Ellen Fokkema Breaks Dutch Age Barrier to Play Football Against Men

 Ellen Fokkema will become the first adult woman to be allowed to play in a Dutch men’s football team, pictured with VV Foarut teammates Jesper Hoeksma, Erik Cats and Mark Polstra. Photograph: BSR Agency/Getty Images
Ellen Fokkema will become the first adult woman to be allowed to play in a Dutch men’s football team, pictured with VV Foarut teammates Jesper Hoeksma, Erik Cats and Mark Polstra. Photograph: BSR Agency/Getty Images
TT

Ellen Fokkema Breaks Dutch Age Barrier to Play Football Against Men

 Ellen Fokkema will become the first adult woman to be allowed to play in a Dutch men’s football team, pictured with VV Foarut teammates Jesper Hoeksma, Erik Cats and Mark Polstra. Photograph: BSR Agency/Getty Images
Ellen Fokkema will become the first adult woman to be allowed to play in a Dutch men’s football team, pictured with VV Foarut teammates Jesper Hoeksma, Erik Cats and Mark Polstra. Photograph: BSR Agency/Getty Images

Ellen Fokkema is proud, and excited, to be the face of a controversial experiment that could see the advent of mixed-gender adult football in the Netherlands. Until this month, the KNVB had barred women over 18 from playing in senior men’s first teams, but the Dutch Football Association has now – on a one season-only trial basis – agreed that the 19-year-old can continue turning out for her local club.

“It’s fantastic I can keep on playing in this team, I’ve played with these lads since I was five,” says the forward from VV Foarut, in the Frisian village of Menaam.

Given its population is only around 2,600, Menaam lacks a women’s side and, without her newly minted dispensation, Fokkema would have been forced to decide between appearing for VV Foarut’s reserves – adult women are not banned from amateur B teams in the Netherlands – or, possibly, give up football.

“It would have been a real shame if I hadn’t been in the team next season; why shouldn’t it still be possible?” says Fokkema. “I’ve no idea how it’ll work out, but I’m super happy to be taking part in the pilot. It’s quite a challenge, but that only excites me more.”

Art Langeler, the KNVB’s head of football development, seems delighted by an experiment taking place in the fourth tier of the eight amateur leagues sitting beneath his country’s two professional divisions.

“Every year there’s a request from an association to let a woman play football in their men’s first team,” says Langeler. “In my opinion it’s special that girls at all levels can play mixed football. The KNVB stands for diversity and equality. We believe there should be room for everyone in every way.

“Moreover, in these cases there’s a nice sporting challenge we don’t want to block. That’s why we’re starting this pilot. Experience will tell if, and how, it works. We’ll monitor how things are going in close consultation with the club. Based on that, we could apply a change of regulation.”

Langeler’s logic reflects an incremental shift in attitudes throughout Europe. The English Football Association bars mixed football at the age of 18 – up from 16 in 2015 – but has recently debated allowing it at adult Sunday league level. In Germany and Italy, the cut-off point is 17.

Although there is no ban on mixed games in Denmark – very much an outlier – a significantly higher proportion of junior girls play for male youth teams in the Netherlands than elsewhere across the continent.

Vera Pauw, the Republic of Ireland’s Dutch coach, believes this trend helps explain the Oranje’s recent international success, winning the 2017 Women’s European Championship and being runners-up to the USA at last year’s World Cup.

Pauw – previously in charge of the Netherlands, South Africa and Houston Dash – regards a 1986 rule change allowing Dutch girls under 12 to join boys’ teams for the first time as a watershed. “The outcome was so extremely positive it opened the door to competitive mixed-gender football throughout the whole pathway of youth football,” she says. “The final step to the under-19s leagues was made at the end of the 1990s.

“It brought a whole base of knowledge into the [Netherlands women’s] squad they’re still profiting from. Every current national-team player comes out of these leagues; every single one has played with and against boys. This is what sets us apart from other countries.”

Several England internationals, including Lucy Bronze, Rachel Daly and Leah Williamson, played in boys’ teams until around the age of 12. Although opinion is divided on the merits of mixed football and, particularly, the risk of injury at adult level, Williamson feels girls can only improve by learning to compensate for their physiological disadvantages on the pitch.

“Young girls develop an understanding of football from playing with boys,” says the Arsenal defender. “We can’t rely on physical attributes, we can’t rely on pace and power, so we have to be clever. That skill transfers to the women’s game when we’re older.”

The big debating point is the gender separation threshold, with the former England and Chelsea midfielder Katie Chapman among those against the rise from 16. “The difference in our mechanics does become an issue,” she says. “Men are quicker and stronger. I think 18 is quite high.”

The Guardian Sport



Zheng Loses to No 97 Siegemund, Osaka Rallies to Advance at Australian Open

Germany's Laura Siegemund  (L) shakes hands with China's Zheng Qinwen after the women's singles match on day four of the Australian Open tennis tournament in Melbourne on January 15, 2025. (Photo by DAVID GRAY / AFP)
Germany's Laura Siegemund (L) shakes hands with China's Zheng Qinwen after the women's singles match on day four of the Australian Open tennis tournament in Melbourne on January 15, 2025. (Photo by DAVID GRAY / AFP)
TT

Zheng Loses to No 97 Siegemund, Osaka Rallies to Advance at Australian Open

Germany's Laura Siegemund  (L) shakes hands with China's Zheng Qinwen after the women's singles match on day four of the Australian Open tennis tournament in Melbourne on January 15, 2025. (Photo by DAVID GRAY / AFP)
Germany's Laura Siegemund (L) shakes hands with China's Zheng Qinwen after the women's singles match on day four of the Australian Open tennis tournament in Melbourne on January 15, 2025. (Photo by DAVID GRAY / AFP)

Distracted by a time penalty and unable to counteract No. 97-ranked Laura Siegemund's aggressive approach, Zheng Qinwen's loss in the second round Wednesday fell a long way short of last year's run to the Australian Open final.
Zheng lost the 2024 decider at Melbourne Park to Aryna Sabalenka and went on to win the Olympic gold medal in Paris and finish runner-up at the WTA Finals in a breakout season.
But her first tournament of the year ended in a 7-6 (3), 6-3 loss on John Cain Arena against 36-year-old Siegemund, who attacked from the first point and put Zheng off her game.
Zheng needed a change of shoes early in the second set, got a time warning on her serve from the chair umpire — she said she couldn't clearly see the clock — and was worried about some minor issues which sidelined her before the Australian Open.
“I feel maybe today is not my day. There’s a lot of details in the important points. I didn’t do the right choice,” The Associated Press quoted Zheng as saying.
Of a weak serve that bounced before the net, Zheng said the time warning from the umpire “obviously that one really distracted me from the match.”
“This is my fourth year in the tour, and never happen that to me.”
Both of last year's women's finalists were playing at the same time on nearby courts.
Sabalenka, the two-time defending champion, extended her run to 16 wins at Melbourne Park by winning the last five games to beat No. 54-ranked Jessica Bouzas Maneiro 6-3, 7-5.
Naomi Osaka, another two-time Australian Open champion, reached the third round of a major for the first time since 2022 when she weathered an early barrage from US Open semifinalist Karolina Muchova before rallying to win 1-6, 6-1, 6-3.
Osaka lost in the first round here last year to Caroline Garcia in her comeback from maternity leave but avenged that with a first-round victory over Garcia this week.
Osaka said she used a loss to Muchova at the US Open as motivation.
“She crushed me in the US Open when I had my best outfit ever,” Osaka joked in a post-match interview. “I was so disappointed. I was so mad. This was my little revenge.”
Osaka will next meet Belinda Bencic, the Tokyo Olympic gold medalist who is playing in her first major since the birth of her daughter, Bella, last year.
Also advancing were No. 7 Jessica Pegula, had a 6-4, 6-2 win over Elise Mertens, and 17-year-old Mirra Andreeva, the No. 14 seed who beat Moyuka Uchijima 6-4, 3-6, 7-6 (8).
The scoreline in Sabalenka's match didn't reflect the difficulty, with Bouzas Maneiro taking huge swipes at the ball in her Australian Open debut and dictating some of the points against the world No. 1-ranked player. Her serve let her down, with Sabalenka able to relieve some pressure on her own serve with five breaks.
No. 7 Jessica Pegula had a 6-4, 6-2 win over Elise Mertens to reach the third round, along with Belinda Bencic and 17-year-old Mirra Andreeva, the No. 14 seed who beat Moyuka Uchijima 6-4, 3-6, 7-6 (8).
Siegemund has never been past the third round in Australia, but is taking confidence from her big upset. Her only lapse was when she was broken serving for the first set. She recovered to dominate the tiebreaker, while Zheng remained too conservative in her tactics until right near the end.
“I knew I just had to play more than my best tennis. I had nothing to lose. I just told myself to swing free,” Siegemund said. Zheng is “an amazing player. One of the best players right now, but I know I can play well and I wanted to show that to myself.”
Third-seeded Carlos Alcaraz, aiming to add the Australian Open title to complete a set of all four major crowns, advanced 6-0, 6-1, 6-4 victory over Yoshihito Nishioka.
“The less time you spend on the court in the Grand Slams, especially at the beginning of the tournament, it’s gonna be better, especially physically,” Alcaraz said. “I just try to be focused on spending as less time as I can,” on court.