Aboul Gheit: Palestine’s Budget Deficit Amounts to $700 Million

Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit. Reuters file photo
Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit. Reuters file photo
TT

Aboul Gheit: Palestine’s Budget Deficit Amounts to $700 Million

Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit. Reuters file photo
Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit. Reuters file photo

Arab League Secretary General Ahmed Aboul Gheit said that Palestine’s budget deficit reached $700 million this year.

His statement came during an emergency meeting of the Arab foreign ministers in Cairo on Sunday.
 
“We are able to support the Palestinians through the financial safety net, or in any form of financial support, including grants or even loans, in order to help them overcome the pressing and dangerous crisis,” he said.
 
In a statement issued at the end of the meeting, the ministers emphasized their commitment to the decisions of the Arab League, with regards to the establishment of a financial safety net to support the budget of the Authority, worth $100 million per month.
 
The finance ministers stressed “Arab support for the political, economic and financial rights of the State of Palestine and the need to ensure its political, economic and financial independence.” They also condemned the “Israeli hijacking of the Palestinian people’s money” and called on the international community to exert pressure on the Israeli government in this regard.
 
The Arab finance ministers proposed to provide soft loans within the safety net through a bilateral agreement with Palestine, and to continue to support infrastructure and development projects through financial aid or soft loans.
 
The final communiqué also called on Arab funds and institutions, as well as Arab banks, to contribute to the financial safety net by providing soft loans to the State of Palestine in direct coordination with the Palestinian competent authorities.
 
Shoukri Beshara, the Palestinian minister of finance and planning, had earlier called on Arab finance ministers to “activate the Arab safety net in accordance with the resolutions of the League of Arab States,” noting that Israeli sanctions put the Palestinian economy at a critical juncture.



Lebanese Army Awaits Political Decision to Implement UNSCR 1701

Soldiers from the Lebanese Army and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol near the southern village of Marjayoun (AFP).
Soldiers from the Lebanese Army and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol near the southern village of Marjayoun (AFP).
TT

Lebanese Army Awaits Political Decision to Implement UNSCR 1701

Soldiers from the Lebanese Army and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol near the southern village of Marjayoun (AFP).
Soldiers from the Lebanese Army and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) patrol near the southern village of Marjayoun (AFP).

Discussions are underway on the role of the Lebanese army in maintaining security in South Lebanon amid rising optimism about a potential ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah and the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701

As part of these preparations, the Lebanese government has begun strengthening the army by recruiting 1,500 new soldiers out of the 6,000 needed, aligning with the outcomes of the Paris Conference held on October 23, which allocated 200 million euros to support the military institution, from a broader package intended to help the Lebanese people during the Israel-Hezbollah war.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, a security official highlighted that the army currently has 4,500 personnel stationed south of the Litani River but requires additional manpower.

The unidentified official noted, however, that any effective deployment would require a political decision and government support. “The Lebanese military will implement Resolution 1701 as is, with no intention of clashing with any party. However, if Israel violates Lebanese sovereignty, the army is fully prepared to respond,” he said.

Although Hezbollah opposes withdrawing from south of the Litani and handing over border security duties to the Lebanese military and UNIFIL, claiming the army lacks the capabilities to defend against Israeli aggression, the security source clarified that the military has been authorized to repel any attacks but will avoid initiating conflict. The army’s expanded deployment depends on a political decision, which, once made, will see the military act without hesitation to uphold Lebanese sovereignty.

While military preparedness is essential, Brigadier General Wehbeh Qatisha argues that Lebanon’s security requires more than just troops or advanced weaponry at the border. The presence of the Lebanese military as a representative of the Lebanese state is also a significant deterrent. He pointed out that prior to 1970, Israel refrained from attacking Lebanon, despite a much smaller army. However, he cautioned that even with a substantial deployment today, the persistence of Hezbollah’s military presence would continue to undermine Lebanon’s stability and security.

Since the 1969 Cairo Agreement, which allowed the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) to launch operations against Israel from southern Lebanon, the Lebanese army has been restricted in its ability to enforce security along the border. After the PLO’s departure in 1982, Hezbollah took over military operations in the South. Even after the 2006 war and the adoption of Resolution 1701, which called for the Lebanese military and UNIFIL to secure the border, Hezbollah retained its armed presence and continued to conduct exercises simulating conflict with Israel. The latter violated the international resolution thousands of times, until the last war broke out against the background of turning southern Lebanon into a front supporting Gaza.

Qatisha emphasized that the path to stability lies in comprehensive implementation of international resolutions, particularly 1701 and 1559, and restricting arms to the Lebanese army. He argued that achieving balanced deterrence requires not only military force but also a commitment to diplomacy and international support.