Haniyeh Criticized After Calling Soleimani 'Martyr of Jerusalem'

 Hamas Chief Ismail Haniyeh gestures as he delivers a speech in Gaza City January 23, 2018. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem
Hamas Chief Ismail Haniyeh gestures as he delivers a speech in Gaza City January 23, 2018. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem
TT
20

Haniyeh Criticized After Calling Soleimani 'Martyr of Jerusalem'

 Hamas Chief Ismail Haniyeh gestures as he delivers a speech in Gaza City January 23, 2018. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem
Hamas Chief Ismail Haniyeh gestures as he delivers a speech in Gaza City January 23, 2018. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem

The head of Hamas political bureau, Ismail Haniyeh, has sparked widespread controversy after he described the commander of the IRGC Al-Quds Force, Qassem Soleimani, who was killed by the United States in Iraq last Friday, as a “martyr of Jerusalem.”

“The martyr Commander Soleimani spent his life in order to support the resistance while he was at the head of Al-Quds Force,” Haniyeh said in a speech before mourners in Tehran.

In the speech translated into Persian, Haniyeh repeatedly said that Soleimani was the “martyr of Jerusalem”. Activists, intellectuals and Brotherhood officials rejected the remarks, criticizing Hamas’ positions.

Many anti-Iran figures, inside and outside Hamas and in the Arab world, rejected Haniyeh’s participation in the funeral and disapproved his statements.

Ibrahim Hamami, a writer and researcher of the leading defenders of Hamas, wrote in response to Haniyeh: “No, he is not the martyr of Jerusalem.”

He said the Hamas official’s words were “more than dangerous.”

Controversial reactions spread on social networking sites. This came despite the fact that Haniyeh had ordered Hamas officials to avoid delving into the issue of Soleimani, “given the situation is very sensitive.”

Haniyeh said in Tehran: “The project of the resistance in the land of Palestine and in the region will not weaken and not back down… the assassinations will increase our strength, steadfastness and determination to proceed in order to liberate Jerusalem and liberate the will of this nation.”



Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
TT
20

Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 

The US military intervention alongside Israel in its war against Iran has sparked growing concern in Lebanon, mixing fear with uncertainty about what lies ahead, especially as the region awaits Iran’s response.

Lebanese citizens are questioning whether Iran will retaliate solely against Israel or also strike nearby US military bases. Some speculate that Iran might avoid targeting American bases in neighboring countries that have shown solidarity with Tehran, as maintaining these relationships could help Iran push for an end to the war and a return to US-Iranian dialogue.

Despite mounting regional tension, Hezbollah continues to avoid direct military involvement. This position aligns with the recent statements of Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who affirmed that Hezbollah will not intervene.

While some interpreted Hezbollah Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem’s pledge of “full support to Iran in any way we deem appropriate” as a divergence, sources say the party is fully aligned with Berri.

Berri maintains that dialogue between Washington and Tehran is the only path to halting the conflict and addressing Iran’s nuclear file. His stance is echoed by Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and other political actors.

US envoy Thomas Barrack, currently stationed in Türkiye, reportedly discussed these matters with Lebanese officials and promised to return in three weeks, hoping for progress toward a ceasefire and the implementation of UN Resolution 1701, which calls for Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon and for weapons to be under the exclusive control of the Lebanese state.

According to sources, the US escalation has prompted behind-the-scenes consultations between Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, and Lebanese state officials. These talks aim to evaluate the situation and ensure Lebanon remains out of the regional conflict.

Hezbollah remains firm in its decision not to engage militarily, refusing to offer Israel a pretext to expand the war into Lebanon. Despite internal solidarity with Iran, Hezbollah is keenly aware that joining the war would not shift the military balance, which now involves advanced weaponry beyond its capabilities.

The sources added that the party is also mindful of Lebanese Shiite public sentiment, which favors stability over another devastating war. Memories of past conflicts, including the toll of Hezbollah’s support for Gaza, linger. Fears of displacement and economic ruin are driving many in Beirut’s southern suburbs to sell their homes, often at steep losses.