Ajax Start the Champions League in the Third Qualifying Round. Is That Fair?

 Ajax celebrate a Dusan Tadic goal in their win at Real Madrid in March. The Amsterdam side’s run to the Champions League semi-finals will only count towards the Dutch coefficient from next season. Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
Ajax celebrate a Dusan Tadic goal in their win at Real Madrid in March. The Amsterdam side’s run to the Champions League semi-finals will only count towards the Dutch coefficient from next season. Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
TT

Ajax Start the Champions League in the Third Qualifying Round. Is That Fair?

 Ajax celebrate a Dusan Tadic goal in their win at Real Madrid in March. The Amsterdam side’s run to the Champions League semi-finals will only count towards the Dutch coefficient from next season. Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
Ajax celebrate a Dusan Tadic goal in their win at Real Madrid in March. The Amsterdam side’s run to the Champions League semi-finals will only count towards the Dutch coefficient from next season. Photograph: Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Ajax were one of the most entertaining and successful sides of the Champions League last season, beating Real Madrid and Juventus on their way to the semi‑finals, where only a ludicrous late comeback from Tottenham denied them a trip to Madrid and the chance to pip Liverpool to the trophy. On Tuesday their European campaign gets under way in the third qualifying round, against the Greek champions PAOK.

This seems quite the humbling for a side good enough to reach the final four just a few months ago, but when it came to deciding at which stage they would enter this year’s competition their efforts last season counted for nothing. Harsh as this seems, it is not entirely without rational explanation: Uefa allocated places for this season’s European competitions based on the rankings as they stood a year ago, so that teams started their domestic campaigns last August knowing precisely how many places they were vying for and how they would be distributed.

Thus the places for 2020-21 are already known. Thanks to Ajax’s efforts last season, whoever wins the Dutch league this year will enter the Champions League in the play-off round, just one two-legged victory from the all-important league stage. Nothing short of winning either of Uefa’s two showpiece competitions this season will change that.

That the triumphs of last season have no impact on when the Dutch champions enter the Champions League this year certainly seems imperfect, but in practice it is justifiable. What seems harder to explain, however, is what does. For example, one of the principal reasons why Ajax have been forced to enter European competition so early is that Milan got a stoppage‑time penalty in a game played six years ago.

At this point it is sadly necessary to go into the details of how Uefa calculate their coefficients. After the qualifiers, when points are halved, teams get two points for a win and one for a draw, plus a four-point bonus for reaching the Champions League group stage, a five-point bonus for making the round of 16, and a one-point bonus for each subsequent round, and for each round of the Europa League from the quarter-finals onwards.

The points won by all the clubs in each association in a season are then added up and divided by the number of clubs involved to give a single figure, correct to three decimal places. That figure plus those for the four previous seasons will be added together to give a final points tally, which is what is used for the rankings.

So the rankings used to determine this season’s European places used results from 2013-14 to 2017-18, bringing us back to Massimiliano Allegri’s Milan team. In August 2013 the Rossoneri comfortably beat PSV Eindhoven in the Champions League play-offs and were then placed in Group H, along with Ajax. When they travelled to Amsterdam that October they earned a draw thanks to that 94th-minute Mario Balotelli penalty; in the return fixture in December Riccardo Montolivo was sent off in the 22nd minute and Ajax launched an assault on the home goal. The Dutch side had 64% of possession and 23 shots, 11 of them on target, to Milan’s combined total of three, but none went in and the game ended goalless. If they had won either of those games, Ajax would have progressed from the group stage.

So results last season, results that speak directly to the quality of this Ajax team, are not taken into account. But had PSV somehow beaten Milan in that play-off; if Balotelli’s penalty had been skewed wide; or if just one of those chances at the San Siro had found its way past Christian Abbiati – in a game played nearly six years ago and featuring only two players who were still at Ajax last season, one of whom had spent four years at Manchester United in the intervening period – the Netherlands would have had enough additional ranking points for Ajax to enter this year’s Champions League one round later.

Equally, the fact that Young Boys enter this year’s Champions League in the play-off round is almost entirely down to Basel’s run to the Europa League quarter-finals in 2013-14. For next season, when those points no longer count, Switzerland will plunge five places down the rankings and their champions will go into the second qualifying round.

It is hard to argue that this system is completely unfair, but there are certainly some quibblesome elements. Most obviously, it discriminates against good teams from poor leagues, who are forever hobbled by the underperformance of their compatriots, some of which occurred quite a long time ago.

It is hard to argue that this year’s Ajax team should be in any way disadvantaged by Utrecht’s Europa League defeat to Zenit St-Petersburg two years ago, let alone the same team’s abject humbling by Luxembourg’s Differdange way back in the 2013-14 qualifiers. Meanwhile the top four nations, who automatically get four places in the Champions League, immediately start racking up massive bonuses, making them extremely hard to dislodge.

Short of switching to knockout competitions with unseeded draws, it is not obvious what Uefa could do to remedy this situation. At least Ajax now know that with one more run to the semi-finals this year the Dutch champions will, almost certainly, finally earn an automatic place in the Champions League group stage – even if they will have to wait until 2021 to make use of it.



Sabalenka Overpowers Badosa to Near 3rd Consecutive Melbourne Title

Tennis - Australian Open - Melbourne Park, Melbourne, Australia - January 23, 2025 Belarus' Aryna Sabalenka hugs Spain's Paula Badosa after winning her semi final match REUTERS/Francis Mascarenhas
Tennis - Australian Open - Melbourne Park, Melbourne, Australia - January 23, 2025 Belarus' Aryna Sabalenka hugs Spain's Paula Badosa after winning her semi final match REUTERS/Francis Mascarenhas
TT

Sabalenka Overpowers Badosa to Near 3rd Consecutive Melbourne Title

Tennis - Australian Open - Melbourne Park, Melbourne, Australia - January 23, 2025 Belarus' Aryna Sabalenka hugs Spain's Paula Badosa after winning her semi final match REUTERS/Francis Mascarenhas
Tennis - Australian Open - Melbourne Park, Melbourne, Australia - January 23, 2025 Belarus' Aryna Sabalenka hugs Spain's Paula Badosa after winning her semi final match REUTERS/Francis Mascarenhas

Aryna Sabalenka moved one win away from becoming the first woman since 1999 to win three consecutive Australian Open titles, recovering from a slow start to beat good friend Paula Badosa 6-4, 6-2 Thursday night to return to the final.
Just 10 minutes in, the No. 1-ranked Sabalenka was down a break and trailed 2-0, 40-love. She kept making unforced errors, shaking her head or gesturing toward her team.
But the 26-year-old from Belarus quickly figured things out, especially once Rod Laver Arena's retractable roof was shut late in the first set because of a drizzle, The Associated Press reported. She straightened her strokes, frequently using huge returns and groundstrokes to overpower the 11th-seeded Badosa, who had eliminated No. 3 Coco Gauff on Tuesday to reach her first major semifinal.
Sabalenka grabbed four games in a row and five of six to lead 5-3 and soon was ending that set with a 114 mph (184 kph) ace. She broke to lead 2-1 in the second set — helped by two double-faults by Badosa — and again to go up 4-1.
The key statistic: Sabalenka finished with a 32-11 advantage in winners.
That's the sort of excellence that helped Sabalenka win her first major trophy at Melbourne Park in 2023, and she since has added two more — in Australia a year ago and at the US Open last September.
The last woman to reach three finals in a row at the year's first Grand Slam tournament was Serena Williams, who won two from 2015-17. Martina Hingis was the most recent woman with a threepeat, doing it from 1997-1999.
Sabalenka and Badosa did their best to avoid any eye contact for much of the evening, whether up at the net for the coin toss or when they crossed paths at changeovers.
One exception came early in the second set, when Badosa tumbled to the court and flung her racket away to avoid injury. Badosa immediately put up a thumb to make clear she was fine. When a replay was shown on stadium video screens, Sabalenka joked that Badosa took a dive, and they both smiled.
When the match was over, they met at the net for a lengthy hug.