Meslet to Asharq Al-Awsat: US Shows Partiality in Dealing with Syrian Opposition Parties

The President of the National Coalition for Opposition and Revolutionary Forces of Syria, Salem al-Meslet.
The President of the National Coalition for Opposition and Revolutionary Forces of Syria, Salem al-Meslet.
TT
20

Meslet to Asharq Al-Awsat: US Shows Partiality in Dealing with Syrian Opposition Parties

The President of the National Coalition for Opposition and Revolutionary Forces of Syria, Salem al-Meslet.
The President of the National Coalition for Opposition and Revolutionary Forces of Syria, Salem al-Meslet.

President of the National Coalition for Opposition and Revolutionary Forces of Syria Salem al-Meslet confirmed, in an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat in Washington, that talks with US parties have been “largely positive” but needed more action to reflect their positivity on the ground.

Meslet, 62, was elected as President of the Coalition last July. He completed his studies in political science in the US in 1978 and later worked as a researcher at the Gulf Research Center in Dubai, where he served as Deputy Director General.

Apart from holding several positions, including chairman of the Syrian Council of Tribes and Clans, Meslet is also the sheikh of the Jubour tribe in Syria and Iraq.

After holding a series of political meetings in Washington, Meslet clarified that the Coalition’s delegation members have met with several US officials from the White House, Department of State, and Department of Defense.

More so, Coalition delegates met with both Republican and Democratic legislators.

According to Meslet, all US officials reaffirmed the US’ commitment to supporting the Syrian revolution and implementing the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act.

However, Meslet revealed Coalition delegation members were spotting a difference in the treatment of US officials when it comes to various Syrian opposition factions, favoring one party over the other, in a hint aimed at the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).

This partiality “causes imbalance among Syrians,” said Meslet, adding that he was convinced that “working with the US administration is important, especially that it is new and without a clear position.”

Meslet pointed out that the US is present in northeast Syria in Kurdish areas, where American distinction in dealing with the Syrian parties becomes “apparent.”

“Friends stand with all parties and not with one party at the expense of another. The Kurds cannot be neglected at the expense of the Arab tribes or the Turkmen, and vice versa as well. We bear the defense of all these parties, and they are our people in Syria,” Meslet told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He demanded the US administration continues to pressure and boycott the Syrian regime, noting that implementing the Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act did not harm Syrians and instead pushed the regime to stop its oppression.

“The US administration is still committed to implementing the Caesar Act, and the Syrian people do not die because of that. It is the sanctions of the Syrian regime that are bringing war and destruction to Syrians and giving Iranians and regime allies the country’s wealth, oil and facilities,” said Meslet.

“We are representing the women living in refugee camps near borders and standing in long ques to buy bread in regime-controlled areas,” he added.

“Our maxim is that we represent all Syrians,” affirmed Meslet.

“The purpose of our visit is to restore the political track on the table of meetings with the Americans, because the matter has become limited to humanitarian and relief aid in many countries of the world, and we thank everyone who contributes to this framework, but our cause is a political one,” said Meslet.

“We want a political solution to end this ordeal. Ten years is enough for us to see real actions now, seeing our country liberated from Iranian and Russian militias, and Assad (Syrian regime head Bashar al-Assad) is the standard guardian of the Iranian project.”

“This is a difficult period and requires Arab solidarity more than anything else. Assad does not only harm Syria, but all Arab countries. This is an Arab-international decision,” he added.

When asked about Jordan’s inclination to cooperate economically with the Syrian regime, Meslet said that “normalization with the Syrian regime rewards it for the crimes it committed against Syrians.”

“I don’t believe that Jordan wants that, and it had long held good positions with our people.”

Recommending for Jordan to refrain from taking such a step, Meslet warned that the “Syrian regime poses a threat to Jordan and Arabs the same way it does to Syrians themselves.”

“We don’t not advise any country to do so, but rather to think about the millions of displaced, killed and refugee Syrians.”

Meslet pointed out that the decision to normalize and restore relations with the Syrian regime was discussed with the US State Department, which advised Arab countries against making the move.

More so, the US State Department reassured the Coalition’s delegation that it fully recognizes the dangers of normalizing ties with the Syrian regime and that they were far from it.

As for the upcoming meetings of the Syrian Constitutional Committee in Geneva on October 18, Meslet said they were scheduled after three meetings that took place with the UN Special Envoy for Syria, Geir Pedersen.

“This is the sixth round, and I am not optimistic,” said Meslet.

Elaborating on his pessimism, Meslet said: “The meetings revolve around the marginality of the constitution proposed by the United Nations, not the content.”

“Yes, we are with UN Resolution 2254, and with international efforts to end the Syrian crisis, and we have agreed to all the requirements of the international envoy, but the delegation of the Syrian regime is the one who is procrastinating in the political processes, and they are not serious,” he explained.



Al-Hadi Idris to Asharq Al-Awsat: The Parallel Government Aims to Prevent Sudan’s Fragmentation

Al-Hadi Idris, former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council (Asharq Al-Awsat).
Al-Hadi Idris, former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council (Asharq Al-Awsat).
TT
20

Al-Hadi Idris to Asharq Al-Awsat: The Parallel Government Aims to Prevent Sudan’s Fragmentation

Al-Hadi Idris, former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council (Asharq Al-Awsat).
Al-Hadi Idris, former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council (Asharq Al-Awsat).

As Sudan grapples with ongoing turmoil following the outbreak of war in April 2023, the establishment of a “parallel government” in areas controlled by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has sparked widespread concern. Domestically, regionally, and internationally, fears are mounting over Sudan’s future, the risk of further division, and the threat of another partition. However, supporters of this initiative—who recently signed a new constitution and a governance roadmap—view it as a major opportunity to build a new Sudan founded on freedom, democracy, and justice, preventing the country from descending into chaos and fragmentation.

A Government for Peace and Unity

The new administration, known as the “Government of Peace and Unity,” aims to rebuild the state on principles of justice and equality while ensuring essential services for all Sudanese citizens—not just those in RSF-controlled areas. Its proponents have sought to reassure both Sudanese citizens and neighboring countries that their objective is to preserve Sudan’s unity.

Emerging at a critical juncture, this initiative presents itself as an alternative to the military-backed government based in Port Sudan, which serves as Sudan’s temporary capital. The parallel government hopes to earn the trust of Sudanese citizens and secure international support by demonstrating a serious commitment to ending the war and reconstructing the state on democratic, secular, and decentralized foundations.

Will this government succeed in bringing about the desired peace, or will the challenges it faces prove insurmountable? Asharq Al-Awsat spoke with Dr. Al-Hadi Idris, a key leader in the “Tasis” coalition behind the formation of the parallel government.

Why Form a Parallel Government?

Idris, a former member of Sudan’s Sovereign Council during the transitional government led by Dr. Abdalla Hamdok, emphasized that their goal is to establish a “government of peace and unity.”

“As a political and military force, we have always been committed to resolving Sudan’s crisis, which erupted on April 15, 2023, through peaceful means,” Idris explained. “We have made extensive efforts to push those supporting the war toward dialogue and engagement with peace initiatives, including those in Jeddah, Manama, and Geneva. However, the army and the de facto authorities in Port Sudan have refused to negotiate. This left us with no choice but to explore more effective ways to bring the warring parties to the table and stop the conflict. The formation of a parallel government is a step toward fulfilling our responsibilities to the many people who have been neglected and left without adequate care.”

Why Is the Army Refusing Dialogue?

Idris, who also leads the Revolutionary Front—a coalition of armed movements from Darfur and political groups outside the region, such as the Beja Congress led by Osama Saeed and the Kush Movement from northern Sudan—claims that the military’s reluctance to negotiate stems from external influences.

“We understand why the army refuses to come to the negotiating table,” he said. “It is under the control of the Islamic movement and remnants of the former regime, who fear that any political process will remove them from power and diminish their influence. They are keen on prolonging the war despite the devastation, suffering, and displacement it causes to civilians.”

Accusations of Division Policies

Idris accused Sudan’s military leaders of implementing measures that risk deepening the country’s divisions. These include issuing a new currency exclusive to areas under their control, restricting access to education in certain regions, and selectively issuing travel and identity documents.

“Such actions could lead to the country’s partition, which we completely oppose,” he stressed.

A Government for All Sudanese

Idris rejected claims that the new government is tied solely to Darfur or the RSF.

“Our government is not for Darfur alone, nor for the RSF or any single region,” he said. “It represents all of Sudan—from north to south, east to west. We have drafted a constitution that guarantees equal rights for all, signed by individuals and entities from across the country. The new government will be responsible for rebuilding the state and delivering essential services, including education, healthcare, and security.”

Local and Regional Concerns

Despite strong opposition to a parallel government from neighboring states, as well as international and regional organizations—including the United Nations and IGAD (Intergovernmental Authority on Development)—Idris remains confident that these concerns will dissipate once the government takes shape.

“People have a right to be worried,” he admitted. “But once they see our government in action, they will understand that we stand for unity, peace, and stability—not the opposite.”

International Recognition: A Secondary Concern

Idris dismissed concerns over whether the new government would gain international recognition.

“This is not something that worries us,” he said. “We have already engaged with countries like Uganda, Kenya, Ethiopia, and Chad, where we have encountered sympathy for our cause. These nations have a vested interest in Sudan’s stability. In Uganda, we were received by President Yoweri Museveni himself, and in Kenya, President William Ruto welcomed us with open arms.”

The Failure of the Old State Model

According to Idris, Sudan’s traditional state structure has failed and is no longer viable.

“The world is changing around us,” he observed. “Lebanon has entered a new era, and Syria has moved past its oppressive old regime. The old political systems have no future. Since Sudan’s independence in 1956, no government has succeeded in establishing a stable, unified national state. Our history is marked by conflict and instability. That is why, during our meetings in Nairobi, we emphasized the need for a democratic, secular, and decentralized state that protects the rights of all citizens, regardless of their regional or ethnic background.”

A Role for the US in Ending the War

Idris believes the United States can play a decisive role in resolving the Sudanese conflict.

“Washington was heavily involved from the beginning of the war in 2023,” he said. “President Joe Biden’s administration made significant efforts to help Sudan, though it was unable to stop the war. We hope that the new US administration under Donald Trump will take a more effective approach, using a mix of incentives and pressure on all parties to achieve peace. We are open to working with anyone who can help resolve the crisis. Our government is a government of peace, and we are ready to engage with all stakeholders.”

Protecting Civilians from Airstrikes

Idris stressed that any legitimate government must prioritize civilian protection.

“A government that does not protect its citizens has no value,” he asserted. “We will appoint a defense minister whose primary mission will be to develop defensive strategies aimed at safeguarding civilians by all possible means. Additionally, we are working to establish the nucleus of a new national army, drawing from our allied forces, including the RSF, the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North, the Sudan Liberation Movement-Transitional Council, and other armed factions. A unified Joint Chiefs of Staff will be formed, and after the war ends, this force will serve as the foundation for a restructured national army dedicated solely to border protection and internal security—completely detached from politics.”

“There will no longer be two separate armies,” Idris declared. “There will be one unified military.”

Currency and Travel Documents

Idris confirmed that the new government will introduce its own currency, passports, and travel documents.

“The currency issue was a major factor in our decision to establish this government,” he said. “In many parts of Sudan, people rely on bartering because the Port Sudan government has drained cash supplies from areas outside its control. As a result, goods like salt, sugar, and wheat are traded in lieu of money. In some regions, cash is virtually nonexistent, making daily life incredibly difficult.”

When Will the New Government Be Announced?

Idris revealed that intensive consultations are underway to finalize the launch date.

“We expect to announce the new government within a month, from inside Sudan,” he said. “We have several options for where the announcement will take place, and we will reveal the location in the coming days.”

Participation in Future Negotiations

As for potential peace talks, Idris made it clear: “We are open to any serious and responsible initiative—whether local, regional, or international—but we will only engage in negotiations as the legitimate government of Sudan, a government of peace.”