalization to Political Solution in Syria

Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
TT

US Links Ankara-Damascus Normalization to Political Solution in Syria

Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)

Recent statements by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on his willingness to meet Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to normalize relations between the two countries have sparked mixed reactions.
While the Syrian opposition sees the possibility of such a meeting despite the challenges, Damascus views the statements as a political maneuver by the Turks. Meanwhile, the United States has tied the normalization process to achieving a political solution in Syria based on UN Security Council Resolution 2254, issued in 2015.
Turkish media reported on Thursday that a US administration official, who was not named, confirmed that Washington is against normalizing relations with the Syrian regime under Assad. He emphasized that Washington cannot accept normalizing ties with Damascus without progress toward a political solution that ends the conflicts in Syria.
Meanwhile, the head of the National Coalition of Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces, Hadi al-Bahra, stated that a meeting between Assad and Erdogan is possible despite the obstacles. In a statement to Reuters on Thursday, Bahra said the meeting is feasible, even though Ankara is fully aware that the Assad regime cannot currently meet its demands and understands the regime’s limitations.
Bahra pointed out that the UN-led political process remains frozen and that he had briefed US and Western officials on the latest developments in the Syrian file. On Saturday, Bahra participated in a consultative meeting in Ankara with the Syrian Negotiation Commission, along with a high-level delegation from the US State Department, during which they exchanged views on the political solution and the need to establish binding mechanisms for implementing international resolutions related to the Syrian issue.
On the other side, Assad’s special advisor, Bouthaina Shaaban, dismissed Erdogan’s announcement that Ankara is awaiting a response from Damascus regarding his meeting with Assad for normalization as another political maneuver with ulterior motives.
Shaaban, speaking during a lecture at the Omani Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which was reported by Turkish media on Thursday, stated that any rapprochement between the two countries is contingent on its withdrawal of forces from Syrian territory.