While the Lebanese are barely starting to grasp the repercussions of the Beirut blast and to collect their wounds and their broken homes, the coronavirus pandemic has reemerged from the rubble. The number of infections, now at 600 per day, has made health concerns serious and grave. The caretaker government took a decision to shut down the country for two weeks. The "total lockdown" that the Lebanese had previously experienced in late March, and again in late July, was partially interrupted by the explosion of the port. It is being resumed again today, with a curfew imposed from 6 PM to 6 AM.
Dr. Abdel-Rahman El-Bizri, a member of the committee on coronavirus, tells Asharq Al-Awsat: “It is natural for the Lebanese people to be frustrated by the decision to lockdown. It does not suit our lives socially and humanly, but unfortunately, people have not yet understood that they have to live with new social conditions for an unknown period.
Bizri continues: "I am not exaggerating when I say that the Lebanese are facing a new reality, that will put them in a new (lockdown) if they do not grasp the gravity of the situation."
According to Bizri, Lebanon is on the verge of "total lockdown" that may be needed for one or two more rounds. If people do not wear the mask, maintain social distancing, avoid crowds, and take other necessary preventive measures to limit the spread of the pandemic. And he continues: “We are paying the price for not complying with the preventive measures needed. The decision to close is similar to a time-out session in a sports match. The team reunites and comes up with a new action plan, and in light of its results, it either wins the match or loses. We will either overcome the danger or have a (lockdown) phase.”
Between supporters and opponents, the Lebanese are divided among themselves. Some of them accept the gravity of the situation and find that the total lockdown is necessary, especially since the Health Minister Hamad Hassan has assured the Lebanese that they will begin to see positive results, with a reduction in the number of cases by up to 50 percent on the tenth day of the lockdown. He also alluded to using the media to defame those infected and not quarantining.
Another segment of the Lebanese people finds the decision unfair, especially as that it will negatively affect their livelihood. Workers in the private sector raised their concerns under the slogan "Stupidity and an epidemic are two sides of the same virus." And they said, in a press conference they held 24 hours before the implementation of the decision, that facing the epidemic should be confronted with reason and prevention and not by closing and "blocking", as they said.
Lebanon’s lockdown began on Friday, August 21, and will continue until Monday, September 7. It includes private institutions, commercial and popular markets, shops and commercial companies, seaside avenues, tourist facilities, indoor and outdoor sports stadiums, sports clubs, public and private outdoor and indoor swimming pools, restaurants, cafes, clubs and nightclubs of all kinds, in addition to children's playgrounds and electronic gaming centers. All gatherings and social events of all kinds are also banned.
A state of frustration prevails among the Lebanese, especially the diaspora, who had come to Lebanon on short visits. The “general mobilization” and the decision to close the country imposed restrictions on their daily movement and recreational plans. As for the Lebanese residents, each person plans for it in their own way. Some of them rented small chalets and apartments in the mountains. In some areas, such as Jezzine, the state of closure has not been generalized due to the absence of any cases.
"We know very well that the situation is dangerous, and that we have to abide by the decision to limit the spread of infection," says Mireille Ghanem, who moved to the southern town of Al-Qaba ', in the district of Jezzine. “So, I rented a house in this quiet town so that the quarantine would pass with the least possible negative effects. I can no longer take the situation, especially since my children's freedom is being restricted in the summer. Keeping them between the four walls any recreational activities for them to enjoy becomes very disappointing to them.
Faris Hajjar, a father of five, believes that going from the city to the mountain and the remote areas is the best thing to do in this kind of situation. He added in an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat: “I moved to my home in the mountains a few months ago. There is no overcrowding, no traffic, and no unexpected visits. It is a reasonable place to quarantine for my five children, who were frustrated, like their friends in the city, because of the restrictions on their movement.
