The Impossibility of Ranking Hazard’s Solo Against Deulofeu’s Improvisation

 Eden Hazard and Gerard Deulofeu lit up Stamford Bridge and Wembley respectively with moments of individual magic. Composite: Getty Images
Eden Hazard and Gerard Deulofeu lit up Stamford Bridge and Wembley respectively with moments of individual magic. Composite: Getty Images
TT

The Impossibility of Ranking Hazard’s Solo Against Deulofeu’s Improvisation

 Eden Hazard and Gerard Deulofeu lit up Stamford Bridge and Wembley respectively with moments of individual magic. Composite: Getty Images
Eden Hazard and Gerard Deulofeu lit up Stamford Bridge and Wembley respectively with moments of individual magic. Composite: Getty Images

People are already saying Eden Hazard’s superb individual effort for Chelsea on Monday deserves to be a contender for goal of the season, even though many would argue that surging through the middle of an away from home West Ham defence may not be a sufficiently reliable yardstick by which to judge excellence.

It was a fine goal, and few other players would have attempted it, let alone succeeded in the enterprise, and it was well worth the accolades in what may turn out to be the Belgian’s last season at Stamford Bridge.

The cinematic term auteur refers to a director whose work is so distinctive its authorship is evident in practically every scene, and if such a concept can be transferred to goalscoring in football, the sight of Hazard using his low centre of gravity and close control to bamboozle bigger defenders in his way surely qualifies.

Very few players put their personal stamp on match-winning moments to such an extent, and if Real Madrid are looking at Hazard as a replacement for Cristiano Ronaldo and counterpoint to Lionel Messi at Barcelona they could well have identified a magician approaching the same stature.

But hang on – goal of the season? It might not even have been the best Hazard goal of this campaign, bearing in mind another solo belter against Liverpool in the Carabao Cup in September, this time cutting in from the right, nutmegging Alberto Moreno and holding off Naby Keïta to drive a fierce shot past Simon Mignolet from an unpromising angle.

The possibility also exists that Hazard’s opener against West Ham was not necessarily the most stunning goal of the weekend. There were a couple of goals from the FA Cup semi-finals at Wembley that were surely worthy of consideration.

Exhibit A would be the remarkable piece of improvisation from Gerard Deulofeu that transformed Watford’s afternoon against Wolves. Again, few other players would even have conceived of such an audacious ploy, let alone had the confidence to attempt it and then the skill to implement it to perfection. You don’t see too many goals like that, but Deulofeu has always been willing to try something different and it was gratifying to see him get a reward.

Not only was it a trademark Deulofeu moment, it was in a real sense a match-winning goal. Watford were going nowhere before he scored it, the commentators were remarking that for nearly 80 minutes they had been unable to lay a glove on Wolves, but from the moment Deulofeu landed his blow there was only one team in it.

Individual brilliance such as that will always be celebrated, and quite rightly, though one of the problems with the entire notion of a goal of the season is the parameters set for evaluation. Is it right that individual or solo virtuosity usually attracts most attention, in the same way that attacking players usually crowd out defenders when it comes to player of the year awards?

What about the concept of a team goal, where several players might be involved, each using movement and anticipation to create a scoring chance that the opposition can do little to prevent?

The goal that took Manchester City to the FA Cup final against Brighton was a great example of that. It might have come too early in the game to permit any drama in the 86 minutes that followed, it might not have featured a mazy dribble or an unstoppable shot, but as an example of members of a team working together like parts of a well-oiled machine it was hard to beat.

First there was Aymeric Laporte’s immaculate pass from midfield out to Bernardo Silva on the right. Brighton would probably cut it out given another chance but first time round they were not expecting such an adventurous and accurate pass from a central defender. Crucially, Silva did not attempt to control the ball, but laid it back first time to Kevin De Bruyne, who was already in position for the sort of cross he delivers so well.

The ball was duly whipped in to the area of uncertainty between the Brighton back-line and their goalkeeper, and though it bounced to make the cross even more difficult to deal with, Gabriel Jesus had the alertness and flexibility to reposition himself for a header at the far post.

Some reports said the ball sat up nicely for him, which it certainly did not. It skidded through quickly and the way Jesus adapted was impressive, though his was simply the fourth piece of skill in an almost perfect team goal. Martin Keown, analysing for the BBC, was almost affronted by City’s lethal efficiency. The defenders never had a chance, was the gist of his comments. The goal, he thought, might simply have been undefendable.

Three different goals from the same weekend, three different contenders for excellence for varying reasons. It might just be because there is so much football on television nowadays, or because pitches are in pristine condition right through the year, but can it be the case that we are seeing more exquisite goals than we ever used to?

The well-documented difficulties the BBC had with its goal of the month/season competition notwithstanding, it has become almost impossible in the last few years to keep track of all the exceptional scoring efforts over the course of a campaign. Goals from direct free-kicks, for example, practically warrant a category of their own. Every time something astounding is achieved it seems to be surpassed within a few weeks.

The expression “spoilt for choice” came to mind when viewing a compilation of the best Premier League goals scored in August last year, and that was just the first month of the season. Clearly Hazard will be a loss to English football if he does move to Spain, though just as evidently he is not the only genius at work in this country. In terms of glorious goals we have quite possibly never had it so good.

The Guardian Sport



Algeria and Austria Clash Revives Memories of the ‘Disgrace of Gijon’

Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
TT

Algeria and Austria Clash Revives Memories of the ‘Disgrace of Gijon’

Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)
Algeria face Austria on Saturday, 44 years on from the "Disgrace of Gijon". (Getty Images/AFP)

When Algeria and Austria meet in their last group game in Kansas City on Saturday, it will not only be key to both countries’ hopes of progressing at the World Cup but will also revive memories of one of the tournament’s darkest moments.

The only previous time the sides shared a group, Austria were accused of conniving with West Germany to ensure both teams advanced in the tournament and Algeria were eliminated.

The game was later dubbed the "Disgrace of Gijon" after the Spanish city where the 1982 World Cup proved an eventful debut for the North Africans, who upset West Germany in their first match with a shock 2-1 victory.

There were 24 teams in the tournament for the first time in ‌1982, divided into ‌six groups of four with the top two advancing to a second ‌round ⁠of group matches.

Algeria ⁠lost their second group game to Austria and beat Chile 3-2, leaving them with four points from their three games at a time when two points were awarded for a win.

NEIGHBORS CONTRIVED RESULT TO BOTH GO THROUGH

The group concluded 24 hours later in Gijon with Austria playing neighbors West Germany and a 1-0 win for the Germans would send both sides through.

West Germany went ahead after 10 minutes through Horst Hrubesch, after which both teams passed the ball around with no intention of adding to the score and contrived a ⁠result that squeezed Algeria out on goal difference.

“Even though we had somewhat ‌expected it, we were all angry, outraged and stunned,” said ‌Rabah Madjer, Algeria’s former African Footballer of the Year.

“That two major football nations could agree to eliminate a small ‌country like Algeria, playing in its first World Cup and just emerging on the international stage, ‌was shocking.”

German sports magazine Kicker described the proceedings as “after about 20 minutes, the attacking intensity faded”.

“The Austrians, for their part, made no effort to exploit the additional space going forward. Suddenly, nobody seemed interested in playing serious football anymore. What followed was an endless exchange of passes, with few challenges and almost no urgency. Possession was ‌lost mainly through misplaced passes.”

French daily L’Equipe said there should have been 22 red cards shown to the players of both sides.

SPECTATORS WAVED WHITE ⁠SCARVES TO PROTEST

Spanish spectators ⁠waved white scarves in a traditional sign of disapproval while on Austrian television, commentator Robert Seeger told his viewers: "Turn it off!"

German defender Paul Breitner, a World Cup winner in 1974, saw little wrong.

"The public is stupid if it doesn't understand that qualification was all that mattered here,” he said, and FIFA ruled the teams were within their rights to play as passively as they did, in response to an Algerian protest.

The Germans won their three-team second-round group, ahead of England and hosts Spain, and advanced to the semi-finals, where they beat France on penalties before losing to Italy in the final. Austria finished behind France in their second group.

A direct result of the "Disgrace of Gijon" was FIFA changing the rule to ensure the final matches in World Cup group stages are played simultaneously to prevent teams having advance knowledge of what they require to advance and the possibility of manufacturing the outcome of games.

“Many people apologized afterwards. It's good to acknowledge the harm you've caused, but it didn’t change anything for us,” Madjer said.


Ghana Draw Cools England Hype and Revives Familiar Questions

 England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
TT

Ghana Draw Cools England Hype and Revives Familiar Questions

 England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)
England head coach Thomas Tuchel listens to the national anthem ahead the World Cup Group L soccer match between England and Ghana in Foxborough, Mass., near Boston, Tuesday, June 23, 2026. (AP)

Thomas Tuchel's England were riding a wave of optimism at the World Cup after their opening 4-2 demolition of Croatia, but Tuesday's 0-0 draw against Ghana served as a reminder that progress at major tournaments is not always straightforward.

The victory over Croatia had showcased England at their best, with fluid attacking football, goals and a sense that Tuchel's methods were taking hold.

Against Ghana, however, they encountered an entirely different challenge. Carlos Queiroz's side defended deep, remained organized and physical, and frustrated England for much of the ‌night as they ‌emerged with a valuable point.

England remain top of Group L ‌and ⁠are still firmly ⁠on course for the knockout stages, but the stalemate raised fresh questions about whether Tuchel's side possess the creativity and variety required to break down stubborn opponents.

Ghana appeared content to sit back and absorb pressure, surrendering possession but denying England space in dangerous areas.

"It is difficult to find a way through when someone plays a 4-5-1 and completely deep and is committed to it," Tuchel said afterwards. "They celebrated a 0-0 like a win. You cannot ⁠lose your head about it."

For all of England's dominance on the ‌ball, the Three Lions struggled to create clear ‌chances. Harry Kane, who scored twice in the opening victory over Croatia, was largely isolated and ‌tightly marked.

His frustration was summed up in stoppage time when he blazed his shot ‌over the bar from six yards after Nico O'Reilly's header had struck the crossbar.

The performance also reignited debate about England's attacking options. Anthony Gordon again struggled before being replaced by Bukayo Saka, whose introduction injected some urgency and unpredictability into England's play, forcing a save from Ghana goalkeeper ‌Benjamin Asare late on.

Marcus Rashford may also be pushing for greater involvement after England's lack of penetration against a compact defense.

Declan ⁠Rice and Elliot Anderson ⁠provided control but little creativity in midfield, allowing Ghana to remain comfortable for long stretches.

Rice insisted there was no cause for concern.

"We have one more group game to top the group, so we have to be positive," he said.

England's emphatic win over Croatia had sparked talk of momentum, belief and the possibility that Tuchel's new-look side might be finding its stride early.

Ninety minutes against Ghana quickly cooled that enthusiasm.

For the fourth major tournament in succession, England failed to win their second group game, exchanging the exhilaration of a four-goal display for a frustrating stalemate.

The surge of optimism generated by the Croatia victory has been checked, at least temporarily.

And while England remain well-placed to reach the knockout stages, the sense of optimism that followed their opening performance has been replaced by familiar questions about flare, consistency and whether they can break down organized opposition when space is at a premium.


Infantino: World Cup Hydration Breaks Purely Sporting, Not Commercial

Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
TT

Infantino: World Cup Hydration Breaks Purely Sporting, Not Commercial

Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha
Soccer Football - FIFA World Cup 2026 - Group K - Colombia v DR Congo - Estadio Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico - June 23, 2026 Colombia coach Nestor Lorenzo gives instructions to his players during a hydration break REUTERS/Raquel Cunha

FIFA president Gianni Infantino has defended the introduction of hydration breaks at the World Cup, insisting that for football's governing body they are driven purely by sporting considerations and not commercial interests.

Mandatory three-minute breaks, introduced in the 22nd and 67th minutes of every match at the tournament, have drawn criticism from players, coaches and fans since the opening round of fixtures.

The breaks, introduced to help players cope with high temperatures across North America, have opened up additional advertising windows for broadcasters, Reuters reported.

This has fueled debate over their impact on the game, with some viewers complaining about being exposed to commercials during the three-minute stoppages.

"There is no ⁠additional revenue for ⁠FIFA, as all commercial agreements were signed well in advance. So, this is not a financial issue for us. For us, it is purely a sporting matter," Infantino said in a statement on Wednesday.

The breaks allow coaching staff to give in-game tactical instructions, a shift critics say disrupts match momentum and fundamentally alters the nature ⁠of the game.

England manager Thomas Tuchel said the additional break "interrupts and changes the identity of the football match,” while Uruguay coach Marcelo Bielsa said dividing matches into shorter segments takes away the fundamental characteristic of the game.

Spain coach Luis de la Fuente and Netherlands captain Virgil van Dijk have supported the intent behind the rule in extreme heat, but questioned the need for it in cooler conditions and at covered venues.

"The main reason is the heat, but we also have to understand that in a competition like the (FIFA) ⁠World Cup, played ⁠over 39 days, with teams potentially playing eight matches in those 39 days, having a moment to rest is extremely important,” Infantino said.

"What matters even more to us is ensuring that all teams, in every match, are playing under the same conditions.

"It's very difficult to accept that a coach might have the opportunity to influence a match by making adjustments simply because it's hotter, while in another match, where the temperature is slightly lower, the same coach doesn’t have the same opportunity."

Infantino added that the breaks had not reduced the intensity of matches, suggesting players were able to maintain a high level of performance throughout games.