US Planning New Strategy to Isolate Damascus ‘for Years’ to Come

A man inspects the damage in the village of Maaret al-Naasan in Syria's Idlib province. (AFP)
A man inspects the damage in the village of Maaret al-Naasan in Syria's Idlib province. (AFP)
TT

US Planning New Strategy to Isolate Damascus ‘for Years’ to Come

A man inspects the damage in the village of Maaret al-Naasan in Syria's Idlib province. (AFP)
A man inspects the damage in the village of Maaret al-Naasan in Syria's Idlib province. (AFP)

A new American plan to isolate the Syrian regime is beginning to take shape. The plan includes a series of military, political, diplomatic, economic and legislative measures that will isolate Damascus “for years.”

Mid-June will be decisive in moving the plan forward as the Caesar Act will begin to be implemented. The act calls for imposing strict sanctions against any Syrian or non-Syrian side that helps in the country’s reconstruction.

A donors conference on Syria’s reconstruction will also be held in Brussels in June. Russia and the West are also headed on a collision course over the decision to extend humanitarian assistance across the Syrian borders. The UN Security Council had in January extended to June 10 authorization for the agency and its partners to deliver humanitarian aid across borders into Syria.

On the other front, Damascus, with Russian and Iranian support, has intensified its campaign to capture the strategic highways between Aleppo and Damascus and Aleppo and Latakia. Capturing the routes will revive Syria’s economy and ease the burden of sanctions and isolation.

The field campaign is accompanied by Russian diplomatic efforts to “normalize” relations between the regime and Europe and the “Arab family.” The upcoming Syrian parliamentary elections and the 2021 presidential elections will also play into these efforts.

The United States has sought to counter these moves by intensifying its contacts with influential European and Arab countries, taking into consideration the regime advances in the Idlib and Aleppo countrysides, the election of a new European Commission chief and Britain’s departure from the European Union.

In meetings with various European officials, the Americans have frequently stressed that Washington was not seeking a regime change in Syria, but a change in behavior. It means that Syria should not destabilize its neighbors and region, support terrorism or threaten Washington’s allies in the region. It must also abandon chemical weapons and ensure that they have been eradicated in line with the 2013 American-Russian agreement. The regime must also ensure the safe voluntary return of refugees to their homes and hold war criminals accountable.

The US is demanding the formation of a Syrian government that can meet the above demands, noting that the current one is incapable of doing so as demonstrated in its failure to respect UN Security Council resolutions 2118 and 2254.

The American disappointment is not limited to Damascus, but extends to Moscow because the American-Russian cooperation has failed to bear fruit in Syria. All it has achieved is avert a military clash between Washington and Moscow and turn a blind eye to Israeli strikes on Syria.

Given the above, escalation against Damascus appears like the natural trajectory. The US will forge ahead with economic, political, diplomatic and military pressure, starting with the implementation of the Caesar Act. European sanctions will also play a role. Europe recently imposed sanctions against ten people and entities affiliated with the regime.

With the Americans and Europeans seeing eye-to-eye, attention will be turned to the Brussels donor conference where conditions will be laid out before Damascus to facilitate a credible political process and provide the necessary conditions for the safe return of refugees in exchange for reconstruction.

Politically, Washington will preserve its relations with the Syrian opposition and contacts with refugees to unite ranks. It will also intensify contacts with the small group on Syria that support the opposition. It includes the US, Britain, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt.

Diplomatically, it will maintain its open contacts with Arab and European countries to avert political and diplomatic normalization of ties with the regime. It will support the Geneva political process to implement resolution 2254.

Militarily, Washington will continue to exert its pressure through its troops deployed east of the Euphrates River and continue to support the Syrian Democratic Forces and prevent regime forces from seizing territories from them. It will also exert efforts to prevent the regime from exploiting natural resources, such as oil and gas. The US will also maintain its al-Tanf military base and block supply routes between Tehran and Damascus.

It will also focus its attention on Turkey by providing it with intelligence and diplomatic support in areas it controls against regime and Russian forces in Idlib. Washington may seek to exploit the differences between Ankara and Moscow over Idlib in its favor. It will also continue to “bless” Israeli strikes against Damascus.

Should the US go ahead with its plan, the regime will be faced with years of isolation until desired change is achieved - unless Syria springs a surprise or the Russians and Americans reach an understanding.



Lebanon's Army Chief Joseph Aoun, a Man with a Tough Mission

Lebanon's Armed Forces Commander General Joseph Aoun attends a cabinet meeting in Beirut on November 27, 2024, to discuss the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. - AFP
Lebanon's Armed Forces Commander General Joseph Aoun attends a cabinet meeting in Beirut on November 27, 2024, to discuss the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. - AFP
TT

Lebanon's Army Chief Joseph Aoun, a Man with a Tough Mission

Lebanon's Armed Forces Commander General Joseph Aoun attends a cabinet meeting in Beirut on November 27, 2024, to discuss the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. - AFP
Lebanon's Armed Forces Commander General Joseph Aoun attends a cabinet meeting in Beirut on November 27, 2024, to discuss the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah. - AFP

Lebanese army chief Joseph Aoun, who is being touted as a possible candidate for the presidency, is a man with a tough mission following an Israel-Hezbollah ceasefire that relies heavily on his troops deploying in the south.

Aoun, 60, was set to retire last January after heading the army since 2017, but has had his mandate extended twice -- the last time on Thursday.

The army, widely respected and a rare source of unity in a country riven by sectarian and political divides, has held together despite periodic social strife, the latest war and a crushing five-year economic crisis.
A fragile ceasefire took effect on Wednesday, ending more than a year of war between Israel and Hezbollah that has killed thousands in Lebanon and caused mass displacements on both sides of the border.
Under its terms, the Lebanese army and United Nations peacekeepers are to become the only armed presence in south Lebanon, where Hezbollah enjoys strong support and had been launching attacks on Israeli troops for months, and fighting them on the ground since late September.

The move averted a military power vacuum as the army, which boasts about 80,000 Lebanese servicemen, seeks to bolster its deployment in south Lebanon as part of the nascent truce.

But it will be a difficult task in an area long seen as Hezbollah territory, and risks upsetting the country's already delicate social balance as tensions run high over the war's course and devastation.

- 'Integrity' -

Aoun "has a reputation of personal integrity", said Karim Bitar, an international relations expert at Beirut's Saint-Joseph University.

The army chief came into prominence after leading the army in a battle to drive out the ISIS group from a mountanous area along the Syrian border.

"Within the Lebanese army, he is perceived as someone who is dedicated... who has the national interest at heart, and who has been trying to consolidate this institution, which is the last non-sectarian institution still on its feet in the country," he told AFP.

Aoun has good relations with groups across the political spectrum, including with Hezbollah, as well as with various foreign countries.

Mohanad Hage Ali from the Carnegie Middle East Center noted that "being the head of US-backed Lebanese Armed Forces, Joseph Aoun has ties to the United States".

"While he maintained relations with everyone, Hezbollah-affiliated media often criticized him" for his US ties, he told AFP.

An international conference in Paris last month raised $200 million to support the armed forces.

The military has been hit hard by Lebanon's economic crisis, and at one point in 2020 said it had scrapped meat from the meals offered to on-duty soldiers due to rising food prices.

Aoun has also been floated by several politicians, parties and local media as a potential candidate for Lebanon's presidency, vacant for more than two years amid deadlock between allies of Hezbollah and its opponents, who accuse the group of seeking to impose its preferred candidate.

Aoun has not commented on the reports and largely refrains from making media statements.

- President? -

A Western diplomat told AFP that "everyone has recognized Aoun's track record at the head of the army".

"But the question is, can he transform himself into a politician?" said the diplomat, requesting anonymity to discuss politically sensitive matters.

Bitar said that "many, even those who respect him are opposed to his election as president, because he comes from the army mostly", noting a number of Lebanon's heads of state, including recently, were former army chiefs.

Most "left a bittersweet taste", Bitar said, noting any election of Aoun could also perpetuate the idea that the army chief "systematically becomes president".

This could end up weakening the military as it creates "an unhealthy relationship between political power and the army, which is supposed to remain neutral", he added.

Hage Ali said that the idea of Aoun's "candidacy for the presidency did not receive much enthusiasm from the major figures in the political class, even those who are opposed to Hezbollah".

Aoun, who speaks Arabic, French and English, hails from Lebanon's Christian community and has two children.

By convention, the presidency goes to a Maronite Christian, the premiership is reserved for a Sunni Muslim and the post of parliament speaker goes to a Shiite Muslim.

He is not related to the previous Lebanese president Michel Aoun -- also a former army chief -- although the two served together in the military.