عربي English Türkçe اردو فارسى
Logo
Latest News

Everything Was Going Well at Colchester but the Coronavirus Shut Everything Down

Colchester manager John McGreal during his side’s Carabao Cup win over Spurs in September which hastened Mauricio Pochettino (right) towards the exit. Photograph: Andrew Couldridge/Action Images via Reuters
Colchester manager John McGreal during his side’s Carabao Cup win over Spurs in September which hastened Mauricio Pochettino (right) towards the exit. Photograph: Andrew Couldridge/Action Images via Reuters
TT
TT

Everything Was Going Well at Colchester but the Coronavirus Shut Everything Down

Colchester manager John McGreal during his side’s Carabao Cup win over Spurs in September which hastened Mauricio Pochettino (right) towards the exit. Photograph: Andrew Couldridge/Action Images via Reuters
Colchester manager John McGreal during his side’s Carabao Cup win over Spurs in September which hastened Mauricio Pochettino (right) towards the exit. Photograph: Andrew Couldridge/Action Images via Reuters

A couple of weeks ago, I had a phone call from my manager, John McGreal. He wanted to deliver some unfortunate news to four players who were out of contract in the summer and tell us that we wouldn’t be offered renewals at Colchester.

Due to the circumstances we’re living in right now, he told us that the chairman, Robbie Cowling, couldn’t promise to fulfil our contracts and that is just the way it is. The chairman then called us a couple of days later just to confirm the news and to thank us for our time at the club. He said: “You never know what might happen in the future but I just can’t promise you I will be able to afford the contract I wanted to offer you.”

I’m not sure what I had been expecting. I had been offered a couple of deals before the end of the season and we had agreed to continue the conversation when it was over so we could just focus on football. We were sixth in the table when everything stopped and our goal was obviously promotion this year. Then we were going to sit down again to agree something to extend my time at the club.

It was a shock because for a few weeks all that had been on my mind was wondering when we were going to start playing again and complete the season. To get that phone call was obviously a bit of a shocker but at the same time I understand the business of football.

It’s still frustrating because I felt like I had finally caught a break somewhere. I haven’t stayed at the same club for a third season since I was at Chelsea as a teenager but I wanted to stay in Colchester. I’ve settled down, the manager has remained the same since I got here so I have been playing every week and enjoying my football. I’m also based down south and closer to London again so everything was going well until coronavirus came along and shut everything down.

I’ve dealt with situations like this before, although obviously nothing as severe. But in terms of moving clubs and starting again, I’ve had plenty of practice and will be ready for whatever comes next. The big issue is for my family because it means we will have to move again – they rely on me and always have to adjust to wherever we have to move to. We have been trying to get my oldest daughter into the school that we wanted but now we are going to have to make new plans for her to go somewhere else. Imagine trying to move house at short notice in the next few weeks with everything that is going on at the moment?

That was part of the reason I really wanted to stay – people don’t realise some of the decisions you have to make when you are being offered a new contract. It’s not the same as before we had kids and could just stay in a hotel for a month. My partner is probably going to have to go up north with her family while I find my feet somewhere.

We’re going to get paid until our contracts expire at the end of June and I assume that if football returns before then we will be able to play for Colchester again. But the situation still hasn’t been clarified. And what happens if they can’t finish the season until the end of July? It might be a case when we can only play five games in June and there are another four games left to play plus the play-offs, so the boys who have been released can’t play.

We’ve lost our captain, a right-back, midfielder and an attacker who have all played regularly this season so that is almost half our team. It would be frustrating if we aren’t able to complete it, especially because some of us now don’t have a club to go to next season and need to be able to showcase our talents to get a move elsewhere.

I’m not sure how they can resolve it – just deciding the table on a points-per-game ratio and then having play-offs means that any teams who could have made a late charge don’t have any chance. I remember Tranmere last year weren’t anywhere near the play-offs with 10 games to go and they ended up being promoted. But there are so many risks in trying to play the matches behind closed doors that I’m not sure if it’s a good idea or not.

The chairman gave us a bit of extra time to try and sort ourselves out but I don’t have anything lined up at this stage. I’m just waiting for news, although the problem is that every other club is still in limbo as well. They don’t know what is happening with the players they already have or what the budget is going to look like so we just have to wait and see. It just shows how fragile life as a professional can be.

Most Viewed

 
 
Arab World

Netanyahu Denies Contacts with Syria Have Led to Final Agreement

Israeli tanks deployed near the buffer zone on the Syrian Golan, Dec. 8, 2024. (AFP)
Israeli tanks deployed near the buffer zone on the Syrian Golan, Dec. 8, 2024. (AFP)
TT
TT

Netanyahu Denies Contacts with Syria Have Led to Final Agreement

Israeli tanks deployed near the buffer zone on the Syrian Golan, Dec. 8, 2024. (AFP)
Israeli tanks deployed near the buffer zone on the Syrian Golan, Dec. 8, 2024. (AFP)

Contacts and meetings held between Israel and Syria have not reached any final understanding or agreement between both sides, the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Tuesday in response to a report published by Asharq Al-Awsat.

Asharq Al-Awsat had quoted unnamed sources saying US mediation brought Netanyahu and Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa together for a meeting during September’s UN General Assembly in New York.

Those talks advanced far enough that Netanyahu declined to endorse a draft security arrangement with Damascus, it wrote.

The Prime Minister’s Office said in statement: “There were contacts and meetings organized by the US, but no agreements and understandings with Syria were ever reached.”

Amid the controversy, a Syrian source familiar with the details told Channel 12: “The final draft of the agreement is almost ready and in its last stages. A breakthrough could happen very soon.”

The source added: “The agreement’s terms are largely agreed upon, with many clauses symbolically signed and written, waiting for US officials to approach Israel and say: ‘This is the final formula, and we want to move forward.’”

He said the pause is currently on Israel’s side, not Syria’s. “So far, the formula is acceptable to Syria and largely acceptable to Israel.”

Israeli media outlets recalled what happened between both sides last September.

The i24 News channel said that at the time, Sharaa had affirmed Damascus and Jerusalem will soon share a new security agreement. His comments came shortly after Reuters said Washington is pushing for enough progress to be made by the time world leaders gather in New York for the UN General Assembly at the end of the month to allow Trump to announce a breakthrough.

The Israeli channel said the deal was obstructed after Syria presented territorial demands that Israel cannot accept, including a withdrawal from the strategically sensitive Mount Hermon and areas in Syria’s buffer zone.

Later, the Times of Israel newspaper confirmed the reports saying that while there was optimism in September that a deal could be signed, Reuters reported at the time of the assembly that contacts between Israel and Syria regarding the deal had reached a dead end due to Israel’s demand to open a “humanitarian corridor” into the Sweida province in southern Syria – where sectarian violence has killed hundreds of people from the Druze community, which Israel has vowed to protect.

The newspaper also cited an Axios report saying Israel has reportedly presented Syria with a detailed proposal for a new security agreement regarding southwest Syria, demanding a no-fly zone and demilitarized zone over its border in Syria, with no limits on Israeli deployment on its own territory.

In return, Israel would withdraw in stages from the buffer zone it established after Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad fell last December, but would remain on the peak of Mount Hermon.

The Israeli army has been deployed to nine posts inside southern Syria for nearly a year, since the Assad regime was brought down, mostly within a UN-patrolled buffer zone on the border between the countries. Two posts are on the Syrian side of Mount Hermon.

Israel said it seized the areas in southern Syria last December due to fears they would fall into the wrong hands after the regime collapsed and said it would hold on to them until a new security deal was signed.

The Walla website reported that Netanyahu was present at the UN General Assembly meeting and was planning to meet with the Syrian leader and sign a security deal with Syria.

But Damascus insisted on Israel’s withdrawal from territory seized in the Golan Heights since Assad’s fall. Tel Aviv refused, saying its troops need to remain in the area to protect its residents in the north.

Arab World

Le Drian Holds Talks in Lebanon to Consolidate Ceasefire with Israel

A photograph released by the Lebanese Presidency Press Office on December 8, 2025, shows Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (R) meeting with French Envoy Jean-Yves Le Drian (L) at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, east of Beirut. (Lebanese Presidency)
A photograph released by the Lebanese Presidency Press Office on December 8, 2025, shows Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (R) meeting with French Envoy Jean-Yves Le Drian (L) at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, east of Beirut. (Lebanese Presidency)
TT
TT

Le Drian Holds Talks in Lebanon to Consolidate Ceasefire with Israel

A photograph released by the Lebanese Presidency Press Office on December 8, 2025, shows Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (R) meeting with French Envoy Jean-Yves Le Drian (L) at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, east of Beirut. (Lebanese Presidency)
A photograph released by the Lebanese Presidency Press Office on December 8, 2025, shows Lebanese President Joseph Aoun (R) meeting with French Envoy Jean-Yves Le Drian (L) at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, east of Beirut. (Lebanese Presidency)

French presidential envoy Jean-Yves Le Drian continued his meetings with Lebanese officials on Tuesday over consolidating the ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah.

Le Drian held talks on Monday with President Joseph Aoun and parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, Foreign Minister Youssef Rajji, Army Commander Rodolphe Haykal and former Progressive Socialist Party leader Walid Jumblatt and his son MP Taymur Jumblatt on Tuesday.

Aoun told Le Drian that Lebanon welcomes any role France can play within the Mechanism committee overseeing the ceasefire, rejecting accusations that the Lebanese army was not doing enough to meet its end of the agreement.

The committee aims to end the hostilities, ensure Israel’s withdrawal from regions it is occupying in southern Lebanon and release Lebanese detainees held by Israel.

A Lebanese presidency statement said Aoun welcomed French President Emmanuel’s constant support for Lebanon, stressing that they reflect the depth of Lebanese-French ties.

Aoun revealed to Le Drian that the Mechanism will meet again on December 19.

“Our desire to activate the Mechanism meetings reflects our willingness to negotiate to reach diplomatic solutions because we never want to adopt war rhetoric,” Aoun added.

Lebanese and Israeli civilian representatives held their first direct talks in decades last week under the auspices of a year-old ceasefire monitoring mechanism.

The two sides met at the UN peacekeeping force's headquarters in Lebanon's Naqoura near the border with Israel, where the guarantors of the November 2024 ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah regularly convene.

Former Lebanese ambassador to the US Simon Karam and Israeli National Security Council official Uri Resnick were included as civilian representatives in the ceasefire mechanism for the first time.

Aoun told Le Drian that “the positive stances from fraternal and friendly states that followed last week’s meeting reflect their support for this step and will inevitably ease the pressure” that Lebanon was under.

He reiterated his rejection of criticism that the army was not doing enough to enforce the ceasefire agreement.

He instead accused Israel of continuing its attacks against Lebanon in violation of the ceasefire. He said it has destroyed homes and properties, preventing the army, United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) and Mechanism from completing their duties.

He stressed that the army and UNIFIL were acting in complete coordination, while urging the need to provide the military with the necessary equipment to allow it to fulfill its mission in full.

The mission, he remarked, is not limited to regions south of the Litani River, but includes all of Lebanon.

Le Drian, for his part, conveyed to Aoun Macron’s support for Karam’s appointment to the Lebanon’s negotiating team, adding that Paris “will always stand by Beirut’s national choices.”

Talks between Berri and the envoy, which lasted over an hour, tackled the situation in Lebanon and the region, especially Israel’s ongoing violations of the ceasefire.

Paris is set to hold next week a meeting between France, the United States and Saudi Arabia in preparation for a conference aimed at backing the Lebanese army and support a roadmap for a long-term ceasefire.

World

Why Japan Issued an Advisory for a Possible Megaquake in the Country’s North 

A car is stranded on a collapsed road in Tohoku, Aomori prefecture, northeastern Japan, 09 December 2025. (EPA/Jiji Press)
A car is stranded on a collapsed road in Tohoku, Aomori prefecture, northeastern Japan, 09 December 2025. (EPA/Jiji Press)
TT
TT

Why Japan Issued an Advisory for a Possible Megaquake in the Country’s North 

A car is stranded on a collapsed road in Tohoku, Aomori prefecture, northeastern Japan, 09 December 2025. (EPA/Jiji Press)
A car is stranded on a collapsed road in Tohoku, Aomori prefecture, northeastern Japan, 09 December 2025. (EPA/Jiji Press)

Japan issued a megaquake advisory Tuesday after a magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck off the eastern coast of Aomori, the northernmost prefecture of Japan's main island of Honshu, and just south of the northern island of Hokkaido. Damage from this quake was modest — 34 mostly mild injuries and some damage to roads and buildings.

Officials said the advisory is not a prediction and the probability of a magnitude 8 or larger quake is only about 1%. But there’s hope the advisory will serve as a wake-up call for a quake that could have the devastation of the 2011 disaster that killed nearly 20,000 people and destroyed a nuclear plant.

There's said to be an increased risk of a subsequent, magnitude-8 or larger quake within the next week. Officials are urging residents, especially along coastal areas, to be well prepared so they can grab an emergency bag and run as soon as possible if a bigger quake hits.

This advisory seemed mindful compared with another advisory last year. The southern half of Japan's Pacific coastline received a "Nankai Trough" megaquake advisory in the summer of 2024, but the ambiguity of that warning led to panic buying of emergency food, event cancellations and business closures.

A megaquake advisory for Japan's northeastern coast

The Japan Meteorological Agency says Monday's powerful quake temporarily increased potential risks in the regions of Hokkaido and the Sanriku coast. That's where the Pacific Plate beneath Japan forms the two trenches — the Japan Trench and Chishima Trench — that have caused many large quakes in the past.

Experts say the deadly quake and tsunami in 2011 was caused by movement associated with the Japan Trench. It spans from off the eastern coast of Chiba to Aomori, and the Chishima Trench goes from the eastern coast of Hokkaido to the northern islands and the Kurils.

In explaining the advisory, the JMA said the magnitude 9.0 quake on March 11, 2011, that devastated large swaths of Japan's northern coast occurred two days after a magnitude 7.3 temblor that occurred at the Japan Trench off the eastern coast of Iwate, one of the hardest-hit areas in that disaster as well as in Monday's quake.

The 2011 quake caused a tsunami that battered northern coastal towns in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures. The tsunami, which topped 15 meters (50 feet) in some areas, slammed into and destroyed the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. That created deep fears of radiation that linger to this day.

A megaquake could cause a 98-foot tsunami and kill nearly 200,000

Another offshore megaquake in the Hokkaido-Sanriku area could cause up to a 30-meter (98-foot) tsunami in the region, kill as many as 199,000 people, destroy up to 220,000 houses and buildings, and cause estimated economic damages of up to 31 trillion yen ($198 billion), according to an estimate by the government. It says as many as 42,000 people could suffer from hypothermia in the winter.

The areas covered by the advisory extend across 182 municipalities from Hokkaido to Chiba prefecture.

Japan's separate advisory for an even more damaging megaquake stemming from the Nankai Trough, which affects the southern half of Japan's Pacific coast, was activated for the first time last August after a magnitude 7.1 quake occurred off the eastern coast of Miyazaki.

In a 2013 damage estimate for a possible Nankai Trough megaquake, the government said a magnitude 9.1 quake could generate a tsunami exceeding 10 meters (33 feet) within minutes, killing as many as 323,000 people, destroying more than 2 million buildings and causing economic damage exceeding 200 trillion yen ($1.28 trillion) in the region.

Officials call on people to be calm and prepared

Officials are stressing that the latest advisory has no prediction for any megaquake happening at any specific time or location, a Cabinet official for disaster prevention, Tsukasa Morikubo, told a news conference early Tuesday. He called on residents to be cautious and prepared while continuing their daily activity and work.

Officials urge people to keep an emergency bag containing a few days' worth of daily necessities along with shoes and helmets. People in the region are also advised to discuss evacuation procedures with family members and sleep in day clothes, not in pajamas, so they can flee immediately. Furniture should also be fixed to the floor or the wall.

The designated municipalities explained the advisory on their websites and started inspecting stocks of relief goods and equipment to be used at evacuation centers.

Iwaki City in Fukushima urged residents to register for emergency emails, while officials in the town of Oarai in Ibaraki prefecture, northeast of Tokyo, inspected wireless communication devices.

Japan's first megaquake advisory in August of last year contained a lot of scientific jargon. It worried and baffled many across the country. Some towns closed beaches and canceled annual events, disappointing many travelers during local holidays.

Many people postponed planned trips and rushed to stock up on rice, dried noodles, bottled water and portable toilets, leaving shelves empty at many supermarkets in western Japan and even Tokyo, which is outside of the at-risk area.