Plan to Resolve Lebanese Govt. Crisis Is 'Dead on Arrival'; Mikati Won't Resign

Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati on Monday at the Grand Serail. (Dalati & Nohra)
Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati on Monday at the Grand Serail. (Dalati & Nohra)
TT

Plan to Resolve Lebanese Govt. Crisis Is 'Dead on Arrival'; Mikati Won't Resign

Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati on Monday at the Grand Serail. (Dalati & Nohra)
Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati on Monday at the Grand Serail. (Dalati & Nohra)

Media leaks that a settlement is being concocted to resolve the government crisis has created a stir in Lebanon.

Prime Minister Najib Mikati met with parliament Speaker Nabih Berri on Monday. The normally calm premier left the meeting angrily without speaking to reporters, signaling that no end is in sight to the government crisis.

The cabinet hasn't convened in almost two months after the Amal movement - headed by Berri - and Hezbollah objected to the investigations carried out by Judge Tarek Bitar in the August 2020 Beirut Port explosion.

The Amal and Hezbollah ministers have since been boycotting government meetings and are demanding that course of the investigations be "rectified".

No sooner had leaks of the alleged "settlement" emerged on Monday, that political parties distanced themselves from it. So quick were they abandon the plan that it was not clear who came up with it in the first place.

Berri, meanwhile, told Asharq Al-Awsat that no dispute had erupted between him and Mikati.

My relationship with him is "good", he stressed.

He also dismissed the settlement, details of which had circulated on social media on Monday. The plan had called for the resignation of four judges as a condition for any solution to resolving the government crisis.

Berri dismissed the reports, saying: "This old idea was dropped a long time ago."

He revealed that he did not have information about any settlement.

Later, Mikati's office issued a statement saying that he had expressed to Berri his rejection of any meddling in the work of the judiciary.

He also expressed his adamant rejection of the exploitation of government to interfere in judicial affairs.

His stance has been conveyed to Berri and President Michel Aoun.

Moreover, his office denied reports that Mikati was intending to resign.

The premier will forge ahead with his duties and efforts to resolve the government crisis, it added.

"Any position he takes later will be tied to his national and personal convictions," it said.

The PM had expressed on Monday his support for trying presidents and ministers before the Supreme Council, not the judiciary.

On the port probe, he said that "the government position is clear. Just as we do not meddle in the judiciary, it should respect constitutional frameworks as well" - a reference to his support for presidents and ministers to be tried before the Supreme Council.

"Just as officer are tried before the Military Court, then so should a minister be tried before a special tribunal," he explained.

The port investigations have stalled with ministers and former ministers refusing Bitar's summons. The officials have accused the judge of political bias.

Hezbollah MP Hassan Fadlallah said that the "situation of the judiciary is the worst it has been since the founding of Lebanon."

He accused some judges of seeking to destroy the judiciary.

Amal's Development and Liberation bloc MP Hani Qobeissi said: "So many judges are not seeking justice in our country .. they are instead seeking politics and gains through arbitrary decisions."

He added that they are ignoring forensic evidence in the port blast.



UN Experts Censure Western Support for Israel Since Gaza War

A vehicle moves past the rubble of collapsed buildings in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on September 16, 2024, amid the ongoing war in the Palestinian territory between Israel and Hamas. (AFP)
A vehicle moves past the rubble of collapsed buildings in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on September 16, 2024, amid the ongoing war in the Palestinian territory between Israel and Hamas. (AFP)
TT

UN Experts Censure Western Support for Israel Since Gaza War

A vehicle moves past the rubble of collapsed buildings in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on September 16, 2024, amid the ongoing war in the Palestinian territory between Israel and Hamas. (AFP)
A vehicle moves past the rubble of collapsed buildings in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip on September 16, 2024, amid the ongoing war in the Palestinian territory between Israel and Hamas. (AFP)

UN human rights experts criticized mostly Western states on Monday for continuing to support Israel despite what they described as a genocide in Gaza which might turn Israel into a "pariah" nation.

The humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza as a result of more than 11 months of conflict has prompted questions about Western states' long-standing political and military support for Israel, including from the United States and Britain which provide arms.

"Shockingly, in the face of the abyss reached in the OPT (Occupied Palestinian Territories) ...most member states remained inactive at best, or actively aiding and assisting Israel's criminal conduct," Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur on human rights in the OPT, told a press conference in Geneva, repeating allegations of genocide.

Israel denies the allegations and says it takes steps to reduce the risk of harm to civilians and that at least a third of the Palestinian fatalities in Gaza are fighters .

"I think it's unavoidable for Israel to become a pariah in the face of its continuous, relentless, vilifying assault of the United Nations, on top of millions of Palestinians," Albanese, an Italian lawyer, said, citing verbal and military attacks on UN facilities in Gaza.

She also questioned Israel's right to a seat at the United Nations, acquired in 1949. "Should there be a consideration of its membership as part of this organization which Israel seems to have zero respect for?" she asked.

In response to her comments, Israel's permanent mission to the UN in Geneva criticized Albanese. "She is not fit to hold any position at the United Nations, and this has been made clear by many," it said.

In the past, her remarks on the Israel-Hamas conflict have drawn scrutiny, including from a US ambassador in Geneva who said she has a history of using "antisemitic tropes".

Albanese was joined by three other UN independent experts who accused Western countries of hypocrisy and double standards, for example by being more vocal over perceived rights' violations by Russia since its invasion of Ukraine than of Israel's actions in Gaza.

They are among dozens of independent human rights experts mandated by the United Nations to report and advise on specific themes and crises. Their views do not reflect those of the global body as a whole.