After Graft Claims, Lebanese Army Says Competency Only Way to Join Military

New military cadets during a graduation ceremony in Lebanon. (NNA)
New military cadets during a graduation ceremony in Lebanon. (NNA)
TT

After Graft Claims, Lebanese Army Says Competency Only Way to Join Military

New military cadets during a graduation ceremony in Lebanon. (NNA)
New military cadets during a graduation ceremony in Lebanon. (NNA)

Controversy erupted in Lebanon in 2017 when it emerged that a military academy cadet had bribed his way into obtaining a star on his uniform.

Days ago, Army Commander Joseph Aoun declared that competency was the “only standard followed by the military institution, especially its academy.”

He added that attempts to tarnish the army’s image will not be tolerated.

Days earlier, Defense Minister Elias Bou Saab revealed that one corruption case involved a bribe of $19 million to have a student enroll in the military academy.

This case dates back to 2017 when dozens of cadets failed their first year at the academy, leading to the arrest of several figures on suspicion they had received bribes in return for facilitating the enrollment of students.

A former officer told Asharq Al-Awsat that some bribes reached as much as $100,000. When authorities began to suspect foul play, bribers turned to offering gold instead of cash to avoid the surveillance of their bank accounts.

Asked about the motives for turning to such extremes, he explained that people in rural regions, such as Baalbek, Hermel and Akkar, dream of having their children join the military. Bribery is seen as a way to achieve this dream given the prevalence of corruption in the country.

Another former officer refuted to Asharq Al-Awsat that corruption was prevalent throughout the military, saying instead that power is abused for sectarian purposes.

“Corruption is limited to a few number of individuals,” he asserted. “The graft cases we witnessed in recent years can be attributed to a lack of transparency in various state sectors and administrations and the flagrant meddling of politicians in military affairs.”

Former military academy chief, Nizar Abdul Qader told Asharq Al-Awsat that in the past, military examinations used to be held without political meddling.

The army used to rely on competencies and grades to bring in new members. Meddling, when it happened, was aimed at preserving higher national interests, he said.

He cited the intervention of late former President Elias Sarkis and former Prime Minister Salim al-Hoss to recruit two figures to the military in order to preserve the representation of regions during a critical security phase.

He also said that the brothers of military martyrs were also allowed to enroll as a sign of gratitude to their parents, but no cases of bribes or cheating were ever recorded in the academy.

Things began to change after the signing of the 1989 Taef Accord, Abdul Qader stated.

The agreement helped end Lebanon’s 1975-90 civil war.

The deal, explained Abdul Qader, saw the disarmament of militias. Some members of these groups were allowed to join the military. Many of them did not meet the necessary academic standards to enter the institution, but the higher national interest demanded that they join the army.

He revealed that he was tasked with resolving the ensuing crisis. He was forced to dismiss 70 students, even though many had close connections to politicians.

Since 1958, the army, he continued, has made sure to avoid any imbalance in sectarian representation in the number of its recruits. This has, however, failed. He explained that the number of Sunni recruits is on the rise, while Christians are dwindling because their overall numbers in Lebanon are also dropping. Shiites are also decreasing because many opt to join the Hezbollah party.

The process of recruiting a cadet to the military is based on a sectarian basis, he stated. Each sect is judged separately from the other in order to maintain certain sectarian balances even though some sects may perform better than others in examinations.

“It is not fair, but in Lebanon we are forced to preserve coexistence, specifically in institutions that protect the nation,” he remarked.



Legal Threats Close in on Israel's Netanyahu, Could Impact Ongoing Wars

The International Criminal Court (ICC) building is pictured on November 21, 2024 in The Hague. (Photo by Laurens van PUTTEN / ANP / AFP) / Netherlands OUT
The International Criminal Court (ICC) building is pictured on November 21, 2024 in The Hague. (Photo by Laurens van PUTTEN / ANP / AFP) / Netherlands OUT
TT

Legal Threats Close in on Israel's Netanyahu, Could Impact Ongoing Wars

The International Criminal Court (ICC) building is pictured on November 21, 2024 in The Hague. (Photo by Laurens van PUTTEN / ANP / AFP) / Netherlands OUT
The International Criminal Court (ICC) building is pictured on November 21, 2024 in The Hague. (Photo by Laurens van PUTTEN / ANP / AFP) / Netherlands OUT

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces legal perils at home and abroad that point to a turbulent future for the Israeli leader and could influence the wars in Gaza and Lebanon, analysts and officials say.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) stunned Israel on Thursday by issuing arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former defense chief Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in the 13-month-old Gaza conflict. The bombshell came less than two weeks before Netanyahu is due to testify in a corruption trial that has dogged him for years and could end his political career if he is found guilty. He has denied any wrongdoing. While the domestic bribery trial has polarized public opinion, the prime minister has received widespread support from across the political spectrum following the ICC move, giving him a boost in troubled times.
Netanyahu has denounced the court's decision as antisemitic and denied charges that he and Gallant targeted Gazan civilians and deliberately starved them.
"Israelis get really annoyed if they think the world is against them and rally around their leader, even if he has faced a lot of criticism," said Yonatan Freeman, an international relations expert at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
"So anyone expecting that the ICC ruling will end this government, and what they see as a flawed (war) policy, is going to get the opposite," he added.
A senior diplomat said one initial consequence was that Israel might be less likely to reach a rapid ceasefire with Hezbollah in Lebanon or secure a deal to bring back hostages still held by Hamas in Gaza.
"This terrible decision has ... badly harmed the chances of a deal in Lebanon and future negotiations on the issue of the hostages," said Ofir Akunis, Israel's consul general in New York.
"Terrible damage has been done because these organizations like Hezbollah and Hamas ... have received backing from the ICC and thus they are likely to make the price higher because they have the support of the ICC," he told Reuters.
While Hamas welcomed the ICC decision, there has been no indication that either it or Hezbollah see this as a chance to put pressure on Israel, which has inflicted huge losses on both groups over the past year, as well as on civilian populations.
IN THE DOCK
The ICC warrants highlight the disconnect between the way the war is viewed here and how it is seen by many abroad, with Israelis focused on their own losses and convinced the nation's army has sought to minimize civilian casualties.
Michael Oren, a former Israeli ambassador to the United States, said the ICC move would likely harden resolve and give the war cabinet license to hit Gaza and Lebanon harder still.
"There's a strong strand of Israeli feeling that runs deep, which says 'if we're being condemned for what we are doing, we might just as well go full gas'," he told Reuters.
While Netanyahu has received wide support at home over the ICC action, the same is not true of the domestic graft case, where he is accused of bribery, breach of trust and fraud.
The trial opened in 2020 and Netanyahu is finally scheduled to take the stand next month after the court rejected his latest request to delay testimony on the grounds that he had been too busy overseeing the war to prepare his defense.
He was due to give evidence last year but the date was put back because of the war. His critics have accused him of prolonging the Gaza conflict to delay judgment day and remain in power, which he denies. Always a divisive figure in Israel, public trust in Netanyahu fell sharply in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas assault on southern Israel that caught his government off guard, cost around 1,200 lives.
Israel's subsequent campaign has killed more than 44,000 people and displaced nearly all Gaza's population at least once, triggering a humanitarian catastrophe, according to Gaza officials.
The prime minister has refused advice from the state attorney general to set up an independent commission into what went wrong and Israel's subsequent conduct of the war.
He is instead looking to establish an inquiry made up only of politicians, which critics say would not provide the sort of accountability demanded by the ICC.
Popular Israeli daily Yedioth Ahronoth said the failure to order an independent investigation had prodded the ICC into action. "Netanyahu preferred to take the risk of arrest warrants, just as long as he did not have to form such a commission," it wrote on Friday.
ARREST THREAT
The prime minister faces a difficult future living under the shadow of an ICC warrant, joining the ranks of only a few leaders to have suffered similar humiliation, including Libya's Muammar Gaddafi and Serbia's Slobodan Milosevic.
It also means he risks arrest if he travels to any of the court's 124 signatory states, including most of Europe.
One place he can safely visit is the United States, which is not a member of the ICC, and Israeli leaders hope US President-elect Donald Trump will bring pressure to bear by imposing sanctions on ICC officials.
Mike Waltz, Trump's nominee for national security advisor, has already promised tough action: "You can expect a strong response to the antisemitic bias of the ICC & UN come January,” he wrote on X on Friday. In the meantime, Israeli officials are talking to their counterparts in Western capitals, urging them to ignore the arrest warrants, as Hungary has already promised to do.
However, the charges are not going to disappear soon, if at all, meaning fellow leaders will be increasingly reluctant to have relations with Netanyahu, said Yuval Shany, a senior fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute.
"In a very direct sense, there is going to be more isolation for the Israeli state going forward," he told Reuters.