Premier League Managers – the Satisfaction Index 2018-19

 (Clockwise from top left) Pep Guardiola, Jürgen Klopp, Ole Gunnar Solskjær and Nuno Espírito Santo. Composite: Getty Images, Rex/Shutterstock
(Clockwise from top left) Pep Guardiola, Jürgen Klopp, Ole Gunnar Solskjær and Nuno Espírito Santo. Composite: Getty Images, Rex/Shutterstock
TT

Premier League Managers – the Satisfaction Index 2018-19

 (Clockwise from top left) Pep Guardiola, Jürgen Klopp, Ole Gunnar Solskjær and Nuno Espírito Santo. Composite: Getty Images, Rex/Shutterstock
(Clockwise from top left) Pep Guardiola, Jürgen Klopp, Ole Gunnar Solskjær and Nuno Espírito Santo. Composite: Getty Images, Rex/Shutterstock

The international break appears to be coming to an end without any further managerial departures on the domestic front, so it is probably safe to assume, with only seven or eight games remaining, that the 20 incumbents will be in situ until the end of the season.

Ultimately the final league standings will be the judge of what they have or have not achieved, but though the table never lies it can sometimes be economical with the truth. Wolves would be delighted to finish seventh, for example, while Chelsea would consider sixth place a failure. Not all managers start the campaign with equal assets or aspirations after all, some have only been parachuted in midway through the season, some have proved popular with supporters despite adverse results and others have found the opposite to be true.

So purely as a hypothetical exercise before the actual gongs are handed out, let us reorganise the league table a little in terms of managerial performance so far. The criterion here is improvement, both at a club level and a personal one. Which managers are sitting prettier now than they were at the start of the season, in other words. Obviously some were sitting prettier than others before a ball had even been kicked, but here is a stab at a satisfaction index for the season so far.

1 Pep Guardiola

Easy to point to Manchester City’s riches and argue anyone could do it, but not everyone would fight on four fronts or mould Raheem Sterling and Bernardo Silva into reliable match winners. With a trophy already in the bag and the league leadership just a game in hand away, it would be odd to top the list with anyone else.

2 Jürgen Klopp

Only in the running for two prizes, but making a good fist of both. While Liverpool are likely to regret surrendering the initiative back to City in the Premier League they are bang on course for a second successive Champions League semi-final. Who remembers now that Klopp’s team had to enter through a play-off round last season?

3 Ole Gunnar Solskjær

Might have been even higher in the list had the euphoria that followed Paris not been punctured by Wolves in the FA Cup, but in terms of giving Manchester United fans exactly what they crave, caretaker Ole simply cannot be faulted. A dazzling improvement on all three previous regimes.

4 Nuno Espírito Santo

Looks like an Old Testament prophet and could probably walk on water in the Black Country at the moment. League position alone would be impressive for a newly promoted side, but Wolves not only have an FA Cup semi-final to look forward to, they are most people’s favoured underdogs for a Wembley fairytale.

5 Mauricio Pochettino

No longer quite the shoo-in for the Old Trafford job he seemed at the time of José Mourinho’s sacking, even if Spurs are still going well in Europe and the overall trajectory has remained upwards. Stadium saga has made things difficult, but Spurs fans worry, with reason, that Arsenal and United pose a threat to a top-four placing.

6 Unai Emery

Faced with arguably the trickiest task of the lot in following Arsène Wenger, Emery needed time to get to grips with a new club in a new country but is now showing results. Arsenal currently look the most impressive team in London, and though all is not perfect, much will be forgiven if they can stay in the top four and perhaps even pip Spurs.

7 Javi Gracia

A similar story to Nuno at Wolves, who will be waiting at Wembley when Watford arrive for an FA Cup semi-final next month. Gracia has quietly but efficiently gone about getting the most from an underrated team of disparate talents; with five home games still to play Watford could manage seventh place, or best of the rest as it is now known.

8 Rafael Benítez

No silverware in sight, obviously, but at least the long-suffering Newcastle fans are reasonably confident of avoiding relegation. That counts for something in the context of the Mike Ashley years. Benítez is one of the few reasons for cheerfulness on Tyneside, and let’s not forget Newcastle beat Manchester City in January.

9 Marco Silva

Enigmatic, inconsistent, jury still out. Everton fans were cheered by a victory over Chelsea in the last match, but even a poor Chelsea side ought to have turned their superiority into points. Silva can only be an improvement on Sam Allardyce, but no one at Goodison is fooling themselves that 11th place in the table is what was expected.

10 Ralph Hasenhüttl

The improvement in Southampton has been plain to see over the last couple of months; they were unlucky to leave Old Trafford empty handed after a spirited display and deserving of the three points against Spurs in the next game. Not safe yet by any means but a good example of a revitalising managerial change.

11 Manuel Pellegrini

Seems to be running a steady, mid-table course at his latest Premier League club, though the word steady does not really belong in the same sentence as West Ham. Wildly inconsistent, infuriating to watch, this is a squad that needs firm guidance that Pellegrini and his array of mournful expressions do not seem able to provide.

12 Maurizio Sarri

Talking of mournful expressions. Fair enough, the Chelsea job is never an easy one. True also that Sarri is new to the country. But 12th place is generous, really, for a manager who has been publicly castigated by his own fans and humiliated in a cup final by his own goalkeeper. Has looked out of place for most of the season.

13 Eddie Howe

Satisfactory, as it used to say on an old-school school report. Not a lot more to say about Bournemouth, who rarely hit the heights or plumb the depths. Howe has deserved enormous credit for that over the last few seasons, as well as for astute signings such as David Brooks and the confidence to give young players game time.

14 Brendan Rodgers

A somewhat arbitrary placing after just three games, though at least Claude Puel’s replacement has managed to win two of them. Rodgers is far more engaging and upbeat than Puel, too. There is a feeling of freshness about Leicester at the moment, an expectation that next season could see them back with a top-six challenge.

15 Neil Warnock

Currently in a relegation position, but few at Cardiff would have expected much else at the start of the season. The crucial point is that Warnock’s players are still in with a chance of survival, there has been no collapse, no throwing in the towel. A manager many think is better suited to the Championship could be about to prove otherwise.

16 Chris Hughton

Probably ought to be higher given Brighton’s consistency over the last couple of seasons, but had supporters worried with a slide towards the bottom of the table after the turn of the year. Still among the candidates for the last relegation spot, but only a result or two from safety and in an FA Cup semi, albeit against Manchester City.

17 Roy Hodgson

Had his moments this season, most notably when inflicting a wholly unexpected home defeat on Manchester City, though Palace’s own home form has been nothing to shout about, hence their flirtation with relegation. Will probably stay up, though fans feel Hodgson could do more with the talent at his disposal.

18 Sean Dyche

Last season’s over-achiever is now inspecting the relegation positions from very close range after suffering four league defeats in a row. Burnley have a tough run-in, too, though a possible chance to save themselves when Cardiff visit Turf Moor next month. Sensational as Dyche has been for Burnley, these are worrying times.

19 Jan Siewert

An odd appointment in many ways, and one that seemed to be made with a Championship season rather than survival in mind, though at least Siewert has tasted both victory and high drama in his last couple of games. Is likely to be judged on next season, and should therefore be warned that the Championship is just as tough.

20 Scott Parker

Not quite bottom of the actual league table but yet to win a game and in charge of a dispirited squad with the worst defensive record in the top flight. Not Parker’s fault, clearly, but Manchester City are up next and Fulham have not won a game since January. If only Claudio Ranieri really had been a risk-free appointment.

The Guardian Sport



Algeria and Austria Clash Revives Memories of the ‘Disgrace of Gijon’

Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
TT

Algeria and Austria Clash Revives Memories of the ‘Disgrace of Gijon’

Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)

When Algeria and Austria meet in their last group game in Kansas City on Saturday, it will not only be key to both countries’ hopes of progressing at the World Cup but will also revive memories of one of the tournament’s darkest moments.

The only previous time the sides shared a group, Austria were accused of conniving with West Germany to ensure both teams advanced in the tournament and Algeria were eliminated.

The game was later dubbed the "Disgrace of Gijon" after the Spanish city where the 1982 World Cup proved an eventful debut for the North Africans, who upset West Germany in their first match with a shock 2-1 victory.

There were 24 teams in the tournament for the first time in ‌1982, divided into ‌six groups of four with the top two advancing to a second ‌round ⁠of group matches.

Algeria ⁠lost their second group game to Austria and beat Chile 3-2, leaving them with four points from their three games at a time when two points were awarded for a win.

NEIGHBORS CONTRIVED RESULT TO BOTH GO THROUGH

The group concluded 24 hours later in Gijon with Austria playing neighbors West Germany and a 1-0 win for the Germans would send both sides through.

West Germany went ahead after 10 minutes through Horst Hrubesch, after which both teams passed the ball around with no intention of adding to the score and contrived a ⁠result that squeezed Algeria out on goal difference.

“Even though we had somewhat ‌expected it, we were all angry, outraged and stunned,” said ‌Rabah Madjer, Algeria’s former African Footballer of the Year.

“That two major football nations could agree to eliminate a small ‌country like Algeria, playing in its first World Cup and just emerging on the international stage, ‌was shocking.”

German sports magazine Kicker described the proceedings as “after about 20 minutes, the attacking intensity faded”.

“The Austrians, for their part, made no effort to exploit the additional space going forward. Suddenly, nobody seemed interested in playing serious football anymore. What followed was an endless exchange of passes, with few challenges and almost no urgency. Possession was ‌lost mainly through misplaced passes.”

French daily L’Equipe said there should have been 22 red cards shown to the players of both sides.

SPECTATORS WAVED WHITE ⁠SCARVES TO PROTEST

Spanish spectators ⁠waved white scarves in a traditional sign of disapproval while on Austrian television, commentator Robert Seeger told his viewers: "Turn it off!"

German defender Paul Breitner, a World Cup winner in 1974, saw little wrong.

"The public is stupid if it doesn't understand that qualification was all that mattered here,” he said, and FIFA ruled the teams were within their rights to play as passively as they did, in response to an Algerian protest.

The Germans won their three-team second-round group, ahead of England and hosts Spain, and advanced to the semi-finals, where they beat France on penalties before losing to Italy in the final. Austria finished behind France in their second group.

A direct result of the "Disgrace of Gijon" was FIFA changing the rule to ensure the final matches in World Cup group stages are played simultaneously to prevent teams having advance knowledge of what they require to advance and the possibility of manufacturing the outcome of games.

“Many people apologized afterwards. It's good to acknowledge the harm you've caused, but it didn’t change anything for us,” Madjer said.


Ghana Draw Cools England Hype and Revives Familiar Questions

 England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
TT

Ghana Draw Cools England Hype and Revives Familiar Questions

 England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)

Thomas Tuchel's England were riding a wave of optimism at the World Cup after their opening 4-2 demolition of Croatia, but Tuesday's 0-0 draw against Ghana served as a reminder that progress at major tournaments is not always straightforward.

The victory over Croatia had showcased England at their best, with fluid attacking football, goals and a sense that Tuchel's methods were taking hold.

Against Ghana, however, they encountered an entirely different challenge. Carlos Queiroz's side defended deep, remained organized and physical, and frustrated England for much of the ‌night as they ‌emerged with a valuable point.

England remain top of Group L ‌and ⁠are still firmly ⁠on course for the knockout stages, but the stalemate raised fresh questions about whether Tuchel's side possess the creativity and variety required to break down stubborn opponents.

Ghana appeared content to sit back and absorb pressure, surrendering possession but denying England space in dangerous areas.

"It is difficult to find a way through when someone plays a 4-5-1 and completely deep and is committed to it," Tuchel said afterwards. "They celebrated a 0-0 like a win. You cannot ⁠lose your head about it."

For all of England's dominance on the ‌ball, the Three Lions struggled to create clear ‌chances. Harry Kane, who scored twice in the opening victory over Croatia, was largely isolated and ‌tightly marked.

His frustration was summed up in stoppage time when he blazed his shot ‌over the bar from six yards after Nico O'Reilly's header had struck the crossbar.

The performance also reignited debate about England's attacking options. Anthony Gordon again struggled before being replaced by Bukayo Saka, whose introduction injected some urgency and unpredictability into England's play, forcing a save from Ghana goalkeeper ‌Benjamin Asare late on.

Marcus Rashford may also be pushing for greater involvement after England's lack of penetration against a compact defense.

Declan ⁠Rice and Elliot Anderson ⁠provided control but little creativity in midfield, allowing Ghana to remain comfortable for long stretches.

Rice insisted there was no cause for concern.

"We have one more group game to top the group, so we have to be positive," he said.

England's emphatic win over Croatia had sparked talk of momentum, belief and the possibility that Tuchel's new-look side might be finding its stride early.

Ninety minutes against Ghana quickly cooled that enthusiasm.

For the fourth major tournament in succession, England failed to win their second group game, exchanging the exhilaration of a four-goal display for a frustrating stalemate.

The surge of optimism generated by the Croatia victory has been checked, at least temporarily.

And while England remain well-placed to reach the knockout stages, the sense of optimism that followed their opening performance has been replaced by familiar questions about flare, consistency and whether they can break down organized opposition when space is at a premium.


Infantino: World Cup Hydration Breaks Purely Sporting, Not Commercial

Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
TT

Infantino: World Cup Hydration Breaks Purely Sporting, Not Commercial

Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha

FIFA president Gianni Infantino has defended the introduction of hydration breaks at the World Cup, insisting that for football's governing body they are driven purely by sporting considerations and not commercial interests.

Mandatory three-minute breaks, introduced in the 22nd and 67th minutes of every match at the tournament, have drawn criticism from players, coaches and fans since the opening round of fixtures.

The breaks, introduced to help players cope with high temperatures across North America, have opened up additional advertising windows for broadcasters, Reuters reported.

This has fueled debate over their impact on the game, with some viewers complaining about being exposed to commercials during the three-minute stoppages.

"There is no ⁠additional revenue for ⁠FIFA, as all commercial agreements were signed well in advance. So, this is not a financial issue for us. For us, it is purely a sporting matter," Infantino said in a statement on Wednesday.

The breaks allow coaching staff to give in-game tactical instructions, a shift critics say disrupts match momentum and fundamentally alters the nature ⁠of the game.

England manager Thomas Tuchel said the additional break "interrupts and changes the identity of the football match,” while Uruguay coach Marcelo Bielsa said dividing matches into shorter segments takes away the fundamental characteristic of the game.

Spain coach Luis de la Fuente and Netherlands captain Virgil van Dijk have supported the intent behind the rule in extreme heat, but questioned the need for it in cooler conditions and at covered venues.

"The main reason is the heat, but we also have to understand that in a competition like the (FIFA) ⁠World Cup, played ⁠over 39 days, with teams potentially playing eight matches in those 39 days, having a moment to rest is extremely important,” Infantino said.

"What matters even more to us is ensuring that all teams, in every match, are playing under the same conditions.

"It's very difficult to accept that a coach might have the opportunity to influence a match by making adjustments simply because it's hotter, while in another match, where the temperature is slightly lower, the same coach doesn’t have the same opportunity."

Infantino added that the breaks had not reduced the intensity of matches, suggesting players were able to maintain a high level of performance throughout games.