New Zealand-Australia Row Erupts Over 'Terrorist' Dual National

New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern accused Australia of failing to take responsibility for a dual national with reported ties to ISIS | AFP
New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern accused Australia of failing to take responsibility for a dual national with reported ties to ISIS | AFP
TT

New Zealand-Australia Row Erupts Over 'Terrorist' Dual National

New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern accused Australia of failing to take responsibility for a dual national with reported ties to ISIS | AFP
New Zealand's Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern accused Australia of failing to take responsibility for a dual national with reported ties to ISIS | AFP

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern angrily accused Australia Tuesday of shirking its responsibility for a dual national arrested in Turkey with alleged links to the ISIS militant group.

Ardern said the woman had been a dual Australian-New Zealand citizen until authorities in Canberra canceled her passport, leaving her situation to Wellington to deal with.

In an unusually blunt message to her counterpart Scott Morrison, Ardern said Canberra was "wrong" to expect New Zealand to accept the woman, who she said had strong ties to Australia.

"Any fair-minded person would consider this person an Australian and that is my view too," Ardern said in a statement. "We believe Australia has abdicated its responsibilities."

The 26-year-old woman was arrested with her two children near the Syrian border this week by Turkish authorities and identified as a member of the ISIS Group.

Local media reported the woman had been taken to a Turkish court in the southeastern province of Hatay for interrogation.

The Turkish defense ministry described the family as New Zealand nationals who had been trying to enter the country "illegally from Syria" and "were caught by our border guards".

But Ardern said the woman had not lived in New Zealand since she was six, and so it was "wrong that New Zealand should shoulder the responsibility" for her.

"(The woman) has resided in Australia since that time, has her family in Australia and left for Syria from Australia on her Australian passport," she added.

Morrison defended his government's decision as in "Australia's national security interests".

"We do not want to see terrorists who fought with terrorism organizations enjoying privileges of citizenship, which I think they forfeit the second they engage as an enemy of our country," he said during a press conference in Canberra.

But Morrison added that he would speak with Ardern further, saying: "There is still a lot more unknown about this case and where it sits and where it may go to next."

Ardern also urged Australia to consider the welfare of the woman's children.

"These children were born in a conflict zone through no fault of their own," she said.

"Coming to New Zealand, where they have no immediate family, would not be in their best interests. We know that young children thrive best when surrounded by people who love them."

Ardern said New Zealand was also engaging with Turkish authorities over the issue.

Wellington has previously criticized Australia for deporting people across the Tasman Sea who have tenuous ties to the country.

Since 2014, around 3,000 New Zealanders in Australia have had their visas canceled "on character grounds" -- which does not always require a criminal conviction.

Ardern has pointed out many of those being deported have lived most of their lives in Australia and described the issue as "corrosive" to the relationship between the neighboring nations.



Washington: A Final Warning to Tehran Before Military Action

US President Biden speaks to journalists at the White House, on Thursday. (DPA)
US President Biden speaks to journalists at the White House, on Thursday. (DPA)
TT

Washington: A Final Warning to Tehran Before Military Action

US President Biden speaks to journalists at the White House, on Thursday. (DPA)
US President Biden speaks to journalists at the White House, on Thursday. (DPA)

In a strikingly timed development, leaks and writings have emerged about discussions in the White House regarding potential military options to hit Iran’s nuclear facilities. These deliberations were reportedly in preparation for the scenario where Tehran moves toward producing a nuclear weapon before January 20, the date President-elect Donald Trump is set to assume office.

According to Axios, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan presented President Joe Biden with a range of options and scenarios in a confidential meeting several weeks ago. While no new intelligence prompted the meeting and no definitive decision was made, it was part of a contingency planning process in case Iran enriches uranium to 90% purity before Trump’s inauguration. Despite the lack of active discussions on military action, some of Biden’s senior advisors believe the potential acceleration of Iran’s nuclear program, especially following Iran and its proxies’ weakened state in the ongoing conflict with Israel, could compel the US to act.

Biden’s advisors, including Sullivan, reportedly view the degradation of Iran’s air defenses and missile capabilities, coupled with the diminished strength of its regional proxies, as factors that improve the chances of a successful strike while minimizing the risks of Iranian retaliation or regional escalation. An American official clarified that Sullivan did not recommend a strike, and Biden has not approved any military action.

This leak has been interpreted as a stern warning from Washington to Tehran, particularly to its hardline factions, which dominate the domestic power struggle and push for confrontation, including potential shifts in Iran’s nuclear doctrine.

Matthew Levitt, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, stated that the Biden administration has been concerned about Tehran exploiting the final days of Biden’s term to advance its nuclear weapons program. To address these fears, a contingency plan was developed, Levitt told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The US Military Stands Ready

Richard Nephew, former deputy special envoy for Iran during the Biden administration, argued that while diplomacy might still offer hope, the US must prepare to use military force if negotiations fail. Nephew warned that a maximum pressure strategy to weaken Iran and force it into talks might provoke Tehran to conceal its nuclear materials, build a bomb, or withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Nephew emphasized that striking Iran’s nuclear program could yield strategic benefits beyond simply preventing a dangerous adversary from acquiring nuclear weapons. Such an action could deplete Tehran’s already limited resources, further strain its ability to threaten US interests, and force it to balance rebuilding its nuclear program with replenishing Hezbollah, restoring its missile stockpiles, and addressing its crippling economic challenges—all under continued sanctions.

However, Nephew cautioned that a single strike might not be sufficient to significantly weaken Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Achieving this objective could require multiple rounds of strikes, a prolonged US military presence, and an expanded scope of attacks targeting Iranian decision-makers beyond nuclear facilities.