US, EU to Mediate in GERD Dispute

Sudan’s Sovereign Council chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. (Reuters)
Sudan’s Sovereign Council chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. (Reuters)
TT
20

US, EU to Mediate in GERD Dispute

Sudan’s Sovereign Council chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. (Reuters)
Sudan’s Sovereign Council chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. (Reuters)

The United States and the European Union have expressed readiness to mediate in the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) dispute.

Sudan’s Sovereign Council chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan received on Monday US Special Envoy for Sudan Ambassador Donald Booth and Head of the European Union Delegation to Sudan Ambassador Robert van den Dool at the presidential palace in Khartoum.

They discussed the differences between Khartoum, Cairo and Addis Ababa over the mega dam and tensions on the eastern borders between Sudan and Ethiopia.

According to a Sovereign Council press statement, Burhan called on the US and EU to contribute to reaching a joint agreement over the GERD and promote the peace process in Sudan.

He affirmed Khartoum’s adherence to peaceful and diplomatic solutions on disputed issues with Addis Ababa.

Meanwhile, both officials stressed the need to reach a diplomatic solution for the GERD dispute based on a satisfactory approach for the three parties.

The approach should ensure Ethiopia’s ability to generate power, Sudan’s territorial integrity and dam security and Egypt’s water rights, the statement read.

They also hailed the government’s signing of the declaration of principles with Abdelaziz al-Hilu’s Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM-N al-Hilu), which will pave the way to achieve a comprehensive peace in Sudan.

Van den Dool said the EU is ready to support the economic reform process taking place in Sudan and contribute to the government’s Family Support program, which will provide direct cash transfers each month to support vulnerable families.

Booth arrived in Khartoum on Monday for a two-day visit as part of a regional tour, which will include Egypt, Ethiopia and the Central African Republic.

The Sudanese government had previously proposed to expand the mediating parties to include the EU, United Nations, US and African Union in the hopes of reaching a breakthrough in deadlocked GERD talks.



Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
TT
20

Hezbollah Reiterates Its Refusal to Enter the War

Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 
Speaker Nabih Berri (dpa) 

The US military intervention alongside Israel in its war against Iran has sparked growing concern in Lebanon, mixing fear with uncertainty about what lies ahead, especially as the region awaits Iran’s response.

Lebanese citizens are questioning whether Iran will retaliate solely against Israel or also strike nearby US military bases. Some speculate that Iran might avoid targeting American bases in neighboring countries that have shown solidarity with Tehran, as maintaining these relationships could help Iran push for an end to the war and a return to US-Iranian dialogue.

Despite mounting regional tension, Hezbollah continues to avoid direct military involvement. This position aligns with the recent statements of Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, who affirmed that Hezbollah will not intervene.

While some interpreted Hezbollah Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem’s pledge of “full support to Iran in any way we deem appropriate” as a divergence, sources say the party is fully aligned with Berri.

Berri maintains that dialogue between Washington and Tehran is the only path to halting the conflict and addressing Iran’s nuclear file. His stance is echoed by Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and other political actors.

US envoy Thomas Barrack, currently stationed in Türkiye, reportedly discussed these matters with Lebanese officials and promised to return in three weeks, hoping for progress toward a ceasefire and the implementation of UN Resolution 1701, which calls for Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon and for weapons to be under the exclusive control of the Lebanese state.

According to sources, the US escalation has prompted behind-the-scenes consultations between Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, and Lebanese state officials. These talks aim to evaluate the situation and ensure Lebanon remains out of the regional conflict.

Hezbollah remains firm in its decision not to engage militarily, refusing to offer Israel a pretext to expand the war into Lebanon. Despite internal solidarity with Iran, Hezbollah is keenly aware that joining the war would not shift the military balance, which now involves advanced weaponry beyond its capabilities.

The sources added that the party is also mindful of Lebanese Shiite public sentiment, which favors stability over another devastating war. Memories of past conflicts, including the toll of Hezbollah’s support for Gaza, linger. Fears of displacement and economic ruin are driving many in Beirut’s southern suburbs to sell their homes, often at steep losses.