Lebanon: Signs of Rift between FPM, Hezbollah Begin to Emerge

Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah during his first meeting with General Michel Aoun in 2006. (AFP)
Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah during his first meeting with General Michel Aoun in 2006. (AFP)
TT

Lebanon: Signs of Rift between FPM, Hezbollah Begin to Emerge

Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah during his first meeting with General Michel Aoun in 2006. (AFP)
Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah during his first meeting with General Michel Aoun in 2006. (AFP)

The Mar Mkhayel understanding, which was reached between now President Michel Aoun and Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah in February 2006, is losing its impetus as a result of a dispute between head of the Free Patriotic Movement, former foreign Minister Gebran Bassil, and the party’s leadership.

The circumstances that made the two sides reach this understanding, following the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, have started to change. Each group now has its own popular orientations that are no longer in line with the political purpose of the understanding.

FPM MP Ziad Aswad made the dispute public, when he announced, during a television interview on Thursday, that it was impossible to combine “the gun and hunger,” in a clean reference to Hezbollah’s arms.

During a long interview on the FPM-owned OTV channel, his colleague in the FPM, Naji Hayek, promoted the need to support political federalism.

According to observers, the dispute between the two sides reflected diverging views that are no longer in harmony with the Aoun-Nasrallah understanding.

They affirmed that the transformation is a result of success political developments, specifically between Hezbollah and Bassil, “the legitimate heir of Aoun”, who has begun to “prepare for the presidency battle.”

This is why Bassil, who is also Aoun’s son-inlaw, is working away from the spotlight to normalize his relations with the United States. He has made clear steps in this regard, by reportedly securing the travel of former collaborator with Israel, Amer Fakhoury, to Washington. The move sparked Hezbollah’s outrage.

Moreover, Bassil decided to strike a truce with Central Bank Governor Riad Salameh. After waging a campaign for his removal, he is now soliciting offers to normalize his relationship with the Future Movement, because he needs to restore his position as a candidate for the presidency.

On the other hand, Hezbollah is currently watching the accruing flaws in the relations with the FPM.

Observers noted that Aswad’s remarks would not go unnoticed because they directly target the party and were welcomed by forces in the opposition. Aswad perhaps wanted to send a message towards the international powers that oppose Hezbollah and Iran.



Palestinian NGO to Ask UK Court to Block F-35 Parts to Israel over Gaza War

Protesters demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of Justice ahead of a legal challenge brought by the Palestinian NGO Al-Haq over Britain's exports of parts for F-35 fighter jets to Israel, amid its conflict with Hamas, in London, Britain, November 18, 2024. REUTERS/Sam Tobin
Protesters demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of Justice ahead of a legal challenge brought by the Palestinian NGO Al-Haq over Britain's exports of parts for F-35 fighter jets to Israel, amid its conflict with Hamas, in London, Britain, November 18, 2024. REUTERS/Sam Tobin
TT

Palestinian NGO to Ask UK Court to Block F-35 Parts to Israel over Gaza War

Protesters demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of Justice ahead of a legal challenge brought by the Palestinian NGO Al-Haq over Britain's exports of parts for F-35 fighter jets to Israel, amid its conflict with Hamas, in London, Britain, November 18, 2024. REUTERS/Sam Tobin
Protesters demonstrate outside the Royal Courts of Justice ahead of a legal challenge brought by the Palestinian NGO Al-Haq over Britain's exports of parts for F-35 fighter jets to Israel, amid its conflict with Hamas, in London, Britain, November 18, 2024. REUTERS/Sam Tobin

Britain is allowing parts for F-35 fighter jets to be exported to Israel despite accepting they could be used in breach of international humanitarian law in Gaza, lawyers for a Palestinian rights group told a London court on Monday.

West Bank-based Al-Haq, which documents alleged rights violations by Israel and the Palestinian Authority, is taking legal action against Britain's Department for Business and Trade at London's High Court, Reuters reported.

Israel has been accused of violations of international humanitarian law in the Gaza war, with the UN Human Rights Office saying nearly 70% of fatalities it has verified were women and children, a report Israel rejected.

Israel says it takes care to avoid harming civilians and denies committing abuses and war crimes in the conflicts with Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Al-Haq's case comes after Britain in September suspended 30 of 350 arms export licences, though it exempted the indirect export of F-35 parts, citing the impact on the global F-35 programme.

Al-Haq argues that decision was unlawful as there is a clear risk F-35s could be used in breach of international humanitarian law.

British government lawyers said in documents for Monday's hearing that ministers assessed Israel had committed possible breaches of international humanitarian law (IHL) in relation to humanitarian access and the treatment of detainees.

Britain also "accepts that there is clear risk that F-35 components might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of IHL", its lawyer James Eadie said.

Eadie added that Britain had nonetheless decided that F-35 components should still be exported, quoting from advice to defense minister John Healey that suspending F-35 parts "would have a profound impact on international peace and security".

A full hearing of Al-Haq's legal challenge is likely to be heard early in 2025.

The Gaza health ministry says more than 43,800 people have been confirmed killed since the war erupted on Oct. 7, 2023.