Egypt, Sudan Seek to Resume GERD Negotiations

Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry with the Deputy Prime Minister receiving Congo's Foreign Minister Christophe Lutundula (Egypt's Foreign Ministry)
Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry with the Deputy Prime Minister receiving Congo's Foreign Minister Christophe Lutundula (Egypt's Foreign Ministry)
TT

Egypt, Sudan Seek to Resume GERD Negotiations

Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry with the Deputy Prime Minister receiving Congo's Foreign Minister Christophe Lutundula (Egypt's Foreign Ministry)
Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry with the Deputy Prime Minister receiving Congo's Foreign Minister Christophe Lutundula (Egypt's Foreign Ministry)

Egypt and Sudan said Thursday that they aim to resume negotiations with Addis Ababa on the Ethiopian Grand Renaissance Dam (GERD) at the earliest opportunity.

The UN Security Council adopted a statement Wednesday encouraging Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sudan "to resume negotiations" under the auspices of the African Union (AU) to swiftly conclude a deal on the controversial mega-dam.

The Council called upon the three countries to resume talks "in a constructive and cooperative manner” in order "to finalize expeditiously the text of [a] mutually acceptable and binding agreement on the filling and operation of the GERD."

Ethiopia expressed disappointment that the Council pronounced itself over a water rights and development issue outside of its jurisdiction.

Meanwhile, Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry met in Cairo with Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of Congo Christophe Lutundula as part of a tour that includes Khartoum and Addis Ababa.

The Republic Democratic of Congo (DRC) chairs the African Union this year.

During a joint press conference, Shoukry affirmed Egypt's willingness to receive invitations to resume the AU-sponsored GERD talks with Sudan and Ethiopia "at the earliest opportunity."

He indicated that the talks should be supported by the "active participation" of the international community to back the chair of the AU and reach a legally binding solution on the filling and operation of the dam.

The Egyptian FM said this support should also help "apply the principle of 'African Solutions to African Problems' and enhance the role of the AU's chair by giving them the chance to resort to international observers agreed upon by the three states."

Shoukry also said that he hopes the "African chairmanship will make a suitable decision that meets the aspirations of not only the three countries but also the international community, now represented in the Security Council."

The minister highlighted the importance of time in the GERD negotiations as indicated by the UNSC's statement, which called for resuming the talks and reaching a binding agreement within a reasonable timeframe.

Shoukry affirmed Egypt's "full readiness and flexibility" to study the proposals introduced based on the Congolese plan and provide DR Congo's presidency feedback about this document that "will contribute positively to relaunching the negotiations process."

He noted that a timeframe for the negotiations should be determined after they are launched.

Lutundula said he and Shoukry held "positive" discussions, hoping that a solution would be reached to the decade-long dispute.

Sudan hailed the UNSC's presidential statement as "balanced and takes into consideration the interests of the three sides."

The Foreign Ministry issued a statement affirming its readiness to engage in the AU-sponsored talks.

The Security Council's statement also reflects the importance the Council attaches to "this critical issue and its keenness to find a solution to avoid its repercussions on security and peace in the region," read Sudan's statement.

Lutundula arrived in Khartoum Thursday, and the Sudanese Foreign Minister, Maryam Al-Mahdi, said that Sudan looks forward to resuming the negotiations under AU leadership, stressing the need to change the ineffective methodology that prevailed in the previous rounds of talks.

The ministry said the negotiations should be conducted under a new methodology and tangible political will so that parties sign a binding agreement that considers their interests.

It should lead the three countries to a "binding agreement on the filling and operation of GERD following the fifth article of the statement that gives observers a facilitating role in the negotiation process," the Sudanese ministry added.

Lutundula handed Sudanese Foreign Minister Mariam Al-Sadiq Al-Mahdi a document on GERD prepared by a team of joint experts from the Congolese presidency and the AU Commission.

The document contains a brief of the points of agreement and disagreement among Egypt, Sudan, and Ethiopia regarding the dam for the experts to study and work on bringing the three countries' views closer to help them reach a satisfying deal.

In return, Ethiopia announced that it would not recognize any claims that might be raised based on the Security Council's statement.

Ethiopia's UN delegation said the statement in a non-legally binding form, adding that the statement took the proper position by referring the matter to the AU.

Ethiopia also attacked Tunisia's position on the Security Council statement, saying: "Tunisia made a historical mistake by requesting a position from the Security Council."



Lebanon–Israel Talks: A ‘Political Declaration’ and Return to UN Resolution 1701?

Two Israeli soldiers walk past a large billboard in central Tel Aviv reading “Thank you God and Donald Trump” (Reuters). 
Two Israeli soldiers walk past a large billboard in central Tel Aviv reading “Thank you God and Donald Trump” (Reuters). 
TT

Lebanon–Israel Talks: A ‘Political Declaration’ and Return to UN Resolution 1701?

Two Israeli soldiers walk past a large billboard in central Tel Aviv reading “Thank you God and Donald Trump” (Reuters). 
Two Israeli soldiers walk past a large billboard in central Tel Aviv reading “Thank you God and Donald Trump” (Reuters). 

Hopes for imminent negotiations between Lebanon and Israel have been tempered after Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said Sunday that no talks are expected in the coming days, despite reports suggesting discussions could begin this week on a French-backed plan to end the conflict.

France’s Foreign Ministry also said there was no French initiative currently on the table, casting further doubt on speculation about a diplomatic breakthrough.

Reports in Tel Aviv had suggested negotiations might begin Wednesday around a proposal centered on a political declaration that could serve as the basis for a non-aggression agreement between the two countries and possibly pave the way for a broader peace arrangement.

But Saar said Israel has no intention of entering direct negotiations with Lebanon to end the war that began earlier this month.

Political sources in Tel Aviv described his comments as a familiar Israeli tactic aimed at maintaining pressure on Hezbollah and the Lebanese government while keeping the diplomatic track ambiguous. According to these sources, Israel is unlikely to enter negotiations unless Hezbollah halts its attacks.

A Lebanese official told Agence France-Presse on Saturday that “negotiations are on the table and preparations are under way to form a delegation,” but stressed that Lebanon needs an Israeli commitment to a ceasefire before talks can begin.

Israel’s Channel 12 reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has tasked former strategic affairs minister Ron Dermer with handling the Lebanese file and managing any potential negotiations with the United States and Lebanon.

A source in Tel Aviv also said the US administration had asked Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law, to oversee the negotiations.

Meanwhile, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, speaking in Beirut, said diplomatic channels remain open to end the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah.

‘Positive Contribution’

Political sources in Tel Aviv said Washington had urged Israel to help create conditions for negotiations by reducing strikes in Lebanon and avoiding civilian infrastructure.

That request, however, reportedly lost momentum after the bombing of the Zahrani Bridge over the Litani River. According to the sources, Washington’s main red lines for Israel are avoiding strikes on Beirut–Rafic Hariri International Airport and the city’s seaport.

Channel 12 reported that the proposed negotiations would focus on a political declaration in which Lebanon would recognize Israel while Israel would affirm Lebanon’s territorial integrity.

The process would begin with a ceasefire followed by a gradual Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory.

Sources familiar with the proposal said the plan — reportedly drafted by France — includes what would be an unprecedented step: Lebanese recognition of Israel. Negotiations supported by the United States and France would aim to reach the political declaration within a month.

Paris or Cyprus?

Talks would initially take place at the level of senior diplomats before moving to higher-level political negotiations. France reportedly wants to host the discussions in Paris, while Israel prefers Cyprus.

The proposed declaration would reaffirm Israel’s commitment to Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Both sides would also recommit to UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which ended the 2006 war, as well as the 2024 ceasefire agreement.

Lebanon would pledge to prevent attacks on Israel from its territory and move ahead with plans to disarm Hezbollah and end its military activity. The Lebanese Army would redeploy south of the Litani River, while Israel would withdraw within a month from areas captured since the start of the current conflict.

Monitoring of ceasefire violations would be carried out through a US-led mechanism. UNIFIL would verify Hezbollah’s disarmament south of the Litani, while an international coalition authorized by the UN Security Council would oversee broader disarmament across Lebanon.

Under the French proposal, Lebanon would declare its readiness to negotiate a permanent non-aggression agreement with Israel within two months, formally ending the state of war between the two countries.

Israel would then withdraw from five positions in southern Lebanon that its forces have held since November 2024. The final stage would involve demarcating permanent borders between Israel and Lebanon — and between Lebanon and Syria — by the end of 2026.


Israel Army Says Begun 'Limited Targeted Ground Operations' against Hezbollah in South Lebanon

An Israeli artillery unit fires, amid escalation between Hezbollah and Israel, and amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, on the Israeli side of the Israel-Lebanon border, March 15, 2026. REUTERS/Shir Torem
An Israeli artillery unit fires, amid escalation between Hezbollah and Israel, and amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, on the Israeli side of the Israel-Lebanon border, March 15, 2026. REUTERS/Shir Torem
TT

Israel Army Says Begun 'Limited Targeted Ground Operations' against Hezbollah in South Lebanon

An Israeli artillery unit fires, amid escalation between Hezbollah and Israel, and amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, on the Israeli side of the Israel-Lebanon border, March 15, 2026. REUTERS/Shir Torem
An Israeli artillery unit fires, amid escalation between Hezbollah and Israel, and amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, on the Israeli side of the Israel-Lebanon border, March 15, 2026. REUTERS/Shir Torem

The Israeli military said on Monday it had begun what it described as "limited ground operations" against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon.

The military said in a statement that in recent days, Israeli army “troops from the 91st division have begun limited and targeted ground operations against key Hezbollah strongholds in southern Lebanon, aimed at enhancing the forward defense area”.

"This activity is part of broader defensive efforts to establish and strengthen a forward defensive posture, which includes the dismantling of terrorist infrastructure and the elimination of terrorists operating in the area, in order to remove threats and create an additional layer of security for residents of northern Israel," it said.

"Prior to the troops' entry into the area,” the Israeli army “conducted strikes using both artillery and the Israeli Air Force against numerous terrorist targets in order to mitigate threats in the operational environment."

Lebanon was dragged into the Middle East war on March 2 when Iran-backed Hezbollah attacked Israel in response to the killing of Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei in US-Israeli strikes, with Israel launching air raids on the neighboring country and troop incursions into border areas.


UN Force in Lebanon Says Peacekeepers Fired Upon ‘Likely by Non-State Armed Groups’

United Nations peacekeepers with the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) drive past a destroyed healthcare center building in the aftermath of an Israeli strike in the southern Lebanese town of Burj Qalawiya on March 14, 2026. (AFP)
United Nations peacekeepers with the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) drive past a destroyed healthcare center building in the aftermath of an Israeli strike in the southern Lebanese town of Burj Qalawiya on March 14, 2026. (AFP)
TT

UN Force in Lebanon Says Peacekeepers Fired Upon ‘Likely by Non-State Armed Groups’

United Nations peacekeepers with the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) drive past a destroyed healthcare center building in the aftermath of an Israeli strike in the southern Lebanese town of Burj Qalawiya on March 14, 2026. (AFP)
United Nations peacekeepers with the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) drive past a destroyed healthcare center building in the aftermath of an Israeli strike in the southern Lebanese town of Burj Qalawiya on March 14, 2026. (AFP)

The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon said its peacekeepers were fired upon three times on Sunday, "likely by non-state armed groups" in the country's south.

The incident came two days after a different UN position was hit by fire that official Lebanese media blamed on Israel, with UNIFIL saying it was investigating.

"Today, UNIFIL peacekeepers were fired upon, likely by non-state armed groups, on three separate occasions while conducting patrols around their bases" in south Lebanon, the force said in a statement.

In one of the locations, the fire struck "as close as five meters from the peacekeepers", it added.

"Two patrols returned fire in self-defense and after brief exchanges, the patrols resumed their planned activities. No peacekeeper was injured," the statement said.

"We strongly remind all actors of their obligations under international law to ensure the safety and security of UN personnel at all times."

Lebanon was drawn into the broader Middle East war on March 2, when the Tehran-backed group Hezbollah attacked Israel in retaliation for the killing of Iranian supreme leader Ali Khamenei in US-Israeli strikes.

Israel has since launched waves of air strikes on its northern neighbor and deployed troop into border areas, while Hezbollah has launched rockets and missiles towards Israeli territory and troops.

Lebanese state media said that Israeli fire hit a UNIFIL base in southern Lebanon on Friday.

UNIFIL spokesperson Kandice Ardiel said the position was hit "likely by heavy machine gun fire", without identifying the source, and said an investigation had been launched into the incident, which left one peacekeeper lightly wounded.

Earlier this month, three peacekeepers serving with a Ghanaian contingent were wounded in south Lebanon, with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun accusing Israel of being responsible and UNIFIL saying it would investigate.

On Saturday, during a visit to Beirut, UN chief Antonio Guterres said attacks against peacekeepers and their positions were "completely unacceptable and... may constitute war crimes".

UNIFIL has acted as a buffer between Israel and Lebanon since 1978. Its mission concludes at the end of this year.