Report: Vote-buying Influenced Jordan’s Parliamentary Elections

An election official wearing a protective mask empties a ballot box following Jordan’s parliamentary elections (File photo: Reuters)
An election official wearing a protective mask empties a ballot box following Jordan’s parliamentary elections (File photo: Reuters)
TT

Report: Vote-buying Influenced Jordan’s Parliamentary Elections

An election official wearing a protective mask empties a ballot box following Jordan’s parliamentary elections (File photo: Reuters)
An election official wearing a protective mask empties a ballot box following Jordan’s parliamentary elections (File photo: Reuters)

Vote-buying had an impact on Jordan’s parliamentary elections and their results, according to a local report.

Al-Hayat Center for Civil Society Development, which monitors the polls through its program Rased, issued last week its report on the 2020 parliamentary elections.

The report was prepared by 3,000 observers who tracked the electoral process in all its stages, in collaboration with 252 civil society institutions distributed over all districts.

It revealed a number of complaints relating to interventions of “official and semi-official bodies” before the deadline for candidate withdrawals from the polls, which directly or indirectly affected the ballots.

In addition, the report noted that nine complaints on “vote-buying” were referred to the security services while 42 others were referred to the public prosecutor for investigation.

“All cases referred to the prosecutor by the Independent Elections Commission have been backed by enough evidence.”

The report stated that the lengthy litigation in the complaints contributed to "weakening the citizen's confidence in the adequacy of legislation and practices in prosecuting the violators and contributed to increasing vote-buying cases."

In addition, Rased observers noted a tangible weakness in the application of electoral procedures and instructions among members of electoral committees in all districts.

They indicated that the discrepancies in the application of procedures led to heightened tensions during the final counting stage.

Several data entrants made various mistakes, given that the input process was broadcast live for the attendees, prompting a number of candidates to lose confidence in the committees, according to the report.

The publication of the report coincided with statements of King Abdullah II who affirmed to Petra news agency that “we must revisit laws regulating political life, such as the election, political parties, and local administration laws, and continue political development efforts.”

The monarch stated that the goal for many years has been to reach a platform-based political party scene that reflects the ideology and leanings of Jordanians, and carries forward their concerns and national causes, and works towards achieving their aspirations by conveying their voices and bringing their representatives to parliament.

Observers linked between the King’s statements and the possible dissolution of the current parliament in preparation for early elections based on a new electoral law.

The polls were held last November according to a list system based on proportional representation within the 23 electoral districts distributed over all Jordanian governorates and regions.

On Sunday, Prime Minister Bisher Khasawneh, Senate President Faisal al-Fayez, and Speaker of the Lower House of Parliament Abdul Muneim Odat stressed the need to cooperate to put the King's vision into practice.

During their meeting, the officials agreed that authorities should open channels of communication with civil society institutions, municipalities, local communities, and political parties to upgrade political legislation, including the elections, political parties, and local administration laws.



Biden Calls Israeli Strike that killed Nasrallah a ‘Measure of Justice’

Rubble of damaged buildings lies at the site of Israeli strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon September 28, 2024. REUTERS/Ali Alloush
Rubble of damaged buildings lies at the site of Israeli strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon September 28, 2024. REUTERS/Ali Alloush
TT

Biden Calls Israeli Strike that killed Nasrallah a ‘Measure of Justice’

Rubble of damaged buildings lies at the site of Israeli strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon September 28, 2024. REUTERS/Ali Alloush
Rubble of damaged buildings lies at the site of Israeli strikes on Beirut's southern suburbs, Lebanon September 28, 2024. REUTERS/Ali Alloush

US President Joe Biden on Saturday called the Israeli strike that killed Hezbollah’s Hassan Nasrallah a “measure of justice.”

The comments came after Hezbollah confirmed earlier Saturday that Nasrallah, one of the group’s founders, was killed in an Israeli airstrike in Beirut the previous day.

Biden noted that the operation to take out Nasrallah took place in the broader context of the conflict that began with Hamas’ attack on Israelis on Oct. 7, 2023.

“Nasrallah, the next day, made the fateful decision to join hands with Hamas and open what he called a ‘northern front’ against Israel,” Biden said in a statement.

He also noted that Hezbollah under Nasrallah’s watch has been responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans.

The State Department on Saturday ordered the departure of the families of US diplomats who are not employed by the embassy in Beirut. It also authorized the departure of those who are, as well as nonessential employees because of “the volatile and unpredictable security situation” in Lebanon’s capital.

The State Department has previously advised American citizens to consider leaving Lebanon and reiterated its warning against all travel to the country.

“Due to the increased volatility following airstrikes within Beirut and the volatile and unpredictable security situation throughout Lebanon, the US Embassy urges US citizens to depart Lebanon while commercial options still remain available,” the department said in a statement Saturday.

The State Department routinely orders or authorizes the departure of nonessential embassy staffers and the families of diplomats when security conditions in the country where they are posted deteriorate.

An ordered departure is not technically an evacuation but does require those affected to leave. An authorized departure allows those affected to leave the country voluntarily at government expense.