Shiite Forces in Iraq Hold Sway over Naming of Next Prime Minister

Sadr delivers a speech from Najaf to declare his return to the elections, on August 27. (AFP)
Sadr delivers a speech from Najaf to declare his return to the elections, on August 27. (AFP)
TT

Shiite Forces in Iraq Hold Sway over Naming of Next Prime Minister

Sadr delivers a speech from Najaf to declare his return to the elections, on August 27. (AFP)
Sadr delivers a speech from Najaf to declare his return to the elections, on August 27. (AFP)

Influential cleric Moqtada al-Sadr’s announcement that he was reneging on his decision to sit out the October elections has reshuffled the political cards in Iraq.

Some sides have benefited from his return, while other have been harmed by it. Those who had initially rejoiced at Sadr’s absence from the October 10 elections, now find themselves at a loss in how to deal with his return.

Ultimately, the parties that had declared their withdrawal from the race on the heels of Sadr’s withdrawal have emerged as the greatest losers. They are the Iraqi National Accord, of former Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, and the Iraqi Communist Party.

With Sadr’s return, the Iraqi political scene has become embroiled in a cutthroat battle ahead of the polls with all rivals vying for the greatest seats in parliament. Regardless of who emerges on top, all sides will be eying the ultimate prize: naming the prime minister, who is always a Shiite, the parliament speaker, who is always a Sunni, and president, who is always Kurdish.

Sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that behind-the-scenes efforts are focusing on the electoral mechanisms and means to limit electoral fraud. They are also getting ahead of themselves by focusing on the three presidencies.

The Shiite forces, for example, in spite of their deep differences, especially with Sadr’s return to the race, are preoccupied with setting the characteristics of the next premier. A seven-part committee is tasked with the mission.

The Shiites are seeking to agree on the name of the prime minister even before the elections are held.

With Sadr’s return, his supporters will want him to hold sway over naming the PM that will ultimately give the cleric major power over the political scene in the country.

Sadr’s return has taken all discussions on the name of the three presidents, especially the premier, back to square one. The cleric wants the PM to be a loyalist of his Sadrist movement.

Question remarks remain over current Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi, who had previously said that he was not seeking a second term. This may have changed with the return of Sadr, who backs Kadhimi. The premier also enjoys the support of Masoud Barzani’s Kurdistan Democratic Party.

Other potential candidates include national security advisor and former interior minister Qassem Araji and former PM-designates Adnan al-Zurfi and Mohammed Shaya al-Sudani. Members of the State of Law coalition have suggested the nomination of its leader, former PM Nouri al-Maliki.

Heated discussions are also ongoing among Sunni and Kurdish circles over the name of the president and parliament speaker. Their choice will have to pass the approval of the Shiite parties. The president is nominated by the two main Kurdish parties, but he needs to be approved by the main Shiite parties. The same goes to the parliament speaker.

As it stands, deep divisions are plaguing the Kurdish and Sunni parties. If the camps remain divided even after the elections, the Shiites will emerge as the most powerful players on the political scene.



Iran's Foreign Ministry: Evacuation of Advisors from Syria Was a Responsible Decision

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei (Archive photo – MEHR)
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei (Archive photo – MEHR)
TT

Iran's Foreign Ministry: Evacuation of Advisors from Syria Was a Responsible Decision

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei (Archive photo – MEHR)
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei (Archive photo – MEHR)

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei stated that Iranian advisors were initially deployed to Syria to support the Syrian army in its fight against terrorism and to prevent insecurity from spreading to neighboring countries and the wider region.

He emphasized that the decision to withdraw these advisors was a responsible measure, reflecting the current security, military, and political conditions in Syria and the region.

Baghaei made these remarks in an interview with IRNA, following statements by the Russian president during his annual Direct Line press conference, where he addressed domestic and international issues, including the situations in Ukraine, Syria, and strained relations with the West.

The Russian president had stated: “When armed opposition groups entered Aleppo, there were 30,000 fighters. Previously, our Iranian friends sought our help in Syria. Now, they are seeking help to leave Syria.”

In response, Baghaei emphasized the history of collaboration between Iran and Russia in combating terrorism in Syria. He noted: “It is not unusual for stakeholders in Syria’s developments to present differing narratives about the causes of events and the roles of various actors. However, some recent claims regarding Iran’s advisory role in Syria before the fall of the Damascus regime are not based on accurate information.”

The spokesperson clarified that Iran’s involvement in Syria was based on an official invitation from the country’s legitimate government. Over the years, Iran and Syria worked together effectively to combat terrorism, successfully preventing ISIS from taking root in Syria and Iraq and curbing the spread of terrorism across the region, he remarked.

Baghaei explained that after ISIS was defeated, Iran’s military presence in Syria shifted to an advisory role, aimed at preventing the group’s resurgence, combating terrorism, and strengthening Syria’s military capabilities against Israeli aggression. “This approach has proven successful, as seen in the immediate aftermath of Iranian advisors’ withdrawal, when Israel occupied strategic areas and destroyed critical infrastructure in Syria,” he added.

When asked about the number of Iranians evacuated from Syria, Baghaei clarified that the evacuees included the families of Iranian diplomats, Iranian and non-Iranian pilgrims, and individuals who had traveled to assist Lebanese refugees in Syria. He stressed that all these individuals were flown back to Iran on Iranian planes via Hmeimim Airport, which was used in coordination with Russia as a secondary airport alongside Damascus Airport.

The spokesperson concluded by underlining the strategic significance of Iran-Russia relations across various sectors. He noted that dialogue between the two countries is ongoing at all levels. “We prefer to exchange views and expertise through official channels,” he stated.